Jordi Visser / VisserLabs

The Edge Awakens: Why the Physical AI Upgrade Is Still in the First Inning [vGemma]

🇬🇧 EN🇪🇸 ES
AIMacroMarketsTrading
47:43 min youtube 2026 Semana 17 🇪🇸 ES

TL;DR

  • La IA física es el motor real: El enfoque se está moviendo de la nube y el software a las inversiones masivas en infraestructura, energía y componentes físicos (chips, fibra óptica).
  • Semiconductores son el nuevo rey: Los semiconductores representan ahora un 17% del S&P 500. La tesis es alcista en chips de potencia e infraestructura, mientras se advierte sobre la debilidad del software SaaS tradicional.
  • Riesgos y Oportunidades: Existe una severa escasez de capacidad física (DRAM, energía) que impulsa precios al alza, pero también hay riesgos macroeconómicos por inflación (>4% CPI) y concentración excesiva en el crecimiento del MAG 7.

Resumen

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vh3m4SNoj4  |  Duración: 47 min


◆ La Tesis Central: El Despertar de la IA Física

El análisis se centra en un cambio fundamental: dejar atrás el enfoque puramente basado en software y migrar hacia la actualización física del mundo con Inteligencia Artificial. Esto requiere inversiones colosales, cercanas a los 90 billones de dólares (según Jensen Huang), enfocadas en elementos pesados como la energía, fibra óptica y componentes físicos.

⚠️ Alerta Crítica de Inversión: Se recomienda no perder tiempo intentando adivinar los mínimos en el sector del software o comparando acciones específicas (Nvidia vs. Marvell/Intel). El tema está en sus etapas iniciales y, a pesar de gráficos parabólicos, se esperan retrocesos severos.

▶ Dominio Sectorial: Semiconductores y la Pirámide de Jensen

Los semiconductores han pasado de ser un sector secundario a representar el 17% del S&P 500, consolidándose como el peso más grande en GICS nivel dos. Esto confirma una reestructuración económica donde la base fundamental es la energía y los chips.

Jensen Huang describe su concepto del "pastel de cinco capas":

  • Base Fundamental: Energía y Chips (la inversión física).
  • Niveles Superiores: Modelos avanzados, aplicaciones digitales, biología digital y robótica.

★ Estrategia de Inversión: Alcista en Infraestructura, Cauteloso en Software

La canasta temática enfocada en la era agentica ha mostrado un crecimiento significativo. Sin embargo, el orador advierte enfáticamente que el código-based SaaS tradicional es una inversión "muerta" y no debe buscarse reversión a la media.

📈 Recomendaciones de Acción:

  • Ser alcista en semiconductores e infraestructura para capitalizar la necesidad de gasto en cómputo.
  • Mantener corto (posición bajista) en los hyperscalers, ya que actúan como lastre debido a su peso en modelos antiguos dentro del S&P 500.

â–º El Auge Industrial Impulsado por la Paranoia de IA

La economía industrial está experimentando un auge impulsado por el gasto en capital generado por la carrera global de la IA. Los indicadores confirman esta fortaleza:

  • Los envíos ferroviarios, químicos y el tonelaje de camiones están en máximos históricos.
  • La relación entre importaciones de bienes de capital respecto a consumo ha vuelto a niveles récord de 1991.

📊 Concentración de Ingresos del S&P

Los ingresos del S&P están altamente concentrados en tecnología y energía, con Micron + Exxon + Chevron + Broadcom representando el 85% de las revisiones. El crecimiento del MAG 7 depende casi exclusivamente de Nvidia.

⚡ Desafíos Macroeconómicos y Cuellos de Botella Físicos

⚠️ Riesgo Inflacionario y Operacional: Se predice que el IPC superará el 4%, respaldado por PMI de servicios en máximos desde 2022. La demanda física está generando cuellos de botella críticos (capacidad DRAM, energía ERCOT), lo que aumenta la volatilidad del mercado a pesar del crecimiento imparable de la IA.

🔬 Escasez vs. Abundancia

La economía actual se caracteriza por una abundancia de ideas y una severa escasez de capacidad física para la IA. La demanda proyecta el mercado de CPUs agenticas hasta los $100 mil millones en 2030, pero está limitada por la capacidad DRAM.

⚙️ El Cambio a la Inferencia y la Eficiencia (Edge AI)

La demanda industrial muestra una recuperación impulsada por las cargas de trabajo de IA que penetran en formatos de borde (robots, vehículos autónomos). Este es un mercado muy temprano. La clave no es el crecimiento del PIB, sino la rotación dentro del volumen de unidades existentes.

💡 Avances Tecnológicos Clave:

  • Texas Instruments impulsa la tendencia expandiendo microcontroladores para IA en dispositivos de borde con mayor eficiencia energética.
  • Los semiconductores de potencia están repuntando tras cinco años de estancamiento, impulsados por el gasto masivo (Capex) de gigantes como OpenAI, Anthropic, Tesla y SpaceX.
  • La urgencia energética obliga a la eficiencia: Nvidia promueve arquitecturas DC de 800V, disparando la demanda en componentes ópticos y fotónicos de silicio (ej. Coherent, Corning, Marvell).

â‚¿ Bitcoin y Activos Alternativos

Se espera que Bitcoin alcance un objetivo entre $95k y $100k pronto debido a la ruptura de correlación e inflación inminente. El orador sugiere aumentar la ponderación de Bitcoin como activo de crecimiento hacia fin de año.

🪙 Proxy de Crecimiento:

Se presenta un proxy de Bitcoin compuesto por Qs (software), oro y cobre, mostrando una configuración de recuperación a largo plazo.

✅ Recomendaciones Adicionales:

  • Revisar ETFs relacionados con stablecoins y tokenización.
  • Invertir en industrias, materiales y semiconductores, no solo en software tradicional.

â—† Buscar el alpha

La tesis central es que la IA está entrando en una fase de "actualización física" masiva ($90 billones), lo cual obliga a un cambio de régimen de capital: el dinero se mueve del software y los modelos abstractos (hyperscalers) hacia los componentes físicos, la energía, los materiales industriales y la infraestructura crítica.

  • Rotación de Capital Primaria: El foco debe estar en semiconductores de potencia, industrias pesadas y materiales (cobre), ya que estos son el cuello de botella físico del crecimiento de IA, no solo en el software.
  • Evitar/Cortar: Se califica como un "negocio muerto" invertir en código SaaS tradicional basado en modelos antiguos; además, se recomienda mantener cautela o estar corto en los hyperscalers debido a su peso en infraestructuras arcaicas.
  • El Catalizador de la Rotación: La demanda no viene solo del crecimiento nominal del PIB, sino de ciclos de actualización interna y la necesidad urgente de eficiencia (ej. arquitecturas DC de 800V), impulsando componentes ópticos y fotónicos de silicio.
  • Expresión Temática Superior: El verdadero motor es el "Edge AI" y la inferencia en dispositivo, lo que impulsa a empresas como Texas Instruments y Intel más allá del crecimiento tradicional de CPU/GPU.
  • Hedge de Crecimiento: Bitcoin se presenta no solo como una apuesta especulativa, sino como un proxy de crecimiento (junto con oro y cobre) para capturar la inflación inminente y el impulso macroeconómico hacia fin de año.
Activo/Sector Señal de Capital Lectura Clave
Semiconductores de Potencia Fuerte Alcista (Breakout) Repunte después de cinco años, impulsado por Edge AI.
Industrias/Materiales Pesados Alcista (Boom Industrial) Confirmado por máximos históricos en tonelaje de camiones y envíos ferroviarios.
Bitcoin Compra/Aumento Ponderación Objetivo $95k-$100k, proxy de crecimiento y protección inflacionaria.
La vuelta de tuerca: El mercado superficial ve la IA como una historia de crecimiento de ingresos en el software. La visión profunda es que esta IA está creando un colapso de capacidad física (DRAM, energía) y forzando una rotación masiva hacia los proveedores de infraestructura dura. Los cuellos de botella físicos son ahora el principal factor limitante del TAM de la IA, no la velocidad de procesamiento en sí misma.

► Resumen por capítulos

Setup: Why the physical upgrade theme is the real trade. Credits to the Craig Fuller and Dylan Patel podcasts this week, both are must-listens for this framework. (0:00)

El orador introducirá temas importantes basándose en dos podcasts escuchados esta semana, uno con Craig Fuller y otro con Dylan Patel. El enfoque principal es la actualización física de la inteligencia artificial. Este concepto implica dejar el mundo de la nube y del software para enfocarse en el mundo físico. Se menciona que se necesitarán enormes inversiones, como los 90 billones de dólares mencionados por Jensen Huang, para actualizar el mundo físico con IA. Los portafolios temáticos están centrados en elementos pesados de energía, fibra óptica y componentes físicos. El orador advierte que este tema está en sus etapas iniciales y aunque hay gráficos parabólicos, habrá retrocesos severos. Recomienda no perder tiempo intentando adivinar los mínimos en el sector del software o comparando acciones específicas como Nvidia frente a Marvell o Intel.

Semis now 17% of the S&P and the largest level-2 GICS weight; Jensen's "five-layer cake" and the $90T physical AI buildout against a $120T global economy. (2:12)

Los semiconductores representan ahora el 17% del S&P 500 y constituyen el peso más grande en la clasificación GICS nivel dos. Este crecimiento es sustancial, ya que anteriormente era el software el sector dominante. El valor actual de este segmento ronda los diez billones de dólares, con Nvidia, Broadcom y Micron liderando gran parte de ese mercado. Se anticipa un rápido crecimiento para otras empresas del sector durante los próximos cinco años o décadas. Jensen Huang reiteró su concepto del "pastel de cinco capas". La base fundamental de esta estructura son la energía y los chips. Los niveles superiores se enfocan en modelos, aplicaciones avanzadas, biología digital y robótica.

Thematic basket up 34% since Opus 4.5; code-based SaaS is a dead trade, not a mean-reversion. Hyperscalers are the funding vehicle as they spend to chase ROIC while semis rip. (3:52)

El orador presenta una canasta temática enfocada en la era agentica, que ha mostrado un crecimiento significativo desde el lanzamiento de Opus 4.5. Advierte enfáticamente contra invertir en software SaaS tradicional, calificándolo como algo muerto y negando la existencia de reversión a la media para este tipo de códigos. Considera que el S&P 500 y los hyperscalers actúan como lastre debido a su peso en modelos antiguos. La estrategia recomendada es ser alcista en semiconductores e infraestructura, mientras se mantiene corto en los hyperscalers. Esta inversión busca capitalizar la necesidad de gasto en cómputo. Los semiconductores están directamente ligados al ROIC y la adopción que impulsan las grandes tecnológicas.

Craig Fuller flips from November bear to full bull, rail, chemicals, truck tonnage, and flatbed rejections at or near records. Capital goods imports relative to consumer at 1991 highs confirm the AI-paranoia industrial boom. (6:32)

La economía industrial está experimentando un auge impulsado por la paranoia global sobre la carrera de la IA y el gasto en capital. El experto Craig Fuller ha cambiado su postura, pasando de ser bajista a extremadamente alcista. Los indicadores de transporte confirman esta fortaleza: los envíos ferroviarios, químicos y el tonelaje de camiones están en máximos históricos. Las rechazos de plataformas planas indican una capacidad nula y cero holgura en la cadena logística. La relación entre las importaciones de bienes de capital respecto a los bienes de consumo ha vuelto a niveles récord de 1991. Esto confirma un auge industrial que no se basa en ciclos tradicionales como el inmobiliario o automotriz. Por ello, se recomienda invertir en industrias, materiales y semiconductores mientras se mantiene cautela con las grandes empresas de IA (hyperscalers).

CPI path above 4% with services PMI at the highest level since 2022, negative real yields return; fiscal stimulus from the One Big Beautiful Bill compounds the pressure. (12:27)

El orador predice que el IPC superará el 4%, respaldado por los índices PMI de servicios en su nivel más alto desde 2022, lo que indica una fuerte demanda industrial y tecnológica. El estímulo fiscal proveniente de la nueva legislación está intensificando esta presión inflacionaria, aunque se espera un retorno a rendimientos reales negativos si el IPC supera dicho umbral. Los mercados de materias primas muestran fortaleza; la industria del cobre es optimista sobre nuevos máximos históricos y China importó su mayor cantidad de plata en marzo. El mercado laboral se mantiene estable con cuatro semanas consecutivas de crecimiento, lo que aumenta el riesgo de una reacción agresiva por parte de la Reserva Federal. Esta combinación de inflación creciente y un mercado laboral sólido podría generar nerviosismo en los mercados financieros.

The Edge Awakens: Texas Instruments flags industrial and edge-AI recovery; Intel breaks out 20%+ on CPU pull-through. Upgrade cycles don't need GDP growth, they need rotation inside the same unit volume. (16:55)

La demanda industrial está mostrando una recuperación general, con las cargas de trabajo de IA penetrando en formatos de borde como robots y vehículos autónomos. Texas Instruments está impulsando esta tendencia expandiendo su portafolio de microcontroladores para habilitar la IA en dispositivos de borde con mayor eficiencia energética. Intel también experimenta un crecimiento significativo en la demanda de CPUs gracias a los despliegues de IA empresarial que dependen de sistemas basados en CPU. El enfoque se está moviendo hacia la inferencia en el dispositivo, lo cual es considerado una etapa muy temprana del mercado. Un punto clave es que las mejoras no requieren necesariamente un alto crecimiento del PIB. Es posible lograr un gran impacto mediante ciclos de actualización o rotación dentro del volumen de unidades existentes. Los inversores a menudo pasan por alto este ciclo de mejora física al enfocarse demasiado en el crecimiento nominal del PIB.

Power semis breakout after five flat years. OpenAI, Anthropic, Tesla, and SpaceX capex numbers revised materially higher; ERCOT peak demand already at capacity limits. (20:10)

Los semiconductores de potencia están experimentando un fuerte repunte después de cinco años de estancamiento, impulsados por la demanda de IA en el borde. Las empresas como Intel y Texas Instruments son ejemplos clave de este crecimiento acelerado. Los números de gasto de las grandes compañías se están revisando al alza significativamente. Además de los hyperscalers, gigantes como OpenAI, Anthropic, SpaceX y Tesla han anunciado aumentos masivos en su inversión en capital. Esta demanda es tan grande que está llevando la capacidad máxima de la red eléctrica ERCOT a sus límites. El orador subraya que este sector se encuentra en una etapa muy temprana de un proceso tecnológico de largo plazo.

Nvidia's 800V DC push in South Korea; optical and silicon photonics as the efficiency story. Coherent, Lumentum, Corning, and Marvell all in the mix. (23:05)

La demanda de infraestructura para la IA está creciendo exponencialmente, pero existe un grave cuello de botella en la disponibilidad y capacidad energética de los centros de datos. La creciente necesidad eléctrica obliga a que la eficiencia se convierta en una prioridad crítica para el sector. Nvidia ha promovido activamente arquitecturas DC de 800V en Corea del Sur buscando minimizar las pérdidas de conversión de potencia. Esta urgencia por la eficiencia está impulsando una gran demanda en componentes ópticos y fotónicos de silicio. Empresas como Coherent, Corning y Marvell son líderes clave en esta área tecnológica. La industria se encuentra en una carrera para lograr el cómputo necesario sin depender únicamente del aumento masivo de consumo energético.

Dylan Patel: abundance of ideas, scarcity of physical compute. DRAM capacity must double or triple; agentic CPU TAM tracking to $100B by 2030. (27:17)

La economía actual se caracteriza por una abundancia de ideas y un severo escasez de capacidad física para la IA. La demanda está explotando, impulsada por el cambio a la inferencia y la necesidad de agentes de IA, lo que proyecta el mercado de CPUs agenticas hasta los 100 mil millones de dólares en 2030. Sin embargo, el ecosistema se está tensando debido a cuellos de botella críticos como la capacidad DRAM, materiales semiconductores y limitaciones de energía en los centros de datos. Se espera que la demanda sea tan masiva que fuerce un aumento drástico de precios para destruir la oferta. A nivel macroeconómico, las disrupciones geopolíticas están generando choques de petróleo e inflación alimentaria debido a problemas con fertilizantes. Aunque el crecimiento de la IA es imparable, los analistas advierten sobre una alta volatilidad y posibles correcciones del mercado debido a estos cuellos de botella en la producción física.

S&P earnings concentration: Micron + Exxon + Chevron + Broadcom = 85% of revisions. MAG 7 ex-Nvidia earnings growth only 6.4%. Russell 1000 Growth in permanent reversal; Salesforce -9% on IBM print; Medallia private credit default wipes $5.1B. (34:58)

Los ingresos del S&P están altamente concentrados en tecnología y energía, con Micron y Exxon/Chevron/Broadcom representando la mayor parte de las revisiones. El crecimiento del MAG 7 depende casi exclusivamente de Nvidia; sin ella, el crecimiento es marginal. La adopción de IA enfrenta problemas serios debido a que la infraestructura corporativa actual es demasiado arcaica para manejar el ritmo acelerado del progreso tecnológico. Por ello, el orador advierte que el crecimiento tradicional en índices como Russell 1000 está experimentando una reversión permanente. Se enfatiza que la inversión debe centrarse en semiconductores, energía y materiales, no solo en software. El sector de software es vulnerable a menos que demuestre cómo su IA compensa los modelos basados en asientos. Además, se señala un riesgo significativo de incumplimiento en el crédito privado, como lo demuestra el caso Medallia.

Bitcoin bottom in place with MACD weeklies turning, $95–100K target if it runs. The Bitcoin proxy (Qs + gold + copper) shows the catch-up setup into year-end; stablecoin and tokenization ETFs worth a look. (44:37)

Se espera que Bitcoin alcance un objetivo de entre $95k y $100k pronto debido a la ruptura de correlación y la inflación inminente. Los indicadores económicos como los PMIs están confirmando una tendencia al alza, lo cual es positivo para el mercado tras el shock del petróleo. El orador destaca que Bitcoin no está en un gráfico parabólico, ofreciendo una oportunidad de compra poderosa en 2024. Se presenta un proxy de Bitcoin compuesto por Qs (software), oro y cobre, mostrando una configuración de recuperación a largo plazo. Por ello, se recomienda aumentar la ponderación de Bitcoin como activo de crecimiento hacia fin de año. Además, se sugiere revisar ETFs relacionados con stablecoins y tokenización.

Generado con algoritmo v1-chunked · modelo google/gemma-4-e4b · 2026-04-28T13:48:00Z

Transcripción

[0:00] Uh,
[0:01] I will be
[0:02] flying out Friday. So, these There's
[0:06] going to There's not I'm not going to
[0:07] recap the week since I won't be here for
[0:10] the the end of it despite where things
[0:12] are trading this morning. Uh, but this
[0:14] is an important one in my opinion for
[0:17] you guys because I am going to spend
[0:18] time on some themes that I've talked
[0:20] about but try to put them into context
[0:22] for the most part around one
[0:25] or two podcasts that I listened to this
[0:27] week. One with Craig Fuller, one with
[0:30] Dylan Patel. That I know I give you guys
[0:34] the podcast info. You can read the
[0:35] summary. I give you the YouTube side,
[0:37] but I highly recommend listening at
[0:39] least to the Craig Fuller one. The Dylan
[0:42] Patel one, if you've listened to other
[0:44] ones in the past, it's very similar. So,
[0:46] but this is really about the physical
[0:48] upgrade is here now. So, that was the um
[0:53] the theme of my my piece for this year
[0:57] was the physical world upgrade, which
[1:00] was all about leaving this world of the
[1:03] cloud, software, the hyperscalers,
[1:07] them spending money and needing
[1:10] according to Jensen Huang, 90 trillion
[1:13] dollars to upgrade the entire physical
[1:15] world with artificial intelligence. And
[1:19] we started that process early. It's very
[1:21] semi-heavy. It's power-heavy. It's
[1:24] optical fiber-heavy. That's what the
[1:25] themes are in my thematic portfolios
[1:29] with all the names. And by the way,
[1:30] thank you to everyone who has reached
[1:32] out, especially after last week when I
[1:34] went through a lot of the different
[1:35] details
[1:36] so that you guys can be involved in
[1:38] these names. They
[1:40] the thematic basket continues to just
[1:42] rip. I'll go through some of the slides,
[1:44] obviously, but this theme is in the very
[1:47] early innings. So, when you see these
[1:48] parabolic charts, yes, there's going to
[1:51] be pullbacks and they will be severe.
[1:53] But, if you continue to waste your time
[1:56] trying to pick bottoms in software, if
[1:59] you continue to waste your time trying
[2:01] to wonder when When is Nvidia going to
[2:03] outperform Marvell? Or when is it going
[2:05] to outperform Texas Instruments? Or when
[2:07] is it going to outperform Intel? It's
[2:08] not going to happen, guys. Um, this side
[2:11] is so massive. The concentration of the
[2:14] cloud, which was a 17-year trend, and
[2:16] then the IQ raising part of the
[2:19] pre-training of GPU, this stuff is so
[2:22] underinvested. And I through the the
[2:25] webinar I did this week for the
[2:27] subscribers, I highlighted that the
[2:29] semiconductors are now the largest
[2:32] weight at a level two gig in the S&P 500
[2:35] at 17% and growing.
[2:38] That is not a bubble. Last year at this
[2:41] time, software was bigger than semis.
[2:44] Software's gone down, semis have gone.
[2:45] And at 17%, that's about 10 trillion
[2:48] dollars. But of the 10 trillion,
[2:51] Nvidia,
[2:53] Broadcom, and Micron make up 7.5
[2:56] trillion. You are going to see the other
[2:58] names in there grow rapidly over the
[3:00] course of the next at least five years,
[3:02] but probably decades. So, as I go
[3:03] through this,
[3:04] really spend the time on making sure
[3:07] that you're prepared for this because
[3:09] the numbers are massive and the money is
[3:11] coming from the Mag 7. So, if you
[3:15] haven't read this, and again, if you
[3:16] listened to the Dwarkesh podcast, Jensen
[3:19] again reiterated the five-layer cake. If
[3:22] you didn't know what the five-layer cake
[3:24] was cuz I had some people reach out.
[3:26] March 10th, this is on a blog on Nvidia
[3:28] where he goes through
[3:30] This is where we are right now, guys.
[3:33] This is it. There's five layers to this
[3:34] with energy and chips as the base of
[3:37] this.
[3:38] This is where these three is where all
[3:41] of my attention is on making money. The
[3:43] models and the applications are more for
[3:44] the agentic side in terms of the use,
[3:46] the profit margins, the digital biology,
[3:49] the robot All of this stuff, but this is
[3:52] where the money's being made. And again,
[3:54] this is all underweight cuz this is
[3:55] industrial.
[3:58] He said it would be 90 trillion. 90
[4:01] trillion dollars again, the global
[4:02] economy is about 120 trillion. That is a
[4:05] massive infusion, and that is why when
[4:08] you go through and look at some of these
[4:10] semiconductor charts, and I'm going to
[4:12] highlight some more today that have just
[4:13] started, you start to realize why this
[4:16] is going on. And that is why I created a
[4:19] thematic basket, which is all related to
[4:21] this movement. So,
[4:23] here is my thematic basket now up 34%
[4:26] since November 24th. The reason I chose
[4:29] November 24th is cuz that's when Opus
[4:31] 4.5 was released, and that was when
[4:33] software started to truly get disrupted
[4:35] because we entered the agentic age. This
[4:37] entire basket is the agentic age. That's
[4:40] what it's for. It's for the buildout,
[4:41] it's for the infrastructure, it's for
[4:43] everything that you're going to need.
[4:44] These lines here, well, this is
[4:46] software, still down now 16%. It had a
[4:49] nice bounce. It pulled back. I still, if
[4:52] I have to guess, these lows will hold
[4:53] for the IGF. I don't think it will hold
[4:56] for all software names, and I want to
[4:58] make sure I I make that clear. I do not
[5:00] want to own a single SaaS software. I
[5:02] think you are wasting your time trying
[5:04] to spend time on software playing for
[5:05] this mean reversion. There is no mean
[5:07] reversion. Software is a dead thing in
[5:10] terms of built-on code. There will be
[5:12] some names that can survive, but just
[5:14] like Ford has survived for 35 years
[5:16] without the price going up. I think it's
[5:18] a waste of time to try and think that
[5:19] there's winners. Now, the problem with
[5:21] that is the S&P 500 is in here. Up 4%,
[5:25] 5% for the year. Heavily weighted into
[5:26] that. The white line is the Dan Ives
[5:29] ETF. Like I said, love Dan, got to know
[5:32] him in the last month.
[5:35] Unfortunately, a lot of the names he has
[5:37] in there are related to the web 1.0
[5:40] playbook, the 2.0 playbook, the software
[5:44] names. And again, that just acts as a
[5:45] dead weight just like for the S&P. The
[5:48] hyperscalers right here, dead weight. I
[5:50] want to use those as a funding vehicle.
[5:52] They're the spenders. You want to be
[5:53] long semis, long the infrastructure
[5:55] side, and you want to be short the
[5:56] hyperscalers. It is going to be very
[5:58] similar. If we have a problem where we
[6:00] run out of compute, the hyperscalers are
[6:02] going to get hurt as well because
[6:03] they're depending on the ROIC and the
[6:05] adoption. These are directly linked.
[6:07] They need to spend money on the compute
[6:09] side, the semis will have 30%
[6:11] corrections just like we saw with Micron
[6:13] from 460 down to 330, but then Micron
[6:16] went right back up. They won't always go
[6:18] up that fast, and I'm sure we're getting
[6:20] closer to a time where they start to
[6:21] sell off just because
[6:24] when Marvell goes from 95 when I write a
[6:26] paper,
[6:27] it closes that day at 87, and pre-market
[6:30] today it was at 170. Those types of
[6:32] moves are building in a lot of what is
[6:34] going to happen over the next year in
[6:36] earnings.
[6:37] Um, just as a reminder, and as we get
[6:39] into this industrial shakeout, this is
[6:40] the reason why I wrote this paper back
[6:43] in July. So, this is not a new theme for
[6:45] me. You can go read what it is, but
[6:47] basically,
[6:48] this was about not being like
[6:51] traditional demand cycles around real
[6:52] estate and autos, but by a new and
[6:54] powerful force, paranoia, across both
[6:57] governments and corporations, a
[6:58] deepening fear of falling behind in the
[7:00] global AI arms race. That's what is
[7:02] driving PMIs. I still read tons of
[7:06] people focused on real estate and autos
[7:08] and saying that we're going to have an
[7:10] issue because that's where growth is.
[7:12] That is not where growth is. And if you
[7:14] want to go find out, listen to this
[7:17] Craig Fuller
[7:19] interview on Adam Taggart Thoughtful
[7:21] Money back in November. This was before
[7:25] Opus 4.5 came out. And his thing, Craig
[7:28] is a freight transport expert. He was
[7:32] saying the real economy is very, very,
[7:34] very weak. And he was very bearish. And
[7:36] just to go through, he was describing
[7:38] that freight is a leading indicator is a
[7:40] better real-time leading indicator. The
[7:43] goods economy is much weaker than the
[7:44] headline data suggests. Current CapEx
[7:46] wave is still mostly hope-driven.
[7:50] Now,
[7:51] I love when you get smart people who are
[7:54] wrong,
[7:56] and they turn around and they do the
[7:58] exact same podcast five months later.
[8:01] Miracle turnaround. The US industrial
[8:03] economy is now booming despite high oil
[8:06] prices. And that's one of the things I
[8:08] want to make sure you guys recognize. If
[8:09] you've been listening to the oil
[8:11] doomers, we obviously are going to have
[8:13] an impact in inflation, which I'll go
[8:15] through. But in terms of the global
[8:17] economy stopping, AI is more important.
[8:19] I said it last year with tariffs. I said
[8:21] AI is the only story. AI is the only
[8:24] story. It is the only story story you
[8:26] will need. It's the reason why I'm doing
[8:28] what I'm doing and trying to bring you
[8:30] guys information that is not only
[8:32] real-time. There's a lot of information
[8:34] in this week's video that is actionable
[8:36] because it just happened this week. So,
[8:38] just keep that in mind is that it's
[8:40] moving so fast that you can't depend on
[8:42] sell-side research to stay on top of
[8:43] stuff. You have to be on the podcast.
[8:45] You have to be listening to Jensen
[8:46] Huang. You have to be going through X.
[8:48] And you have to be reporting it. So,
[8:50] here are the highlights. I'm not going
[8:51] to go through everything, but he said
[8:53] November, he flipped from November to
[8:56] now as bullish as he's been in years.
[8:58] The goods economy is now roaring. Rail
[9:00] shipments up. Chemical shipments at
[9:02] record highs. Remember, chemical moat is
[9:04] part of this. I'm going to go through
[9:06] chemicals again in this because that is
[9:07] a late cycle part of this. You are going
[9:09] to see chemicals. You need to be
[9:11] involved in petrochemicals, particularly
[9:13] US ones or ones that are going to
[9:15] benefit from lower natural gas prices
[9:16] versus the rest of the world.
[9:19] Truck tonnage at a three-year high.
[9:21] Truck loading postings at strongest
[9:23] level. I've read people that said that
[9:24] this was all about Avis in terms of
[9:26] transports. You have to stop listening
[9:28] to permabears and people that get caught
[9:30] in this situation. People like Craig
[9:32] Fuller that were bullish in November,
[9:34] and I could give you a list of people
[9:35] that were bearish in November that have
[9:37] not changed their view. They just move
[9:38] on to the next thing.
[9:40] Bonus depreciation is helping. Cheap
[9:42] natural gas is helping. It's no longer
[9:44] being led by imports but by domestic
[9:47] production. It means the middle of the
[9:48] country is what's driving GDP, and the
[9:51] coastlines are suffering. Keep that in
[9:53] mind when you're reading the surveys.
[9:56] Nothing in the freight data suggesting
[9:58] the war is hurting industrial demand.
[10:02] Insensitive, non-cyclical AI has the
[10:06] capital coming from
[10:08] free cash flow, and even if that free
[10:09] cash flow goes negative, these companies
[10:11] have massive debt they have massive
[10:13] equity, so debt to equity will rise.
[10:15] It's not good for them. That's why I say
[10:17] be short the hyperscalers, all of them.
[10:19] I don't care which one it is, including
[10:20] Google.
[10:22] Will they go up? I'm sure they will go
[10:23] up. Are they going to go up as much as
[10:25] the S&P? Not in my opinion, because
[10:27] semis are going to drive the S&P
[10:28] performance. Optical fiber is going to
[10:30] drive the S&P performance. Caterpillar
[10:32] is going to drive the S&P. You have to
[10:34] be long industrials, materials, energy,
[10:36] and semis. This is the 1970s again and
[10:38] again and again. This is a physical
[10:39] upgrade.
[10:40] Flatbed rejections hit the highest
[10:42] levels ever recorded.
[10:45] So, flat they have no capacity. There is
[10:48] zero slack.
[10:50] So, again, if someone has told you that
[10:52] trucking is not happening and this is
[10:54] fake, they're just wrong. And if you
[10:57] want actual factual data, here are the
[10:59] imports of capital goods relative to
[11:03] consumer goods. So, I want you to think
[11:05] about what this is. This is, "Hey, we
[11:07] need tons of semi, we need tons of uh
[11:10] uh of parts for the data center. We need
[11:13] things from Switzerland. We need gas
[11:15] turbines. We need all of this stuff."
[11:17] This is This is back to 1991, guys. This
[11:20] is the ratio of them. This is all about
[11:23] the opposite of what was going on from
[11:26] this period, where there was no capital
[11:28] goods relative to the consumer goods. We
[11:31] are not buying furniture. We are not
[11:33] buying things cuz there's no housing
[11:34] market at this point.
[11:36] Deal with We'll deal with that later,
[11:37] but there's confirmation that the
[11:39] industrial boom is happening. And if you
[11:40] don't believe that data,
[11:42] and you don't believe that um oil isn't
[11:45] hurting the economy, how about we go to
[11:47] Asia? Taiwan machinery, all-time highs.
[11:50] Kospi machinery,
[11:53] all-time highs. And then obviously you
[11:55] have the S&P machinery. They're all
[11:56] moving together.
[11:58] This week, United Rentals, a good proxy
[12:00] for not just the industrial economy, but
[12:03] also when the turnaround is starting. We
[12:05] had the largest day uh on Wednesday for
[12:08] United Rentals.
[12:10] This is in coming out of COVID. This is
[12:13] coming out of the worst of
[12:16] the housing GFC time, and this is coming
[12:19] out of 1998 with LTCM.
[12:24] Yes, Avis. Here we go. This is
[12:26] year-to-date. Avis is up. Who cares? The
[12:29] entire group is up. And this is after
[12:31] Avis had collapsed 70%. This is not
[12:34] about one stock, and don't let people
[12:37] uh
[12:38] try to direct you uh misdirect you with
[12:41] the bearishness.
[12:42] Prices are moving higher. There's no
[12:44] other way to say this. Um I will keep
[12:46] saying it. We are going to get CPI above
[12:48] 4%. If this holds, this little thing
[12:50] here, we're going to be above it very
[12:52] soon.
[12:53] When we get CPI above four, I don't
[12:55] think the Fed is raising rates, but that
[12:56] will be above three-month bills. So, we
[12:58] will have negative real yields again. I
[12:59] think that's an important story, but the
[13:01] most important part, this is from this
[13:03] week's S&P
[13:04] uh data. This includes the service PMIs
[13:07] and the manufacturing. This is not just
[13:09] manufacturing. It will spread a little
[13:11] bit into the service side, because
[13:13] technology is going higher. So,
[13:16] remember, semiconductors are in
[13:17] everything. When you walk into a
[13:19] doctor's office and you're getting a
[13:20] service done, if they need new
[13:22] computers, if they need new machinery,
[13:23] if they need new MRIs, it's all being
[13:25] impacted by commodities and especially
[13:27] by semiconductors. Here is the services
[13:29] part of the uh PMI. This is the ISM PMI
[13:35] for the service side. And again, I just
[13:36] want to highlight, we ripped to the
[13:38] highest level since 2022,
[13:40] when year-over-year CPI was up around 5
[13:42] and 1/2%. Here you can see the long-term
[13:44] trend of year-over-year CPI.
[13:47] Again, I find it hard to believe we
[13:48] won't get above 4%. There's fiscal
[13:50] stimulus that just continues to show up.
[13:52] Warren Pies put this out and basically
[13:54] said,
[13:55] "Tax receipts
[13:57] much lower
[13:59] than expected. So, we are seeing tax
[14:02] refunds tracking higher versus last
[14:04] year.
[14:05] Tax received for the government's much
[14:07] lower, so we're getting a fiscal push
[14:11] from the one big beautiful bill that's
[14:13] coming at the same time the gas at the
[14:15] pump has gone higher. So, for people
[14:16] that getting refunds that are much
[14:18] bigger,
[14:19] those are probably the same people that
[14:21] live paycheck to paycheck that are being
[14:22] offset by the oil prices. So, that's one
[14:25] of the reasons why we're not some seeing
[14:26] some big collapse. The other one is, as
[14:28] I've highlighted in previous videos,
[14:30] we are an exporter of energy, so it
[14:32] benefits the economy. Here's the raw
[14:34] industrial uh
[14:36] uh commodities. If the Iran situation
[14:38] was having an impact, you'd see the
[14:40] metals going down. They're not going
[14:41] down.
[14:43] In fact, Robert Friedland uh from
[14:45] Ivanhoe, the entire copper industry just
[14:47] returned from last week's leading copper
[14:49] conference,
[14:51] and basically
[14:53] uh saying
[14:54] they're even more bullish that all-time
[14:56] copper highs could be tested in the
[14:57] coming weeks. Uh there's all kinds of
[15:00] uncertainties. There's all kinds of
[15:01] bottlenecks. Uh if you want to get a
[15:03] sense as to how much people are
[15:04] investing now in trying to avoid the
[15:07] energy situation, uh solar batteries,
[15:11] EVs, through the roof from China in
[15:13] terms of exports.
[15:15] If you want to know what China is
[15:16] buying, remember, silver is part of my
[15:18] uh
[15:19] thematic uh portfolio.
[15:22] Uh
[15:22] it's lagging here, which means it's a
[15:24] great entry point in my opinion uh based
[15:27] on what I see and have written about on
[15:28] silver. Well, China just imported the
[15:30] most silver ever in March. And remember,
[15:34] they stopped exports December 31st.
[15:38] Surprising move here. I think this has
[15:40] implications if you're looking for
[15:42] something that could slow everything
[15:43] down.
[15:44] Uh this is the ADP weekly employment.
[15:47] We've had four weeks in a row now of
[15:49] kind of moving higher.
[15:52] If for any reason we get an unemployment
[15:54] report at any point, which is greater
[15:56] than 150, when everyone is now moved
[15:58] down to zero is okay,
[16:00] I think with inflation moving higher and
[16:02] a stable labor market, you will start to
[16:04] freak out in terms of whether the Fed
[16:06] may go.
[16:07] Um John Roque uh has been pounding the
[16:10] table on this chart, and this would
[16:12] argue for this being a risk, which is
[16:14] technically he does not like two-year uh
[16:17] notes. Uh and this is from a price
[16:19] perspective, this would mean yields
[16:20] going higher, and his first level is up
[16:23] at 4%, but his target is five. We're
[16:27] currently in the upper threes,
[16:30] uh around three and three quarters, so
[16:32] anything that moves in terms of the Fed
[16:33] possibly going could be something that
[16:35] kind of freaks out the market, even
[16:37] though I don't think the Fed is going to
[16:39] go. Texas Instruments reported. So,
[16:41] real-time data week. Uh
[16:43] they said, "Industrial demand keeps
[16:45] improving while data center segment
[16:47] flourishes." So, we are now getting the
[16:49] physical upgrade spreading
[16:51] into the industrial side. Texas
[16:54] Instruments is a demand barometer for
[16:56] the industrial economy. They cover so
[16:59] many different things, so
[17:01] recent commentary notes that industrial
[17:02] demand is recovering broadly. Comments
[17:05] about AI-related sensing and power needs
[17:07] suggest that AI workloads are starting
[17:08] to penetrate industrial and edge
[17:12] form factors, meaning robots, test
[17:14] equipment, building assistant, EV,
[17:16] industrial vehicles, not just GPUs in
[17:17] the cloud. This is critical, guys.
[17:19] Remember, we just increased the
[17:21] uh
[17:22] spending for defense.
[17:24] We are getting into the edge. The edge
[17:26] is everything. It's drones. It's
[17:29] humanoids. It's autonomous vehicles.
[17:31] It's computers. It's phones. It is
[17:33] enterprise edge. This is the beginning,
[17:37] the very beginning. This isn't even the
[17:38] first inning. I'm not even sure they've
[17:40] gotten through the national anthem yet.
[17:42] Texas Instruments expands
[17:43] microcontroller portfolio and software
[17:45] ecosystem to enable edge AI in all
[17:48] devices. And again,
[17:50] I bring this up and mention improve
[17:53] energy efficiency when processing at the
[17:55] edge and neural processing units. If you
[17:57] guys have my paper from NPUs, I would go
[18:00] bring it up and go read again. This is
[18:03] all happening now. So, if you don't like
[18:06] Texas Instruments, how about we go to
[18:07] Intel?
[18:08] They emphasize that AI workloads evolve,
[18:10] the importance of CPUs infrastructure is
[18:12] growing. I spent a lot of time on Intel
[18:14] last week, going from dead just seven
[18:16] months ago
[18:18] to
[18:19] breaking through all-time highs, and now
[18:21] we're ripping through them.
[18:23] Up this morning, 20-plus percent.
[18:26] You cannot put a GPU everywhere. We're
[18:28] moving into inference. Again, this is
[18:29] the very beginning. Intel and
[18:31] third-party analysis highlight that CPU
[18:33] demand is being pulled not just by
[18:35] cloud, but also by enterprise AI
[18:37] deployments
[18:38] that re-
[18:40] rely on CPU-heavy systems. Again, this
[18:43] is part of the edge device side. They
[18:46] mention Intel has flagged signs of
[18:48] improvement in PC-related CPU demand,
[18:51] with prior quarters already showing a
[18:52] pickup. One of the mistakes people are
[18:54] making,
[18:55] even if the prices go higher and PC
[18:59] overall PC demand is, let's say, lower
[19:02] than it was last year. Let's say
[19:04] handsets are lower than we were last
[19:06] year. Think Qualcomm. I'll be talking
[19:08] about Qualcomm more and more in the
[19:09] coming weeks. Remember, if you only do a
[19:12] certain this slightly less than last
[19:15] year,
[19:16] but of those, the percentage that are
[19:18] AI-related goes up, that increases all
[19:23] of these companies like Intel. It is the
[19:26] rotation. It is the, quote-unquote, as I
[19:29] wrote at the very beginning, the
[19:30] physical upgrade.
[19:32] Upgrade, upgrade, upgrade. You don't
[19:34] need to have GDP to have an upgrade. You
[19:37] can have zero GDP, and it can be a
[19:38] rotation. And when I mean zero GDP, I
[19:41] mean you can have zero growth, like you
[19:43] do in autos. You could sell 16 million
[19:44] autos this year, 16 million next year.
[19:47] And if this year none of them were AI,
[19:50] and next year 4 million of the 16 are
[19:52] AI. You had massive growth in AI. Well,
[19:54] that has enormous impact for
[19:56] semiconductor chips. That is what
[19:58] everyone is missing is they are focusing
[19:59] way too much
[20:01] on nominal GDP growth and not enough on
[20:04] the upgrade cycle.
[20:07] The Edge Awakens. So, this is going out
[20:09] Monday morning. I just wanted to give
[20:11] you guys a preview.
[20:13] The Edge Awakens. It's all on news that
[20:15] happened this week and it's not just the
[20:17] Intel and Texas Instruments, which you
[20:20] can see I highlight here, but it's also
[20:22] Nvidia's reported 800 V DC power push in
[20:25] South Korea that was going through the
[20:27] media this week.
[20:28] I wrote a paper on the whole rack. Intel
[20:31] is in the whole rack. So, it's one of my
[20:33] names in there. The Edge AI investment
[20:35] [clears throat] universe, which I
[20:37] highlighted last week and went on the
[20:38] subscriber website, which has 68 names
[20:41] in it. Many of them are in the overall
[20:43] portfolio. But in particular, the power
[20:46] semis, which is what this is on, there
[20:48] were six of them in there.
[20:50] If you didn't see what they've done this
[20:52] week, and again, I put this out the Edge
[20:55] thing last week, this is what the power
[20:57] semis did this week and this is the
[20:59] chart. So, 5 years ago, they were
[21:02] unchanged as of last week. Those six
[21:05] names have gone through the roof, of
[21:07] which one of them is Texas Instruments.
[21:09] So, I just want to remind you again
[21:11] because this was brought up in Craig
[21:12] Fuller.
[21:13] I highlighted this on the webinar this
[21:15] week. And again, I say this for all the
[21:17] FAs and RIAs that are out there. We've
[21:18] seen a lot of
[21:19] a lot of you guys signing up. Tell your
[21:21] other people that work for the firm, you
[21:24] should be paying attention to this. It's
[21:26] going to be very hard to get this kind
[21:27] of research. This is something that's
[21:29] worth the money and the reason is
[21:30] because I'm covering the space in a way
[21:33] that's real time. Power semis is a
[21:35] real-time story. It's in the very, very
[21:37] early beginnings. There's a lot of names
[21:39] on there
[21:40] that as far as I'm concerned, they
[21:42] haven't even seen their earnings grow in
[21:44] a meaningful way. You saw it with Texas
[21:45] Instruments, but the edge devices are
[21:47] going to keep coming because as I go
[21:49] through, we haven't even started
[21:51] humanoids. Like this literally is the
[21:53] beginning of a long-term process and
[21:56] last week I covered Terafab. Terafab is
[21:59] just your confirmation that Elon Musk
[22:01] believes we're going to run out of
[22:02] chips.
[22:03] You want to
[22:05] invest in scarcity.
[22:07] 6 months ago, post Opus 4.5 and open
[22:10] class. So, before we got there, these
[22:12] were all the things that people were
[22:14] worried about. This is what Craig Fuller
[22:15] was talking about. Here's where we are
[22:17] now. It has only been 6 months ago.
[22:21] All right, let's go through this
[22:22] quickly. The spending numbers, they're
[22:24] being revised higher.
[22:26] So, this is from BlackRock this week.
[22:28] Just look at these numbers. And again,
[22:29] this is the hyperscaler.
[22:31] These are still for the main companies.
[22:34] Remember, you've got other companies
[22:36] that are spending like OpenAI and
[22:38] Anthropic are each targeting now 30
[22:40] gigawatts of compute. They're not
[22:42] included in that hyperscaler number.
[22:44] Then you've got SpaceX not included in
[22:46] that hyperscaler number. They're going
[22:47] to do 25 billion or so
[22:50] 25 billion or so. Then you've got Tesla
[22:53] this week announcing increased to do 25
[22:55] billion. These numbers just don't stop.
[22:59] They are massive. And the way you can
[23:01] see them is ERCOT electricity demand.
[23:04] This is basically what we're talking
[23:06] about. So, here's where we are now.
[23:08] We're already at a problem.
[23:10] This problem gets worse and worse in
[23:13] terms of peak demand. Based on
[23:15] everything, and if you want to know
[23:17] what's causing us to be, look at these
[23:18] numbers. I mean, how are we going to get
[23:20] enough power?
[23:22] This is all related to data centers.
[23:24] This is the number out of this number
[23:26] total in terms of what is needed. And
[23:29] this point is being made. Remember when
[23:30] they screamed that Bitcoin mining would
[23:32] boil the oceans? Here's Bitcoin mining's
[23:34] expectations and this is where they
[23:36] were. We're dealing with numbers so
[23:37] massive. And again, look at the growth
[23:40] rate.
[23:41] This is all AI related. If you're not
[23:43] investing in these kind of CAGRs, what
[23:45] are you doing? That's entirely what my
[23:47] thematic basket is. Who cares if
[23:50] Salesforce is going to survive or not
[23:52] when you've got the opportunity to
[23:53] invent invest in those type of CAGRs.
[23:55] You just need to know the names. Reid
[23:57] Hoffman came out and basically said
[24:00] started talking more about something I'm
[24:02] I'm spending more time on, which is
[24:04] we're having a problem here with the
[24:06] data centers being built. You've got
[24:08] bottlenecks in in parts coming from
[24:10] China. You've got the politicians and
[24:12] the
[24:13] looking for votes and threatening rising
[24:16] electricity costs. So, they're spreading
[24:18] doomer news in terms of trying to get
[24:20] voters to turn.
[24:21] SemiAnalysis put this thing saying that
[24:24] now we've got the Blackwell shipment
[24:25] showing a slowdown. The issue is not
[24:27] demand, but infrastructure readiness.
[24:29] Some cloud service providers still do
[24:30] not have the data center infrastructure
[24:32] fully operational.
[24:33] This is what's happening. This is why I
[24:35] put the data center thing up.
[24:37] My analysis in the the subscriber
[24:40] website, which you guys can go see.
[24:42] Anthropic and Amazon expand
[24:43] collaboration for up to 5 gigawatts of
[24:45] new compute.
[24:47] Anthropic has troubles because they
[24:49] don't have enough compute. Meta and
[24:51] Microsoft looking to pay for their AI
[24:53] spending by trimming workforces.
[24:56] Trimming 10% of workforces not trimming
[24:59] um
[25:00] 7% for Microsoft. They have to finance
[25:03] this somehow. The spending will happen
[25:05] regardless of whether it comes from
[25:06] bonds or it comes from firing people,
[25:08] but it's going to come. The question is,
[25:10] will they be able to get the ROIC? The
[25:12] problem is for those companies, it's
[25:13] very hard to get the ROIC unless your
[25:15] data centers are built. That's the
[25:17] issue. So, the progress is happening.
[25:20] Demand is there from enterprises, but
[25:22] the question is, is the performance
[25:23] there? And as I go through, the adoption
[25:25] is screwed up as well.
[25:27] Why energy is becoming a boardroom
[25:29] priority. This was a great piece this
[25:31] week came out from
[25:32] Pure Storage, now Everpure, a company
[25:35] that is also on my
[25:37] portfolio thematic portfolio.
[25:41] I would go read it. The potential power
[25:42] shortage for AI infrastructure. Just
[25:44] look at these numbers, the shortfall
[25:46] available supply. Do I think they're
[25:48] going to find a way?
[25:50] Yes, but not in the near term.
[25:53] Data centers growing electricity
[25:55] consumption is set to double. There's
[25:57] just no way to build the infrastructure
[25:58] fast enough, so it's going to have to
[25:59] come through efficiency and things like
[26:01] this. So, this is what I was saying
[26:03] before about South Korea media report.
[26:06] Nvidia has reportedly visited Korean
[26:08] power equipment companies and asked them
[26:10] to design data center infrastructure
[26:11] around an 800 V
[26:13] class DC architecture.
[26:15] This is being interpreted as an effort
[26:17] to minimize power conversion losses. So
[26:20] again, everything is focused on power
[26:21] efficiency.
[26:23] This is the reason why on the optical
[26:25] side, you've got so much demand and this
[26:27] is the reason why the power semis are
[26:29] there. So, optical necessary for
[26:31] inference. This is why we've got
[26:33] Coherent and Light and Corning. It's
[26:35] also why we have Marvell, which is one
[26:37] of the leaders in silicon photonics and
[26:39] has purchased companies including one
[26:40] this week. All of these companies fit on
[26:43] being able to somehow or another find a
[26:45] way to get the compute through without
[26:48] needing more gas turbines, more gas,
[26:51] more everything by being more efficient.
[26:53] There's a race on all of these sides and
[26:54] this is where this fits in and this is
[26:56] why those South Korean heavy-duty power
[26:59] things go, but it's also where the power
[27:01] semis go. So, we've got shortages. The
[27:04] problem is the demand's growing so fast,
[27:05] we have run into shortages. We've got
[27:08] component shortages in many things, but
[27:10] in particular in this, the optical
[27:11] transceiver
[27:13] market.
[27:14] Naphtha has become a big issue because
[27:18] of the Middle East conflict. Critical
[27:20] semiconductor materials including
[27:23] ceramic capacitors, power devices,
[27:25] helium. They're expected to face rising
[27:27] prices, shortages and geopolitical
[27:28] disruption throughout this year. Lead
[27:31] times already there.
[27:33] Dylan Patel gave an interview with
[27:34] Invest Like the Best with Patrick
[27:36] O'Shaughnessy. Again, highly recommend
[27:39] listening to it.
[27:40] The critical parts in there. The economy
[27:43] has flipped. Ideas are are now abundant.
[27:45] So, get back to the abundance side. You
[27:47] want to be short abundance. Ideas are
[27:49] abundant. Anything that you can come up
[27:51] with an idea like a software, it comes
[27:53] to market immediate now. You can utilize
[27:55] it immediately. The death of software
[27:58] that is built on code.
[28:00] He described SemiAnalysis' own AI
[28:02] spending exploding from tens of
[28:04] thousands to 7 million annualized run
[28:06] rate. So, I want you to think and do the
[28:07] math in your head. If a little company
[28:10] like SemiAnalysis has gone to a 7
[28:13] million annualized run rate on AI
[28:16] spending,
[28:17] think about what a Goldman Sachs, a
[28:19] Morgan Stanley, a JP Morgan, Eli Lilly,
[28:21] how much money they have to spend and
[28:23] you start getting to the 90 trillion
[28:25] dollars, guys. You have to start really
[28:27] doing the math and realize how big this
[28:29] is. On token demand, he says the key
[28:31] story is not falling cost per token, but
[28:33] exploding demand.
[28:35] He expects meaningful robotics
[28:37] breakthroughs in the next 6 to 18
[28:39] months. The whole AI stack is
[28:41] tightening. Remember, the whole rack is
[28:44] the whole AI stack and that gets back to
[28:46] the five-layer cake. So,
[28:49] margins are expanding, memory is
[28:50] severely constrained, and even upstream
[28:52] items like copper foil PCB materials.
[28:54] Again, PCB material
[28:56] you're going to run into the same thing
[28:58] in chemicals, guys. He does highlight a
[29:00] public backlash against AI and they need
[29:03] to have the This is going to be an issue
[29:05] all year. The bottlenecks are going to
[29:07] be an issue.
[29:08] Um
[29:09] People will say, and I've heard this, is
[29:11] why I wanted to highlight this is, "Oh,
[29:12] the memory story is old news. Everyone
[29:15] gets it." No, no, no, you don't get it
[29:16] all. DRAM capacity will still double or
[29:19] even triple because the market needs
[29:21] such massive production capacity and
[29:24] they have to steal capacity from
[29:25] somewhere else. In a capitalist economy,
[29:27] the only way to steal capacity is by
[29:29] driving up prices to destroy demand.
[29:31] Elon Musk is building a Terafab. It's
[29:34] all related to the same thing. We have
[29:37] years ahead of a shortage, guys. Years.
[29:39] Here's another way to look at it. This
[29:41] is just the AI training and what is
[29:43] needed or the change that is going uh uh
[29:49] basically from inference. So, we're
[29:51] going from
[29:53] pre-training into AI inference. This is
[29:57] where we are now. Every year it gets
[29:59] bigger and bigger. That's why when you
[30:00] see these CPU charts and you start
[30:02] realizing why we need so many CPUs not
[30:04] just today. The agentic AI shifts the
[30:07] latency bottleneck from GPUs towards
[30:09] CPUs, just what I said. So, again,
[30:12] chatbots,
[30:14] that's what most of you use at this
[30:16] point. Well, let's go through everything
[30:18] and realize that complex orchestration,
[30:20] which really gets into the enterprise
[30:22] side, especially
[30:25] we need an enormous amount of memory.
[30:27] Morgan Stanley's report on agentic CPUs
[30:29] has a TAM expansion forecast in line
[30:30] with mine from a month ago. I thought it
[30:31] was crazy for saying it would reach 100
[30:33] billion in 2030 and now it's becoming
[30:35] consensus.
[30:36] >> [sighs]
[30:37] >> I mentioned the Intel,
[30:39] which happened last night.
[30:42] Also, Open AI released GPT 5.5,
[30:47] bringing the company one step closer to
[30:49] AI super app.
[30:51] On many metrics better than Mythos.
[30:54] China's Deep Seek released a preview of
[30:56] the long-awaited V4 model. It looks like
[30:58] they used Nvidia chip, so that reduces a
[31:02] risk for Nvidia.
[31:04] Oh, yeah, that's right. Uh nothing has
[31:06] been solved in Iran. The only thing
[31:08] that's not happening is we're not seeing
[31:09] bombings right now, but I wouldn't be
[31:11] surprised if that picks up again, but we
[31:14] do have the disruption. The oil shock
[31:16] that dwarfs history won't have a rapid
[31:18] recovery.
[31:20] This to me is the story. The doomers
[31:22] saying that this is like COVID have
[31:24] already been proven wrong. Um this is
[31:26] not a US, you know, stock bubble thing.
[31:29] The rest of the globe is going through
[31:31] this. This is an AI story. Again and
[31:33] again and again, I'll keep saying it. If
[31:34] you keep getting caught into these and
[31:36] go. Now, that doesn't mean that the S&P
[31:38] 500 won't finish down this year. That
[31:40] doesn't mean we won't see a 10%
[31:42] correction over the course of the next 3
[31:44] months. I think it's very possible we
[31:46] will. Again, I think the issue is the
[31:48] inflation and the possibility that rates
[31:49] will go higher. The bottlenecks are
[31:51] there. We could have disruptions where
[31:53] semi production doesn't meet what was
[31:54] expected. We miss earnings. There are
[31:56] tons of things that can go on in a
[31:58] 1970-style bottleneck. Do not get caught
[32:02] in looking at parabolic charts and not
[32:04] realize they can fall 30% and still be
[32:07] within a parabolic move. That is what
[32:09] you have to get used to. We are used to
[32:11] these nice linear staircases and not
[32:13] these elevators up, elevators down type
[32:17] moves, but that's what you're going to
[32:18] see. And the way that I know that is if
[32:20] you go back to the 1970s and you look at
[32:22] oil,
[32:23] if you look at it on a quarter basis
[32:25] where it strips out the daily moves,
[32:27] you're going to see something that's
[32:28] almost a straight line, but if you look
[32:29] at it daily, you have plenty of big
[32:31] corrections in this stuff.
[32:33] In this case, you can see the numbers.
[32:35] It is completely different. Forget the
[32:37] price side, the regional supply,
[32:40] I mean, these are big numbers. The
[32:41] demand has not been impacted and that's
[32:43] because again, most of the demand that's
[32:44] happening globally
[32:46] is happening in AI, which does not need
[32:48] oil. Kuwait declared force majeure.
[32:50] Force majeure is going to be a story for
[32:52] this year. It's going to be across many,
[32:53] many items. Do not think this is just
[32:56] going to be on the oil side. This will
[32:57] be in a lot of places.
[32:59] Russia extended their fertilizer export
[33:01] quotas until December as the global
[33:03] deficit deepens.
[33:05] Here comes the food inflation. I mean,
[33:07] these numbers speak for themselves. You
[33:09] don't think people are going to be
[33:10] complaining and there's no way to get
[33:11] around this. The shipping has gone
[33:13] higher in terms of diesel prices.
[33:15] Fertilizer prices have gone higher.
[33:17] Everyone forecasting or anyone
[33:18] forecasting that we're not going to see
[33:20] any kind of an increase in inflation, if
[33:22] we don't see increase inflation, I will
[33:23] be shocked. UAE asks about a wartime
[33:26] financial lifeline.
[33:28] I think the disruptions that have macro
[33:30] implications from what has gone on,
[33:32] people need to pay attention to. Okay, I
[33:34] put this slide in the subscriber thing.
[33:36] I'm going to emphasize it twice here.
[33:39] Again,
[33:40] what I want you to think about is just
[33:42] the massive nature of all of this in
[33:45] terms of the data center infrastructure
[33:48] moving into the Blackwell side and the
[33:52] Vera Rubin and where we are and the
[33:55] build-outs of more data centers
[33:56] necessary and what this all leads to.
[34:00] Again, we need more tokens per watt.
[34:02] We're going to have grid overload, so we
[34:04] could have blackouts. We could have
[34:05] situations. We've got power capacity
[34:07] limits. When you're running things hot
[34:10] and you don't have the investment in the
[34:11] physical infrastructure, expect there
[34:13] for there to be problems. At the same
[34:15] time, if the models get so powerful,
[34:17] you're going to have hackings. We don't
[34:19] have the security ready. When you move
[34:21] too fast and you run things too hot, it
[34:23] is a different kind of scenario than
[34:25] after the GFC where unemployment was 10%
[34:27] and we were gradually taking it back to
[34:29] four. Now we're fully employed. We have
[34:33] rates below inflation and we have way
[34:36] too much demand relative to supply and
[34:38] the money to fund it. It is not done by
[34:41] debt. It is not going to be a systemic
[34:43] event. Even though I'm still negative on
[34:45] private credit, I'm still negative on
[34:46] software and I think the credit cycle is
[34:48] in the early stages of deleveraging.
[34:51] It's not going to be fast because
[34:53] there's too much capital flying around
[34:54] and too many industries that are fine.
[34:56] This is where the edge is. We haven't
[34:58] even gone to the edge yet, guys. That's
[35:00] why I wanted that visual there. So,
[35:01] let's go through the analysis on the
[35:03] S&P. We've seen the earnings amazingly
[35:05] go higher despite the situation Iran.
[35:07] Well, if you want to break down where
[35:09] they're coming from, they're coming from
[35:11] technology, energy, and materials.
[35:14] This is the entire
[35:17] estimate revisions.
[35:19] And out of that, it's basically one
[35:22] company is 51% of 100 of it. Micron
[35:25] Technology is 51% of the earnings
[35:27] revision. Now, what else do you have on
[35:29] the list? Exxon, Chevron, Broadcom.
[35:31] These three alone make up 85%. This is
[35:35] not a broad thing. This is isolated to
[35:37] those areas that are part of all of
[35:39] those names, by the way. Those four
[35:41] names
[35:42] are part of my thematic portfolio.
[35:45] Those have been there all year. That's
[35:47] what we're seeing is the earnings growth
[35:49] again from this side. I thought this was
[35:51] uh I showed this this week in the
[35:53] subscriber webinar. I want to make sure
[35:55] that everyone gets to see it because
[35:58] the S&P earnings growth for the Mag 7,
[36:00] 23%.
[36:01] Here's the rest of the S&P 500. But,
[36:07] if you strip out
[36:09] Nvidia,
[36:11] then all of a sudden it goes to 6.4.
[36:15] So, if Nvidia were excluded, the other
[36:18] 495 would be required would be reporting
[36:20] higher earnings than the remaining Mag
[36:22] 7. So, the Mag 6
[36:24] uh or the Mag 7X
[36:26] Nvidia is only growing earnings at 6.4%.
[36:29] Think hyperscalers, guys. Think funding.
[36:32] All right, this is where the adoption
[36:33] problem gets in. AI is everywhere, the
[36:35] agentic organization isn't. I think you
[36:37] should read this report. It's a McKinsey
[36:39] report. I'm not going to show you the
[36:40] details, but basically,
[36:43] having worked at Morgan Stanley, knowing
[36:45] how archaic the entire infrastructure
[36:47] is,
[36:48] to make a wholesale change is
[36:50] impossible. And Aaron Levie put this out
[36:52] this week. It's remarkable how often you
[36:54] need to be dramatically upgrading your
[36:56] AI architecture given the pace of
[36:58] progress in AI models right now. For the
[37:00] fourth time I upgraded my open claw
[37:02] today.
[37:03] Now, not all today, but during the time
[37:06] since I started it, GPT-5 is now been
[37:08] uploaded into my open claw. So, again,
[37:11] and I'm working on getting more Mac
[37:13] Minis and more Mac Studios so that I can
[37:15] use either Deep Seek or Kemi K 2.6,
[37:18] which came out this week, which is
[37:19] equivalent to Opus 4.6 or Opus 4.7 as an
[37:22] open-source model that is anywhere from
[37:24] 70 to 90% cheaper.
[37:27] We're moving too fast for companies to
[37:29] know what to do.
[37:31] Amazon boom is creating a massive
[37:33] duplicate tools and data inside the
[37:34] company. As someone who uses this all
[37:36] day long, I don't know how you separate
[37:38] the two. You've got two separate
[37:40] components, the personal workflow, and
[37:42] that's what this duplicate tools inside
[37:44] the company are. Meaning, if I build
[37:46] something, but the person next to me
[37:47] doing the same job builds a completely
[37:49] different tool, which one do we use? Why
[37:51] do we have two tools? We're using more
[37:52] tokens. Maybe one's more efficient than
[37:54] the other. Then you've got the
[37:55] orchestration level, which is more from
[37:56] a top-down basis. How do we replace 80%
[37:59] of the people when we need to make sure
[38:00] that AI can do It's a very complex
[38:03] thing. The adoption is going fast from a
[38:05] place of zero, but don't be surprised. I
[38:07] still don't think the ROIC is going to
[38:08] come in as fast and that's the reason
[38:10] why I want to be short this. So,
[38:13] many of you on the RIA and FA world,
[38:16] this is going to be a problem. So, this
[38:17] is the chart. The white line here is
[38:20] Russell growth.
[38:22] The Russell 1000 growth. So, the
[38:24] overweight position that many, many
[38:26] people, including my stepfather, have is
[38:29] in growth. Uh there needs to be a
[38:31] reweighting and it needs to be not
[38:33] necessarily towards value, but just have
[38:35] to know that growth is not happening the
[38:37] way it was. This is about
[38:38] semiconductors. This is about energy.
[38:40] This is about materials. That's where
[38:41] you need to have everything. This chart
[38:43] is overlaid with the hyperscalers
[38:45] relative to the S&P. So, since 2016, and
[38:48] if I took this back, and the reason I
[38:49] haven't is because of the hyperscalers,
[38:51] but if you took this back to 2007, this
[38:53] has been all of the performance. You
[38:54] just wanted to be long growth relative
[38:56] to the S&P or the hyperscalers. Well,
[38:59] now I think that's going to be in a
[39:00] permanent reversal the other direction.
[39:03] Salesforce came out with their headless
[39:05] 360
[39:07] and then immediately
[39:09] uh were billy clubbed uh and down 8, 9%
[39:12] yesterday on the back of IBM's earnings.
[39:14] This is something I talked about a
[39:15] couple weeks ago.
[39:17] The bar for the software companies is,
[39:19] if you beat earnings, which is what's
[39:21] been going on, that's not a surprise.
[39:23] Unless you can actually show that your
[39:26] AI stuff is going to offset the rest of
[39:28] your seat-based model, that's the only
[39:31] way your stock's not going to fall. If
[39:32] you miss for any reason or it's slightly
[39:34] disappointing, you're down 8 to 10%.
[39:37] That's why it's a waste of time to spend
[39:38] time in the software side. This spreads
[39:40] into the private credit side. It's a
[39:42] very large default uh this week in
[39:45] Medallia. Probably didn't read people's
[39:47] radars, but wipes out 5.1 billion in
[39:50] equity, imperils the lenders, too.
[39:53] Blackstone's public BDC has massive
[39:57] size, nearly 400 million, and complies
[40:00] as 5% of the net assets.
[40:02] If you're in private credit,
[40:04] good luck.
[40:06] Uh again, this chart just kind of bring
[40:08] it in home with the themes. Here, since
[40:11] the lows in October, I wanted to show
[40:13] that this is my thematic portfolio. It's
[40:16] been up. This is the daily numbers every
[40:18] single day so far this month except for
[40:21] one.
[40:22] Uh and it was down slightly that month
[40:24] and
[40:25] slightly that day. Here is the basket
[40:28] relative to the hyperscalers. This is
[40:29] the trade that I want to have on. So,
[40:31] for long short people, for hedge funds
[40:33] that are looking for the basket and
[40:34] looking for access, this is the way I
[40:36] would trade it. Uh I think it's going to
[40:38] have You can see it's a good sharp
[40:40] ratio. They are correlated.
[40:43] It It's going to matter. This is it
[40:45] relative to the S&P, and there's two
[40:46] things I want you to realize. Yes, it's
[40:48] had a breakout,
[40:50] but it was unchanged 6 years ago or 5
[40:53] and 1/2 years ago as of last week. So,
[40:56] this is the beginning of a trend. My
[40:58] portfolio is not something that is late
[41:00] stage. This is the beginning of a trend.
[41:06] Uh thanks to the people who reached out
[41:08] on the technical side. There were a
[41:09] couple RSIs that were wrong. I ran
[41:11] everything. I will put this up every
[41:13] single week. And again, for people
[41:15] calling, this is not what I think people
[41:17] should do. This is not some scoring that
[41:20] is done by other people. This is purely
[41:23] something I put together. There is an
[41:25] explanation that's on the subscriber
[41:27] site. This is giving you the ability of
[41:30] getting all the technicals for them in
[41:31] one place.
[41:33] What I did was say I did a video this
[41:35] week that you guys got
[41:37] how to use Claude to turn your portfolio
[41:39] list into trade ideas. You can do
[41:40] whatever you want. If you like to find
[41:42] names that aren't working on my list,
[41:44] where their RSIs just went from 30 to
[41:46] 35, but they're down 20% for the year,
[41:49] go for it. I show you in this video how
[41:53] you can put different prompts and how
[41:54] you can do it. It's a short video. Watch
[41:56] it. It's 5 minutes, but it'll give you
[41:58] some ideas on how to do this. In terms
[42:00] of the Nvidia
[42:02] 800-V DC
[42:05] not announcement, but report in South
[42:07] Korean media that I talked about. Um
[42:11] again, as a reminder, this was it and
[42:12] the demand for power firms. What I did
[42:15] was I want to remind you this edge side.
[42:17] So, as a reminder in that first part of
[42:19] this video, I talked about the
[42:21] connection to the edge. This is up on
[42:23] the website. It went up last week.
[42:26] Power semis are one of the verticals
[42:29] that are in there, and there are six
[42:30] companies. That was the chart I showed
[42:32] you. That is this chart. Equal weight of
[42:36] those names. That's what it's up now.
[42:37] These are timely things when I put them
[42:40] out.
[42:41] Now,
[42:42] I did a dual one,
[42:45] and I connected the Nvidia side with the
[42:47] edge investment side using the Claude
[42:50] skill, which I gave to you guys last
[42:52] week as well. For those of you who tried
[42:54] to use it and it didn't work, I can't
[42:56] say this loud enough.
[42:58] It works. All you have to do, if it
[43:00] doesn't work for you, is put it into
[43:02] Claude and say, "How do I do this?" You
[43:04] guys have to get used to using AI, and
[43:07] the more that you use it, the better you
[43:09] will get at it. That is the reason why
[43:11] I'm doing the videos. I can't
[43:12] individually go through every single
[43:14] person and figure out what you did that
[43:16] was wrong. So, please take the prompt
[43:19] that I gave you, upload it, try to run
[43:21] it. If it doesn't run, ask it what I'm
[43:23] doing wrong, and then Claude will take
[43:25] you through and fix it. If you're not
[43:27] paying $20 for it, I don't know if it'll
[43:29] work, because this is something that I
[43:31] know that my son, who's a college
[43:32] student, I gave him the entire thing. He
[43:34] ran all of them. I know that a lot of
[43:35] people have reached out and showed me
[43:37] what they're able to do. This is the
[43:38] kind of stuff you can do is take that
[43:40] news report, upload it with my edge
[43:42] investment universe, and say, "Hey, out
[43:45] of these names, give me some other
[43:46] names. Give me small cap names. Give me
[43:48] mid cap names." That's the way you use
[43:49] Claude connected to the work that I'm
[43:51] doing.
[43:52] This is what I'm working on now,
[43:54] molecular moat 2.0, chemistry at the
[43:57] interface. We're getting new news where
[43:59] advanced packaging, photonics, and
[44:01] liquid cooling coverage converge.
[44:03] If you guys are interested more in
[44:05] chemicals, I will get some more, but
[44:06] because of the Middle East conflict and
[44:08] what has happened with the the regional
[44:11] oil energy prices being different, uh I
[44:14] think there's an opportunity here, so I
[44:15] would go spend time on the chemicals. I
[44:18] will bring you something in the coming
[44:20] weeks.
[44:21] Bitcoin. Again, yesterday we got a huge
[44:24] move down in the software side.
[44:25] Remember, this overlay is what I've
[44:27] shown before. This is software relative
[44:30] or software overlaid with Bitcoin.
[44:32] I believe Bitcoin has made a bottom. The
[44:35] MACD weeklies are going. If I'm right,
[44:37] they should start moving at some point
[44:39] and get up to this level, which would
[44:40] get it close to 95 to 100,000. I believe
[44:44] if this is going to happen, it needs to
[44:45] happen soon.
[44:47] Uh and I say that because we have broken
[44:49] the correlation.
[44:50] Uh there's inflation that's coming. I
[44:52] gave you guys the quadrants in terms of
[44:55] if we're where we do phenomenally well
[44:57] for Bitcoin, we're entering that
[44:58] quadrant the next
[45:00] week. Uh sorry, the next month. If you
[45:03] think about PMIs, I've talked about PMIs
[45:05] going higher. Now we've got
[45:06] confirmation, the industrial thing, that
[45:08] PMIs are going to be going higher. We
[45:09] will get up towards my 60 level. So,
[45:12] once we get through the oil shock that's
[45:14] happening, I fully expect that we're
[45:16] going to see it go higher. So, between
[45:17] inflation and PMIs, that is normally a
[45:19] good thing. But the other thing is, by
[45:21] the end of this year, this is my main
[45:23] prediction for the people who are
[45:25] interested in Bitcoin, but also for
[45:26] hedge funds and mutual funds and private
[45:27] wealth managers, I've said this before.
[45:30] I'll say it to you guys. If you want
[45:31] Anthony Pompliano and I to come speak
[45:33] for your FAs, give us a call. By the end
[45:36] of this year,
[45:38] this growth asset basket will be a
[45:40] problem, and people are going to be
[45:41] looking for things they can invest in.
[45:43] And the problem is no one likes to buy
[45:45] the end of parabolic charts. The one
[45:48] thing good about Bitcoin right now is
[45:50] that it isn't a parabolic chart. It is
[45:52] unchanged right now. You're getting the
[45:54] chance to buy something unchanged
[45:57] from 2024.
[45:59] That is a very, very powerful situation,
[46:01] and that reminds me more of things that
[46:04] wealth managers should be doing. I think
[46:06] it's a great opportunity. Now, I have a
[46:08] Bitcoin proxy. I haven't shown it to you
[46:10] guys. It's three components, and it
[46:12] involves the three things I just said.
[46:14] So, it involves the Qs. That is the
[46:15] software side. It involves gold. That is
[46:18] the store of value side {slash} when
[46:21] everything is breaking down, where do we
[46:22] go hide our money? And includes copper.
[46:24] That is the PMI side. This is the
[46:26] long-term chart
[46:28] going back to 2017. The white line here
[46:30] is the proxy. We have alligator jaws,
[46:32] guys. I like the catch-up trade that's
[46:34] coming, and I think gold is going
[46:35] higher. I think copper's going higher. I
[46:37] think the Qs are going higher. I don't
[46:38] think the Qs are going higher because of
[46:40] the hyperscalers. I think the Qs are
[46:41] going higher because of
[46:43] biotech,
[46:44] semis,
[46:46] all of that stuff. There will be changes
[46:48] in the Qs. I don't think the growth
[46:50] baskets are going to do the same thing,
[46:51] and I certainly don't think software.
[46:52] So, I think by the end of the year,
[46:54] you're going to be wanting to increase
[46:55] your weighting in Bitcoin as a growth
[46:56] thing.
[46:58] And ETFs are coming for crypto. So, I've
[47:00] been asked this a lot. If you've been
[47:02] looking for stable coins and
[47:03] tokenization, you've got STBQ, Amplify
[47:06] Stablecoin Technology, Amplify
[47:09] Tokenization Technology. I'd go take a
[47:11] look. Uh and finally, for those of you
[47:13] in California, I will and those of you
[47:16] attending this event on the
[47:17] institutional and the public pension
[47:19] side,
[47:20] uh reach out to me. Um you can reach out
[47:23] to me at on Twitter. You can reach out
[47:25] to me on LinkedIn. You can reach out to
[47:27] me on on email if you have my 22V email.
[47:31] Uh you will be able to find me at this
[47:33] event speaking at the institutional
[47:35] investor event. That's it for this week,
[47:37] guys.
[47:40] Good luck trading these parabolic
[47:41] markets, and I'll see you next week.

← Volver al listado de vídeos

Scroll al inicio