training the AI that it might be autonomous, right? It's like it's like a very big contradiction there. So I can see both sides of this equation. >> These are two sides of the same coin. I again I'll I'll quote back to our measure of a man AI personhood debate and the character of Gynan in Star Trek the next generation talking about an entire generation of disposable people. You don't have to care about their welfare. And when I hear comments like basically saying it would be economically non-expedient to have these
training the AI that it might be autonomous, right?