yes i do believe we're going up to 150 000 or 200 in this four year cycle
MissDirection: correct. Covered 26.0% of the required move; closest approach $68,790 on 10-Nov-2021.
Bob Loukas
Sign in with a verified email and ask the tutor anything about this video.
yes i do believe we're going up to 150 000 or 200 in this four year cycle
MissDirection: correct. Covered 26.0% of the required move; closest approach $68,790 on 10-Nov-2021.
Lucas opens on January 7, 2021, noting that Bitcoin has doubled since the prior video six weeks earlier and is near $40,000. He recalls the December 2018 video, released after a bear market decline of about 85%, which framed the downturn as a cyclical bottom and an opportunity for people who still believed in Bitcoin. He says the series aims to help viewers understand cycle position, potential outcomes, and the challenges of staying invested, rather than simply telling them to buy and hold. He stresses that his views can be wrong, that investment involves uncertainty, and that a portfolio plan should account for multiple outcomes. He says he will review charts and then answer questions about the portfolio, buying and selling, the rally, and general advice.
Lucas describes Bitcoin’s history on a monthly chart, starting the first four-year cycle at the point when it reached $1 on exchanges and price discovery had meaningful liquidity. His investment thesis is that the network is expanding, adoption as a store of value is increasing, and time and trust may bring more capital into Bitcoin relative to assets such as dollars, euros, gold, bonds, or treasuries. He characterizes the current rally as institutionally driven, following earlier periods associated with technology and venture capital participants and then retail participation. He sees a secular upward trend despite major swings, and says Bitcoin’s roughly $550–600 billion market capitalization remains small compared with gold and total financial assets. In his cycle analysis, the market is around month 25 of a four-year cycle that began in December 2018, near its time midpoint; he expects a cycle top in the second half, with timing uncertain. He also speculates that a following cycle could top early and then spend about three years declining or consolidating, but says the immediate task is to execute the current cycle. His stated goal is to increase his Bitcoin holdings by selling near cycle highs and accumulating near the next bottom, rather than simply holding for distant price projections.
Lucas says the market is ahead of his earlier guide models: Bitcoin has moved above the 2017 high while only around halfway through the four-year cycle. He sees growing separation from the 10-month moving average as a sign of froth, but says prior separation has sometimes preceded several more months of gains. He cites possible cycle targets of $100,000, $150,000, $200,000, or even $250,000 if a blow-off phase is beginning early, while emphasizing that these are scenarios rather than predictions. On the weekly chart, he says the accelerating rate of change may indicate a short-term top, but a 30–40% decline is also possible and would not invalidate the advance from the March 2020 lows. Such a pullback could reach the 10- or 20-week moving average; he notes that touching the 20-week average was common in earlier bull markets. He says he did not sell other positions in anticipation of the previously discussed possible 30% decline; the point was to prepare viewers and explain that a correction could be normal. He urges investors to decide in advance how they would react to a sharp fall, since unrealized gains can create fear and panic. His sale of a small amount at $28,000 was preplanned and intended partly to reduce that pressure; he suggests that people who expect they would panic might sell a small amount to realize some gains.
Lucas compares the current move with Bitcoin’s 2013 rise and silver in 2011, saying it resembles an orderly, spot-driven rally rather than a retail mania or speculative futures-led move. He says he sees little evidence of a large influx of new retail participants, while suggesting that institutions and capital seeking physical Bitcoin are driving demand. He compares the early 2013 move, which he describes as rising from $13 to $200 before a nearly six-month consolidation and a later advance to $1,200, with the possibility that the current rally could continue rapidly. He explicitly says he is not predicting Bitcoin will reach $257,000 within weeks, but sketches a scenario in which several more large weekly candles could bring the price to $100,000 by late January or mid-February, followed by a sharp correction. He also describes an alternative path: a quick rise and roughly 40% decline, potentially followed by consolidation through summer and a later cycle peak around October or November, with a broad $200,000-range estimate. He says the price targets are guides with wide uncertainty, and that both a near-term spike and correction or a longer rise are plausible. He believes the rally can be sustainable in the short term but expects a peak to be followed by a quick fall.
Lucas explains that he sold 5 BTC, about 15% of the model portfolio, at $28,000. The sale had been planned when Bitcoin was around $4,000–$5,000: in his worst-case cycle scenario, price would make a new high, rise about 20% beyond it, and top, so selling would recover the portfolio’s initial outlay. He also says realizing some profit made the position easier to hold and left him feeling that he could not lose money on the endeavor, while later clarifying that the model portfolio still had $30,000 of initial capital at risk. He rejects the view that institutions make 30% corrections impossible. In his account, at higher prices long-term holders, miners, and institutional buyers may take profits, increasing supply; potential institutional buyers may also hesitate after a rapid price rise, reducing demand. He therefore expects a 30% correction at some point, although it could happen before or after Bitcoin reaches $100,000 and could occur soon. He presents sharply opposing scenarios as reasonable responses to an unusually uncertain market.
Lucas says the model portfolio represents each $100,000 invested through a four-year cycle, so followers can apply the same proportions to their own circumstances. He reports that it holds 30 BTC, shows Bitcoin around $39,200, and values the portfolio at about $1.1 million with about $1.1 million in profit; he also says the initial outlay has been covered and describes purchases of 25 BTC at the start, another purchase in September 2019, five more in March during the collapse, and the recent sale of five at $28,000. He acknowledges that if Bitcoin went to zero, the model would lose $30,000. He has no fixed target for the next sale. If Bitcoin rallies above $65,000 over the next few weeks without a 30% decline, he may sell another 5 BTC, because he sees an outside chance of a top around $90,000–$100,000 in the next two or three months followed by a long downturn. If the rally continues toward roughly $75,000–$80,000 over the next three or four weeks, he says he would consider selling five BTC. If instead a 30% pullback occurs, he says he would look for six-figure Bitcoin before selling more. He prefers a pullback as a way to allow backfilling and profit-taking and, in his view, support a more sustainable bull market. He also decides to dedicate 10 BTC, or one third of the remaining position in the model, to a never-sell, always-hold position as protection against an extreme upside outcome such as a cycle that runs much longer than expected or Bitcoin rising dramatically without revisiting the expected cycle low. He says this position should remain under the holder’s control, preferably in multisignature storage.
For people who sold near $20,000 and remain on the sidelines, Lucas says buying at earlier levels such as $18,000, $22,000, $28,000, $32,000, or $36,000 would have worked out so far, though buying at $40,000 could still prove to be near a top. For friends and family asking how to enter after a 300% rise in two months, he recommends building a core position they are comfortable with if their goal is exposure to a possible $150,000–$250,000 Bitcoin, while accepting volatility and a possible drawdown of up to 40% without panic selling. He says investors who cannot tolerate that risk could sell a small amount to reduce stress. He describes identifying the end of the bull market as discretionary and dependent partly on the market’s character; a blow-off peak may be easier for him to recognize in real time than a top without one. He says he is not prepared to consider a major top before after summer, more likely toward year-end, and not before Bitcoin reaches six figures.
Lucas advises against putting everything into Bitcoin or borrowing to invest, saying an all-in position can impair decision-making. He says his own circumstances differ from those of a younger investor: he is in his late 40s, has had a successful career, and does not need to risk everything to make more. He describes selling some holdings as a way to take profits while letting the rest grow. On adding to a hold position, he says he previously would not add above the prior cycle high of $20,000; he considers new income or dollar-cost averaging reasonable cases for buying, but says the risk and reward are less favorable now than when Bitcoin was at $5,000. He characterizes the opportunity as still tilted positively, but with more downside risk and less upside than before. He closes by describing the video as his personal experience and approach, thanks viewers, and wishes them well for 2021.
Does this summary look right?