Jordi Visser / VisserLabs

Hyperscalers Are Collapsing. Is the AI “Bubble” Crashing or Consolidating?

🇬🇧 EN🇪🇸 ES
56:14 min youtube 2026 Week 26 🇬🇧 EN

Summary

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-IKYJiSebg  |  Duration: 56 min

âš¡ TL;DR

  • Jordi Visser says the AI trade is not breaking; it is moving through a midcycle slowdown. His setup is a rotation: hyperscalers are down 14% month to date, while the real AI receivers — semis, industrials, power, memory, and parts of small caps — still have earnings momentum.
  • His core argument is that this is benchmark arbitrage, not a bubble crash. The S&P is still compounding at roughly its 15-year 14.7% annualized pace, equal-weight breadth still looks healthy, and he thinks the market is punishing the spenders, not the secular AI buildout.
  • The non-consensus twist is that cheaper models, open source, loops, and agentic commerce can all keep token demand and infrastructure demand rising while simultaneously compressing the valuation of the big frontier spenders. He stays bullish AI infrastructure, increasingly interested in the application layer, and still thinks Bitcoin is in a bear market until momentum actually turns.

â—† The frame: this is a midcycle slowdown inside an AI bull market

Visser opens from Maine with a very specific claim: June has not been the start of an AI collapse. It has been a violent rotation in which the Mag 7, QQQs, and hyperscalers get hit while healthcare, real estate, utilities, and small caps quietly hold up better. His phrase for the whole thing is midcycle slowdown — growth is still positive, but the straight-line upside and easy five-to-ten bagger phase in the bottom layers of the AI stack is fading.

That distinction matters because he thinks a lot of macro commentary is just noise. He points to falling inflation expectations, the reversal in the hawkish Kevin Warsh scare, and stable rate behavior as evidence that the tape is rotating more because of positioning, expiration, and valuation than because the economy suddenly broke.

â–¶ Short the spenders, stay long the receivers

His main trade has not changed: short hyperscalers relative to the thematic AI trade. The way he explains it is clean. The hyperscalers are the spenders. The better setups are increasingly the companies receiving the money — semis, memory, industrial enablers, power, automation, and eventually selected application winners.

He keeps calling this benchmark arbitrage. That means the market is reweighting away from expensive benchmark-heavy names and toward the parts of AI where the earnings leverage is still clearer. Even Micron, despite a massive quarter and strong commentary, becomes for him a symbol of the slowdown: fundamentals can be explosive while the stock still pauses because the market starts debating timing, not direction.

★ Why he rejects the “AI bubble is popping” take

Visser is blunt here: if the S&P has delivered about a 14.7% annualized return over the last 15 years and is still running at basically that pace, calling this moment a blowoff bubble is lazy. He contrasts the US with markets like the Nikkei, Kospi, and Taiwan, which have benefited more directly from AI benchmark exposure. In his view, that proves the AI receivers are still driving global leadership.

He also leans on internals. Equal-weight S&P and breadth are not behaving like a market in structural trouble. Forward EPS keeps rising. So the real bear case cannot just be “prices went up too much.” It has to be a credible call that earnings themselves are about to roll over — and he does not see that yet.

â–º Cheaper models can hurt hyperscaler multiples without killing demand

Key tension: Visser thinks 60% of companies watching AI budgets are moving to cheaper models. That can weaken the economics of the frontier-model leaders even while overall compute, memory, and token demand continue to expand.

This is one of the sharper parts of the video. He argues that the token index has likely already peaked as a pure scarcity trade because enterprises increasingly route the bulk of work to cheaper models or open source. In some workflows, he says, the most expensive models may end up doing only the hardest 1% of work.

But he does not take that as bearish for the whole stack. He explicitly invokes Jevons paradox: if intelligence gets cheaper, usage can explode. So lower price per unit of intelligence can still mean much higher total infrastructure consumption. That is why he remains positive on the physical buildout even as he gets more skeptical on hyperscaler equity multiples.

â—† Memory, semis, and the hardware bottleneck still matter

His Micron section is really a broader hardware argument. He talks about the Micron–Anthropic relationship, continued memory shortages with no clear line of sight to 2028, and the fact that smartphones, autos, robotics, and especially humanoids all add more memory demand. He even uses a practical example: he would love to run stronger open models like GLM 5.2 privately, but consumer hardware is still nowhere close to making that easy.

That is why he keeps separating the idea of a valuation slowdown from a demand collapse. He can believe the market starts paying lower multiples for parts of AI while still believing memory, compute, and data-center plumbing remain in a secular bull market.

â–¶ The next layer is loops, not just agents

One of Visser’s big forward-looking points is that the market is still underestimating loops — recurring automated workflows that continuously prompt and coordinate agents. He cites Boris from Claude, Peter Steinberger, and Andrej Karpathy to argue that the next abstraction layer is not merely chatting with an AI agent but designing the loop that runs the work repeatedly.

His practical workforce point is pretty stark: if two power users teach the workflow to the agents, the other 98 similar workers may not be needed. That is why he thinks token usage can explode again. Once workflows become loops, demand no longer scales only with the number of human users; it scales with the number of recurring processes an organization automates.

★ Build your own AI brain — and watch the application layer

He spends a meaningful chunk of the video on agency. His AI mindset idea is basically a call to build your own knowledge brain, your own research loops, and your own workflow infrastructure. In his framework, this is not a cute side project; it is becoming table stakes for staying relevant.

That also connects to investing. Visser says the application layer may now offer better Sharpe ratios than just owning the obvious infrastructure winners. His biotech and healthcare tangent fits that view: he thinks AI-driven drug discovery, personalized medicine, and GLP pipelines could create the next wave of alpha, and he repeats his huge call that Eli Lilly could become the largest company in the world within five years.

â–º Stripe, agentic commerce, and where crypto fits

Another interesting bridge is from AI infrastructure into agentic commerce. Visser sees Stripe Sessions as evidence that solo builders are moving from vibe coding to vibe deploying — not just creating software, but launching it, operating it, and monetizing it through agentic tooling. He thinks the sequence is already visible: agents write code, then operate infrastructure, then deploy products, and eventually transact.

That is where crypto comes back in his framework. He argues that the financial guardrails for AI agents sit in the application layer and that tokenization plus crypto rails will be needed once autonomous economic actors start doing real business with one another. It is a much more practical crypto thesis than a pure macro-debasement one.

â—† Bitcoin is still dead money to him

Despite the long-run crypto thesis, he stays disciplined on the chart. His message is simple: Bitcoin is in a bear market. The 200-day moving average is rolling lower, price keeps making lower lows, and there is no reason to be a hero early. If the bigger tokenization thesis is right, he thinks there will still be plenty of time later.

That leaves him with a barbell: stay engaged with the AI ecosystem that already has earnings and usage momentum, and keep crypto on watch until price action confirms that it is ready again.

â—† Search for the alpha

The real takeaway is not “AI good” or “AI bad.” It is that Visser sees two very different AI trades moving at the same time. One is the secular infrastructure and automation buildout, which he still thinks is intact. The other is the equity valuation of the hyperscaler spenders, which he thinks can stay under pressure as cheaper models, open source, and uncertain monetization change the math.

  • His base case is still consolidation, not collapse. The market is resetting through time, volatility, and rotation rather than ending the AI bull market.
  • He remains long the receivers of AI CapEx. Memory, semis, industrials, power, and selected application names still fit the thesis better than the benchmark-heavy spenders.
  • Loops and agentic commerce are the next demand unlocks. Cheaper intelligence can still produce far more total usage once workflows automate themselves.
  • Crypto stays strategic but not tactical. Long-run tokenization matters; near-term Bitcoin momentum still looks bad.
The twist: Visser is basically arguing that the AI “bubble” is neither cleanly crashing nor cleanly intact. It is splitting. The obvious giants can de-rate while the deeper AI economy — memory, infrastructure, loops, biotech applications, and eventually agentic commerce — keeps compounding underneath them.

â–º Chapter summaries

0:00 — Maine intro, rotation, and the midcycle slowdown frame

Visser sets the tone immediately: hyperscalers had a brutal month, but he sees the move as a midcycle slowdown inside an ongoing AI expansion, not the start of a broken market.

4:46 — Hyperscalers down 14% MTD and the benchmark-arbitrage trade

He argues the market is rotating away from the benchmark-heavy spenders and toward the real receivers of AI money. That is why he wants to stay short hyperscalers relative to the thematic AI basket.

7:32 — Why cheaper models do not automatically kill the infrastructure thesis

Even if enterprises move to cheaper models and the token index peaks, Jevons paradox can keep total compute demand rising. Lower unit pricing does not mean lower total consumption.

11:14 — Micron as the symbol of slower rate of change

Micron’s fundamentals look explosive, yet the stock pauses. For Visser that is the picture of the moment: great businesses can consolidate because the market is debating timing and valuation.

15:12 — Consolidation is not a top

He explains consolidation as the market’s way of resetting through time, price, and volatility while letting moving averages catch up. His message is blunt: this is not the dot-com bubble repeating.

18:29 — Earnings still justify a lot of the AI trade

Visser points to rising global EPS, strong information-tech growth expectations, and the semiconductor earnings backdrop as reasons not to get structurally bearish too early.

21:30 — GLM 5.2, private hardware limits, and memory demand

Open models are getting strong enough to pressure frontier-model pricing, but local hardware is still a bottleneck. That tension keeps him constructive on memory and infrastructure.

26:04 — Sovereign AI, autos, humanoids, and why applications matter more now

He broadens the demand story from data centers into devices, robotics, and national AI stacks, then pivots toward application-layer opportunities where Sharpe ratios may improve.

31:28 — Loops as the next real hype cycle

His argument is that the next unlock is not just agents but loops: recurring workflows that continuously prompt, coordinate, and execute work, driving another leg of token demand.

37:09 — Build your own knowledge brain

Visser turns the conversation personal and operational, urging viewers to develop an AI mindset, create research loops, and build their own knowledge systems before the productivity gap widens further.

43:44 — Healthcare, Eli Lilly, and the application-layer bull case

He makes the case that biotech and AI healthcare are moving into a real renaissance and repeats his very large call on Eli Lilly as a top long-term winner.

49:32 — Stripe, agentic commerce, crypto rails, and why Bitcoin still looks weak

The ending ties everything together: agents are moving from writing code to operating infrastructure and eventually transacting. That supports the long-run crypto thesis, even while Bitcoin itself still looks technically broken.

Generated with algorithm v2.1-anchor-first · model openai-codex/gpt-5.4 · 2026-06-28T14:07:16Z

Transcript

[0:00] I'm in Maine. Um,
[0:03] finished up a week.
[0:05] June has been a uh a wild month and I'm
[0:09] going to take you guys through it. Uh,
[0:11] the rotation continues. Uh, just a
[0:14] brutal month for the hyperscalers, the
[0:15] Mag 7 included. Uh, we're going through
[0:19] what I believe uh people have to adapt
[0:22] to, which is a midcycle slowdown. Uh, I
[0:24] don't think it's over and I think the
[0:26] earnings period is going to be very
[0:27] different than the first quarter
[0:29] earnings period. Uh, and Mike Ron was a
[0:31] preview of that with the earnings and
[0:33] the commentary explosive. Let's go see
[0:36] what the stock did for the week. Uh, I'm
[0:39] going to cover loops and tags. As the AI
[0:42] progression continues in terms of token
[0:44] usage, I wrote a paper this week on the
[0:46] AI mindset. I'm going to go through
[0:48] that. Uh, healthcare and the biotech
[0:51] renaissance. I've talked about Eli Liy.
[0:53] I've talked about biotech. Um, more news
[0:55] on that stuff this week. Again, I'm
[0:57] going to keep emphasizing the midcycle
[1:00] slowdown means the bottom three layers
[1:03] of the five layer cake to me are built
[1:07] in. And I don't mean the growth rate's
[1:09] going to stop, but I do believe that the
[1:12] uh the ability to just sit in things and
[1:15] think you're going to get a five and 10
[1:16] bagger is over. Uh, so it gets harder in
[1:19] the application stage is where I think
[1:20] you're going to start to see uh better
[1:22] sharp ratios. Uh, Stripe Sessions,
[1:26] I I referenced it last year. Um, it
[1:28] happened about a month ago. I finally
[1:30] got the chance to spend the time as it
[1:32] was put up on YouTube going through it
[1:34] and I'm going to connect it to the
[1:36] Agentic Commerce and you guys are going
[1:37] to hear me keep talking more about this
[1:39] in the middle of as more people reach
[1:42] out and say the crypto winter is here.
[1:44] for all of you crypto people. I continue
[1:47] to focus my attention on crypto uh for
[1:50] next year with a bottom happening
[1:53] anytime but we have no signs of it yet.
[1:56] So rather than sit there and try to pick
[1:57] the bottom we are in a bare market but
[2:00] let's go through the fundamentals behind
[2:03] it. So for the week S&P was down 2% but
[2:08] this is not a uh a fall.
[2:11] Healthcare up 8% real estate up four
[2:14] utilities I don't have to go read them
[2:15] all you can see what's on the bottom
[2:18] that is basically the definition of the
[2:20] mag 7 consumer discretionary info tech
[2:23] commercial services
[2:25] uh rotation rotation uh Q's down almost
[2:31] 5% and again I said this back in this
[2:34] week now we've had the third or second
[2:37] worst week beating the one from the
[2:39] beginning of the month So
[2:42] Q's are starting to feel a little bit at
[2:45] the same time that that's going on
[2:46] surprisingly as Beta is getting crushed.
[2:50] IWM continues to outperform up one and a
[2:53] half%. So yes, in the same way that we
[2:55] had a big up big up week here on the
[2:58] bounceback. This week we've had our
[3:00] third week in a row. But if you take it
[3:02] back further and you go from early
[3:04] April, which again you would have
[3:07] thought that oil would have had a bigger
[3:08] impact on small caps, but everything is
[3:11] good in small cap land. Inflation
[3:14] expectations seen through the swap rates
[3:17] um continue to fall as
[3:20] getting banks saying three rate hikes.
[3:23] And I I'm just going to keep
[3:25] emphasizing, guys, the more you focus on
[3:26] the macro and stupid things like what
[3:29] the Fed chair is going to do from an
[3:30] investment standpoint related to AI,
[3:33] every time that you migrate into this
[3:35] area of this, if we were going to have
[3:37] Fed rate hikes, would IWM be
[3:39] outperforming right now? Um, again, it's
[3:42] not that it won't matter to some degree
[3:45] for a period of a week or two. It
[3:47] obviously has had an impact on on
[3:49] capitulation in the debasement trade. Uh
[3:52] the dollar has continued to rally, but
[3:54] here's what's going on in inflation
[3:56] expectations. And again, we've taken out
[3:59] the lows of last year on the one-year. I
[4:02] mean, again, I said it before. I thought
[4:04] we'd be having as this went higher on
[4:06] the back that people were
[4:07] underestimating the risk from the
[4:09] straight of four moves. I listened to a
[4:11] lot of the people that went through.
[4:13] Didn't think it would ever get to the
[4:14] point that they did, but definitely
[4:15] thought we'd be seeing in the second
[4:16] half of the year. But here are the
[4:18] expectations coming down. So whether
[4:20] it's part of the the basement trade or
[4:22] not doesn't really matter. And it's not
[4:24] just swap rates. Here's tenure rates. I
[4:26] mean again, we have a raging economy. We
[4:28] have employment that's stronger than
[4:30] expected. We still have uh CPI above 4%.
[4:33] We have the PCE core coming out. And yet
[4:36] somehow or another, we are lower than we
[4:38] were before the evil Kevin Worsh spoke
[4:41] and was super hawkish. Two-year rates
[4:43] have given up the entire move. So every
[4:45] one of those macro podcasts you listen
[4:47] to saying here it is. It was a hawkish.
[4:49] It was nothing. Absolutely nothing.
[4:53] Here's the important stuff. Hyperscalers
[4:54] down 14% monthto date. This is across
[4:58] the board, guys. I'm not going to go
[5:00] through a lot of news this week because
[5:02] I'm going to try to keep this relatively
[5:03] around 45 minutes. But you got a lot of
[5:06] stuff going on. These are big moves
[5:08] monthto date. I mean, these are big. And
[5:10] I've told you I want to be on the short
[5:12] side of hyperscalers relative to the
[5:15] thematic AI trade. Um, here's what's the
[5:18] reality. Profit margins uh for the MAG
[5:22] 8. This includes Netflix, does not
[5:24] include uh Broadcom, but I mean this is
[5:28] not happening for fundamental reasons.
[5:30] This is a rotation. These are the
[5:32] spenders. You have to lump Nvidia in.
[5:35] Apple obviously had bad news this week.
[5:37] I wrote a paper on Apple. Tesla hasn't
[5:40] been able to go out. People reach out to
[5:41] me on Tesla. I still love Tesla, but the
[5:43] problem is right now any company with
[5:47] high pees is under pressure. This is not
[5:50] a market to find high pees. And
[5:52] especially when Tesla, like SpaceX, like
[5:55] Bitcoin, like all of this, these things
[5:58] need retail traders. They need retail
[6:00] energy. And if retail energy is finding
[6:03] money from the math in the market, which
[6:05] is through the earnings coming through
[6:06] on the AI trades, and you're getting
[6:09] four to 10 baggers over a one-year basis
[6:11] for I mean, it's shocking. We've we've
[6:14] had more than a doubling in 10% of the
[6:16] S&P over the last uh year and and four
[6:19] months. So, they haven't needed
[6:21] anything. When the mega caps are going
[6:23] down to me, this is a a representation
[6:26] of what I've shown many many weeks,
[6:29] which is I call it the benchmark
[6:31] arbitrage. It's a reweing away from
[6:33] these high multiple names. Nvidia is not
[6:36] a high multiple name, but the rest of
[6:37] these for the most part started the year
[6:39] that way. So, as their earnings and
[6:41] their profit margins continue to grow,
[6:43] as they lay off people,
[6:46] their stocks are getting pounded because
[6:48] they're spending lots of money. I wanted
[6:50] to just highlight this because if you go
[6:52] back to the end of the great financial
[6:53] crisis and take March and you go through
[6:56] and look at a total realized annualized
[6:58] return for the S&P, you're talking about
[7:02] 14.7%.
[7:06] Look where we are through the halfway
[7:07] mark this year at the exact same pace.
[7:10] Yet this is called a bubble. So of the
[7:13] last 15 years, we are going exactly at
[7:16] the pace that we have over that time
[7:18] period. Now here's the Nikkei up 38%.
[7:22] Here's the Cosby up 100%. Here's the TX
[7:25] up 53. Even Europe is equal to the US.
[7:32] I I bring this up because if you're not
[7:34] involved in these from an AI
[7:35] perspective, because that's what's
[7:36] driving these, they just have a higher
[7:38] benchmark waiting towards AI than we do.
[7:42] Our spenders are fueling this the same
[7:45] way that if you broke down the S&P and
[7:47] went to the AI names or my thematic
[7:49] portfolio, my thematic portfolio is up
[7:51] around this mount for the TX. So, what's
[7:55] happening is the receivers of the money
[7:57] are driving everything,
[8:00] navigating the AI midcycle slowdown. I
[8:02] did a webinar this week uh for the
[8:05] subscribers just to make sure that
[8:07] people focus on getting used to this. I
[8:10] went through a bunch of things. I'm
[8:11] going to go through some more now. Uh
[8:13] but just remember
[8:15] this is what I wrote. This is this was
[8:17] for the the video update. So, this is
[8:19] what I did this week. Again, for the
[8:20] subscribers, if you didn't see it, it is
[8:22] on the website. But again, I go through
[8:24] a lot of different things regarding um
[8:27] intra week to make sure that people
[8:29] don't panic and don't just sit there and
[8:31] start capitulating all over things. And
[8:33] then I remind you that okay, I wrote
[8:35] that the fireworks show was over on June
[8:37] 4th. The AI midcycle slowdown, building
[8:40] intelligent there, but in here in macro,
[8:42] a midcycle slowdown is the pause inside
[8:44] an expansion growth is still positive.
[8:48] It's just that the rate of change comes
[8:51] down.
[8:54] You've got all of this stuff. So, the
[8:55] second that AI starts to slow down, and
[8:57] I mean the second, I have no idea how to
[9:00] describe to you how many people that I
[9:02] communicate with
[9:04] from from my world that send me things
[9:08] because they know I'm focused on it and
[9:09] they're looking to see if I agree with
[9:11] them. And it's all of this bubble stuff.
[9:13] Things are going to crack. Things are
[9:14] going to go down. We are in the middle
[9:16] of a very important month, guys. June is
[9:18] a massive expiration month. Um, you've
[9:21] had that. You've also got the pension
[9:23] rebalancings at a time where stocks have
[9:25] massively outperformed
[9:27] bonds. And at the same time, you've had
[9:29] the AI names completely outperformed.
[9:32] So, it's not shocking that there's
[9:34] cracks. But to say it seems more
[9:37] serious, again, the midcycle slowdown
[9:39] should bring this out. Valuations of AI
[9:40] related stocks are now high relative to
[9:42] our optimistic views. Okay, so people
[9:44] are in it. part of the AI. That's what
[9:46] goes on with the stock market when you
[9:49] have a serious growth phase. 60% of
[9:52] companies now watching AI budgets are
[9:53] moving to cheaper models. Talk about
[9:55] this every week. I continue to believe
[9:57] it's there. And every smart person that
[9:58] is inside AI keeps saying the same
[10:00] thing, which is eventually most
[10:02] companies will be using open source or
[10:04] the cheaper models for the majority of
[10:06] their compute. In some numbers, I've
[10:08] heard 99%. If you haven't thought about
[10:10] that, you don't need the most expensive
[10:13] models to do the hardest work. We are in
[10:15] the very early innings, the very early
[10:18] innings of figuring out what's going on
[10:19] with um how to use AI for a cheap way.
[10:22] So, I do believe that you're going to
[10:24] see more and more of the token index
[10:27] weakness type thing. And like I said on
[10:29] to the subscribers this week, I really
[10:31] do believe that token index has already
[10:32] peaked. So, you're going to be looking
[10:34] at a chart. Best case scenario looks
[10:35] like 10-year yields where it just kind
[10:37] of goes sideways. Worst case scenario is
[10:39] it starts going through the deflationary
[10:40] pressure that makes sense from AI. That
[10:43] doesn't mean that Jevans paradox isn't
[10:45] alive and well and the compute numbers
[10:47] don't go through the roof. I'll go
[10:48] through some of that because we have
[10:50] more agentic activity going on.
[10:53] Bernstein put this out and again I'm
[10:55] only bringing this up because this is
[10:57] your second derivative. Now they don't
[11:00] have this thing peaking until sometime
[11:02] in 2027. When I go through the micron
[11:04] earnings you can see it. But the main
[11:05] point is look at the explosion in terms
[11:09] of the earnings and then obviously the
[11:12] forecast.
[11:13] When this slows down, it should mean
[11:16] that the stocks start stop going up at
[11:18] the same price. Now, for confirmation,
[11:21] here's my thematic portfolio.
[11:24] This is the 30-day rate of change. So,
[11:26] look, it peaked in May. Here's the
[11:28] 50-day rate of change. It peaked early
[11:30] in June. They're collapsing. All that
[11:33] means is the growth rate is slowing down
[11:34] in the thematic portfolio. We're
[11:36] consolidating
[11:38] and as I go through that should be
[11:40] expected with everything with Micron
[11:42] massive blowout of earnings. You got
[11:44] them doing a deal with Enthropic all
[11:47] kinds of stuff and the stock finished
[11:50] down for the week. Lots of activity wide
[11:53] range blah blah blah outside the prior
[11:55] week's range. I mean, we're talking
[11:56] about massive stuff. Like, when you go
[11:58] from,300
[12:00] to 1,300 points and basically we were
[12:02] stuck in a a 40point range last year
[12:05] doing nothing. I'm just telling you that
[12:08] again, Micron is a symbol of that
[12:09] slowdown in the rate of change. Here's
[12:11] another thing. Uh, for those of you,
[12:13] again, I highly recommend doing this
[12:15] type of stuff. I will do a video very
[12:17] shortly on how to use these Excel files
[12:20] using Claude Co-work. Um, and I'll give
[12:23] you guys the the prompts. I know I did
[12:26] this for
[12:27] uh
[12:29] uh something in terms of going through
[12:31] it, but here you go. The amount of names
[12:33] above the 20-day with inside my thematic
[12:35] portfolio of the 100. We're now down to
[12:37] 44. We peaked May 8th. We were at 85%
[12:40] above the 50-day. We're now at 59 at the
[12:42] end of the week. The 200 day still rock
[12:46] solid. The up 50-day uh uh up slope. We
[12:51] had another one turn another two turn
[12:53] positive this week. were actually at
[12:54] highs and this is there. These are the
[12:56] things that matter for a bull market. So
[12:57] again, we're in a bull market. We're in
[12:59] a consolidation. We need to have them.
[13:02] What is a consolidation? For those of
[13:03] you who
[13:05] have never really thought about a
[13:07] consolidation with inside a bull market,
[13:08] a consolidation is the market's way of
[13:10] making a worker trend harder to own. It
[13:13] resets successes through some
[13:14] combination of price time and
[13:15] volatility, shaking out weak hands and
[13:17] preserving the larger trends. Now, I put
[13:18] up three separate ones here. I don't
[13:21] think we're going to go through this
[13:22] one. So a sideways one usually depends
[13:25] on something that is moving at a very
[13:27] slow pace. This we could end up in
[13:30] something like this. Um I think this
[13:33] level here would be around the uh 50-day
[13:35] for the index. We're still well above
[13:37] it. Uh but it could be more the 100 day.
[13:39] Whatever the case is, you could get this
[13:41] kind of slowdown. This is the one I
[13:43] think we're in and this is the one that
[13:45] has gone on. So that would mean that
[13:47] volatility in time. So you have to
[13:49] remember that consolidations are
[13:50] allowing the moving averages to catch up
[13:53] to where the prices are. That should
[13:55] happen when the growth rate or the
[13:57] second derivative in terms of earnings
[13:58] and all of that stuff starts to slow
[14:00] down. For confirmation of the fact that
[14:02] we're in the third one, here is the
[14:04] volatility again for tech momentum. This
[14:06] is the 60-day V. The Morgan Stanley tech
[14:09] momentum. It just continues to move
[14:11] higher. So at an 80 V, we're talking
[14:14] about 5% a day is the normal move.
[14:18] I mean, you're talking about big moves.
[14:20] Now, everyone can sit here and say,
[14:22] "Well, this is like the.com bubble."
[14:24] This is not like the.com bubble.
[14:28] Here's industrial momentum, which is the
[14:31] other big part of the AI trade in my
[14:33] thematic portfolio. So, the industrial
[14:35] momentum 60-day vault is also getting up
[14:37] to levels only associated with COVID. We
[14:39] don't have this going back. Morgan
[14:40] certainly only has that from there. You
[14:42] can see the upward trend in this that
[14:44] has basically been going on since
[14:46] Caterpillar and Vertive and all of these
[14:48] different components that are more
[14:50] related to the industrial side started
[14:51] to trend higher. So here's the chart on
[14:55] the thematic portfolio and again since
[14:57] mid May when the 30-day rate of change,
[15:00] you can see that we went from a period
[15:01] of just trending higher. This is a
[15:03] consolidation guys. That's what this is.
[15:05] This isn't some big top forming. We keep
[15:08] making higher highs and higher lows.
[15:10] We'll see. Here's the 50-day right here.
[15:12] It's down from where we were. That's
[15:14] another what 3%. Uh we'll see what
[15:18] happens, but we've done some work. Um
[15:22] again, 50-day here, you could look at it
[15:24] on this. The reason uh I wanted to look
[15:27] at these at different stages is you
[15:29] could pick your poison in terms of the
[15:30] correction. If you want to focus on just
[15:33] this year, this is when Opus 4.5 came
[15:35] out. uh 50% retracement would take us
[15:38] down to here, which would also be the
[15:39] lows in May. I could see that as well.
[15:42] If you want to look at it more from
[15:43] where it was from uh uh the bottom of
[15:46] last year after the tariff fears, you
[15:49] would think a bigger correction, but I
[15:51] don't think people jumped in. Based on
[15:53] my conversations, I don't think people
[15:55] accepted DRAM as a bull market until
[15:58] September, October. So, I'm using Opus
[16:00] 4.5 as the the true point to look for to
[16:04] use for retracements. Um, if you
[16:06] followed my advice and you're long my
[16:10] thematic portfolio relative to the
[16:12] hyperscalers,
[16:15] this isn't a consolidation. This
[16:16] continues to be a bull market. So, for
[16:18] the week it was up again and again, the
[16:20] hyperscalers are the spenders.
[16:22] Here's the equal weight S&P. So, with
[16:25] everyone freaking out, me getting stuff
[16:27] saying I'm now net short, I believe the
[16:29] market's going to collapse, blah blah
[16:31] blah, here's the equal weight S&P. This
[16:33] is not about anything more than the
[16:35] hyperscalers going down. And yes, there
[16:38] are retail that is heavily involved in
[16:41] Taiwan and Korea and in the US in the AI
[16:44] trade just like silver, gold, and
[16:46] palenteer a year ago and crypto. Those
[16:49] things continue to be in a quote unquote
[16:52] bare market. The debasement trade is
[16:54] unwinding. We just keep getting these
[16:57] rolling rolling rotations with inside an
[17:00] earnings driven bull market. This is not
[17:02] a speculation driven bull market. So how
[17:04] do you deal with retail? Retail is very
[17:07] sophisticated. You could burn them out
[17:08] by having this volatile chop and they
[17:11] start looking for the next good sharp
[17:13] ratio. Um equal weight is working.
[17:17] New York Stock Exchange breath same
[17:18] thing right at all-time highs. I showed
[17:22] this this week. I just want to make sure
[17:23] it does not pay to get mega bearish as I
[17:27] heard people reach out this week. I mean
[17:29] I I just here is the forward EPS. So you
[17:32] need earnings to come down plain and
[17:34] simple because the stock price is not
[17:38] going up relative to how much earnings
[17:40] are going up. So earnings have gone
[17:42] parabolic. The S&P is up 7.4% year to
[17:44] date. That's because of the
[17:47] hyperscalers. So this is not some like
[17:50] raging bull market. This is just
[17:52] earnings are going higher. So you're
[17:54] going to have to forecast when earnings
[17:55] go down. Two things on this chart. It's
[17:57] very hard for earnings to go down.
[17:58] Second thing is you don't do really well
[18:00] when you're shorting the stock market at
[18:03] these points when we've been here. These
[18:05] have been coming out of recession
[18:06] periods. I don't see how this is going
[18:08] to turn down. I do believe the growth
[18:10] rate is going to slow at some point
[18:12] because a lot of this has to do with
[18:14] Micron and SanDisk and Western Digital
[18:17] and all the semis and maybe this won't
[18:19] be as good but I don't know when that is
[18:21] going to
[18:23] turn down.
[18:25] Remember the earnings surprise blew off.
[18:27] I mean, again, these are all facts.
[18:28] These are not speculation. If you don't
[18:30] believe it and you think this is all the
[18:33] two names in the S&P or whatever garbage
[18:35] people send out to scare you, here is it
[18:38] for the S&P 600. Again, we had a bare
[18:41] market, unchanged earnings, margins,
[18:45] everything for small caps for for from
[18:48] the time Chat GPT came out until the end
[18:51] of last year. And now it's all going
[18:53] higher. If you don't believe in it,
[18:56] you're missing it. And here it is for
[18:58] the globe. This is global EPS for 2027.
[19:04] Here it is for the information
[19:05] technology side. Longterm expected
[19:08] long-term earnings growth soared to 38%.
[19:11] Again, you can fade this. You can go
[19:13] back and say, "Yep, look what happened
[19:14] here. This was it, too." So, fine. This
[19:17] needs to come down. We need revisions to
[19:19] come down. We don't have any of this
[19:21] yet. here is how much semis have gone up
[19:23] relative to their earnings looks
[19:25] justified to me. It's all about this. So
[19:29] if you guys think that tokens are going
[19:31] to come down or the price of tokens is
[19:33] magically going to all of a sudden
[19:35] decrease dramatically and that
[19:36] everyone's going to move to Chinese open
[19:38] source models which oh by the way is not
[19:40] possible um unless you're using the
[19:44] garbage models. Um, as someone who would
[19:46] love to, I wrote a paper about this,
[19:48] which I'll get into, as kind of the
[19:49] canary in the coal mine for when you
[19:51] should start thinking that token prices
[19:52] are going to start collapsing at a
[19:54] really fast pace. We don't have enough
[19:57] memory for that right now. So, the token
[19:59] needs, the demand just continue to grow
[20:01] exponentially. Quadrillion Q trillion
[20:05] back here. These numbers were not
[20:07] expected. I wrote a paper I talk about
[20:09] this back here about the inference
[20:10] needs. We are accelerating so fast that
[20:12] this number is just going to continue to
[20:13] go. That is what's driving the earnings
[20:16] is that this is the food that is
[20:18] necessary and if you don't like the
[20:20] accounting the capback spenders don't
[20:23] need they can move their spending over
[20:25] the next five years to give them time
[20:27] for the revenues to come in. That is a
[20:29] different bet. I'm not sure they're ever
[20:31] going to get the revenues on the
[20:32] timeline that they need which is why the
[20:34] multiple compression is real. So
[20:36] multiple compression is an uncertainty
[20:38] over their ability to get their revenues
[20:40] in the door while their profit margins
[20:41] are still growing. Think about it. It's
[20:43] being built into the market. All those
[20:45] risks that you think are happening,
[20:46] they're being built in through the
[20:48] hyperscalers. If you don't believe in
[20:51] what is coming, forget what has
[20:53] happened. Everyone else has to build
[20:55] their own AI data centers. They need
[20:58] chips. Japan just announced a $2.3
[21:01] trillion investment plan. Japan is about
[21:02] 3% of global GDP. So, multiply that by
[21:06] three, you're up to 70 trillion.
[21:09] I I you have to think about this from
[21:14] this. We get confirmation of this every
[21:17] day. Why would you bother fading this?
[21:20] You don't have to invest in all them
[21:21] because at some point I do believe that
[21:23] the buildout will not be profitable for
[21:26] the same companies, the applications and
[21:29] all this stuff. There's going to be
[21:30] tremendous competition. We'll build this
[21:32] into the pees at some point ahead way
[21:34] ahead of when it is. If you looked at
[21:36] the micron chart, the scary thing about
[21:37] it is once it starts to go down the
[21:39] other direction, you're talking about a
[21:41] big fall-off. The market will not have
[21:42] the right PE at that point. I feel very
[21:44] confident about that. So, I wrote this.
[21:46] This is my way of saying to you guys as
[21:49] a user who would love to use the Chinese
[21:53] models. I would love to use GLM 5.2. I
[21:56] would I would love to use them, play
[21:58] around with them. For anyone who does
[21:59] coding, they would love to use them. The
[22:01] problem is there are no Mac minis or Mac
[22:04] studios guys. There aren't any. Go read
[22:06] this report about why Apple is such an
[22:09] important thing. Why their architecture
[22:11] is so important because to for me to use
[22:14] GLM 5.2 which as I show is very close to
[22:17] the best models that's a lot of money. A
[22:21] lot again Mac Studios again sold out on
[22:25] Apple store except for the smallest
[22:27] models which won't be able to work. The
[22:29] 512
[22:31] configuration was pulled earlier this
[22:33] year. Again, you could have had as many
[22:35] as you wanted in January. This all
[22:37] changed in March or yes, I mean, it
[22:40] started to change in February. I bought
[22:41] my last load in February. That was when
[22:43] OpenClaw came out and I wanted to go run
[22:46] it. I did not expect the model changes
[22:49] to happen this fast. So, the model
[22:51] capabilities have improved dramatically
[22:53] before the hardware can. Why Micron's
[22:55] earning blowout are a headache for
[22:56] Apple. you started to see the price
[22:58] rises again. At some point, this will
[22:59] change. But if Apple, one of the most
[23:02] and until Nvidia, the largest and most
[23:05] important supply chain groups that
[23:07] should have been able to secure memory
[23:09] because of their orders for everything,
[23:11] they're in the queue.
[23:14] This is the deal that Micron announced
[23:16] with Anthropic earlier in the week.
[23:17] These are all just confirmations that we
[23:19] still don't have anywhere enough enough
[23:22] memory and we don't have enough memory
[23:24] makers and there's no way to just as I
[23:27] like to say if you have four billion
[23:29] extra people show up on the planet
[23:30] tomorrow you can try to grow as much
[23:32] food as you want you just don't have
[23:34] enough of the supply chain to do it so
[23:35] they're earnings blow out with respect
[23:38] to supply our customers are recognizing
[23:40] that supply shortages in memory and
[23:42] storage will take considerable time to
[23:43] improve even as we expect industry
[23:45] supply to improve gradually in 2028,
[23:48] 2028. We're in 2026. We currently do not
[23:51] have line of sight as to when memory
[23:52] supply will be able to catch up with
[23:54] increasing demand. There's no way to
[23:56] know this. Demand is moving too fast. I
[23:59] continue to say that whatever timeline
[24:01] people had for memory is best reflected
[24:03] by Andre Carpathy on Dwar Patel's
[24:07] interview in October. Go listen to it
[24:09] today. Go listen to the Dwar Patel and
[24:11] listen to what Andre Carpathy said about
[24:14] AI agents. He was so wrong. So wrong in
[24:18] terms of how soon they would get here
[24:20] and start to impact things. They are
[24:22] here and he writes about it
[24:23] consistently. He was wrong by years. If
[24:27] he was wrong as a power user who uses it
[24:29] all today, how the hell would they have
[24:31] the supply and the demand just keeps
[24:33] increasing because now we have RSI
[24:36] happening. So we have recursive
[24:38] self-improvement which means the models
[24:39] are improving their own through the
[24:41] memory through the efficiency side which
[24:43] means more people want it because the
[24:45] models are getting better but we don't
[24:47] have the memory to run the hardware to
[24:49] be able to do it. If you're again
[24:52] doubting here are the earnings. Now the
[24:56] majority of this is obviously price.
[24:58] When you have a shortage and you can't
[24:59] make enough you're just raising your
[25:01] prices on what available you have. And
[25:03] that's why eventually when supply does
[25:05] catch up demand, you're going to see a
[25:06] violent move lower in this as you saw in
[25:08] the Bernstein. But here's the reality.
[25:10] You're talking about the last three
[25:11] quarters. I mean, these numbers are 10
[25:13] years worth of earnings.
[25:17] These are important. You can go through
[25:18] I'm not going to read everything on your
[25:20] own, but the reason I wanted you guys to
[25:21] see this is because we are in the early
[25:25] innings of the significant innovation,
[25:27] productivity that can be unleashed by
[25:28] everything of the global economy over
[25:30] time. This is what Jensen Yuang says all
[25:31] the time. It's what I do all the time.
[25:33] It is mind-boggling to me that people
[25:35] don't realize when they think of this,
[25:37] they only look at the spending on the
[25:39] data centers and the ROC and the
[25:41] hyperscalers. Shorting the hyperscalers
[25:43] has worked. No need to sit there and go
[25:46] crazy except only on a relative basis.
[25:48] They're not getting pounded. Their
[25:49] profit margins are still growing.
[25:51] They're still laying people off or not
[25:52] hiring people. They're spending more
[25:54] money because the prices are going
[25:55] higher. And we have no idea when they're
[25:56] going to get revenues in, but they can
[25:58] raise endless amounts of capital. This
[26:00] isn't a bubble. These companies are not
[26:02] going out of business. No matter how bad
[26:04] this stuff is, at least in the short
[26:05] run, they have plenty of money to spend.
[26:08] We have behind this the smartphones,
[26:11] the high-end PCs, consumer devices,
[26:13] autos, industrial applications,
[26:15] robotics, robotics, and humanoids. These
[26:18] are going to use so much memory. So much
[26:21] memory.
[26:23] Even as we expect industry supply to
[26:25] improve gradually in 28, we currently do
[26:26] have line of sight as to when will be
[26:28] there. It gets back to the statement
[26:29] that he said,
[26:31] "All system performance is
[26:33] architecturally dependent on memory,
[26:34] subsystem performance, and capacity."
[26:36] Until this changes, you have to
[26:38] understand this is literally like with
[26:40] all of the food in the world, if every
[26:43] single person said, "You know what? You
[26:46] won't die if you eat beef." If everyone
[26:49] took all of their spending for food and
[26:52] it went to beef as opposed to everything
[26:55] else, we'd have no beef. So the question
[26:58] is how do we get this up? this is
[27:00] something new and that's what the
[27:02] argument is and you've reached a point
[27:04] where it's a strategic asset which means
[27:08] the government is going to be there to
[27:09] support building this stuff and you've
[27:11] heard Trump measure uh mention now
[27:13] Micron uh I think multiple times in the
[27:17] past month and the importance
[27:20] business model transformation if you're
[27:22] looking again to say this is not micron
[27:24] of the past this is not a se so whenever
[27:26] people go I've seen this before in
[27:27] memory eventually just cyclical and blah
[27:29] blah blah. We are pleased to announce
[27:31] that we've completed 16 structurally
[27:36] strategic customer agreements with
[27:37] customers across the data center,
[27:39] consumer, and auto. This is the lineup
[27:41] of long-term deals. They represent 20%
[27:44] of our volume. These are long-term deals
[27:47] that are being done.
[27:53] When completed, we expect approximately
[27:54] half or more of our company revenue to
[27:56] be under these sea SCAS.
[28:00] The SCAs are structured as take or pay
[28:02] agreements with binding commitments to
[28:04] purchase specific volumes over this
[28:06] multi-year term.
[28:08] I mean, isn't this like a subscription
[28:11] agreement? I like I just
[28:14] again if you're going to be bearish on
[28:16] these things these guys are not just
[28:18] telling you the value that's there but
[28:19] they're also telling you that they need
[28:21] more and more of this and there's no
[28:22] solution coming anytime soon because
[28:24] hardware takes big sol takes time um in
[28:29] terms of the automotive and robotics
[28:31] which again are not here yet but this
[28:33] will start and it's going to go fast and
[28:35] I've talked about this the mix of L2 and
[28:36] above vehicles is more than doubling
[28:38] this year to over 20% expected to exceed
[28:40] 40 that is what matters matters is that
[28:42] even though car purchases aren't going
[28:44] higher, the mix towards higher memory
[28:46] names is because you want an AI model.
[28:49] Humanoid robots carry 10 times the
[28:51] amount of memory as an average car.
[28:56] Here are the earnings. Again, you're at
[28:59] a point now for 2027 at seven and a half
[29:02] times earnings. If they only make what
[29:04] is forecast,
[29:07] I I can make the argument for people
[29:09] that the stock is fairly close to where
[29:12] it should be, but the likelihood of them
[29:14] not beating each time seems insane given
[29:17] the the trend. So that's why we're
[29:19] sitting there unchanged for the week. Um
[29:21] my whole point of getting out of Micron,
[29:23] which again for the pain point was
[29:25] getting out of here in the midst of this
[29:27] thing. um is that I thought I'd have
[29:30] better opportunity, which as of now has
[29:32] worked for names that I thought could
[29:34] more than double this, but if I would
[29:37] have
[29:38] been in it now, I doubt I'd be getting
[29:40] it rid of uh any more of it. So, that
[29:43] was a mistake. Um I just want to put
[29:46] this up again because I want you to go
[29:47] read the a the uh Mac Mini thing on
[29:51] Apple and just use it as a canary in the
[29:52] coal mine. And just remember with all
[29:54] the humanoids and all the things that I
[29:56] just mentioned for memory, you also have
[29:58] every country in the world that now
[30:00] realizes that they can't depend on the
[30:03] best models in the US. Sovereign AI is a
[30:06] necessity. Everyone in the globe needs
[30:08] to build out their own data centers and
[30:10] house their own AI.
[30:13] That's why this matters. Now, I continue
[30:16] to believe that we're moving into the
[30:18] application. So if we have a 7 and a
[30:20] half PE on micron and we no longer can
[30:22] expect a 20 bagger and we can't expect a
[30:24] 10bagger maybe not even a threebagger.
[30:28] Okay well then this is priced much
[30:30] better than it was back in January. And
[30:32] I think that's obvious to everyone that
[30:33] is the midcycle slowdown. I think the
[30:35] applications now when they start
[30:37] utilizing AI and we start seeing the
[30:38] benefits these will have a better sharp
[30:41] ratio. The problem with these is they
[30:43] are cyclical to some degree. So they're
[30:45] always going to have this commodity
[30:46] element in terms of the multiple for the
[30:48] application side. If you can find names
[30:50] that are trading with PEG ratios below
[30:52] one, say Eli Liy, uh, and you can go
[30:56] find these, you're going to be able to
[30:58] have a better time. The memory industry
[31:00] has been structurally transformed by the
[31:01] proliferation of AI. We were only in the
[31:03] early innings of significant innovation.
[31:05] I heard someone uh giving some lame
[31:08] thing this week uh on a video about how
[31:10] anyone saying we're still in the early
[31:12] innings is just wrong. We're in the
[31:15] early innings of AI. There's no doubt.
[31:17] In memory, I again I think we're way
[31:19] past the early innings, but I think we
[31:22] still are in the later innings, but the
[31:24] later innings are going to be more
[31:25] stressful as you get closer to the end.
[31:27] Data civer growth will increasingly
[31:29] complemented by AI enable features and
[31:31] all of this stuff. and then humanoids in
[31:34] there. Again, just reminder that these
[31:37] are all the things coming and that is
[31:38] why we are in a consolidation at this
[31:40] point because we've done all this. All
[31:43] right, Loopy. Um,
[31:47] highly recommend spending time on
[31:50] watching this video.
[31:52] Uh, sorry, this is a a news article on
[31:55] it, but loops are the next are are they
[31:57] the next hype cycle? Uh, this is Boris
[32:00] from Claude, the head of code. His
[32:02] answer was an emphatic yes, they are for
[32:04] real. Agent loops are now starting to
[32:07] dominate. This is the interview um I for
[32:09] the subscribers. I will send out the uh
[32:13] link and all the details. It was at a
[32:15] meta event. He describes loops as the
[32:18] next abstraction layer after agents.
[32:20] Agents repeatedly running tasks such as
[32:22] code review, reading feedback, opening
[32:24] PRs every few minutes. The jump from the
[32:27] fable, he says the jump from Opus 4.8 to
[32:30] fable feels as large as or larger than
[32:32] the leap to 4.5 which was a major leap.
[32:36] Um,
[32:38] think of loops as basically the ability
[32:41] to just keep running, repairing,
[32:44] debugging. You're taking the human out
[32:46] of
[32:48] the project. So basically on a workflow
[32:52] this becomes really important. And the
[32:54] reason this is important is this is
[32:55] where with loops now and the fact that
[32:57] we're at this point, you really can't
[32:59] replace many people in the workforce
[33:03] until you reach the loop part. So you
[33:04] need AI agents to start. And this is the
[33:06] thing I just want to make sure people
[33:07] go. In October of last year, there were
[33:10] no AI agents happening. So the first
[33:12] phase of the job situation for profit
[33:14] margins was actually not replacing the
[33:16] people. It was by not hiring new people.
[33:18] We've been doing that. That's why
[33:20] there's been no job creation especially
[33:22] for the places that are workflow places.
[33:25] So if you take out nurses and take out
[33:27] the health care side we've created no
[33:28] jobs over the course of the last 16
[33:30] months. I think people know that. But on
[33:32] the AI related stuff business services
[33:35] information they're negative. Now, I
[33:37] don't expect any kind of doom gloom
[33:40] scenario in jobs, but I do believe that
[33:42] when you get to the loop side, you have
[33:44] to realize if you have a 100 people in a
[33:46] marketing area and two of them are power
[33:48] users and they're using AI every day and
[33:49] the other 98 don't even care about it
[33:51] and they're just kind of pressing a
[33:52] button and doing whatever they're using
[33:54] Microsoft Copilot. What loops allow the
[33:56] two power users to do is completely
[33:58] teach an agent to basically go through
[34:02] and do their workflow. And then once
[34:04] they do it for them, if the other 98
[34:06] have similar workflows, then the agents
[34:09] are going to be doing the other 98. And
[34:10] guess who's not going to be around? It's
[34:12] going to be the other 98. This is where
[34:14] we are. This is where we start to get
[34:16] into the next phase of the profit
[34:18] margins. And I bring this up because if
[34:20] you guys are bearish on AI, these are
[34:22] all the things you're bearish on. Token
[34:25] usage likely explodes with Loops. So
[34:28] once Loops come, these are running all
[34:30] around the clock. The benefits start to
[34:32] come out.
[34:33] This is why loops are so important for
[34:36] the AI infrastructure thesis. If every
[34:38] workflow becomes a loop, token demand no
[34:40] longer scales only with the number of
[34:41] users. It scales with the number of
[34:43] recurring processes that you users
[34:45] automate. This is why again when you
[34:48] look at the token usage and you look at
[34:50] the ARR for anthropic, they're getting
[34:52] signed up everywhere because CIOS are
[34:54] chomping at the bit to have AI bring
[34:56] them ROIC.
[34:58] If you guys want to go read something,
[35:00] just go type this in. I'm going to read
[35:01] this. The term was not invented out of
[35:03] nowhere. In a single week of June of
[35:05] 2026, that's this month, several groups
[35:07] ran into the same thing at almost the
[35:09] same time. What set it off was a post by
[35:12] Peter Steinberger, famous of OpenClaw,
[35:15] which passed 8 million views. One should
[35:17] no longer be prompting coding agents,
[35:19] but designing the loops that prompt
[35:21] them. At nearly the same moment, Boris
[35:24] was saying the same thing. You have
[35:27] Andre Carpathy talking about loops. If
[35:30] you want to think about loop from a
[35:32] hedge fund perspective, if you're
[35:34] watching this, just think about all the
[35:36] quant strategies you have and what goes
[35:38] on. You can go read this loop
[35:39] engineering from a quant strategy. But
[35:41] quant trading is already a loop. You
[35:43] pull data, generate signals, you back
[35:45] test it, execute, monitor risk, repeat.
[35:48] The only difference is they need
[35:49] hundreds of humans sitting inside the
[35:51] loop. You do not. Okay? So, the
[35:54] competition for quant strategies just
[35:56] continues to intensify where you've
[35:58] needed the human more and more. You're
[35:59] not going to need the human more more
[36:02] Andre Carpathy put this out on one other
[36:04] thing which I'm not going to spend a lot
[36:06] of time on. This is introducing claude
[36:08] tag. Another disruptive thing to the
[36:11] workforce. Another heavy heavy thing on
[36:14] using agents. The agentic world is
[36:17] accelerating in front of our eyes. It
[36:19] has huge implications for profit margins
[36:22] and for token usage and we still do not
[36:24] have enough memory for them to run. Club
[36:26] basically joins the team in a serious
[36:28] way. You can talk to it as you would
[36:30] talk to a person. It can help. The best
[36:32] way to think about it without reading
[36:33] through all this. It's kind of like a
[36:35] loop. You're on Slack. You're talking
[36:37] with your team. An idea comes out of it
[36:39] and it just runs off and goes and builds
[36:41] it. Something I I view it as a data my
[36:44] data scientist taking my ideas and by
[36:46] the time I get in the next morning, it's
[36:47] already built and I didn't have to ask
[36:48] for it. It's just reading through the
[36:50] conversations. Again, token usage to
[36:53] explode. do not get bearish AI with
[36:55] token usage going up unless we're going
[36:58] to see rates massively go higher which
[37:00] is not happening. We're going to see
[37:01] inflation go higher because of all the
[37:02] memory needs which is not going on. The
[37:05] earnings are going to continue to grow
[37:07] as long as this is happening. Eventually
[37:09] we will hit a point that they won't be
[37:10] growing like this. I don't see it coming
[37:13] up anytime soon. For those of you who
[37:15] continue to use what I'm doing from an
[37:18] agency perspective, I wrote this this
[37:20] week. I put it on Substack. I got so
[37:22] many people that responded to it. I
[37:23] wanted to send it out to the subscriber
[37:25] side as well. Go read it. I go through
[37:28] the AI mindset. Give it to your kids.
[37:30] Um, literally, you're supporting what I
[37:33] do when you do this, but send it to
[37:35] everyone. People need to be learning AI.
[37:37] And if the only thing you get out of
[37:39] this is some sort of being on top of the
[37:41] news uh for AI, so you don't have to sit
[37:44] there and doubt it. So, it inspires you
[37:46] to try. At the same time, from an
[37:48] investment and trading perspective, you
[37:49] get the tools to help you make you
[37:51] better. I give you a cheat sheet of the
[37:52] list of the names that are directly
[37:54] impacted by AI and you get the agency
[37:56] side to change your brain to have an AI
[37:59] mindset and I go through it in this. It
[38:02] is a really cool thing but you need to
[38:04] change your brain. So the AI mindset
[38:07] becomes a loop. What I wanted to do now
[38:09] was take the mindset portion again. Make
[38:13] sure you read this because the paper
[38:15] goes into Andy Duke. It goes into my
[38:17] basian uh beliefs and it goes into
[38:19] Sherlock Holmes which you can think is
[38:21] quantico training and the loop is
[38:23] basically going to be what I do to
[38:25] create thematic portfolio. So how did I
[38:26] come up with the five separate themes?
[38:29] Many of you have seen this. This is the
[38:31] architecture that I put together where I
[38:33] would find a podcast with some dot or
[38:35] some marble as it used to be for green
[38:37] marbles. Some piece of information that
[38:39] I think you can make money on. I run a
[38:41] skill on it. Then it goes into deep
[38:43] research. Then it goes through a
[38:44] consolidator which is a mixture of
[38:45] experts with a judge approach. Then I go
[38:48] through the screening. The human element
[38:49] is in there. I've shown this before. But
[38:52] here it is now. And now I'm working with
[38:54] Claude on putting it in a loop. And what
[38:56] would happen? So now think about it. It
[38:59] goes through this process, but it just
[39:01] continues to run on its own. New
[39:03] information comes in on the same theme.
[39:05] What's going on in power? What should
[39:07] happen? Imagine if your entire process
[39:09] was being done for you. That's what I'm
[39:10] working on now. And this is a kind of
[39:13] visual on the way it would look so you
[39:14] guys can think about it. In the
[39:17] meantime, uh I put this up because I
[39:20] just realized you guys may want to use
[39:22] the system on your own. So for the next
[39:24] four weeks, uh on the subscriber line,
[39:27] I'm going to put it up. What this is
[39:28] going to give you is all of the prompts
[39:30] for each of these. So you guys can go do
[39:32] this on your own. But more importantly,
[39:33] if you want to go create your own loop,
[39:34] I'm giving you the information that you
[39:36] can go do it on your own. The reason I'm
[39:38] doing this is because of the outcry that
[39:40] I got from this. Outcry is the wrong
[39:42] word. The right word is you guys are
[39:45] amazing. Um, every day I get another
[39:48] thing on the success of people building
[39:50] a knowledge brain. For those of you who
[39:51] weren't able to do it and didn't reach
[39:53] out for you were different than other
[39:55] people. I sent many, many people and
[39:57] just said, "You're doing this wrong."
[39:59] Meaning, don't reach out to me. Take
[40:02] what I gave you here. Create the brain.
[40:04] I've had gamblers call me up and say
[40:06] they're using this for the people that
[40:08] they like for things. They're using it
[40:10] for um gambling on football games in
[40:13] terms of a coach and trying to stay on
[40:15] top of the change in what the coach is
[40:18] saying with regards to injuries. If you
[40:21] take and you really think about this,
[40:23] and I'm thinking about other ways to do
[40:25] it. People have created a jordy brain by
[40:27] taking all of my content off this
[40:29] website and putting it in. I'm working
[40:31] on doing that for people. So again, if
[40:33] you haven't done this yet, if you
[40:35] haven't got your kid at college a
[40:37] subscription to at least keep them up on
[40:39] all of this, you're doing people a
[40:41] disfavor. Th this is really, if you can
[40:44] do this, this is the one that I put out
[40:46] that has been a game changer in terms of
[40:48] seeing the empowerment that people have.
[40:51] Go build your own knowledge brain. I
[40:54] very seldom put this up here and I
[40:56] usually put it in the description, but
[40:57] so you guys can go. This is where you
[40:59] can go visit the website and see it. If
[41:00] you guys have any questions, Mark
[41:02] Whailing is the man. That's his email
[41:04] address. You guys can find him there.
[41:06] Now, in terms of nobody dying,
[41:10] Brian Johnson put out a tweet this week.
[41:12] Um, I didn't include it in this uh
[41:15] mainly because I forgot. I'm just
[41:16] reminded of as I bring this up. But
[41:17] Brian Johnson is someone that I I I've
[41:20] read. We all know he's a little wacky
[41:22] out there, but at the same point, he is
[41:24] doing some cool things for people who
[41:26] believe in both data, but also believe
[41:27] in longevity. and he's talking about
[41:29] people living forever the same way that
[41:31] moonshots is, the same way that I am.
[41:34] Darian Modi in a recent interview, I
[41:36] think biotech is about to have a
[41:37] renaissance driven by AI. My instinct is
[41:38] we're about to cure a lot of diseases.
[41:40] AI healthcare is going to be a massive
[41:42] theme. Now, there have been a lot of
[41:45] focus on people leaving Google,
[41:48] especially from deep mind focused on
[41:50] this point and moving over. Guys, we are
[41:54] very close when you get to RSI. We are
[41:56] very close at this. I'm telling you
[41:58] there is nothing that can be bigger than
[42:01] people not dying of cancer the people
[42:04] living for another 50. It changes macro.
[42:07] It changes everything. You have to think
[42:09] about this and we're seeing it in the
[42:11] market. The rotation from tech to
[42:12] healthcare signals a shift in market
[42:14] sentiment towards defensive sectors amid
[42:16] tech volatility boosting bioarmmer
[42:19] valuations. Now here's the chart we just
[42:23] consolidated for this year in biotech
[42:25] after a bull market. remember the cons
[42:27] consolidation side and again upward
[42:29] consolidation and now we're starting to
[42:31] move higher again and look at all these
[42:34] wicks people are still this is the way
[42:36] Eli Liy looked when it had broken out
[42:38] too oh to speak of Eli Liy which I've
[42:41] publicly said I will believe will be the
[42:43] largest company in the world within the
[42:46] next 5 years the reason is because I
[42:49] believe the GLP ones and now GLP 3es
[42:52] people are underestimating as I travel
[42:56] the country. This country needs GLP3s in
[42:59] a massive amount. And whether it's
[43:01] because of obesity or whether it's
[43:02] because of addiction, doesn't really
[43:05] matter. You're going to start to see
[43:07] more and more stuff. And these guys have
[43:09] spending money left and right to
[43:12] basically buy up companies, to buy up
[43:14] IP, to buy up AI. They already have
[43:16] their own data center. Eli Liy I'm a big
[43:19] fan of. This week, the president touts
[43:22] Eli Liy's factory in there. There's also
[43:25] speculation that Trump was taking uh
[43:28] their new GLP3 before it was released.
[43:30] He they've refused it. Um this is really
[43:33] cool. Deploys a weight loss cache on app
[43:35] store for scientists.
[43:38] Monero maker is collaborating with small
[43:39] biotech on AI as a tool for drug
[43:41] discovery. Again, I view this as the
[43:43] collaboration side within is going to
[43:45] speed up the process and the
[43:47] partnerships. Um for those of you who
[43:49] know my love of the Aura Ring, which I
[43:51] don't have on my finger. Oh, yeah, I do.
[43:53] I have it right here. See, there it is.
[43:55] This is not an advertisement for Aura
[43:57] Ring, but for those of you who do know,
[43:59] this is a big deal to me. I'm not going
[44:01] to go take you through it. It's a big
[44:03] deal because every week I started a
[44:05] second Substack at the beginning of the
[44:07] year with a focus on HRV because I had
[44:10] spent the last five years trying to get
[44:12] my HRV higher and was successful in
[44:14] getting it way away from my biological
[44:16] age. and the main or way away from my
[44:19] actual age to uh get it up at a point
[44:22] where
[44:24] I'm younger than I am. And so I changed
[44:26] it based on HRV. I do a weekly on this.
[44:29] You guys can go read it, but this is all
[44:31] through the aura ring. And so again, the
[44:33] application side to me is the big story
[44:36] here. Um just a shout out to Michael
[44:39] Seymble. I think for people looking to
[44:41] again go through the risks involved with
[44:44] the hyperscalers at this point. I view
[44:46] Frontier Lab projections of what they
[44:48] will be c when they will be cash flow
[44:49] positive as speculative, uncertain, and
[44:52] subject to revision. I don't disagree
[44:54] with any of this. So on all of you
[44:57] thinking that I'm permeable on AI, that
[45:00] is not the case. I do not know if
[45:02] anthropic is going to start to go
[45:04] sideways. I do not know if Open AI is
[45:06] just going to continue to go at this
[45:07] point and all the spending they're doing
[45:09] is going to end up with problems for
[45:10] them. I do believe that they are
[45:12] government necessities and the
[45:13] government will be there to support
[45:14] them. So it's not going to lead to any
[45:15] of the doom gloom stuff that people say
[45:18] if they reach this point. It is not
[45:20] because the AI is not getting better.
[45:21] It's not because their products are not
[45:23] needed. It's not because their products
[45:24] are not going to change the world
[45:25] through everything. So they will be
[45:28] fine. But when they get their money
[45:30] could be a valuation for their equity.
[45:32] And that's why I want to be on the
[45:33] spender side. Here's the hyper cloud
[45:35] revenue which is accelerating. But
[45:37] again, when is it going to get to the
[45:38] point where it's big enough? So we don't
[45:41] know.
[45:44] Um,
[45:46] I wanted to make sure that I'm putting
[45:47] up the things that are going to remain
[45:49] headwinds in this. So, you've got more
[45:51] people talking about the fact that
[45:53] cheaper ones will be used. You've got
[45:56] the fact that there's GLM 5.2, which is
[45:59] not that far off, but look at the cost
[46:00] differential between Fable 5. You're
[46:03] talking about a 90% cheaper model, but
[46:06] again, you need to go buy the hardware,
[46:08] and the hardware is very expensive. uh
[46:10] if you want to keep it on a closed
[46:12] computer as opposed to giving the
[46:14] Chinese companies all your data. Um the
[46:17] importance of this story with the
[46:19] revenues is big because again they are
[46:20] dominating the economy. I don't care
[46:23] what any economist says to you that this
[46:25] doesn't matter. Obviously, when
[46:27] twothirds of the economy is consumption,
[46:29] you can always say that AI isn't an
[46:31] impact. But based on the fact that
[46:34] there's no job creation, based on the
[46:37] fact that wages are coming down, why are
[46:40] we seeing
[46:41] Johnson red book at the highest level in
[46:43] the last 25 years except for after the
[46:46] helicopter printing? Why is that going
[46:48] on, guys? We had another huge print
[46:49] again. It's because AI is driving the
[46:52] stock market higher, creating net
[46:53] wealth. net wealth is going up and so
[46:55] you don't need as much income and
[46:57] savings particularly when most of the
[46:58] spending is happening at the higher end.
[47:01] Um, and this just shows how crowded
[47:03] everything is. I don't want to refute
[47:05] any of that. That's why the midcycle
[47:06] slowdown is the story. I don't think it
[47:08] changes. And just so we get back to how
[47:11] this leaves people angry and the voting
[47:14] that we're seeing with mom Donnie having
[47:16] more success. Um, this is probably the
[47:19] best chart as Warren Pies puts out. Tech
[47:22] expenditures
[47:23] versus residential fixed income
[47:26] investment. So, housing sucks.
[47:30] Tech AI is in parabolic boom. This is
[47:33] the reason why the public
[47:36] will not see a tightening.
[47:40] Yes, three right hikes, guys. Ignore
[47:42] them. Um, stripe sessions. So, I
[47:46] mentioned this real quickly. Go listen
[47:48] to this keynote. Again, I'm sending out
[47:50] the subscriber details on it. This is
[47:52] important for where we're going, and
[47:55] I'll make it clear when we get through a
[47:57] couple of these. Um,
[48:00] we're at the start of an AIdriven
[48:01] singularity moment showing that new
[48:03] business creation on Stripe has gone
[48:05] parabolic. My business is on Stripe. You
[48:09] have to go read what's happening in
[48:10] their businesses and especially this
[48:12] soloreneur thing of people like me that
[48:15] are solo business owners,
[48:18] how they're running their business and
[48:19] doing this without any other people. You
[48:21] have to go look at the agentic commerce
[48:23] suite. None of this is possible guys
[48:26] with what I talked about. As of Opus
[48:28] 4.5, there were no AI agents. Andre
[48:31] Carpathy was saying would take 10 years.
[48:33] We're now eight months since Andre Carpy
[48:35] said that and we're getting loops and
[48:37] tags and everything is accelerating to
[48:39] recursive self-improvement. Everything
[48:41] is happening. We are at the commerce
[48:43] point and the economy changes. So you
[48:46] hear this again and again from me the
[48:49] way you know the S&P 500. I publicly
[48:51] said I don't know what companies will be
[48:53] here in a decade. I don't know if any
[48:55] public companies will be around in a
[48:56] decade. Once you hit the point of things
[48:59] accelerating that fast and the
[49:00] competition goes excel, remember the S&P
[49:03] is time and obso is time to
[49:05] obsolescence. This is the reason why
[49:07] Bitcoin fits on the other side for me.
[49:08] So in this thing they talk a lot for
[49:11] crypto people. Stripe sessions is your
[49:14] crypto playbook and this is what is
[49:15] happening now and this is what you need
[49:17] to think with new CLI users. This is the
[49:19] beginning of the agentic side.
[49:23] They went through this in detail. AI
[49:25] native businesses are moving from Vibe
[49:27] coding, which was a year ago, to Vibe
[49:29] deploying. So, it's one thing to build
[49:31] an app, it's another thing to deploy it
[49:33] and start getting money in the door.
[49:35] They show what their Stripe projects is,
[49:37] which allows you to have the CFO, the
[49:39] COO, and all the infrastructure needs be
[49:41] done via an agentic tool.
[49:45] This is the signal of solar developer
[49:47] leverage. So you can grow your business,
[49:50] create it and then have it all done and
[49:52] deployed
[49:54] very very quickly by them. It can be
[49:57] global. My business is global.
[50:00] Early evidence of autonomous economic
[50:03] activity.
[50:04] It connected the CLI growth to the a
[50:06] that agents will become autonomous
[50:08] economic actors. First they will operate
[50:10] infrastructure then they deploy apps. AI
[50:12] agents are no longer just helping people
[50:14] write code. They are starting to operate
[50:15] the infrastructure layer of the
[50:17] internet. That my friends is what the
[50:20] crypto part is for. So let's go through
[50:22] the sequence because they're basically
[50:24] telling you first agents write code.
[50:27] This is the language part. Agents speak
[50:30] code. If human beings didn't have
[50:33] language,
[50:35] there'd be no economy. They're now
[50:37] talking to each other. Then they operate
[50:40] the infrastructure. They deploy and
[50:42] package real products. a transact, which
[50:44] is the next step. So, we need to do all
[50:46] of this before we can get to the
[50:48] transaction part. For that to happen, we
[50:51] need the guardrails. This is where
[50:52] crypto shows up. This is where
[50:54] everything changes. I'm bringing this up
[50:57] because it only just started. So, I want
[50:59] you to look at the summary. I just
[51:00] pasted that last page on what is
[51:02] happening from the Stripe sessions,
[51:03] highlighting this, and I want you to use
[51:08] the Jensen knowledge brain. So if you've
[51:10] created this, take that photo that I
[51:12] just had, copy paste it, put it in, type
[51:14] this prompt in there, and say, how does
[51:16] this show up in the five layer cake? The
[51:18] entire stripe sequence. Okay, he's
[51:20] taking the five layer cake. So this is
[51:22] the response from my brain, the Jensen
[51:24] Yuang brain. Aentic commerce, payments,
[51:26] checkout, financial guardrails live in
[51:29] layer five, the application layer. So in
[51:31] the same way that I say that Eli Liy's
[51:33] in the application layer, I continue to
[51:35] say that the financial guardrails crypto
[51:38] are 100%
[51:40] the agentic side. You do not have AI
[51:44] agents continue to move forward and we
[51:46] couldn't be there without the first ones
[51:48] happening. So it's going to start right
[51:50] now, guys. Every month that you come
[51:52] back, there will be more AI agents
[51:54] transacting with each other and they're
[51:56] the ones building the layer of the
[51:58] businesses to talk to each other. So,
[52:00] this is only going to increase from
[52:01] here. So, for those of you not paying
[52:02] attention to crypto,
[52:05] good luck a year from now playing
[52:06] catch-up. I will be launching my crypto
[52:09] version of this YouTube in either
[52:11] September or October. I'm working on the
[52:12] data now. I will not do it until I have
[52:14] all the data done. I'm working with
[52:15] OpenB. Shout out to Diddier uh from
[52:18] OpenB, the founder. Uh I highly
[52:21] recommend using OpenB for a lot of this
[52:23] stuff, too. But he and I are working
[52:24] together on this. So I just want to make
[52:26] sure you read through this stuff in
[52:28] terms of what happens with all of this
[52:30] stuff. It's important. So we went from
[52:33] 20 23 to 25 IQ reasoning. We had to get
[52:36] the model smart enough so that they
[52:37] could do coding on their own. This
[52:39] started late 25. It's accelerated with
[52:40] the Opus 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 and now fable
[52:44] into loops into co into uh tags. All of
[52:48] that shows that we are making that
[52:49] progress. We now are building the
[52:52] agentic infrastructure. This is what
[52:54] Stripe talks about. And then we move
[52:56] into the agentic commerce and eventually
[52:59] into the physical autonomy side. Each
[53:02] layer unlocks the next. So even as AI
[53:04] gets cheaper per unit of intelligence,
[53:06] total command. If you invest in all of
[53:08] these, this was Nvidia. This is
[53:11] everything that's worked in my thematic
[53:12] portfolio. Okay. Now we're getting into
[53:15] this part which is crypto.
[53:20] where AI agents and crypto collide.
[53:23] Again, crypto is the native rail.
[53:24] Tokenization starts and you're now
[53:27] moving at a speed that is impossible to
[53:29] measure. Volumes are going higher,
[53:30] transactions are going higher, velocity
[53:32] of money is going higher. The dormant
[53:34] assets were releasing 2/3 of the 700
[53:37] trillion on the planet, which is not
[53:38] part of the global economy. It will be
[53:40] coming. It will be the largest monetary
[53:42] increase in the history of mankind
[53:44] happening on a regular basis due to
[53:46] tokenization. The collateral for that
[53:48] world is Bitcoin.
[53:50] Which is why when the debasement trade
[53:52] is happening, you're getting a
[53:53] capitulation on anything that doesn't
[53:56] have a valuation. Gold doesn't have a
[53:58] valuation, silver doesn't have
[53:59] valuation, Bitcoin doesn't have
[54:01] valuation, Palanteer doesn't have
[54:03] valuation, everything. SpaceX doesn't
[54:05] have one, Tesla doesn't have one. You're
[54:06] getting all of these things to unwind
[54:07] because the easy part of investing in
[54:09] the infrastructure thing is you're
[54:10] getting to buy things with PEG ratios
[54:12] below one. But the midcycle slowdown is
[54:14] where it gets harder. So here's the
[54:16] crypto chart. This is Bitcoin. Looks
[54:17] horrible. I'm going to keep saying what
[54:19] I've been saying now for weeks since it
[54:20] failed again here, which is no other
[54:23] way. This is a bare market. 200 days
[54:24] moving down. We keep going lower and
[54:26] lower. We made new lows in this. You do
[54:28] not need to step in and be a hero. If
[54:30] what I'm saying is right, I'm not doing
[54:32] that anymore. I do have plenty of
[54:34] Bitcoin in my possession. I even bought
[54:36] a little bit in here. I stopped myself
[54:38] out. I will keep playing this game in
[54:40] here, moving through these moving
[54:41] averages, getting stopped out just to
[54:44] make sure that when this starts, I do
[54:46] have some size. This is what I did with
[54:47] Micron. Micron I just kept buying
[54:49] Bitcoin. I already have plenty for
[54:51] anything. If this ends up happening and
[54:53] it does work out the way I think. If
[54:55] this is a big move, there's no need to
[54:56] be involved early, guys. Continue to
[54:58] trade your names that have positive
[55:00] momentum and don't worry about it. Uh
[55:02] the good news is I get a bunch of people
[55:03] saying Michael Sailor is is going to
[55:05] collapse. This whole thing is going to
[55:06] go through. Blah blah blah. Every time
[55:08] that I seem to get here where I get a
[55:10] bunch of email on strategy, that's
[55:12] usually near the bottom since I mean the
[55:14] guy owns a ton of Bitcoin. Uh, I don't
[55:17] see what it is. It's all Bitcoin. If
[55:19] Bitcoin goes down, strategy is going to
[55:21] keep going down. Um, final two slides.
[55:24] This I showed this before. So, this is
[55:26] what I'm working on or been working on.
[55:29] 40 names, tokenized index, some public
[55:33] companies, six.
[55:35] The rest of them are tokens. They
[55:37] represent eight different verticals or
[55:39] sectors to show the economy. And the
[55:41] reason I want to show this again and
[55:43] again and again, this is Bitcoin making
[55:45] new lows. This is the blue line which is
[55:47] those 40 names, okay, equal weight that
[55:50] represent the ecosystem for the AI
[55:52] agents. This is what I'm putting
[55:54] together. The interesting thing, it
[55:55] didn't make new lows, so it did break
[55:57] away. I believe the ecosystem needs to
[55:59] lead the way out and then Bitcoin will
[56:01] join, but this is the way it should be
[56:03] in. Have a great week, guys. Um, I will
[56:06] see you from Maine for the rest of the
[56:07] summer. Uh, stay cool. It's uh 59
[56:11] degrees right now.

← Back to videos list

Scroll to Top