Jack Mallers
Lesson 3: Jack Mallers Explains Inflation
Ask the tutor about this video
Sign in with a verified email and ask the tutor anything about this video.
Research summary
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShsgkmRJnsA | Duration: 37 min
◆ Understanding the Experience of Inflation
The speaker begins by defining inflation not through academic jargon, but through lived experience: the same amount of money buys less over time. This reduction in purchasing power is universal. A key historical marker is 1970, the last full calendar year before the dollar abandoned the gold standard. This shift allowed politicians and central banks to print unlimited amounts of currency.
The core mechanism is simple: when money supply increases without a corresponding increase in physical goods, inflation occurs. For context, a new house cost $23,000 and bread was only twenty-five cents in 1970, demonstrating significant price changes over time.
▶️ The Economic Debate: Keynesianism vs. Hard Money
Keynesian economics argues that inflation is beneficial because it incentivizes continuous spending; if money held its value, consumers would delay purchases and save wealth, which they claim is harmful to a dynamic economy. However, the speaker critiques this view, presenting the Hard Money Response. He asserts that human desire to consume what one has earned is a fundamental driver independent of central bank policy. Government overreach and database-based money planning are identified as the root causes of economic problems.
★ The Mechanics of Monetary Debasement
Inflation occurs because more monetary units do not inherently create wealth; wealth is defined as tangible resources (food, housing, labor). Money is merely a claim on these real resources. When the money supply increases without corresponding physical goods, prices rise. This process creates an illusion of productivity and growth that is fundamentally unreal.
The Corn Analogy illustrates this limitation: one cannot simply increase consumption from a fixed resource pool (10 bushels of corn) without changing production. Economic decisions must therefore be made at the margins, highlighting the difference between tangible resources and paper claims.
► The Uneven Distribution of Wealth
Inflation is not spread evenly; wealth benefits disproportionately from new money creation. This phenomenon is known as the Cantillon effect. Governments create credit by allowing banks to use government bonds as collateral, primarily granting immediate access to leveraged capital for hedge funds and Wall Street entities. The general public only experiences inflation much later through delayed increases in wages and rents.
The speaker emphasizes that there is no single "inflation rate" because costs are entirely dependent on an individual's specific wants and lifestyle choices (e.g., the cost of basic math vs. college tuition). Bitcoin, by reacting immediately to changes in monetary liquidity, is presented as a crucial instrument for protection.
◆ The Bitcoin Standard vs. Fiat Systems
A soft money system allows governments to print more currency when demand rises, leading directly to inflation and forcing consumption. In contrast, a fixed money standard prevents new money from being printed regardless of increased demand. While gold is a hard standard, its supply can still increase; Bitcoin differs because its issuance is determined by the protocol itself, making it resistant to inflationary pressures inherent in fiat systems.
The fixed supply of Bitcoin contrasts sharply with the manipulated nature of fiat currency. The core principle is that no man should work for what another man can print. When money supply increases without corresponding economic growth, inflation erodes wages and hard work.
★ Bitcoin, AI, and Deflationary Abundance
The rise of AI is driving massive resource abundance across medicine, energy, and education. Inflation occurs because monetary claims grow faster than these real resources. However, with a fixed money supply like Bitcoin, increased productivity competes for a limited amount of sats. This allows holders to benefit from all human progress since every invention must compete for the same finite currency. Unlike soft money systems where prices rise due to excessive printing, the Bitcoin standard leads to deflation as resources outpace monetary growth.
► Investment and Financial Recommendations
The speaker strongly advises against relying on traditional financial instruments under a fiat system. The current market activity is influenced by mathematical predictions, but a true bull market requires substantial money printing—a condition that was not met in 2025.
- Avoid owning bonds or holding dollars due to the inherent inflationary risk and currency debasement.
- Advocate for Bitcoin as an asset with infinite price that is not controlled by central authorities, offering protection against uneven economic processes.
- Focus on acquiring assets whose value is tied to real resources and technological progress, rather than relying on government-backed claims.
◆ Search for the alpha
The core thesis driving capital allocation is a fundamental rejection of fiat currency and centralized monetary control. The guest advocates for a systemic rotation out of debt instruments, government-backed claims, and traditional dollar holdings into assets with fixed supply, viewing Bitcoin as the primary hedge against inevitable inflationary debasement.
- Strongly advise against owning bonds or holding dollars due to inherent inflationary risk associated with central bank policies.
- Advocate for Bitcoin as a non-centralized asset that resists monetary manipulation and maintains its value relative to purchasing power.
- The primary capital rotation is from soft money claims (fiat, government debt) toward hard assets defined by fixed supply protocols.
- Caution against assuming the current market activity represents a true bull market; genuine expansion requires substantial money printing which has not yet occurred.
► Chapter Summaries
Introduction (0:00)
The speaker introduces a deep dive into inflation within the context of Bitcoin 101. He promises to explain the concept from first principles, deliberately avoiding jargon and academic nonsense. The discussion will address fundamental questions such as what inflation is, how it functions, why it exists, and if adopting Bitcoin can provide a solution. Rather than starting with complex definitions, which he finds frustrating, the lesson will begin by focusing on people's real-world experience of inflation. This approach aims to make the concept accessible and practical for the audience.
The Experience of Inflation (0:29)
Inflation is best understood through personal experience, where the same amount of money buys less over time. For example, $100 that once purchased a full cart of groceries now only gets some of it. This reduction in purchasing power is what inflation truly is. The speaker emphasizes that this lived reality applies to everyone, regardless of their education or political views. He notes that understanding the technical definition is unnecessary because we all experience its effects daily. To provide context, he references 1970 as a significant year. That was the last full calendar year before the dollar abandoned the gold standard. This shift allowed politicians and central banks to print unlimited amounts of currency.
What Changed After 1971 (1:42)
The speaker explains that inflation resulted from severing the link between the dollar and gold after 1971, allowing for unlimited money creation. In 1970, a new house cost $23,000 and bread was only twenty-five cents. Comparing these historical costs to today reveals significant price increases despite no changes in country or currency. The speaker notes that while the general trend is rising prices, current costs are highly variable. For instance, the price of a new house depends entirely on whether it is located in Miami Beach or rural Kansas. Similarly, the cost of a car varies greatly depending on whether one chooses an affordable used model or a luxury vehicle like a Rolls-Royce.
Keynesian Economics Says Inflation Is Good (3:37)
Keynesian economics maintains the view that inflation is beneficial for maintaining economic activity. Mainstream economists argue that if money held its value, consumers would tend to delay purchases and save their wealth. They believe this tendency toward delayed gratification is harmful to a dynamic economy. Therefore, they claim that a slight erosion of purchasing power through inflation is necessary to incentivize continuous spending. This constant cycle keeps the overall economy active and ensures economic data continues to churn. The system requires external forces to manage and set the cost of money, which encourages immediate consumption over saving.
The Hard Money Response (6:12)
The speaker critiques standard economic models, arguing that setting inflation targets too low discourages necessary consumption and leads to excessive saving. He presents the hard money theory, asserting that human desire to consume what one has earned is a fundamental driver independent of central bank policy decisions. This natural urge to spend on quality of life items overrides attempts by economists to dictate behavior through data analysis or interest rate changes. The speaker finds it offensive when financial experts attempt to determine an individual's personal consumption choices or life goals. He argues that government overreach and the planning of money within a database system are the root causes of these economic problems.
The Mechanics of Inflation (8:52)
Inflation occurs because more monetary units do not inherently create wealth. Wealth is defined as tangible resources like food, housing, and labor, which cannot be printed. Money itself is merely a claim used to command these real resources. When the money supply increases without a corresponding increase in physical goods, inflation results. For example, increasing claims on fixed resources does not magically produce more buildings or doctors. This process creates an illusion of productivity, growth, and innovation that is fundamentally unreal. Because the economy cannot print all the things the money claims to purchase, prices rise, leading to inevitable boom and bust cycles.
The Corn Analogy (11:59)
The corn analogy illustrates the limitations of inflation when dealing with real resources. Starting with a fixed amount of 10 bushels of corn, one cannot simply increase consumption without changing production. The attempt to eat more while maintaining current planting levels is impossible because it would require more than the available resource. Economic decisions must therefore be made at the margins, requiring trade-offs between immediate needs and future optimization. For instance, one must choose between eating seven and planting three or eating six and planting four. This scenario highlights the fundamental difference between tangible real resources, which cannot be inflated, and paper claims used as a medium to command those physical goods.
Credit Can't Create Real Resources (13:14)
Credit cannot create real resources such as land, workers, or specialized equipment like GPUs. When more money and credit are created, they only generate more claims against a fixed supply of physical goods. This increase in paper claims leads to more bidding for the same limited resources. Consequently, the price of those resources rises when measured in paper currency, which is inflation. For instance, if there are 10 real resources but 15 monetary claims, the resource's value increases dramatically. Inflation ultimately reduces purchasing power because one unit of money buys less of the goods it competes for. The speaker emphasizes that this inflationary effect is not spread evenly across the economy.
Inflation Is Uneven — Who Gets the Money First (15:51)
Inflation is not distributed evenly; wealth benefits disproportionately from new money creation and credit expansion. Governments create more credit by allowing banks to use government bonds as collateral, which primarily grants immediate access to leveraged capital for hedge funds and Wall Street entities. The general public only experiences inflation much later through delayed increases in wages, rents, and consumer prices. This timing difference allows sophisticated investors to acquire assets at low prices using freshly printed currency before the average person can benefit from an adjustment. Because Bitcoin reacts immediately to changes in monetary liquidity, it is presented as a crucial instrument for individuals seeking protection against this uneven economic process.
There Is No Single "Inflation Rate" (19:49)
The speaker argues that there is no single inflation rate because costs are entirely dependent on an individual's specific wants and lifestyle choices. The notion of a universal inflation rate implies knowledge of personal consumption, which the speaker rejects as manipulative. For example, learning basic math is incredibly cheap with modern technology, while college tuition carries a much higher annual inflation rate. Similarly, the cost of healthcare varies drastically based on dietary choices and health maintenance. When discussing assets like Bitcoin, its effective inflation rate must be measured against its Compound Annual Growth Rate relative to purchasing power. Finally, the speaker introduces the Cantillon effect, noting that whoever receives newly created currency first gains an advantage by spending it before prices fully adjust.
Who Wins and Who Loses (24:42)
Inflation creates an uneven system where those who receive money later must consume goods at adjusted, higher prices. Currency debasement benefits debtors with fixed dollar obligations because a weaker currency makes it easier to earn the required amount of dollars. The primary losers during inflation are lenders and currency holders whose claims lose purchasing power faster than any yield they receive. The speaker argues that governments benefit by fixing their expenses in dollars while devaluing the money supply. He strongly advises against owning bonds or holding dollars due to this inflationary risk. Instead, he advocates for Bitcoin as an asset with infinite price that is not controlled by central authorities.
Life on a Bitcoin Standard (27:54)
A soft money system allows governments to print more currency when demand rises, leading directly to inflation and forcing consumption. Unlike this, a fixed money standard prevents new money from being printed regardless of increased demand. While gold is considered a hard standard, its supply can still increase over time in response to market incentives. Bitcoin differs significantly because its issuance is determined by the protocol itself, meaning supply does not automatically expand even if demand increases dramatically. This rigidity makes it resistant to inflationary pressures inherent in fiat systems. Furthermore, living on a Bitcoin standard could be particularly relevant in an age of AI, which promises to create massive abundance in goods like housing.
Bitcoin and AI: An Abundance of Resources (30:54)
AI is driving massive resource abundance across fields like medicine, energy, and education. Inflation occurs because monetary claims grow faster than these real resources and human innovation. Bitcoin provides a fixed money supply, meaning increased productivity competes for a limited amount of sats. This allows holders to benefit from all human progress since every invention must compete for the same finite currency. Unlike soft money systems where prices rise due to excessive printing, the Bitcoin standard leads to deflation as resources outpace monetary growth. Therefore, using Bitcoin means your life gets cheaper because humanity is constantly improving and producing more.
Fixed Money in a World of Innovation (34:46)
The fixed supply of Bitcoin contrasts sharply with the manipulated nature of fiat currency systems like the dollar. The dollar system relies on rate changes, credit expansion, and fiscal spending, which the speaker dismisses as nonsense. In contrast, if more Bitcoin is needed, it must be acquired through the market, where miners adjust difficulty to maintain consistent block production. While critics argue that zero inflation means better savings, the speaker counters that wealth accumulation allows for real-life benefits like having a family and property. The speaker strongly warns that those holding only dollars and government bonds are at risk of being crushed by economic forces. Ultimately, governments must either implement yield curve control or allow inflation to run rampant, leading to extreme austerity or hyperinflation.
Why the Bull Market Hasn't Even Started (36:39)
The current movement in the market, including Bitcoin's activity, is being influenced by mathematical predictions that are now widely communicated. This suggests a potential end to the bear market phase. However, the speaker strongly cautions viewers against believing they have witnessed a true bull market in 2025. A genuine bull market requires substantial money printing. In reality, the economic conditions of 2025 involved the Federal Reserve actively shrinking its balance sheet. Furthermore, the period was still characterized by ongoing monetary tightening measures.
No Man Should Work for What Another Man Can Print (37:12)
The core principle discussed is that human labor should not be exchanged for currency that can be arbitrarily printed by others. This critique targets the inherent instability of fiat monetary systems controlled by central banks. When money supply increases without corresponding economic growth, inflation erodes the value of wages and hard work. The ability of a government or institution to print unlimited amounts of money undermines individual financial security. Bitcoin is presented as a direct counterpoint to this system. It functions as an asset that resists inflationary pressures because its supply is fixed and cannot be manipulated by printing presses.
Full transcript
[0:02] first principles, not jargon, not
[0:05] nonsense, not garbage. Really, what is
[0:08] this thing? How does it work? Why is it
[0:10] here? And if we all adopt Bitcoin, will
[0:13] it still be here? Can we solve for
[0:15] inflation? Okay, it's felt necessary for
[0:17] me.
[0:18] Firstly, let's start with the experience
[0:20] of inflation because people get lost in
[0:23] definitions, which really pisses me off.
[0:26] It's just like, "Well, technically,
[0:27] according to Harvard, inflation No. How
[0:30] about [ __ ] you? How about let's just
[0:32] talk about the experience of inflation.
[0:35] I've experienced inflation. Everyone
[0:37] listening to this has experienced
[0:38] inflation. Don't mansplain me. Don't
[0:41] treat me like a [ __ ] like an idiot,
[0:43] like a peasant. I know what it is
[0:45] because I've lived it. This is what
[0:47] inflation is. $100 of groceries used to
[0:50] get you a full cart of groceries. $100
[0:53] of groceries today only gets you some of
[0:55] a cart of groceries. The same monetary
[0:58] units, the same $100 gets you less
[1:01] stuff. That's what inflation is. That's
[1:03] the experience of it, and it doesn't
[1:05] matter how educated someone is, what
[1:07] their religious beliefs are, what their
[1:08] political beliefs are, what their
[1:10] demographic is. It does not matter.
[1:13] We've all experienced it, and I don't
[1:15] need to go to Harvard or actually
[1:17] understand what the technical definition
[1:18] is.
[1:19] You. That's what inflation is. We all
[1:22] know it because we've all lived it. Now,
[1:24] on this screen for the podcast
[1:26] listeners, this is the cost of living in
[1:29] 1970. What's the relevance of 1970?
[1:32] Well, it was the last full calendar year
[1:34] before the dollar divorced itself from
[1:36] the gold standard, which allowed
[1:38] politicians and the central bank to
[1:40] print unlimited amounts of it. In
[1:42] theory, you weren't allowed to print
[1:44] dollars when $1 represented a specific
[1:47] amount of gold. You can only have
[1:49] outstanding dollars that backed the gold
[1:51] you had in the vault. But when you sever
[1:54] the relationship between the dollar
[1:56] notes floating around in our pockets and
[1:58] the gold that's actually in the vault,
[2:00] then you can create as many dollars as
[2:01] you want, which results in inflation.
[2:04] So, let me read to you guys what the
[2:06] cost of living was in 1970.
[2:09] A new house was $23,000.
[2:13] $23,450.
[2:15] The average income was at $9,400
[2:19] in 1970. A new car was $3,450.
[2:25] A movie ticket was $1.55.
[2:29] Gasoline
[2:31] was $0.36 a gallon.
[2:34] A postage stamp was $0.06.
[2:37] Bread was a quarter, $0.25.
[2:43] Now, fast forward to today.
[2:45] Same dollars, same country, same
[2:48] everything, same everything. We didn't
[2:52] move.
[2:54] We didn't change nations. We didn't
[2:56] change currencies. We didn't We the
[2:59] people didn't do anything wrong. We
[3:01] didn't do [ __ ]
[3:04] And the
[3:05] Now, the problem is, well, what's
[3:07] everything cost today? And I'll get more
[3:09] into this in a second. Well, what's a
[3:10] new house today, Jack? It was $23,000 in
[3:13] 1970. What is it today? Well, it
[3:15] depends. What type of house do you want?
[3:17] Do you want to live on Miami Beach or do
[3:20] you want to live in rural Kansas?
[3:24] Well, Jack, what's a new car cost? It
[3:27] used to be $3,400.
[3:29] Well, it depends. Do you want to drive a
[3:31] used Toyota Camry or do you want a
[3:33] Rolls-Royce?
[3:37] You see?
[3:39] So, let's first start back to inflation.
[3:42] Man, this topic gets me wound up. I
[3:44] apologize, but holy moly, it just Once
[3:48] you understand basics, which I really
[3:51] hope this show gives you guys.
[3:53] It should infuriate you what these
[3:55] people have done. Infuriate you.
[3:59] So, there is a group of people
[4:02] that think inflation is good. I This is
[4:05] not This is not satire. I swear to God.
[4:08] Okay?
[4:09] Mainstream economists say inflation is
[4:11] good. And this is what's called
[4:13] Keynesian economics.
[4:15] Now, this is their legitimate claim. And
[4:17] by the way, this is what they teach in
[4:19] school.
[4:21] They teach this in school. This is like
[4:23] if you pay $40,000 of tuition a year to
[4:27] learn economics, this is what you learn.
[4:30] They claim that if money were to hold
[4:32] its value, you would wait to buy things.
[4:37] And they think that's a bad thing. They
[4:39] think delayed gratification and low time
[4:41] preference is bad.
[4:44] So,
[4:45] prices must rise a little bit, which is
[4:48] another way of saying erosion of your
[4:51] purchasing power and erosion of the
[4:53] value of your money
[4:55] must happen a little bit to keep you
[4:57] spending all the time.
[5:00] Therefore,
[5:03] the economy, this whole thing called the
[5:05] economy,
[5:07] can be acting and behaving to our
[5:09] standards.
[5:11] That I Guys, I'm not This is not a joke.
[5:14] I swear to you. This is Keynesian
[5:18] economics on inflation.
[5:20] They say if your currency was hard and
[5:23] held value, well, then you wouldn't wake
[5:25] up and spend all of it every single day.
[5:29] And in order to keep the economy humming
[5:31] and keep keep all of the economic data
[5:33] churning through,
[5:36] we have to inflate things just a little
[5:38] bit so that you're incentivized to spend
[5:40] it today rather than save it for
[5:42] tomorrow.
[5:43] And so,
[5:45] as a result of all of this, someone has
[5:47] to sit at the dial and set the cost of
[5:49] money.
[5:50] That's why Kevin Warsh is there. How
[5:52] dare I disrespect Kevin Warsh?
[5:55] Kevin Warsh is sitting there looking at
[5:57] all this data and analyzing to the
[5:59] perfect tune what the cost of money is
[6:02] and how much my life should be inflated
[6:04] away just so that if I wanted to save
[6:07] money, I shouldn't and I should go out
[6:09] and spend it on on dumb [ __ ]
[6:12] Guys, I I'm not joking. This is quite
[6:15] literally the economic reasoning for
[6:18] inflation. Because you Everyone have
[6:21] heard this. 2% is the inflation target.
[6:23] The target? How about the target is
[6:25] zero? No, no, no. Zero would be too low.
[6:29] Then you would have a low time
[6:30] preference. Then you'd have delayed
[6:31] gratification. Then you would save a lot
[6:34] of money for your future. We can't have
[6:37] that.
[6:39] This is the claim. Now,
[6:42] what is the hard money theory? What is
[6:44] my opinion? What is the opinion of a
[6:46] Bitcoiner? Okay? The opinion is that
[6:50] nobody asks me how badly I want to
[6:54] spend. I want to spend because I'm
[6:56] human. As a human, I naturally want to
[6:58] consume. Kevin Warsh does If Kevin Warsh
[7:02] raises or lowers rates in September, I'm
[7:04] still going to be hungry. I'm still
[7:06] going to want a car rather than walk.
[7:08] I'm still going to want to fly United
[7:10] rather than kayak to Europe. I'm still
[7:12] going to want a penthouse rather than a
[7:14] [ __ ] condo. I'm still going to want to
[7:17] live on Miami beachfront real estate
[7:19] rather than a [ __ ]
[7:22] apartment in in Midwestern America.
[7:26] I want to consume
[7:28] the what I've earned, no matter what
[7:31] Kevin Warsh decides in September. It is
[7:33] so offensive for these people to make
[7:36] the claim that my desire to consume what
[7:40] I've earned is based on their economic
[7:43] phenomena of data analysis that they do
[7:46] in private unauditable.
[7:48] What an what an offensive
[7:52] thing to claim?
[7:55] That they understand the quality of life
[7:58] that I want.
[8:00] No, things need to be inflating in your
[8:02] life, Jack, because trust me, you
[8:05] wouldn't want to be saving for your
[8:06] future. How the [ __ ] do you know what I
[8:09] want?
[8:11] You have no idea if I want to get
[8:13] married next year, how many kids I want,
[8:16] if my family is sick, if I want to move
[8:19] to the suburbs, or if I want to live in
[8:20] an urban city. Who are you to determine
[8:24] my life, my consumption?
[8:27] It's It is It is outrageous.
[8:31] But this is the problem This is the
[8:32] problem that we have
[8:35] from government getting too big and
[8:37] money being essentially planned entry in
[8:40] a database.
[8:42] Sorry, this topic it gets me so wound
[8:45] up. It really bothers me.
[8:48] So, anyways,
[8:50] >> [sighs]
[8:51] >> I that my my claim, the hard money
[8:55] claim, is the opposite of my money
[8:58] should hold the value. Things around me
[9:00] should get cheaper over time, and it is
[9:03] a good thing for me to be saving. It is
[9:06] a good thing for me to have delayed
[9:08] gratification. It is a good thing for me
[9:10] to place a premium on tomorrow. It is
[9:14] It is of a high-functioning society for
[9:16] me to have the belief that tomorrow
[9:18] could be and should be and will be
[9:20] better than today. That is necessary, or
[9:23] else I've made this point a million
[9:25] times, I would just eat donuts and get
[9:28] fat tonight, because who cares about
[9:30] tomorrow? I would get blackout drunk
[9:32] tonight, because who cares about
[9:33] tomorrow? I would spend all my savings
[9:35] tonight, because who cares about
[9:37] tomorrow? And that's a lot of what goes
[9:38] on in society is a discount to tomorrow,
[9:42] an inability to lower their time
[9:43] preference, an inability to delay
[9:45] gratification, high time preference
[9:47] spending, and it just devastation of
[9:51] value today, of health,
[9:54] of wealth, of capital,
[9:56] of family, of everything.
[9:58] It's It's utterly preposterous,
[10:01] honestly.
[10:03] So, to the mechanics of inflation.
[10:06] We must understand this. More money does
[10:09] not create what I call wealth. And by
[10:12] wealth, I mean what's the difference
[10:14] between monetary units and the things
[10:16] that they actually are purchasing. So,
[10:18] what I describe wealth in this slide is
[10:21] food, housing, energy, machinery, labor,
[10:24] software, medicine, transportation.
[10:27] These are the things you can't actually
[10:28] print. Now, monetary units like dollars,
[10:31] you can print. So, what I'm calling is
[10:33] money are claims used to command these
[10:36] resources. So, I have dollars
[10:39] as a as a means to command more food or
[10:42] more housing or more energy. The more
[10:44] dollars that I have, the more I can
[10:46] command these resources. But, by
[10:48] printing more dollars, it does not
[10:50] automatically create more stuff. Meaning
[10:53] this, if I have let's let's take a very
[10:56] simple economy for the sake of the math.
[10:59] If I have 10 real resources in the
[11:01] economy, and I have 10 monetary claims
[11:04] on those resources. Now, let's say I
[11:06] increase the monetary claims by 50%,
[11:10] meaning
[11:11] I go from 10 monetary claims in the
[11:13] economy to 15 monetary claims. I still
[11:16] only have 10 real resources. I cannot
[11:19] print doctors, buildings, cars. I can't
[11:22] print these things.
[11:24] Yes, I can print monetary claims on
[11:27] these things, but I can't print the
[11:28] things.
[11:30] Therefore,
[11:32] here's the the the main point of this is
[11:35] that inflation creates the illusion of
[11:39] productivity and the illusion of growth
[11:42] and the illusion of innovation, but it
[11:44] is no it is not real.
[11:47] It is not real, which causes these boom
[11:49] and bust cycles.
[11:52] Because you can't print all of the
[11:54] things that the money has a claim to,
[11:56] which is what causes the prices to rise.
[11:59] So, I give you this example. Let's say
[12:01] you have 10 bushels of corn, okay?
[12:05] Let's say you plan to eat six and plant
[12:08] four
[12:09] so that you can produce more corn.
[12:10] That's your total of 10.
[12:13] Now,
[12:14] if I could inflate real things,
[12:18] I would say, "You know what? I'm a
[12:20] little more hungry than eating six, but
[12:22] I still want to plant four. So, I've
[12:24] decided to eat seven bushels of corn and
[12:27] plant four." Yeah, but jackass, you
[12:31] can't because that would mean you have
[12:32] 11 bushels of corn, but you don't have
[12:35] 11 bushels of corn. You have 10.
[12:38] So, that's not an option. You have to
[12:40] and we've talked about this in one of
[12:42] the earlier 101 episodes. You have to
[12:43] make these decisions at the margins. You
[12:45] have to decide how hungry are you versus
[12:48] how much do you want to optimize for
[12:50] your future? You can either eat seven
[12:52] and plant three or eat six and plant
[12:54] four, but you have 10 bushels of corn,
[12:58] period. Sorry. And you we must
[13:01] understand the difference between real
[13:03] resources and their inability to be
[13:05] inflated and printed out of thin air
[13:08] versus paper claims that we use as a
[13:11] means to command these real resources.
[13:14] A piece of paper cannot create the 11th
[13:17] bushel of corn. I've talked about this
[13:19] before. One of the things that's
[13:20] happening right now is there's a serious
[13:22] demand for commodities because AI
[13:24] infrastructure is being built all over
[13:26] the world. And guess what you cannot
[13:28] build an AI data center with? You can't
[13:30] build it with silver futures contracts.
[13:33] Turns out you need real silver.
[13:37] And so we've created the illusion
[13:40] that there's an abundance of silver. But
[13:42] when people actually need the real
[13:44] silver,
[13:46] well, there goes the price. There goes
[13:47] the price of gold. There goes the price
[13:49] of Bitcoin.
[13:51] Do you understand?
[13:53] >> [snorts]
[13:53] >> So credit can change who gets the
[13:55] resources, but it cannot create
[13:58] resources themselves. So more credit in
[14:01] the system cannot create another worker
[14:03] in the workforce, it cannot create
[14:05] another acre of land, it cannot create
[14:06] another power plant, it can't create
[14:08] another GPU for AI, it cannot create
[14:10] another barrel of oil.
[14:12] It can create another claim to command
[14:15] these resources, but on a relative
[14:18] basis, this these resources remain
[14:20] relatively fixed.
[14:22] So, this is what happens
[14:24] when they create more money and more
[14:25] credit.
[14:27] That creates more bidding for the same
[14:29] things.
[14:31] So if I have 10 resources in the economy
[14:34] and 10 paper claims against those
[14:36] resources, there's one paper claim per
[14:38] resource.
[14:40] Now if I create 15
[14:43] res- uh paper claims to only 10
[14:45] resources, well now I have more than one
[14:48] paper claim per resource.
[14:51] So, a resource will now be worth more
[14:53] than one paper claim. The price of the
[14:55] resource went up when denominated in
[14:57] paper claims.
[14:59] That is inflation. That's how prices
[15:01] rise.
[15:02] You create more money and more credit,
[15:04] there's more bidding for the same
[15:05] things. That means real supply grows
[15:07] slowly if at all.
[15:10] Sometimes more paper claims will grow
[15:12] the supply of the real stuff because
[15:13] there's more money to produce more. But
[15:15] take Bitcoin for example, you can't make
[15:17] any more Bitcoin. So more paper paper
[15:20] claims just make Bitcoin's price go
[15:22] higher.
[15:23] So, then at the very end, you get
[15:24] adjustment in pricing.
[15:27] Which is Guys, this is why inflation
[15:30] reduces your purchasing power. One
[15:32] monetary paper claim gets you less of
[15:35] the goods it's competing for, the more
[15:37] units that they create.
[15:40] Now, we must understand that inflation
[15:42] is uneven.
[15:44] Okay? This is critically important.
[15:47] Inflation is not spread evenly. Like,
[15:49] okay, we're going to devalue the
[15:50] dollars, but at least everyone feels it
[15:53] evenly and benefits from it evenly. That
[15:56] I wish that was the case. That is not
[15:58] the case. So, first, they create new
[16:00] money and new credit in the system.
[16:02] Then,
[16:04] asset prices rise, government spending
[16:07] increases, lending increases at the
[16:09] fundamental level, like banks are giving
[16:11] out more loans.
[16:12] Only later after that, do wages get
[16:16] impacted, rents get impacted, services
[16:19] get impacted, and then only after that,
[16:22] way after that, do consumer prices get
[16:25] impacted, like the cost of your food.
[16:29] But, let me put it to you guys this way.
[16:32] Let's say the US government is going to
[16:34] print all sorts of money, which they
[16:36] kind of have already started to do.
[16:38] Now, if I was a hedge fund that got
[16:40] access to some of these So,
[16:43] let me Hold on. Let me slow down.
[16:45] Slow down for a second.
[16:48] One way the US government can print
[16:51] money
[16:52] is making it easier to create credit,
[16:54] create loans. So, they can go to the
[16:56] banks and say, "Hey, you can take
[16:58] certain collateral from hedge funds and
[17:01] from Wall Street folks, and treat that
[17:03] collateral as in the money good, no
[17:06] matter what. So, treat all of their
[17:08] treasuries, all of their bonds as in the
[17:10] money good, unlimited leverage against
[17:12] it."
[17:13] Okay, now banks are they're to issue a
[17:15] lot more credit, and that's going to be
[17:17] highly inflationary, and they're
[17:18] creating a lot more monetary claims on
[17:20] the stuff in the economy, right? Like we
[17:21] just went over. But, who gets access to
[17:24] those loans?
[17:26] Does your neighbor? Does your old high
[17:28] school classmate?
[17:31] No.
[17:32] The normal person doesn't get access to
[17:33] that. Who gets access to that? Hedge
[17:35] funds, Wall Street.
[17:38] So, who gets to buy Bitcoin with
[17:40] unlimited leverage with freshly printed
[17:42] currency because of government
[17:45] to buy Bitcoin at 60K? Who gets access
[17:48] to that? Now, by the time all of this
[17:51] spreads through the economy so that your
[17:53] neighbors got the got the
[17:56] inflation-adjusted promotion. Like,
[17:58] "Hey, we gave you a bonus, or we gave
[18:00] you a raise, or we gave you a promotion
[18:02] because inflation." But, they got that
[18:04] promotion 1 year later, 2 years later.
[18:06] Bitcoin is at 250K.
[18:09] So, the hedge funds on Wall Street got
[18:11] to buy Bitcoin at 60K the day that
[18:13] Besant made that announcement.
[18:16] And your neighbor gets to buy Bitcoin
[18:17] with their new promotion bonus, but
[18:19] Bitcoin's at 250K.
[18:23] Well, who got to benefit from inflation?
[18:26] The guy with unlimited leverage at 60K,
[18:28] or your neighbor who's buying the top?
[18:33] You see?
[18:35] So, that's what I I put on this slide.
[18:37] Everyone's money and prices don't reset
[18:40] at the same time. So, your salary once a
[18:43] year, your rent once a year. But, how
[18:46] often do your food prices change?
[18:49] More frequently.
[18:50] How often do home prices change? Every
[18:53] single day. How often do stock prices
[18:55] change?
[18:57] Between market and close. How often does
[18:59] the Bitcoin price change? 24/7/365.
[19:04] You see? Inflation is not even.
[19:07] This is why it's not fair, and this is
[19:09] why everyone must own Bitcoin. Bitcoin
[19:11] is the most sensitive instrument we have
[19:14] access to to monetary liquidity. As soon
[19:18] as money starts getting printed, Bitcoin
[19:20] reacts immediately. So, we all get
[19:22] access to own the thing that performs
[19:25] the best in the face of all of this.
[19:27] Like our neighbor can own Bitcoin, can
[19:29] be DCA'ing even if it's a dollar a week.
[19:34] So,
[19:35] I made this point earlier and I have to
[19:37] reiterate it.
[19:38] Now we get on to well, what's the rate
[19:40] of inflation? When Kevin Warsh says,
[19:42] "Our target is 2%." What is he talking
[19:44] about?
[19:46] Don't even I've already displayed enough
[19:48] emotion on the show. Don't even get me
[19:50] started. Listen, there is no such thing
[19:53] as the inflation rate.
[19:55] Because again, these a-
[19:58] are implying that they know what you
[20:00] want.
[20:02] I'll tell you the inflation rate, but
[20:03] you have to tell me what you want. Do
[20:05] you want to live
[20:07] on the beach in Miami?
[20:09] Or do you want to live in an apartment
[20:11] in rural Kansas?
[20:14] Totally different inflation rates. Do
[20:17] you want to be eating grass-fed ribeyes,
[20:19] or do you want to be eating porridge
[20:21] slop? Totally different inflation rates.
[20:26] Do you want to be driving a Rolls-Royce,
[20:28] or you okay walking?
[20:31] Totally different inflation rates.
[20:35] So, the notion that there is an
[20:37] inflation rate that they can measure
[20:39] implies they know how I want to live.
[20:42] You guys don't know me. You didn't
[20:44] consult with me. You have no right to
[20:46] tell me
[20:48] how I should be saving and how I should
[20:49] be living.
[20:51] Garbage.
[20:53] Manipulative tactical garbage.
[20:56] Sorry.
[20:57] And And you guys don't know, there's a
[20:59] lot of people out there that will ping
[21:00] me and say, "Hey, you got to be careful
[21:02] about how you talk about government on
[21:05] your show, or who you're calling out.
[21:08] That ship has sailed, brother.
[21:11] I'm a man of the people
[21:15] through and through at this point. I've
[21:17] made that decision. That ship is gone.
[21:19] I'm going to call it how I see it. It's
[21:22] garbage. And I'm not saying it's the
[21:24] Trump administration's fault. It's not
[21:25] Besson's fault. It's not Worst's fault.
[21:27] This is decades in the making, but I
[21:29] call it how I see it, garbage.
[21:33] So, what I have here on the slide.
[21:36] How How about learning math? What's the
[21:38] inflation rate for learning math? Well,
[21:40] learning math has gotten
[21:42] incredibly cheap. You can talk to your
[21:44] AI agent in your phone, and you got that
[21:47] app for free. You can look it up on
[21:48] YouTube. So much productivity. There's
[21:51] an abundance of accessible information
[21:54] that can teach you base-level math.
[21:57] That's incredible. Amazing. What about a
[21:59] Caesar salad? Well, a Caesar salad is
[22:03] There's not really inflation. I don't
[22:05] expect there ever to be inflation for a
[22:07] Caesar salad, because that's pleb slop
[22:09] food. That's not real nutrition. If you
[22:12] If what you want to do for the rest of
[22:13] your life is cut leaves off a tree and
[22:15] put dressing on it and call that dinner,
[22:17] then yeah, no inflation. So, if what you
[22:20] want out of your life is to learn math
[22:22] and eat leaves off a tree, no inflation.
[22:24] You're good.
[22:26] What about things like college tuition?
[22:28] College tuition could be considered
[22:30] learning math. No, no, no, no, but I
[22:32] mean, I wanted to join a fraternity, and
[22:34] I wanted to go to football games, and I
[22:36] wanted to learn more than just
[22:37] mathematics, and I wanted to build
[22:39] towards a career, and I wanted to have
[22:40] relationship with professors, and I
[22:42] wanted to meet who my future wife and
[22:44] the future mother of my children is
[22:45] going to be. That's what I meant by
[22:47] learning math. Oh, that learning math?
[22:49] Oh, well, this is why you must be
[22:51] specific.
[22:52] If you want to learn math, go on
[22:53] YouTube. Oh, you want to go to college.
[22:56] Oh, yeah, no, no, no. The inflation rate
[22:58] of that is
[22:59] tens of percent a year.
[23:01] Okay. What about health care? Well, if
[23:03] you just eat salad every single meal and
[23:06] you don't give yourself proper nutrition
[23:07] and you get disease. Oh, okay. So, you
[23:10] are willing to eat salad, but you're not
[23:12] willing to just be malnourished and die.
[23:14] Oh, yeah, well, health care that that's
[23:16] that's really really expensive. So, you
[23:18] tell me what you want and I'll tell you
[23:19] the inflation rate. So, anytime anyone
[23:21] says, "Oh, I know the inflation rate."
[23:23] Liars. Liar, liar, liar. They don't know
[23:26] what you want. They don't know what you
[23:27] want to consume. I'll tell you the
[23:29] inflation rate. The inflation rate is
[23:30] very easy to measure. Think about
[23:32] Bitcoin. I want Bitcoin.
[23:34] What's the inflation rate of Bitcoin?
[23:36] Well, it's its CAGR. Bitcoin goes up 40%
[23:38] a year on average.
[23:40] So, unless I'm getting a 41% raise every
[23:43] single year
[23:44] in Bitcoin terms, I'm not going to be
[23:46] able to acquire the same amount of
[23:47] Bitcoin every single year.
[23:50] When I got into Bitcoin over a decade
[23:51] ago, I was able to buy a lot more
[23:54] Bitcoin than I can today.
[23:56] Of course.
[23:57] I'm not making as much money in Bitcoin
[24:00] terms than I was years ago. Hundreds of
[24:02] thousands of Bitcoins was the average of
[24:05] was the was one average home when I got
[24:07] into Bitcoin. Now, an average home's
[24:09] like three Bitcoins.
[24:12] So, right?
[24:14] I'll tell you the inflation rate. Tell
[24:16] me what you want. Oh, you don't want to
[24:17] save in Bitcoin. You want to save in
[24:20] pleb slot bonds. Oh, inflation rate's
[24:22] not bad. You're good.
[24:25] You're good.
[24:27] So,
[24:29] who gets the money This is the
[24:30] Cantillion effect. Who gets the money
[24:31] first matters, obviously, because if
[24:34] they're going to create new currency,
[24:35] whoever gets it first wins, cuz they get
[24:38] to spend it before the prices have
[24:39] adjusted. They get to buy Bitcoin at
[24:41] 60K. They get to buy all the eggs before
[24:43] the price goes up. They get to hoard all
[24:45] the beef before the price of beef goes
[24:46] up. Whoever gets the money late
[24:49] has to consume the adjusted prices.
[24:52] This is why it's so unfair and it's so
[24:54] uneven.
[24:56] So, if you owe a fixed amount of
[24:59] dollars, weaker currency can help. This
[25:01] ties it back to the macro section.
[25:04] If my debt is fixed in dollar terms, and
[25:07] the dollar is getting weaker, well, then
[25:09] it's easier to earn that amount of
[25:11] dollars to pay the debt back. You
[25:12] understand?
[25:14] Let me go all the way back to the 1970
[25:17] slide.
[25:18] In 1970, the cost or the average income
[25:22] was $9,400,
[25:23] guys.
[25:26] Crazy.
[25:28] So, meaning
[25:31] And today, what's the average income? I
[25:33] don't know the answer. But, how easy is
[25:35] it to make $9,400 today?
[25:39] It's not that hard, right?
[25:42] Relative It In 1970, it took you a whole
[25:45] year to make $9,400.
[25:47] Today,
[25:49] it takes you less than a year to make
[25:50] $9,400. So, by making the dollar cheaper
[25:54] and devaluing it and debasing it, it's
[25:56] easier to pay back debt. Let's say I
[25:58] owed someone $9,400, and that's been
[26:01] fixed since 1970. Well, it used to take
[26:04] me a year to earn that and pay them
[26:05] back. Now, it does not take me nearly a
[26:07] year. You understand? So,
[26:09] that is why governments try and have
[26:12] their expenses fixed in dollars and then
[26:15] devalue the dollar, it's easier for them
[26:17] to pay it back. That's that whole
[26:19] debt-to-GDP concept. We've already went
[26:21] over that.
[26:22] Um so,
[26:23] in this situation,
[26:26] where the dollar is getting inflated,
[26:28] and inflation is happening in our lives,
[26:30] and especially when they're fixing the
[26:32] cost they're willing to pay on their
[26:34] debt,
[26:35] who loses? The lender and the currency
[26:38] holders.
[26:39] Your claim You lent them money, and they
[26:41] owe you money back. What the The claim
[26:44] that they owe you back is going to get
[26:45] you less stuff by the time they pay you
[26:48] back, because they're going to have
[26:49] inflated it away, and the inflation's
[26:51] going to be rising faster than the yield
[26:53] that they're paying you.
[26:55] So, in this era, I cannot stress enough
[26:59] and I know and I know people are saying
[27:00] you can't say that, the government's
[27:02] going to be pissed if they hear you. I
[27:03] don't care.
[27:05] I just I'm telling the truth. This is
[27:07] either freedom of speech or we're not
[27:09] living in the America I thought.
[27:12] Do not own bonds.
[27:14] Do not own the dollar.
[27:16] This is why we own Bitcoin.
[27:19] They cannot Think of Bitcoin like a bond
[27:22] that has zero yield but infinite price
[27:25] that no one can control. That's what I
[27:27] want to own. Your yield. I don't give a
[27:29] [ __ ] about your yield. You're not going
[27:30] to pay me the yield of the inflation
[27:31] rate anyway. I'm not expecting you to
[27:33] make me whole on yield. I want something
[27:36] that floats truly in a free market in
[27:38] the dollar price.
[27:40] So, that when you print money and it
[27:41] goes up 25% in 3 days, just like that.
[27:44] That's what I want to own.
[27:46] So, I will not own dollars and I will
[27:48] not lend you guys money. 0% chance. And
[27:50] the people that that's continue to hold
[27:52] dollars and continue to lend the
[27:53] government money, those are the losers.
[27:56] Now, quickly to end this whole episode,
[27:58] let's talk about what would the world
[28:00] look like on a Bitcoin standard? Can
[28:02] living on a Bitcoin standard fix this?
[28:04] The answer is yes.
[28:06] So,
[28:07] back to basics. What happens when demand
[28:09] for money rises? Well, in a soft money
[28:12] system, when demand for money rises,
[28:14] they can just print more money. So,
[28:16] right now, Scott Bessent really needs
[28:18] more money. People aren't willing to
[28:19] lend him money. What can he do? He can
[28:22] just print his own money. And what does
[28:24] that do? That results in inflation,
[28:26] which we just went over very
[28:28] straightforward from a first principles
[28:29] basis. And these guys are inventing
[28:31] metrics like the inflation rate, and
[28:32] they're telling you you need inflation
[28:35] or or else you'd save. How offensive is
[28:37] that? God, I can't get over that. We
[28:39] design inflation in the system or else
[28:41] you'd save for your future.
[28:44] you guys. So, they force you to spend.
[28:48] They they supposedly
[28:50] understand what quality of life you want
[28:52] and what goods and services you want to
[28:54] consume.
[28:56] Utterly and completely ridiculous all of
[28:58] that. That's what a soft money standard
[29:00] is. Now, on a Bitcoin standard, I'm not
[29:02] even going to call Bitcoin a hard money
[29:04] standard because it's a fixed money
[29:06] standard. A hard money standard would be
[29:07] gold. But you can still create more
[29:09] gold. A fixed money standard. Demand
[29:11] goes up and you cannot print the money.
[29:13] If what Scott Bessent needed was Bitcoin
[29:16] and not dollars, he'd have to go buy it
[29:18] from guys like me. He can't print
[29:22] Oh, you want Bitcoin, Scott?
[29:24] Offer me a good price and maybe, just
[29:27] maybe, I'll go into cold storage and
[29:30] sell you a little bit of mine.
[29:33] That's That's the money that I want. You
[29:35] can't just print it out of thin air. You
[29:37] got to go get it from the market.
[29:40] So, again, gold is hard
[29:43] because
[29:45] it's harder to produce gold than it is
[29:47] dollars, but it's not fixed. So, the
[29:49] gold price goes up, you have more
[29:51] incentive to mine gold, but mining takes
[29:53] time, it takes capital, it takes energy,
[29:55] it takes geology, it takes it takes
[29:58] humans collaborating and unifying.
[30:01] So, the supply of gold does respond
[30:04] and gold typically inflates at about 2%
[30:06] a year. So, the reason gold has been a
[30:08] great money is because 2% is reasonable
[30:11] and if the things around you are
[30:12] inflating 2%, then gold should be
[30:14] relatively fixed price. You know, it was
[30:16] it was like a flat rock for a very long
[30:18] time. But Bitcoin is even different than
[30:21] that because if its price goes up and
[30:23] its demand goes up and mining
[30:24] competition goes up, the issuance
[30:26] doesn't change. The issuance is
[30:28] determined by the protocol because of
[30:30] the difficulty adjustment when Satoshi
[30:32] started the network. It doesn't matter.
[30:34] None of that matters. So, life on the
[30:36] Bitcoin I want to talk about this. Life
[30:38] on the Bitcoin standard in the age of
[30:39] AI.
[30:41] So,
[30:42] AI is going to create an abundance of
[30:44] more stuff. Elon talks about this all
[30:45] the time, and it's true. Think about it.
[30:47] Housing. We're going to be able to build
[30:49] faster and cheaper housing because of
[30:52] AI, because of humanoids and robots.
[30:54] Medicine. People are coming up with
[30:56] cures to cancer already.
[30:58] Crazy. So, we're going to be able to
[31:00] create a lot of more drugs, a lot of
[31:02] more medical care, a lot of more medical
[31:03] solutions. We're all going to be way
[31:04] more informed on how to be healthy.
[31:07] We're going to know what to eat, when to
[31:08] eat it, how to work out.
[31:11] We're going to be able to measure our
[31:12] bodies much better. What about energy?
[31:14] We're going to have way more energy, an
[31:16] abundance of energy because of AI. What
[31:18] about education?
[31:20] We're all much smarter, much more
[31:23] educated. We have access to much more
[31:24] information because of AI. So, this is
[31:26] an abundance of real resources. Remember
[31:29] back when I said there's real resources,
[31:31] and then there's monetary claims on
[31:33] those resources.
[31:34] We're Humans are constantly innovating.
[31:37] It's actually a shame that we live in an
[31:39] in an era of inflation because we are
[31:41] constantly producing more resources for
[31:43] ourselves, but they're printing more
[31:45] money than we're making new resources,
[31:47] which is crazy. It's It's absolutely
[31:50] absurd. If we had a fixed money, then
[31:53] everything around you would go down in
[31:55] price because you're producing more
[31:56] resources than money. Think of it that
[31:58] way. Which one's growing faster?
[32:01] Resources for all of us or money? And
[32:03] creating more resources is just
[32:04] innovating, like using AI to make
[32:07] housing more affordable and more
[32:08] efficient and build it better, or more
[32:10] medicine, or more energy, or more
[32:12] education. That's creating more
[32:14] resources in the economy, but they're
[32:15] creating more money more than we're
[32:17] creating resources. But, on a Bitcoin
[32:19] standard, there's only 21 million, and
[32:21] that's it.
[32:23] So, as the world gets more productive
[32:25] and produces more stuff, that stuff is
[32:27] competing for the fixed 21 million sats.
[32:31] So, it's not Bitcoin competing for
[32:33] stuff, it's an increasing amount of
[32:35] stuff
[32:36] that's competing for Bitcoins.
[32:39] All of human pro
[32:40] I I've said before I've now I don't know
[32:42] if I've ever been able to explain this
[32:44] quote, but I've had this quote that is
[32:46] owning Bitcoin allows me to be long
[32:48] humanity. And what I mean by that is all
[32:50] of human progress competes for a fixed
[32:52] amount of Bitcoins. Oh great, someone
[32:55] invented AI? Well, guess who gets to
[32:56] benefit from that? Me. I do. Because
[33:00] they can't print more money than humans
[33:02] are making cool [ __ ] with AI. So, all of
[33:04] this progress that's going to be made
[33:06] with AI is going to have to compete for
[33:08] the fixed amount of sats and I got mine
[33:10] and I buy my more every single day in
[33:13] cold storage.
[33:15] So, on a soft money world, you have a
[33:17] relatively fixed amount of resources in
[33:19] a growing amount of monetary claims. The
[33:21] money grows faster than the resources,
[33:24] which causes inflation.
[33:26] On a Bitcoin standard, you have a
[33:29] relatively growing amount of resources.
[33:32] So, on a relative basis, which one's
[33:33] growing faster? Resources grow faster
[33:35] than the monetary claims.
[33:38] So, you get to benefit from human human
[33:40] innovation, human productivity, from a
[33:42] growth in resources. That means prices
[33:45] fall. When I got into Bitcoin, my dream
[33:48] house was hundreds of thousands of
[33:50] Bitcoins.
[33:51] Today, my dream house is like five or
[33:54] whatever. I don't What's the price?
[33:56] 80,000?
[33:57] Your dream house is 10 Bitcoins.
[34:01] What are we talking about?
[34:03] So, every single year my life gets
[34:06] cheaper because of the money I use. You
[34:09] have to understand this. Not because I'm
[34:11] better than anyone else, not because I'm
[34:12] smarter than anyone else, not because
[34:14] I'm faster or I'm stronger, none of
[34:16] that. Simply because I use a money they
[34:19] can't make more of.
[34:21] As long as my money is not growing
[34:23] faster than the resources that I want to
[34:25] consume, I win. I win. It's that simple,
[34:29] guys.
[34:31] So, my life is getting cheaper because
[34:33] we as humanity got better.
[34:36] That's it.
[34:39] I get to benefit from human innovation.
[34:42] That's it.
[34:46] So, it's a fixed amount of Bitcoin and
[34:48] as humans continue to innovate and build
[34:50] cool [ __ ] more stuff.
[34:52] That's it.
[34:56] So, anyway, and [clears throat] I mean I
[34:59] already made this point, the dollar
[35:01] system can have rate changes and credit
[35:02] expansion and fiscal spending and
[35:04] buybacks and balance sheet and liquidity
[35:06] programs and all this nonsense. If
[35:09] Bessant wants more Bitcoin, there's only
[35:11] one place to get it, the market. The
[35:15] market. He can spin up as many miners as
[35:17] he wants. The difficulty will adjust and
[35:20] he'll get a block on average about every
[35:23] 10 minutes.
[35:27] That's it. That's the system that I
[35:28] want.
[35:29] That's the system we deserve, by the
[35:31] way.
[35:32] These people telling me, "Well, without
[35:33] any inflation, you'd save money." Yeah,
[35:36] I'd save money.
[35:37] And I'd have kids and I'd have a big
[35:39] yard and I'd have a nice car.
[35:43] You guys.
[35:48] So,
[35:49] that's what I'll leave you guys with. A
[35:51] little bit of macro, a little bit of
[35:53] one-on-one inflation from first
[35:54] principles, and then what what money
[35:56] would you want to own?
[35:58] And what money do you want your parents
[35:59] to own and your friends to own and your
[36:01] colleagues to own?
[36:03] And again, it ta- it takes time to have
[36:06] to build the conviction to go all in on
[36:08] Bitcoin like me.
[36:11] But owning zero Bitcoin to me is a
[36:13] bigger risk than owning any at all.
[36:17] You got majority of the world out there
[36:19] flying blind, sitting in dollars and
[36:22] government bonds, and they're going to
[36:24] get crushed. I just walked you guys
[36:26] through the math.
[36:27] These guys have to implement some form
[36:30] of yield curve control and let inflation
[36:32] run. I promise you. Or we're living
[36:35] through some form of austerity or
[36:36] something equally as insane. But it it
[36:40] seemed like this was always going to be
[36:42] the answer according to the math and now
[36:44] Bessent and these guys are effectively
[36:46] communicating it. That's why Bitcoin has
[36:48] started to move. That's why this bear
[36:50] market looks like it might be ending.
[36:51] And if this is what's happening, you
[36:53] guys think you've seen a bull market in
[36:55] 2025? I promise you you haven't. I
[36:58] promise you you have not.
[37:00] Cuz we would get real money printing. In
[37:03] 2025, the Fed was still shrinking their
[37:06] balance sheet. We were still living
[37:07] through monetary tightening.
[37:12] So,
[37:13] in summary, no man should work for what
[37:15] another man can print. That is the case
[37:18] for Bitcoin. Period.