Anthony Pompliano

The TRUTH About Bitcoin Mining & AI Data Centers

🇬🇧 EN🇪🇸 ES
AIBitcoinMacro
32:35 min youtube 2026 Semana 20 🇪🇸 ES

TL;DR

  • Transición Estratégica: La compañía, HUD, está pivotando de la minería de Bitcoin a la infraestructura HPC para Inteligencia Artificial (IA), lo que reduce su exposición a la volatilidad del mercado cripto.
  • Oportunidades y Desafíos: Los centros de datos son cruciales para el liderazgo global en IA, pero enfrentan cuellos de botella críticos en suministro eléctrico y componentes clave (transformadores, chips).
  • Modelo de Negocio Sólido: HUD asegura contratos multimillonarios (cercanos a los $17 mil millones) al posicionarse como un socio de infraestructura a largo plazo para hiperescaladores como OpenAI y Anthropic.

Resumen

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VfRGtz6_YA  |  Duración: 32 min


◆ Introducción y Visión Estratégica

El CEO de HUD, Asher Gnut, destaca que la compañía se enfoca en construir infraestructura, manejando menos volatilidad que las fluctuaciones del precio de Bitcoin. Su modelo no está limitado a una sola tecnología (Bitcoin o IA). La conversación profundiza en cómo operan y por qué estas empresas representan una oportunidad valiosa para los inversores.

▶️ De la Minería de Bitcoin a la IA

La compañía ha realizado un cambio estratégico, pasando de ser un gran minero de Bitcoin a enfocarse en infraestructura HPC (High-Performance Computing) para IA. Aunque la demanda de IA está en fase inicial, su crecimiento es extremadamente rápido y exige una vasta construcción de infraestructura.

  • A diferencia de competidores que simplemente reutilizaron instalaciones existentes, HUD construyó proyectos completamente nuevos desde cero para los casos de uso de IA.
  • Separaron el negocio de la minería de Bitcoin (700 MW) en otra empresa pública llamada American Bitcoin, lo que les permite mitigar la volatilidad del mercado cripto y apoyar tecnologías futuras más amplias.

★ Centros de Datos, Comunidad y Sostenibilidad

Se aborda el conflicto entre la necesidad de infraestructura de IA y las preocupaciones locales (agua, electricidad). Se desmiente que los centros de datos aumenten los precios de energía; por el contrario, mejoran la utilización y actualizan sistemas, reduciendo costos para todos.

  • Uso del Agua: Se emplean sistemas de circuito cerrado, consumiendo mucho menos que las oficinas tradicionales.
  • Diseño: El ruido y la estética pueden gestionarse con un diseño adecuado, permitiendo construcciones más atractivas que simples almacenes industriales. Es vital superar estos miedos locales para mantener el liderazgo tecnológico global frente a competidores como China.

► Campus Energéticos e Integración de Cargas

Los campus energéticos son una evolución clave: no solo consumen carga, sino que también aportan generación de energía propia. Esto permite aprovechar infraestructura subutilizada, como el enfriamiento.

  • La tendencia es que los proveedores traigan su propia fuente de poder y demanda en lugar de depender únicamente de las utilidades.
  • Existen dos grandes cargas complementarias: la minería de Bitcoin (enfocada en seguridad y volatilidad) y la computación de IA (más intermitente y basada en flujos de trabajo).
  • La manufactura avanzada y las fábricas de chips se están consolidando como importantes campus energéticos a nivel nacional.

★ Mega Sitios vs. Campus Urbanos

Se compara el desarrollo de grandes centros de datos con instalaciones más pequeñas en áreas urbanas.

  • Históricamente, la baja latencia requería proximidad poblacional, pero esto es menos relevante para las cargas de trabajo modernas de inferencia.
  • El principal desafío actual es la restricción de suministro eléctrico a gran escala. Por ello, se espera una mayor implementación de campus más pequeños (más fácil gestionar un consumo de 50 megavatios que uno de mil).

► Innovación en Hardware y Cadena de Valor

La innovación en hardware está impulsada por la demanda de modelos de lenguaje grandes. La clave competitiva es reducir el costo por token, calculado sobre una base totalmente depreciada.

  • Tres factores determinan este costo: precio de la energía, coste del centro de datos, y coste de los chips y tecnología.
  • HUD destaca su valor al poseer plantas de energía tanto internas como externas a sus instalaciones, lo que les permite entender toda la cadena de valor computacional desde principio a fin.

◆ Cómo se Consiguen Contratos Multimillonarios

Hut 8 consigue acuerdos gigantescos estableciendo relaciones profundas con grandes consumidores de cómputo (hiperescaladores y laboratorios de IA de grado de inversión, como OpenAI y Anthropic).

  • La empresa busca ser un socio de infraestructura a largo plazo, no solo vender inventario.
  • Los contratos son acuerdos de 15 años con contrapartes financieramente sólidas (tipo tomar o pagar). Dos proyectos anunciados suman un valor contractual cercano a los $17 mil millones.

⚠️ Alerta Crítica: Cuellos de Botella en la Expansión de IA

Los principales obstáculos que ralentizan el crecimiento son multifacéticos:

  • Limitación Energética: Restricción tanto en la generación como en la transmisión de electricidad a gran escala.
  • Suministro Crítico: Problemas con artículos de suministro de largo plazo (transformadores e interruptores), lo que ha impulsado iniciativas gubernamentales de reshoring.
  • Componentes Tecnológicos: El cuello de botella incluye los chips y todos los componentes de infraestructura necesarios para esta pila tecnológica.

▶️ Estrategia Financiera y Crecimiento (Riverbend)

El proyecto Riverbend implementó una estructura de financiación única al alcanzar un estatus de grado de inversión desde la fase de construcción, desriesgando completamente la ejecución.

  • Al evitar préstamos bancarios tradicionales, eliminaron el riesgo masivo asociado al refinanciamiento futuro.
  • Lograron recaudar más de $3.2 mil millones con instituciones financieras globales.
  • La compañía opera bajo un modelo tipo pod para gestionar múltiples iniciativas simultáneamente y se asocia con grandes empresas EPCM como Jacobs y Vera.

★ Desarrollo Interno vs. Adquisición (Build vs. Acquire)

El CEO enfatiza el orgullo por la capacidad interna de desarrollo, aplicando un enfoque de primeros principios para maximizar eficiencia.

  • Aunque existe un equipo dedicado a M&A que busca adquirir activos o asociarse con proyectos, el motor principal de crecimiento sigue siendo el desarrollo interno, ya que ofrece el mejor rendimiento.

◆ El Futuro: Escalabilidad y Visión

El CEO se preocupa por escalar la empresa manteniendo su cultura única y credibilidad operativa. La visión es capitalizar la inteligencia física, redefiniendo cómo se construyen cosas en el mundo real.

  • Se espera que los centros de datos sean diseñados en días gracias a soluciones nativas de IA, no en meses.
  • HUD está en un momento perfecto: lo suficientemente grande para grandes proyectos, pero con la mentalidad de una startup de alto crecimiento.

► Actualización American Bitcoin

American Bitcoin ha tenido un buen desempeño desde su salida a bolsa hace menos de un año.

  • Ha mantenido márgenes superiores al 50% durante los últimos tres trimestres, incluso con la volatilidad del precio de Bitcoin.
  • La demanda creciente de IA permite utilizar esa misma capacidad de cómputo para adquirir más Bitcoin.
  • El CEO subraya que el enfoque debe estar en construir un negocio fundamental sólido, ya que esto impulsa el valor a largo plazo y garantiza la seguridad del ecosistema en Norteamérica.

â—† Buscar el alpha

La tesis central no es sobre la tecnología de IA en sí misma, sino sobre la infraestructura industrial necesaria para sostenerla. El verdadero movimiento de capital se está realizando desde activos volátiles y especulativos (Bitcoin puro) hacia proyectos de infraestructura crítica con contratos a largo plazo y riesgo operativo desriesgado, donde el cuello de botella principal ya no es solo el chip, sino la capacidad energética y regulatoria.

  • Rotación de Capital: La estrategia clave es la transición deliberada desde la minería de Bitcoin (volatilidad del precio) hacia la infraestructura HPC para IA. Esto permite a la compañía desvincularse del ciclo especulativo cripto, enfocándose en flujos de caja estables y predecibles generados por contratos industriales.
  • Catalizador/Cambio de Régimen: El cambio de régimen es el paso de ser un proveedor de inventario (hardware) a ser un socio estratégico de infraestructura de 15 años para hiperescaladores (OpenAI, Anthropic). Esto transforma la naturaleza del riesgo, pasando de riesgo de demanda a riesgo de ejecución.
  • Mejor Expresión del Tema: El verdadero cuello de botella que ralentiza el despliegue de IA no son los modelos ni los chips per se, sino la capacidad energética a gran escala (generación y transmisión) y la disponibilidad de componentes críticos de largo plazo (transformadores e interruptores). La energía es el activo limitante.
  • Horizonte/Condición: El éxito financiero está ligado a la habilidad de desriesgar completamente la ejecución del proyecto desde la fase de construcción, permitiendo acceder a financiación institucional de grado de inversión y evitar la dependencia masiva de préstamos bancarios tradicionales (modelo Riverbend).
La vuelta de tuerca: El invitado está señalando que la narrativa del "boom de IA" es, en esencia, una historia de infraestructura energética y logística. Los inversores superficiales se centran en el software o los chips, pero el alpha reside en las empresas que están resolviendo el problema físico más básico: cómo obtener y entregar gigavatios de energía de manera confiable a largo plazo bajo contratos blindados.

► Resumen por capítulos

Intro (0:00)

HUD se enfoca en construir infraestructura y maneja menos volatilidad que las fluctuaciones del precio de Bitcoin. La compañía apoya múltiples tecnologías, no limitándose únicamente a Bitcoin o Inteligencia Artificial. El invitado es Asher Gnut, CEO de HUD, un líder reconocido en la intersección entre minería de Bitcoin e HPC para IA. En esta conversación se profundiza en el funcionamiento detallado de estas empresas. Se explicará cómo operan, cuáles son sus diferencias clave y por qué representan una oportunidad para los inversores. El diálogo promete ser muy valioso al ofrecer información especializada que no se encuentra fácilmente en otros lugares.

Bitcoin mining to AI: the transition (0:45)

La empresa pasó de ser un gran minero de Bitcoin a enfocarse en la infraestructura HPC para Inteligencia Artificial. La demanda de IA se encuentra en una fase inicial, pero su crecimiento es extremadamente rápido y requiere una vasta construcción de infraestructura. A diferencia de otros competidores que simplemente convirtieron instalaciones existentes de Bitcoin, esta compañía optó por construir proyectos completamente nuevos desde cero para los casos de uso de IA. Separaron el negocio de la minería de Bitcoin (700 MW) en otra empresa pública llamada American Bitcoin. Este enfoque les permite a HUD reducir la volatilidad del mercado cripto y apoyar una gama más amplia de tecnologías de próxima generación.

Data centers & community pushback (3:09)

El capítulo aborda el conflicto entre la necesidad de infraestructura de IA y las preocupaciones locales sobre agua, electricidad y estética en las comunidades. Se desmiente que los centros de datos aumenten los precios de energía; al contrario, mejoran la utilización y actualizan sistemas, lo que reduce costos para todos los consumidores. Respecto al uso del agua, se emplean sistemas de circuito cerrado, consumiendo mucho menos que las oficinas tradicionales. Además, el ruido y la estética pueden gestionarse con un diseño adecuado, permitiendo construcciones más atractivas que almacenes industriales. Es vital que Estados Unidos supere estos miedos locales para construir esta infraestructura tecnológica crítica. Esto es necesario para mantener el liderazgo global frente a competidores como China en la revolución de la IA.

Co-location & energy campuses (8:52)

Los campus energéticos son vistos como una evolución clave, ya que no solo consumen carga sino que también aportan generación de energía propia. Estos sistemas permiten aprovechar la infraestructura subutilizada de los centros de datos, como el enfriamiento. La tendencia actual es que los proveedores traigan su propia fuente de poder y demanda en lugar de depender únicamente de las utilidades. Existen dos grandes cargas: la minería de Bitcoin, enfocada en seguridad y volatilidad de precios, y la computación de IA, que es más intermitente y basada en flujos de trabajo. Estas dos demandas pueden complementarse debido a sus diferentes requisitos operativos. Además, la manufactura avanzada y las fábricas de chips se están consolidando como grandes campus energéticos a nivel nacional.

Mega sites vs. smaller urban campuses (11:42)

Se compara el desarrollo de grandes centros de datos de mega sitios con las instalaciones más pequeñas ubicadas en áreas urbanas. Históricamente se creía que la baja latencia requería estar cerca de la población, pero esto es menos relevante para cargas de trabajo de inferencia modernas. Hoy en día, los campus a gran escala pueden manejar estas cargas de inferencia fuera de zonas densamente pobladas. Sin embargo, el principal desafío actual es la restricción de suministro eléctrico a gran escala. Por esta razón, se espera que haya una mayor implementación de campus más pequeños. Es más sencillo gestionar un consumo de 50 megavatios que construir un complejo de mil megavatios. En resumen, ambas tipologías de infraestructura seguirán siendo construidas en el futuro.

Hardware innovation inside the data center (13:08)

La innovación en el hardware de los centros de datos está avanzando rápidamente, impulsada por la demanda de modelos de lenguaje grandes. Los desafíos incluyen asegurar energía y construir las instalaciones físicas. La clave competitiva en este mercado es reducir el costo por token, que debe calcularse sobre una base totalmente depreciada. Tres factores principales determinan este costo: el precio de la energía, el coste del centro de datos y el coste de los chips y la tecnología. HUD destaca su valor al poseer plantas de energía tanto internas como externas a sus instalaciones. Esto les permite entender toda la cadena de valor computacional desde principio a fin.

How Hut 8 lands billion-dollar contracts (17:15)

Hut 8 consigue acuerdos multimillonarios al establecer relaciones profundas con grandes consumidores de cómputo. Sus socios son hiperescaladores y laboratorios de IA de grado de inversión, como OpenAI y Anthropic. La empresa aborda estos proyectos buscando ser un socio de infraestructura a largo plazo en lugar de solo vender inventario. Para asegurar la calidad de los contratos, se trata de acuerdos de 15 años con contrapartes financieramente sólidas. Estos son contratos tipo tomar o pagar donde el cliente está obligado a realizar pagos mensuales independientemente del uso. En total, dos proyectos anunciados suman un valor contractual cercano a los 17 mil millones de dólares.

The River Bend financing structure (20:01)

El proyecto Riverbend implementó una estructura de financiación única al alcanzar un estatus de grado de inversión desde la fase de construcción. Esto fue posible gracias a que desriesgaron completamente la ejecución del proyecto, permitiéndoles acceder a mercados de capitales estables y a largo plazo. Al evitar depender de préstamos bancarios tradicionales, eliminaron el riesgo masivo asociado al refinanciamiento futuro de grandes infraestructuras. Con esta estrategia, lograron recaudar más de 3.2 mil millones de dólares con la participación de las instituciones financieras más importantes del mundo. En cuanto a su crecimiento, la compañía opera bajo un modelo tipo pod para gestionar múltiples iniciativas simultáneamente. Para asegurar su escalabilidad global, se asocian con grandes empresas EPCM como Jacobs y Vera.

Build vs. acquire strategy (24:19)

El CEO destaca el orgullo de la empresa por su capacidad interna de desarrollo, aplicando un enfoque de primeros principios para maximizar eficiencia y calidad. A pesar de esto, reconocen que las fluctuaciones del mercado abren oportunidades estratégicas. La compañía cuenta con un equipo dedicado a M&A que busca adquirir activos o asociarse con proyectos que necesiten un socio de ejecución. Sin embargo, el motor principal de crecimiento sigue siendo el desarrollo interno porque es donde obtendrán el mejor rendimiento de su tiempo.

Bottlenecks slowing AI buildout (25:18)

Los principales cuellos de botella que ralentizan la expansión de los centros de datos de IA son multifacéticos. En primer lugar, existe una limitación en la capacidad energética a gran escala, tanto en la generación como en la transmisión de electricidad. Segundo, hay problemas con los artículos de suministro de largo plazo necesarios para los centros de datos, como transformadores e interruptores, lo que ha llevado a iniciativas gubernamentales de reshoring. Tercero, el cuello de botella incluye los chips y todos los componentes de infraestructura que soportan esta pila tecnológica. Para mitigar estos desafíos, la empresa está profundamente involucrada en la gestión de la cadena de suministro. Analizan los costos, insumos crudos y tiempos de entrega de cada pieza de equipo adquirido. Además, colaboran diariamente con sus socios para diseñar la infraestructura modular e impulsar la innovación junto a los fabricantes.

What keeps Asher up at night (27:36)

El CEO se preocupa por cómo escalar la empresa manteniendo su cultura única y credibilidad operativa. La visión a largo plazo es capitalizar la inteligencia física, redefiniendo cómo se construyen cosas en el mundo real. Buscan convertirse en una de las grandes empresas tecnológicas aprovechando esta oportunidad. El futuro exige que los centros de datos sean diseñados en días gracias a soluciones nativas de IA, no en meses. Además, esperan que la IA libere al talento humano de tareas monótonas para enfocarse en la innovación y la creatividad. Considera que HUD se encuentra en un momento perfecto: lo suficientemente grande para grandes proyectos pero con mentalidad de startup de alto crecimiento.

American Bitcoin update (30:40)

American Bitcoin ha tenido un buen desempeño desde que salió a bolsa hace menos de un año. La empresa ha mantenido márgenes superiores al 50% durante los últimos tres trimestres, independientemente de la volatilidad del precio de Bitcoin. Esto se debe a que cuando el precio baja, los mineros menos eficientes dejan de operar, lo que mantiene estables sus ganancias. Un aspecto único es que la creciente demanda de IA permite utilizar esa misma capacidad de cómputo para adquirir más Bitcoin. La compañía destaca su papel como uno de los últimos operadores a gran escala que garantiza la seguridad del ecosistema en Norteamérica. El CEO enfatiza que el enfoque debe estar en construir un negocio fundamental sólido, ya que esto es lo que verdaderamente impulsa el valor a largo plazo.

Generado con algoritmo v1-chunked · modelo google/gemma-4-e4b · 2026-05-15T11:04:41Z

Transcripción

[0:00] So at HUD, we deal with less of the
[0:02] volatility of Bitcoin going up and down
[0:04] and we're focused on building
[0:05] infrastructure, but we're supporting
[0:08] multiple technologies today rather than
[0:10] just Bitcoin or just AI. We believe that
[0:13] the company will continue to support all
[0:15] of the next generation technologies that
[0:16] we think will change the world. What's
[0:18] going on guys? Today we got a great
[0:19] conversation with Asher Gnut. He is the
[0:21] CEO of HUD and he is one of the leading
[0:24] operators when it comes to the
[0:25] intersection of Bitcoin mining and AI
[0:27] HPC. In this conversation, he goes
[0:29] through the excruciating detail of what
[0:31] these companies are, how they operate,
[0:33] how they differentiate, and why
[0:34] investors should consider putting them
[0:36] into their portfolio. This conversation
[0:38] covers a lot and I think you're going to
[0:39] find it very, very valuable. There's
[0:40] lots of information in here that you're
[0:42] not going to find anywhere else. Here's
[0:43] my conversation with Asher.
[0:45] Asher, you guys were one of the biggest
[0:46] Bitcoin miners. You've now converted to
[0:49] AI HPC. You've got a very unique story,
[0:51] I think, in how you've converted this
[0:52] business. It's now 10 plus billion
[0:54] dollar market cap. talk a little bit
[0:55] about the transition the industry is
[0:57] going through and why investors are
[0:58] flocking to this AI HPC trade.
[1:02] >> The demand for AI is really just at the
[1:05] starting point right now. Adoption I
[1:07] think is at the very very early onsense.
[1:09] You see the companies like Enthropic
[1:11] that have increased their revenue month
[1:13] over month over month adding over $10
[1:16] billion of ARR month over month which is
[1:19] the most insane growth that you've seen
[1:21] companies. I mean they've just raised at
[1:23] 100 then 300 then almost a trillion
[1:25] dollars and you're seeing all this news
[1:26] in the market which is super exciting. I
[1:28] think building infrastructure to support
[1:31] those technologies and those use cases
[1:33] is selling the picks and shovels to the
[1:36] ecosystem and for HUD our mission is to
[1:40] create an energy infrastructure platform
[1:42] that supports the technologies of
[1:43] tomorrow and that's building digital
[1:46] infrastructure and so when we started
[1:48] the business we supported Bitcoin
[1:50] compute and that was a technology that
[1:52] we believed could revolutionize the
[1:54] financial system and we created the
[1:56] security behind that network for
[1:58] transactions to happen. As most of our
[2:01] peers in the ecosystem said, you know
[2:03] what, we have these megawws. We're using
[2:05] them for Bitcoin. Let's convert them to
[2:07] AI because they're we can make more
[2:08] money off of that. We took a very
[2:10] different approach. We said, we've built
[2:12] this platform and become one of the
[2:14] largest people in the world securitizing
[2:16] the Bitcoin network. Let's use the skill
[2:18] set of finding power, building
[2:21] infrastructure at scale, and managing
[2:23] power and build for the AI use case. And
[2:26] so I think very uniquely the last two
[2:28] deals that we've announced, some $17
[2:30] billion in contract value, those are net
[2:32] new projects that we built from the
[2:34] ground up and developed rather than we
[2:36] converted over from existing Bitcoin
[2:39] facilities. We still manage about 700
[2:41] megawatts of Bitcoin infrastructure and
[2:43] we spun out that business to a company
[2:46] called American Bitcoin which is
[2:47] publicly traded as well and they're a
[2:49] customer now of HUD infrastructure. So
[2:51] at Hud, we deal with less of the
[2:53] volatility of Bitcoin going up and down
[2:56] and we're focused on building
[2:57] infrastructure, but we're supporting
[2:59] multiple technologies today rather than
[3:02] just Bitcoin or just AI. We believe that
[3:04] the company will continue to support all
[3:06] the next generation technologies that we
[3:08] think will change the world.
[3:10] >> Now when you think about building these
[3:11] data centers, you guys are going and
[3:13] finding land, you're powering these
[3:14] things, you're going and striking these
[3:16] business development deals. Um, one of
[3:18] the things that has happened in society
[3:19] is there's a lot of people who do not
[3:21] want data centers. They're worried about
[3:22] water. They're worried about electricity
[3:24] prices. They're worried about the
[3:25] aesthetics of the data center in their
[3:26] local community. Talk a little bit about
[3:28] this balance between, you know, kind of
[3:30] the everyday American in a local
[3:32] community and their views towards
[3:34] artificial intelligence and data centers
[3:36] and then the belief that maybe from the
[3:38] uh, you know, kind of uh, Wall Street
[3:39] crowd, the Silicon Valley crowd of we
[3:41] don't have enough data centers, we need
[3:43] more compute. And so how are you guys
[3:45] navigating this balance?
[3:48] >> The US needs to build more
[3:51] infrastructure if it wants to be the
[3:53] leader in the technology revolution
[3:56] around the world. And that's critical. I
[3:59] think about kind of where the US stands
[4:02] today and we have been and can continue
[4:05] to be a leader in the technological
[4:07] revolution and being at the forefront. I
[4:09] think but right now even with us saying
[4:12] let's go build as much infrastructure as
[4:14] possible we're still competing neck
[4:16] andneck with countries like China who
[4:18] are able to build energy infrastructure
[4:20] we're able to build data center
[4:21] infrastructure frankly faster and
[4:23] cheaper than we are today and so I think
[4:25] we need a common unity to say we should
[4:29] be behind the infrastructure that
[4:32] supports the growth of these
[4:33] technologies continue to make sure that
[4:35] our LLM models are at the forefront we
[4:37] had a head start because we have Nvidia
[4:39] which is a US company being able to
[4:41] support us with the best generation
[4:43] chips but as they start building their
[4:45] own chips and as they start competing
[4:47] infrastructure is going to be the key
[4:49] bottleneck and you're seeing that today
[4:51] power infrastructure data center
[4:52] infrastructure and so I think there's
[4:56] this general fear of what does AI mean
[4:58] for me as across the US today and
[5:01] whether that fear be around what what's
[5:03] going to happen with my job whether that
[5:05] fear be around what is this
[5:06] infrastructure and all this investments
[5:08] in my neighbor neighborhood going to do.
[5:09] And I think there's a lot of these kind
[5:10] of false fallacies that have like
[5:14] percolated and gotten people scared,
[5:15] right? And so some of them you
[5:16] mentioned, one, data centers are going
[5:19] to make my energy prices go up. That's
[5:21] not true. We work with the leading
[5:23] energy utilities across the country. And
[5:25] the reality is every time a data center
[5:27] is built, especially today at large
[5:29] scale, we come in, we pay for what is
[5:32] called a kayak, which is we pay for all
[5:33] the infrastructure and system upgrades
[5:35] to be able to trans transport that
[5:37] energy. And that goes to the overall
[5:38] system. So all the people who are
[5:40] consuming energy get to benefit from
[5:43] those system upgrades as well. And then
[5:45] the energy supply itself, we pay and
[5:47] commit to the consumption of that power
[5:49] as well. And so in a lot of these
[5:51] utilities, and you're seeing more of
[5:53] them start post data about this, but
[5:55] energy prices actually come down with
[5:58] data centers coming online because you
[5:59] increase the utilization and you upgrade
[6:01] the infrastructure. But like there are
[6:04] some areas where you might have a really
[6:05] bad uh kind of summer storm and energy
[6:08] prices go up or you have other criteria
[6:10] that are happening and people blame it
[6:12] on data centers, right? But the real
[6:14] kind of facts have seen the opposite
[6:15] which is energy prices have gone down in
[6:17] a lot of areas where they're structured
[6:19] correctly. The second is water usage.
[6:21] There's two ways to cool these chips.
[6:24] One is the analogy I like to use is if
[6:28] you're walking around at Disneyland with
[6:29] your family and you're kind of spraying
[6:32] a fan and like misting water and you're
[6:34] basically using the cooling temp
[6:36] temperature of the cool water to cool
[6:37] down your chips. Alternatively, you have
[6:40] a refrigerator at home and that
[6:42] refrigerator doesn't use active water to
[6:44] cool it down, right? It's a closed loop
[6:46] system that is able to cool down the
[6:48] chips. And so we use that closed loop
[6:50] system where we don't actually use any
[6:54] water on an ongoing basis other than the
[6:56] restrooms, the sinks, and things of that
[6:57] nature. It's like any other office
[6:59] building and we're much smaller
[7:00] consumption than a traditional office
[7:01] building because everything is in that
[7:03] closed loop system. Historically, not
[7:05] everyone did that because one, it's more
[7:08] expensive from an infrastructure
[7:09] perspective. two is that you have to
[7:14] invest um into kind of higher POE so you
[7:17] consume kind of uh more electricity
[7:20] prices and so forth and so those are
[7:22] some of the reasons why historically
[7:25] you've had different types of use cases
[7:26] on the water side but the water issue
[7:28] can be solved where you're not actually
[7:30] using water in the community um and
[7:32] you're using much less water than what
[7:34] people have kind of day-to-day when they
[7:36] drive by any office building car wash um
[7:39] and anything of that nature
[7:41] And so I think those are like two big
[7:42] ones. The third one is is is noise uh
[7:45] and how you design and how you build
[7:47] these data centers. If you look at
[7:48] Ashurn, Virginia, there are literally
[7:50] data centers right next to homes. And so
[7:51] these things can be built in a much more
[7:54] quiet manner. And lastly, we're actually
[7:56] spending a good amount of time with this
[7:57] is historically a lot of these things
[8:00] look like kind of large infrastructure
[8:02] warehouse like buildings, but I think
[8:04] there's an opportunity to invest a bit
[8:05] more money and make these things look
[8:07] beautiful and have them drive by and
[8:09] feel more like museums than they do um
[8:11] kind of warehouses. And so we're
[8:13] thinking about all of those things and
[8:14] as we go into new markets, we're kind of
[8:16] talking through those. But I think as a
[8:18] nation, we've got to figure out how to
[8:20] get people excited that we could be at
[8:22] the leading forefront of this technology
[8:24] rather than nervous and scared because
[8:26] if that is really what ends up really
[8:28] driving our decisions in this country, I
[8:30] think it's going to inhinder us from
[8:33] leading in this AI revolution and allow
[8:35] other countries like China to be able to
[8:38] surpass us. And that's why I think this
[8:40] sense of coming together in this
[8:41] nationalistic pride of let's build the
[8:43] infrastructure that supports this
[8:45] compute is critically important because
[8:47] if it doesn't get built in the US it
[8:48] will get built elsewhere and we don't
[8:50] want that compute lying in other
[8:51] countries.
[8:52] >> Now I'm going to throw out a couple of
[8:54] things that I've heard various players
[8:55] doing and I want you to react to agree
[8:57] disagree you know and why. Uh the first
[9:00] is I've heard some people pitch well we
[9:01] should do collocation. we should do some
[9:03] like high performance manufacturing and
[9:05] colllocate it with data centers that
[9:06] changes the economics of uh the actual
[9:09] site and it allows us not only to get
[9:11] the compute online but then it also
[9:13] allows us to do high performance
[9:14] manufacturing. How do you guys think
[9:15] about that?
[9:18] >> I don't really fully follow uh kind of
[9:22] connecting those two. I think energy
[9:24] campuses are going to be a bigger and
[9:25] bigger thing which is you bring
[9:28] generation. So you not only bring the
[9:30] load and the consumption, you actually
[9:32] bring netu generation as well. And there
[9:34] might be other use cases, right? Because
[9:36] like we have a 500 megawatt data center,
[9:38] but it the IT load is 352 and the rest
[9:41] is kind of the cooling infrastructure
[9:43] that doesn't always get used. And so you
[9:45] can have kind of colloccated
[9:46] infrastructure that's able to consume
[9:49] some some of that power that's not being
[9:51] used. So I think there's a lot of
[9:52] creativity of how to build these energy
[9:54] campuses but it depends on what do these
[9:57] loads need what are the different
[9:58] requirements and how do you create kind
[10:00] of these utilized systems. I think the
[10:02] next phase historically for data centers
[10:04] was we go we ask a utility hey can we
[10:06] get power obviously we don't have much
[10:08] power and so we need to go build new
[10:10] power and so now a lot of uh
[10:11] infrastructure providers are thinking
[10:13] about how do we bring power with us so
[10:14] we bring power and we bring load and
[10:16] then we can help add capacity into the
[10:18] market while consuming as well and I
[10:20] think you'll see a lot more of that
[10:21] >> now that collocation or like the other
[10:24] offtakes of the energy what would they
[10:25] be doing is it other types of data
[10:27] consumption or or is there something
[10:29] else
[10:30] >> so as we Think about it from a Huda
[10:32] perspective. Today we have two large use
[10:34] cases, right? We have use cases for ASIC
[10:36] that kind of power the Bitcoin network
[10:38] and security. And we're also big
[10:39] believers. If Bitcoin is going to be a
[10:41] currency around the world that people
[10:43] trust, we want that compute or a large
[10:45] portion of that compute to be in the US
[10:47] rather in countries that um whether it
[10:50] be kind of Iran, Russia, Ukraine, China,
[10:53] like we we want it to be in countries um
[10:56] that are more on in in the west. And so
[10:58] maintaining compute in the US we think
[11:00] is kind of critical to national
[11:01] security. Separately is from an AI
[11:04] compute perspective. So these two loads
[11:05] are very different. AI compute is more
[11:08] bursty more based on workloads and kind
[11:10] of a traditional data center they
[11:12] consume and it's less price sensitive
[11:14] where Bitcoin you trade around price
[11:15] volatility. And so these are interesting
[11:17] loads that can actually work together
[11:19] because one doesn't have to be online
[11:21] all the time and one does. Um and so
[11:23] other use cases we're seeing in the US
[11:25] today, you see advanced manufacturing,
[11:27] you see these kind of onshoring, you
[11:28] know, these chip manufacturing
[11:30] companies, fab manufacturing companies
[11:32] that are all large scale energy campuses
[11:34] in the hundreds of megawatts, if not
[11:35] gigawatts as well. And you'll see more
[11:37] of that as we step into the world of
[11:39] robotics and advanced manufacturing.
[11:41] Now, another thing I've heard is there's
[11:43] obviously the mega sites, you know, uh,
[11:45] hundreds of um, megawws, but then I've
[11:48] also seen people talk about, well,
[11:49] actually closer to urban areas, we're
[11:51] going to need 50 to 100 megawatt sites.
[11:53] How do you think through the mega sites
[11:55] versus maybe the smaller sites that are
[11:56] closer to the density?
[12:00] >> I'll talk about it from a power then
[12:02] kind of a latency perspective.
[12:03] Historically, there's was this belief
[12:05] that like you could only do training
[12:08] farther out and you have to be much
[12:10] closer to population density to to to
[12:12] have better latency to run workloads. If
[12:14] folks use Chad GPT or use claw or use
[12:17] Grock, you realize that sometimes you
[12:18] ask it a question and it goes and it
[12:20] thinks for some time and then comes
[12:21] back. So that really quick latency is
[12:24] less relevant compared to a world where
[12:26] you're browsing
[12:28] your emails or social media or whatever
[12:30] it may be. And so we've seen that these
[12:33] large scale campuses actually the the
[12:35] ability to build kind of these inference
[12:37] loads not just in population dense areas
[12:41] and first uh kind of tier markets is a
[12:44] reality today. At the same time you have
[12:46] a power constraint which is how much
[12:50] power at scale can you get and that's
[12:52] becoming harder and harder. And so I
[12:54] think you're going to see a lot more
[12:55] smaller campuses being deployed because
[12:58] it's easier to be able to say all right
[12:59] let's consume 5 15 50 megawws rather
[13:02] than go build a thousand megawatt campus
[13:04] and so you'll see both and you'll see
[13:06] people building infrastructure across
[13:07] both sets.
[13:08] >> Now another thing that I think people
[13:10] are trying to figure out is uh at the
[13:12] same time we're trying to get power
[13:13] we're trying to get the data centers
[13:14] built and there's a bunch of um kind of
[13:16] constraints or obstacles in just those
[13:18] two things alone. Also there's a lot of
[13:21] movement in like what is going inside
[13:22] the data center. The hardware itself is
[13:24] being rapidly innovated on and these
[13:27] large language models are now putting a
[13:28] lot of money and they're trying to
[13:30] figure out like who can get the
[13:31] advantage on the actual metal itself and
[13:34] so are you guys participating in that or
[13:35] you are just trying to deliver you know
[13:37] powered shells or just the power itself
[13:39] and and leave that for somebody else.
[13:41] >> We are building full turnkey solutions.
[13:43] So we're not just building the powered
[13:45] shell we're building everything that
[13:46] goes inside the data center as well. And
[13:48] as we think about the long-term kind of
[13:50] competitive edge in the data center
[13:52] market, what matters most is your cost
[13:54] per token, which is like your unit of
[13:56] compute and your cost per token on a
[13:59] fully depreciated and advertised basis.
[14:01] And so that means you don't really care
[14:03] if the costs are in capex or in opex.
[14:06] You care about the all-in cost of that
[14:08] infrastructure. And the three pieces
[14:09] that really drive those costs are one
[14:11] the cost of energy, two the cost of the
[14:14] data center, and three the cost of the
[14:16] chips and the technology that
[14:17] orchestration runs it all to run it the
[14:19] most efficiently to get the most compute
[14:21] out of that infrastructure stack. And so
[14:22] at HUD, we're proud because we're not
[14:25] just a data center business. We've own
[14:28] power plants in our history. We own four
[14:30] power plants. We have behind the meter
[14:32] assets, front the meter assets. And so I
[14:34] think understanding that full value
[14:36] chain on the compute side we have
[14:38] another company called high-rise.ai that
[14:40] we incubated and that's like a neocloud
[14:42] business cororeweave. And so we
[14:44] understand this full stack from
[14:45] beginning to end and can think about how
[14:48] to drive efficiencies across a full
[14:51] chain to drive the thing that matters
[14:52] most which is your cost per token.
[14:54] >> Today's episode is brought to you by
[14:56] simple mining. Bitcoin mining has a
[14:57] reputation for being complicated, risky,
[14:59] and hard to evaluate as a real
[15:01] investment. If you're considering mining
[15:03] in 2026, what actually matters isn't
[15:05] headline profitability, it's uptime,
[15:08] repairs, and whether the operation is
[15:09] run like a real business. That's why
[15:11] I've been using Simple Mining. They're
[15:13] based in Cedar Falls, Iowa, and they run
[15:15] a white glove hosting operation where
[15:17] you own your miners. You choose your own
[15:19] pool, and you have Bitcoin sent directly
[15:21] to your wallet. They were featured on
[15:23] the Inc. 5000 list as the fastest
[15:25] growing company in Iowa with over 40,000
[15:27] machines under management. What stands
[15:29] out to me is execution. They have the
[15:31] number one rated ASIC repair center. And
[15:33] for the first 12 months, repairs are
[15:35] included. If mining margins get tight,
[15:38] you can pause with no penalties. And if
[15:39] you want to resize or upgrade your
[15:41] fleet, there's a marketplace to resell
[15:42] equipment instead of being stuck. To
[15:44] help people think it through whether
[15:46] mining actually makes sense right now,
[15:47] they put together a short resource
[15:49] called the 2026 Bitcoin mining
[15:51] blueprint. It walks through the five
[15:53] mistakes investors make when allocating
[15:54] to mining, and they also explain how to
[15:56] avoid them before deploying capital. If
[15:58] it sounds interesting to you, you can
[16:00] get it for free at simplemining.io/p.
[16:04] That's simplemining.io/pom.
[16:07] Go check it out today and see if you
[16:09] should get into the mining game. Today's
[16:11] episode is brought to you by Fountain
[16:13] Life.
[16:14] Your body is incredibly good at hiding
[16:16] disease
[16:19] unless you look.
[16:31] True wealth isn't measured in
[16:32] possession.
[16:34] It's measured in the time you gain,
[16:36] the energy you feel, and the life you
[16:39] create. It may be the smartest
[16:41] investment of your time you'll ever
[16:42] make.
[16:49] Life is so very very precious and I want
[16:53] each of you to be truly awakened to your
[16:57] aliveness and live longer without
[17:00] limits.
[17:06] >> Your number one job is to educate
[17:08] yourself and Fountain wants to help
[17:10] educate you.
[17:16] Now you guys are striking very large
[17:17] deals. Last one was over $9 billion of
[17:20] uh revenue. I think that uh that that's
[17:22] part of that contract. Um what's that
[17:24] process like? So you guys know, okay, we
[17:25] got the land. We're going to go power
[17:26] with this thing. But we need to have a
[17:28] partner. We need to have somebody who's
[17:29] actually going to pay us for this. Do
[17:31] you just call up a bunch of companies
[17:33] and say, "Hey, I got land. I got power.
[17:35] Let's have a conversation." you know
[17:37] just walk through maybe how do you get
[17:38] in touch with these people and and what
[17:40] are those conversations like right now
[17:42] >> we've built really deep relationships
[17:44] with some of the largest consumers of
[17:46] comput in the world that's some of the
[17:47] largest investment grade hyperscalers
[17:49] that's the AI labs like the anthropics
[17:52] open AI X's that's also the fast growing
[17:56] companies that are AI companies that are
[17:58] growing as well and creating use cases
[18:01] across the board that are consuming
[18:03] hundreds of millions if not billions of
[18:04] dollars of compute and so you have
[18:06] massively growing market. Um, and then
[18:08] enterprise is slowly starting to
[18:10] percolate right now as well. And so for
[18:11] us, we're excited because we've
[18:13] approached these relationships as
[18:14] partnerships. And the way that we've
[18:16] approached it is not we have this piece
[18:18] of inventory. Do you want it or not? But
[18:20] what is your long-term growth map? And
[18:22] can we be infrastructure partners to you
[18:24] all? And that's how we've really
[18:26] approached and been building our deals
[18:27] that come together. And that's really
[18:29] kind of the mindset that we're taking as
[18:31] we're continue to grow and scale.
[18:32] >> Now $9 billion. I think there's a lot of
[18:35] companies who would love to sign a deal
[18:36] like that. How do you know the numbers
[18:38] are right? You know, so much is changing
[18:39] in terms of some of these are 10 plus
[18:41] year contracts. And I think one of the
[18:43] questions that investors have of the
[18:45] hyperscalers in particular is like are
[18:46] they going to get a return on their
[18:47] investment? You guys are a little bit
[18:49] different because you're basically
[18:50] signing up it as revenue, but how do you
[18:52] protect yourself or what are some of the
[18:53] things that if you're an investor
[18:54] looking at a company like HUD or other
[18:56] that people should be looking for to
[18:58] know, hey, this contract is good, it's
[19:00] high quality, they're likely to get paid
[19:01] on it.
[19:03] So today, if you look at the two deals
[19:05] that we've announced, they're 15-year
[19:07] contracts. Both of them, both of them
[19:09] are investment grade counterparties that
[19:11] back the payments of those obligations
[19:13] during the 15 years. And so you have
[19:16] basically the most valuable
[19:18] multi-trillion dollar companies in the
[19:19] world supporting uh the cash flows of
[19:22] these and those are diversified
[19:23] businesses that have a variety of
[19:25] different revenue streams. Um and so you
[19:27] have an investment grade kind of
[19:28] counterparty standing behind it. It's
[19:30] not just a startup that is using the
[19:31] compute. It's a take or pay kind of
[19:34] triple net lease where they're obligated
[19:36] to pay those payments every single month
[19:38] regardless of if they want to use it or
[19:40] not. Like they are committing to that
[19:41] infrastructure stack and we have a
[19:43] commitment and belief in them that
[19:45] they'll continue to grow and continue to
[19:46] scale. And so in total between those two
[19:48] over the duration of those contracts,
[19:50] it's almost $17 billion in total
[19:52] contract value between the two projects.
[19:54] Um but stabilized contract value with
[19:57] some of the most creditw worthy
[19:58] companies in the world um backing them.
[20:02] Now you have this Riverbend project.
[20:04] It's one of the two big ones that you
[20:05] guys have. Um there's some unique or or
[20:07] like innovative financing that you've
[20:09] put around this project. Can you talk
[20:10] about you know what is the financing and
[20:12] how it's structured? But why is this
[20:14] unique and no one's done it before?
[20:16] >> So most of the financing that we see in
[20:18] the market in the data center space is
[20:21] kind of short-term construction like
[20:23] bridge financing. So whether that be 2
[20:24] to 5 year 10 years meaning you get the
[20:26] money it's a little bit more expensive
[20:28] but you go and you construct and build a
[20:30] data center and then once the data
[20:32] center is stabilized then you go and you
[20:34] refinance that project and you get a
[20:36] little bit of a cheaper cost of capital
[20:37] because you don't take the risk of
[20:38] construction and you refinance it for
[20:40] the duration of the project. What was
[20:42] interesting is from a credit
[20:44] perspective, so we had S&P and Fitch uh
[20:47] kind of radar project. Usually you get
[20:49] kind of like a subinvestment grade
[20:51] rating during construction because the
[20:53] construction risk and then once you
[20:55] finish the construction depending on who
[20:57] your tenant is and who your offtake is,
[20:59] then if it's an investment grade part
[21:01] counterparty, then you'll get an
[21:03] investment grade uh credit after
[21:04] commercialization.
[21:06] What was unique is because of how we
[21:08] de-risk execution of the project and
[21:10] delivery, our project was actually
[21:13] investment grade day one and that
[21:15] allowed us to be able to go and raise
[21:18] capital from the investment grade
[21:19] markets day one instead of from the high
[21:21] yield markets or from the project
[21:22] finance uh uh kind of bank markets and
[21:25] so that the investment grade markets
[21:27] gave us duration. So instead of doing a
[21:29] two to fiveyear financing because I
[21:31] think the risk you face there is in two
[21:33] to five years you you have all these
[21:35] data centers being built today that are
[21:37] all going to need to be refinanced and
[21:39] so you'll have maybe 100 plus billion
[21:41] dollars of infrastructure that needs to
[21:43] be refinanced at that time and so what
[21:45] is going to be the appetite to refinance
[21:46] in that moment what is going to be the
[21:48] overall sentiment in the market and I
[21:50] think that's a risk that we really
[21:51] wanted to take away in the first project
[21:53] when we announced Riverbend and because
[21:55] of the investment grade status we felt
[21:57] like we could take away that risk. And
[21:59] so what we ended up doing was we're one
[22:01] of the first investment grade kind of
[22:03] construction phase data center projects
[22:05] in the market ever. And we were taking a
[22:06] bit of a risk when we did it because it
[22:07] was kind of a first of its kind. And we
[22:10] size the uh capital we raise to over 16
[22:14] 1/2 years. So instead of 2 to 5, it
[22:17] basically covers a construction period
[22:18] plus the full 15-year lease. and the
[22:21] full debt gets paid down via the cash
[22:23] flows of the project rather than via a
[22:27] refinancing that you expect to have. So
[22:29] what we felt like is for Had it fully
[22:32] derisks any refinancing risk and we've
[22:34] already derised so much of the project.
[22:35] It took the financing piece out of it as
[22:37] well. And for investors, they didn't
[22:39] have to take the bet that we were going
[22:41] to be able to refinance us to pay them
[22:42] back. We had the cash flows that are
[22:44] backed by investment counterparts to be
[22:46] able to do so. And so it was led by JP
[22:48] Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan
[22:50] Stanley. And we had a phenomenal
[22:52] outcome. Really proud. And had some of
[22:54] the most institutional, some of the most
[22:56] blue chip names in the market. So we
[22:58] raised over $3.2 billion. And we had 10
[23:02] billion dollars plus of uh demand across
[23:04] the book from the most well-known
[23:06] institutions around the world.
[23:08] >> How many of these can you do a year?
[23:09] Right. So you guys have two major ones.
[23:11] You obviously have the Bitcoin mining,
[23:12] you've got some other projects that are
[23:13] underway, but is this like one mega
[23:15] project per year? is the pace at which
[23:17] you think you can go. Can you do four or
[23:18] five of them?
[23:20] >> So, we're doing two already. Um, and
[23:22] we're looking at expansion on those
[23:23] campuses as well. But as a company, the
[23:26] way that we're really building is if you
[23:29] think about like some of the most
[23:30] successful kind of hedge funds, they
[23:32] have this pod model, right? Where you
[23:34] have pods that go and run different
[23:35] initiatives. And that's really kind of
[23:37] how we've built our business. We have
[23:38] this PR these principles that are part
[23:40] of a task force and they go and they
[23:42] build and run a project. And so for us
[23:44] and then we have partners that can scale
[23:45] with us. The reason we chose Jacobs and
[23:48] Vera from an EPCM which is engineering
[23:51] uh construction management to supply
[23:54] chain is because these companies are
[23:56] some of the biggest companies in the
[23:58] ecosystem. Jacobs is 40,000 employees
[24:00] worldwide. Ver is a 100 plus billion
[24:02] dollar company and so they can grow with
[24:04] our scale and our demand as well. Um,
[24:07] and then from a financing perspective,
[24:09] who has a stronger balance sheet than JP
[24:10] Morgan and Golden Sask and Morgan
[24:12] Stanley? And so we're really proud of
[24:13] the partners we brought together so that
[24:15] as we scale, they can scale with us and
[24:18] support our growth as well.
[24:19] >> As a CEO of HUT, how do you think about
[24:21] building stuff yourself versus acquiring
[24:24] other companies or other uh properties
[24:26] and sites? Is there a world where you'll
[24:28] do both or are you guys pretty focused
[24:30] on just uh development?
[24:32] >> We're really proud of our ability to
[24:34] develop. We think that we take a first
[24:36] principles approach towards how we
[24:38] develop. How do we develop more
[24:40] efficiently? How do we develop at a more
[24:42] efficient cost? How do we develop at a
[24:43] higher quality? And really proud of what
[24:46] we build. At the same time, kind of the
[24:48] market es and flows. Sometimes people
[24:51] are really excited, things are really
[24:52] expensive, sometimes things are cheap.
[24:53] And I think as you move forward in the
[24:55] next couple years, execution is going to
[24:56] be key. And so there might be
[24:58] opportunities where we can buy
[24:59] opportunities, assets where they say,
[25:01] you know what, I need an execution
[25:03] partner to come into this project with
[25:04] us. and that might be an earlier stage
[25:05] project or I want some type of liquidity
[25:07] and that might be a later stage project.
[25:09] And so we have a corporate development
[25:10] M&A team that looks at opportunities all
[25:12] day. Um but we also our core kind of
[25:14] growth engine is our development growth
[25:16] engine because that's where we're going
[25:17] to get the best yield out of the time we
[25:19] spend.
[25:19] >> All right. So people are very convinced
[25:20] we need more data centers, we need more
[25:22] compute. What are the bottlenecks? Like
[25:24] energy is a bottleneck. Are there
[25:26] critical minerals or other things that
[25:28] you look at and you're like these are
[25:29] the things that are slowing us down
[25:31] right now?
[25:32] So if you think about the kind of the
[25:34] full chain, I would say right now it's
[25:36] energy capacity at scale. Um and so
[25:39] that's generation of energy capacity,
[25:41] that's transmission capacity if you're
[25:42] pulling it from the grid. And so that's
[25:44] from like an power infrastructure
[25:45] perspective. Then when you go up the
[25:47] chain to the data center perspective,
[25:48] it's long lead time supply items. So
[25:50] that's breakers, transformers, switch
[25:52] gears, and you're seeing some things
[25:53] that the government is doing in calling
[25:55] these kind of national security assets
[25:57] and bring manufacturing, invest into
[25:59] manufacturing and reshoring that. And
[26:01] the third is the chips, right? You're
[26:02] seeing all these memory companies
[26:04] skyrocket in terms of their share price
[26:06] like SanDisk and um and SK and some of
[26:09] these like large memory companies
[26:11] because it's not just the GPU itself.
[26:14] It's all the components that go into
[26:15] that infrastructure stack on the ship
[26:17] side that support that no matter how big
[26:19] or small. So I think across the whole
[26:21] chain the long lead time item or the
[26:23] bottleneck es and flows depending on
[26:25] where we are in the market. I think
[26:27] today people need more infrastructure
[26:29] quick um and they need more power
[26:30] capacity in the long term as well.
[26:33] >> Now, are there things that you guys are
[26:35] doing to try to fix some of those supply
[26:37] chain stuff or because the way you're
[26:39] developing and you've got these
[26:40] partners, you're kind of just
[26:41] susceptible to whatever the lead times
[26:43] are.
[26:44] >> No, we are we were definitely very very
[26:46] cognizant and deep into the supply
[26:48] chain. We think about how much does it
[26:51] cost to produce every single piece of
[26:54] equipment that we buy from someone else
[26:55] and what are the raw inputs and what are
[26:57] the lead times, what is the time to
[26:59] build look like and that's how we drive
[27:01] kind of our ability to be able to
[27:03] deliver projects in a super efficient
[27:05] manner. Um when we announced the
[27:07] partnerships with Jacob Inverters, we
[27:08] had almost every other kind of
[27:10] manufacturer and partner reach out to us
[27:12] and say can we join the program? Can we
[27:13] be a part of it as well? And so overall
[27:16] we're very very deep into the supply
[27:18] chain. That's how we think we can drive
[27:20] efficiencies, innovation. And right now,
[27:22] we don't just buy equipment or hire jigs
[27:25] and converters to do things. We are
[27:27] alongside them every single day
[27:29] designing the infrastructure, designing
[27:31] the equipment, the modulars that we put
[27:33] together and driving a lot of that
[27:35] innovation alongside.
[27:36] >> What are the things that keep you up at
[27:37] night? Like what what are you worried
[27:39] about?
[27:41] I think what I'm I would say as a CEO of
[27:45] HUD and I'll go kind of more broadly as
[27:47] a CEO of HUD is as we continue to scale
[27:49] and build how do we keep what makes us
[27:52] unique in the culture that we built and
[27:54] how do we scale effectively and I've
[27:57] always shared this is we care about
[27:59] scaling but scaling with credibility and
[28:02] being able to execute on everything that
[28:03] we say we're going to do rather than
[28:05] trying to move too fast or move too
[28:06] slow. So finding that right balance. Um
[28:08] and for HA like the vision we have long
[28:10] term is there's this huge opportunity of
[28:14] physical intelligence. I think if you
[28:16] look back in the '9s like you had these
[28:18] companies that said we're going to build
[28:20] internet companies and today you fast
[28:22] forward 20 30 years you have Microsoft,
[28:25] Amazon, Meta, Alphabet and all these are
[28:28] the most valuable companies in the world
[28:30] but each of them have actually different
[28:32] businesses from social media to search
[28:36] to e-commerce and so on. But at their
[28:39] core, they learn how to build businesses
[28:42] in an internet era. And the opportunity
[28:45] that we believe exists today that allows
[28:48] us to potentially become one of those
[28:49] multi-trillion dollar companies in 10,
[28:52] 20 years from today is physical
[28:55] intelligence. How do you use technology
[28:58] and redefine how you build in the
[28:59] physical world? And that's what we're
[29:01] most excited by in the long term. We're
[29:03] building this data center
[29:04] infrastructure, these critical assets,
[29:06] but how do we use the technologies that
[29:08] we're empowering to reinvent our
[29:10] businesses ourselves? And so as we look
[29:12] forward kind of 5 years and 10 years,
[29:14] data centers shouldn't take 6 months to
[29:17] build with all of our engineers, etc.
[29:19] They should be the ones driving these AI
[29:22] native solutions to be able to design
[29:23] these in days, not months. In addition
[29:26] to that, as we think about building, how
[29:28] do we make sure that we're able to
[29:30] augment kind of the talent that we have
[29:32] to build alongside um robotics and
[29:35] infrastructure as well to build more
[29:36] efficiently? I think like the beauty
[29:38] about AI is it's going to free people's
[29:42] times up to be more creative to be able
[29:45] to innovate more and you're going to see
[29:47] a whole new kind of industry being born
[29:50] out of creativity because I think what
[29:52] the human mind is a beautiful thing and
[29:54] rather than focusing it on kind of
[29:56] monotonous tasks if those can be uh
[29:59] taken over by AI how do we have that
[30:02] human mind focus on innovation focus on
[30:04] pushing kind of the world forward and I
[30:06] think that's we're excited by at HUD
[30:08] long term. And I think what keeps me up
[30:10] as night is kind of messing that
[30:12] opportunity up. I think we have a moment
[30:13] in time where HUD is in this perfect
[30:15] moment. We're big enough as a company
[30:17] where we can raise tens of billions of
[30:19] dollars to support these large
[30:20] infrastructure projects, but we're small
[30:22] enough where we have this mindset of a
[30:25] high growth startup and a fast growing
[30:27] business that wants to win and wants to
[30:29] take over the world and we can rethink
[30:31] and reframe every single thing that we
[30:33] do. And so we're really grateful and
[30:35] fortunate uh to be where we are today
[30:37] and we want to be able to really build
[30:39] out what the potential of this business
[30:41] can be.
[30:42] >> Talk for a second about uh American
[30:43] Bitcoin. You guys spun it out. Um I
[30:45] think people are very interested in the
[30:46] Bitcoin mining still uh as well. What's
[30:49] the latest on that business? How do you
[30:50] think about it?
[30:51] >> It's great. Uh we went public less than
[30:53] a year ago. We have over 7,000 Bitcoin
[30:56] from zero when we spun it out.
[30:57] Obviously, HUD has its own Bitcoin stack
[30:59] as well, but the business has been doing
[31:01] well through the last three quarters.
[31:04] Regardless of Bitcoin price, our margin
[31:06] has been over 50%. Which is amazing. And
[31:09] that's the beauty because even if
[31:11] Bitcoin price comes down, other people
[31:12] that are less efficient stop mining and
[31:15] stop using the compute and that
[31:17] therefore the difficulty comes down. And
[31:19] so our net margins actually remain the
[31:22] same even with the volatility uh of
[31:24] Bitcoin, which is awesome. And so the
[31:25] business, we're super proud of the team,
[31:27] what they continue to do, what they
[31:28] continue to build. They just brought a
[31:30] site on uh last quarter. And I think
[31:32] what's unique around American Bitcoin is
[31:34] because everyone is moving to AI, it's
[31:36] actually becoming easier to use that
[31:38] same compute to buy more Bitcoin. Um and
[31:40] so we think long-term kind of the
[31:42] security and the integrity of the
[31:44] Bitcoin ecosystem is critically
[31:45] important. And we're one of the last
[31:47] remaining large scale operators that are
[31:49] providing that in North America. Um and
[31:51] we're really proud of to do that. And
[31:53] that business is is is going well. the
[31:54] foundation is building. Obviously,
[31:56] there's stock price volatility, but
[31:58] that's kind of more macro that we can't
[32:00] really control, but what we can control
[32:01] is the fundamentals of the business. And
[32:03] what I've always told the team, I was
[32:04] like, look, when I took over the CEO's
[32:06] HUD 8, our stock price was around $6. I
[32:09] mean, you remember this, you were one of
[32:10] the early folks that said, hey, people
[32:12] should take a look at HUD 8, right? And
[32:14] we fast forward two years, we've
[32:16] appreciated by over a,000%. Um, and I
[32:18] and I told the team, I was like, what
[32:19] mattered most is not focusing on what
[32:21] happens on the stock price on a
[32:23] day-to-day basis. If you build an
[32:24] amazing underlying business, the rest
[32:26] will follow.
[32:28] >> Makes uh makes sense to me. Thank you
[32:29] very much for taking the time to do this
[32:31] and uh we'll do it again soon. Thanks
[32:33] for having me

← Volver al listado de vídeos

Scroll al inicio