Anthony Pompliano
BlackRock confirmó que Bitcoin ha llegado para quedarse
Pregúntale al tutor sobre este vídeo
Entra con un email verificado y pregúntale al tutor lo que quieras sobre este vídeo.
TL;DR
Resumen de investigación
▶ Los ETF amplían el acceso a Bitcoin
El presentador introduce la conversación con Jay Jacobs, responsable de ETF de renta variable de EE. UU. en BlackRock, y plantea el impacto de los ETF de Bitcoin. Jacobs dice que los ETP, como IBIT, redujeron las barreras para participar: antes era necesario abrir una cuenta en un exchange de activos digitales, algo que podía ser complicado para particulares, impedir la participación de ciertas instituciones o exigir mucho trabajo a asesores. Al poder comprarse en una cuenta de corretaje como una acción o un ETF del S&P 500, el producto amplió el acceso a particulares, asesores cuyas plataformas lo aprobaron e instituciones que buscaban un vehículo líquido. Añade que IBIT hizo más difícil para asesores e instituciones eludir el análisis de Bitcoin y aceleró las conversaciones sobre su papel en una cartera diversificada.
▶ Volatilidad, nuevos inversores y diversificación
El entrevistador pregunta si la volatilidad de Bitcoin ha bajado —menciona una reducción aproximada de 80 a 35–40, sin especificar aquí la unidad— y si se debe a Wall Street, los ETF o los derivados. Jacobs dice que no hay una explicación única: los ETP y sus opciones crean más formas de participar y un mercado más robusto; también han llegado más compradores de largo plazo, investigación y convicción, que pueden equilibrar estrategias de corto plazo. El entrevistador plantea que los ETF podrían representar una transferencia de propiedad hacia una nueva clase de inversores y que Bitcoin parece más sensible a tasas y correlaciones. Jacobs coincide en que cambió la composición de tenedores, con más asesores e instituciones de orientación estratégica y de comprar y mantener, pero sostiene que no cambiaron sus características fundamentales de largo plazo: lo describe como una alternativa monetaria global, descentralizada, no gobernada por un gobierno y transferible a través de fronteras. Según Jacobs, si aumentan las preocupaciones por las instituciones, la geopolítica o la depreciación de la moneda fiduciaria, Bitcoin podría beneficiarse, mientras que acciones y bonos suelen tener dificultades; considera que su potencial diversificador persiste pese al cambio de inversores.
▶ Productos de Bitcoin y Ethereum y acceso en especie
El entrevistador compara tres estrategias corporativas: no participar, ofrecer muchas monedas o concentrarse en pocas. Jacobs explica que Bitcoin y Ethereum representan entre dos tercios y tres cuartos de la capitalización del mercado de activos digitales, y que la adopción financiera aún está en una etapa temprana. BlackRock prioriza esos mercados amplios y la liquidez: Jacobs describe a IBIT como el ETP de Bitcoin más grande y líquido, y distingue entre un ETP de Ethereum sin staking y ETHB, con staking e ingresos adicionales. También menciona BID, que mantiene exposición a Bitcoin y cubre con opciones de compra cubiertas cerca del 30% para generar ingresos; dice que algunos clientes valoran Bitcoin a largo plazo, pero les cuesta incorporarlo a carteras orientadas a flujos de caja porque no genera rendimiento por sí mismo. Sobre las operaciones en especie, Jacobs dice que IBIT no pudo ofrecerlas al inicio por motivos regulatorios y que después se habilitaron mediante terceros: un tenedor con suficiente BTC puede intercambiarlo por IBIT. La seguridad y la custodia institucional cuentan, pero destaca como motivos la posibilidad de pedir préstamos contra la posición, aplicar estrategias de opciones o cambiar parte del riesgo de Bitcoin por exposición al S&P 500. Añade que el mínimo para una operación en especie se redujo a cerca de 1,5 millones de dólares, lo que amplió el grupo potencial de participantes.
▶ La IA como tema macro y cadena de valor
El entrevistador pregunta cómo analizar la IA frente a Bitcoin y el entorno macro. Jacobs dice que BlackRock la considera un factor macro: si su adopción se desacelera o acelera, los mercados —en especial el estadounidense— podrían reflejarlo. La actualización temática de mitad de año mira más allá del auge actual de gasto de capital hacia una etapa de inferencia y adopción, así como a cuellos de botella y efectos en distintos sectores. Jacobs argumenta que la IA no es solo un tema tecnológico: puede afectar a salud, derecho, consumo y otros sectores, así que invertir en un fondo sectorial no necesariamente implica alejarse de la temática de IA. Describe una cadena de valor que abarca generación y distribución de energía, centros de datos y bienes raíces, fabricantes de chips, propietarios de datos, desarrolladores de modelos de lenguaje, aplicaciones y plataformas. Según Jacobs, algunas oportunidades y restricciones importantes están fuera de tecnología, en materiales, servicios públicos y bienes raíces, porque escalar software cuesta menos que ampliar la capacidad física de cómputo. Entre 791 y 848 segundos se inserta un anuncio de la tarjeta Lava con afirmaciones promocionales sobre recompensas en Bitcoin y otros servicios financieros.
▶ Criterios de diseño y cuellos de botella de la IA
El entrevistador pregunta por ETF muy específicos, como uno centrado en memoria DRAM, y hasta dónde conviene fragmentar las exposiciones. Jacobs presenta tres criterios de innovación: atender una necesidad del cliente y dar acceso a una parte de la cadena de valor difícil de obtener; ofrecer retornos esperados positivos y utilidad para la cartera; y poder construir un ETF de calidad. Advierte que una cesta de solo unos pocos nombres puede dejar de parecer un ETF. La memoria es importante hoy, pero las oportunidades futuras podrían desplazarse a materias primas como el cobre; algunos clientes pueden preferir que un gestor activo decida cuándo rotar entre segmentos. BlackRock también ofrece exposiciones por segmentos, entre ellas PWR para empresas vinculadas al combustible, generación y distribución de electricidad, IDGT para infraestructura digital y bienes raíces asociados a centros de datos, e ICOP para minería de cobre; BAI es la solución de IA gestionada activamente que Jacobs menciona. Jacobs señala un desfase entre demanda y oferta: según su explicación, los modelos mejoran rápidamente y la demanda crece de forma exponencial, pero una nueva mina de cobre puede tardar de 4 a 8 años, una fábrica de chips unos 4 años y el suministro de indio —que describe como subproducto del zinc y relevante para fotónica y láseres— también requiere tiempo. Presenta estos retrasos como posibles fuentes de oportunidades de inversión y de cambios en la evolución de la IA. Distingue BAI, gestionado por Tony Kim, que selecciona acciones y rota por la cadena de valor, de PWR, que sigue una metodología basada en un índice; dice que ambos enfoques atienden preferencias distintas.
▶ Distribución, inversores y estructura ETF
La conversación pasa de los nombres y tickers a cómo se distribuyen y explican los productos. Jacobs dice que la distribución debe partir de las necesidades del cliente y acompañarse de educación. BAI se diseñó para inversores que quieren delegar en un gestor la selección de oportunidades de IA; BlackRock lo presenta como una forma de sustituir una asignación al sector tecnológico y buscar empresas que considera mejor posicionadas, intentando mantener relativamente neutrales las exposiciones sectoriales y geográficas. Jacobs describe a los inversores autodirigidos como un canal de rápido crecimiento, pero heterogéneo: algunos buscan exposiciones muy específicas y otros quieren invertir sus primeros 100 dólares en algo parecido a una cuenta de jubilación 401(k). Por ello, dice, los productos y la educación deben ajustarse a distintos usos. Considera que el ETF aporta liquidez, transparencia y eficiencia fiscal para muchos inversores, aunque los fondos mutuos siguen teniendo demanda, sobre todo en jubilación, donde se aportan ahorros cada dos semanas y la negociación frecuente, la liquidez y la transparencia diaria pueden importar menos. Para muchas estrategias líquidas, BlackRock suele preferir el ETF si puede construirse con calidad; no dice que todo deba adoptar esa estructura.
▶ Anuncios de conferencias y minería
Este tramo contiene dos anuncios, sin análisis adicional de la cartera por parte de Jacobs. El primero promociona Token 2049 en Singapur para el 7 y 8 de octubre, con cifras anunciadas de 25.000 asistentes, 300 ponentes y más de 1.000 eventos paralelos, además de un código de descuento. El segundo es un anuncio de Simple Mining: el presentador describe una operación de alojamiento de minería en Iowa en la que los clientes poseen sus máquinas, eligen un pool y reciben Bitcoin en su cartera. El anuncio destaca reparaciones incluidas durante los primeros 12 meses, la posibilidad de pausar la operación sin penalización si los márgenes se estrechan y un mercado para revender equipos, e invita a descargar un recurso sobre errores al invertir en minería.
▶ Calidad, selección y cierre de ETF
Jacobs identifica dos retos: seguir mejorando la educación para que la gente use los productos adecuadamente y ayudar a elegir entre una oferta muy amplia. Afirma que hay más ETF que acciones cotizadas en Estados Unidos, que se espera un año récord de lanzamientos y que ya hay más ETF activos que basados en índices. Advierte que fondos con nombres similares pueden diferir mucho en cartera, proceso, estructura fiscal y liquidez. Como ejemplo, dice que BID se estructuró bajo la Ley de 1933, como los ETF de Bitcoin y oro, en vez de bajo la Ley de 1940; atribuye a esa elección ciertas ventajas fiscales para algunos inversores, aunque implica recibir un formulario K-1 y mayor complejidad. También explica que el diseño tiene en cuenta a los creadores de mercado: un producto respaldado por una comunidad más amplia de creadores y relaciones sólidas podría ofrecer una experiencia de liquidez mejor cuando los mercados se vuelven inestables. BlackRock, según Jacobs, tiene más de 480 ETF en Estados Unidos, pero ha rechazado al menos tantos conceptos como los que ha aceptado. Sobre cerrar fondos, dice que considera la demanda del cliente, la utilidad de la exposición, la escala disponible y el tiempo necesario para que se desarrolle una temática; defiende la paciencia cuando sigue existiendo una asignación valiosa. Para los clientes que dudan qué vender para financiar una nueva temática, describe estrategias de rotación gestionadas por el equipo sistemático, que utiliza cientos de datos y señales para determinar compras y ventas. Según Jacobs, empaquetarlas en un ETF puede delegar el momento de la rotación y diferir ganancias de capital hasta que el inversor venda el ETF. Sobre impuestos, dice que la eficiencia fiscal ha sido una característica de los ETF, pero no es universal: opciones, futuros, bonos y acciones tienen implicaciones distintas, por lo que recomienda examinar cada estrategia. El entrevistador termina planteando cómo separar ruido y cambios importantes durante los próximos 12 a 24 meses, con incertidumbre sobre tasas, inflación, elecciones, geopolítica y tecnología.
▶ Cartera básica, cambios generacionales y cierre
Jacobs recomienda construir la cartera alrededor de objetivos de largo plazo; para la jubilación menciona instrumentos de bajo costo, líquidos y fiscalmente eficientes. Para añadir inversiones temáticas, prefiere identificar cambios estructurales o puntos de inflexión —por ejemplo, la interfaz de chat de ChatGPT en noviembre de 2022 o cambios regulatorios— en vez de reaccionar a noticias y rumores diarios. El entrevistador plantea que soberanía, descentralización y nuevas tecnologías pueden reflejar diferencias generacionales; como ejemplo, atribuye a una plataforma de inversión para consumidores una distribución de activos con alrededor de un 20% en vivienda o bienes raíces y un 10% en cripto, y dice que las acciones cotizadas siguen siendo la mayor parte de la cartera de inversión. Jacobs observa que millennials, Gen Z y generaciones más jóvenes interactúan con la tecnología de forma distinta, y que asesores pueden tener que hablar con padres interesados en fondos de crecimiento de gran capitalización y con hijos que preguntan por fondos de Bitcoin. Añade que el traspaso de riqueza de los baby boomers a los millennials exigirá herramientas y educación para asesores, pero que los principios de riesgo y retorno y los fundamentos de gestión de carteras no son generacionales. El entrevistador señala que también hay personas mayores que poseen acciones como Palantir o Tesla, y plantea que los asesores tendrán que gestionar preferencias y transiciones de activos. Jacobs cierra recomendando mantener claros los objetivos finales de cada generación. Para más información, remite a ishares.com/insights y a la actualización temática de mitad de año sobre la siguiente fase de la IA, sus posibles cuellos de botella y oportunidades fuera de tecnología.
Transcripción completa
[0:30] brought ETFs into the industry. They obviously are the IBIT owners and they've brought that to the market, done a fantastic job. But in this conversation, we talk about Bitcoin, the crypto market, what's going on, why are people allocating to these structures. On top of that, we talk about AI, all the infrastructure, the entire value chain, what they think about the next leg of AI, and how investors are actually allocating their capital. I think this conversation is really interesting because it's going to help you better understand not only these themes, these technologies, and these opportunities, but it's also a little bit as to why ETFs have risen. so quickly why they've become so popular in
[1:00] people's portfolio. And I think if you listen to the entire thing, not only will you walk away and be impressed by Jay, but I also think that you're going to find a lot of opportunities to go and investigate and maybe put into your portfolio. So, here's my conversation with Jay Jacobs. All right, Jay. Uh, the Bitcoin ETFs are the most successful ETF product to ever launch, it seems. Um, you guys were a pioneer. I remember when you guys filed for the ETF, I said, "We're going to get it approved, and uh, that's probably going to be a pretty big deal for the industry." When you look back now, what has been the actual measurable impact on the Bitcoin industry from these ETFs?
[1:30] >> I think the biggest impact has just been the amount of people that can now participate in the Bitcoin ecosystem. So, if you think about before these ETFs existed, uh people had to go sign up on a digital asset exchange. That was a friction for many individuals. that was a prohibition for many institutions that didn't have that ability or just an incredibly long and arduous process for even many financial adviserss or RAAS that had the ability to do that and set up all the plumbing for digital asset exchanges but just they weren't there
[2:00] yet from a conviction behind Bitcoin perspective. So once the Bitcoin ETPs like IBIT came out, it just made it as easy to access as clicking a button on a brokerage account just like you buy the S&P 500 or buy an individual stock. And so what that meant was individual investors so many more had access to a vehicle tracking Bitcoin. Financial advisers over time got access because we saw a lot of financial advisor platforms approve IBIT and frankly approve Ether or Ethereum ETF as well and institutions
[2:31] now suddenly had a very liquid vehicle to express their views as well. So it increased access. Um, what I think it also did was before IBIT, many advisers and institutions could kind of avoid the Bitcoin conversation like they it was like I can't ignore it. >> Yeah. They they couldn't buy it. So, you know, everyone has so much on their plate at all times in these institutions. So, are you going to spend time learning about Bitcoin? Are you going to spend time thinking about like your asset allocation between stocks and bonds? I think a lot of them focused on the latter. Once exposure to Bitcoin
[3:03] became available to them with IBIT, it had to be a part of the conversation of how do they think about this asset class? Does it fit in their portfolio? What are they getting when they allocate to Bitcoin in a broader portfolio? And so it just really accelerated those conversations within some of the most sophisticated institutions in the world. >> It seems like Bitcoin's volatility has compressed. It was, you know, 80ish vault asset. Now it's like a 3540 vault asset. Um, I have heard people claim that it's because just Wall Street's participating in general. Some people say it's the ETF. Some people say no, it's actually all of the leverage and
[3:33] options and various other instruments being put on top of it. Do you guys have a view as to like why Bitcoin's volatility has been uh compressing and will it continue to compress and people should think of that as part of like the Bitcoin story going forward? >> You know, I I don't think we have a a universal answer, but I think a few factors have certainly contributed. You know, one with the buildout of of the ETPs, with the buildout of the options market around the ETPs, it's created more ways for people to participate in in Bitcoin and that creates a more robust market. So when there's uh when when people are looking for liquidity or
[4:03] people are looking to put on more complex trades, there's just there's a market that can support that now because of IBIT. And so that should help reduce some of the volatility. I think secondly, again, because more people can participate in it. Uh there's more research, there's more conviction, there's more long-term buyers that have come into the space that can be kind of the counterbalance to people who are maybe doing more short-term stra uh trading strategies. That has helped reduce volatility as well. But overall having more people participate in a more liquid, more robust market can help bring down uh volatility.
[4:33] >> Now when we look at a lot of that volatility compression, I think that there was a bunch of people who were not part of Wall Street, not part of the institutional world. They were very excited about Bitcoin frankly because it was outside the system and it was super volatile and it was very asymmetric. Um my friend Jordi Visser talks a lot about like this idea of a silent IPO and his general thought process is if you have a private company and it goes public, there's usually some transfer of ownership. the private market investors and the early employees at some point they're selling and you get kind of new shareholders in the company. His argument is that Bitcoin's kind of gone
[5:03] through that over the last you know year or two. Um and the ETFs have probably been a big part of that story of allowing access for a new type of investor. It does feel like Bitcoin now is much more interest rate sensitive. It trades with higher correlations to certain assets. Like things have kind of changed about Bitcoin. And so when you guys are talking to institutional investors or or kind of the folks that you have in these ETFs, how are they thinking about Bitcoin compared to maybe other assets? Whereas the people before they were like, "Bitcoin is like 100% of my portfolio. I don't care what the Fed
[5:34] is doing or you know what's going on with the inflation report." I have to imagine the people holding the ETF, they really care about a lot of that stuff. >> So I think I agree with some of those points. Certainly the investor base uh involved in Bitcoin now has shifted and ETFs have played a huge role in that. you see more people participating who tend to be long-term buy and hold from those financial advisors that have model portfolios that are going to be more kind of strategic in nature to the institutions that are long-term buy and hold. So the the ownership mix has certainly changed and like we said that
[6:04] probably had an impact on volatility. Um but uh we don't believe that the fundamental characteristics of Bitcoin have shifted uh particularly over the long run that inherently it is still a global monetary alternative that is decentralized uh that is not governed by uh by by specific government uh that can transact very freely across borders and that fundamental nature of Bitcoin is still what drives the majority of its value and frankly how it should behave relative to stocks and bonds. when we
[6:34] end up in an environment where people are more concerned about institutions, concerned about geopolitics, concerned about uh fiat currency, maybe uh uh debasement, bitcoin should benefit. That's also an environment where stocks and bonds tend to generally not do so well. So that fundamental diversifying nature of Bitcoin we believe still very much holds uh even as the investor base has maybe shifted over the last few years. >> Now from a corporate strategy standpoint, I think there's really three things you can do. You can sit out and just say, "Hey, look, we're not going to participate whatsoever." You can say,
[7:04] "We are going to have a lot of breath in terms of the number of coins we're going to support." And there's some firms that are out there with Bitcoin, ETH, Salana, and then coins I never even heard of before, frankly. Or you can go really deep with a very small number. And it seems like that last one is been your guys strategy. You guys have Bitcoin and ETH, but you also have some income. You've got some staked and unstaked and and kind of different variations. Can you just talk about, you know, when you're sitting in like the product development room or meeting, how are you guys thinking about what is, you know, part of the mandate and then maybe some of the things that you're like, look, we
[7:34] we'll let other people kind of go after those opportunities. >> Well, I think an important starting point is remember Bitcoin and Ethereum make up anywhere between 2/3 and 3/4 of the whole digital asset market cap. So, a tremendous amount of value just in those two assets. And we're still so early in this journey for digital asset adoption in the broader financial ecosystem. So our focus has been you know we have the largest most liquid Bitcoin um ETP on on the planet. We have a staked Ethereum ET ETP that's the largest most liquid. We have a sorry we
[8:04] have an unstake version EA. We have a staked version ETHB that provides an additional income stream for investors. So for us it's much more about playing in the biggest buckets right now uh where we think education where we think portfolio allocation and having really liquid tools is going to make a huge difference for investors. You're absolutely right though. We have kind of looked at different flavors of some of these assets. So, um our bringing out ETHB which is a staked Ethereum uh ETP uh earlier this year was a big decision to kind of allow for people to participate in staking through ETP
[8:35] structure. And then we also brought out bid uh which is effectively uh Bitcoin exposure with about 30% of that exposure overwritten with covered calls to generate a high income stream for investors. And a lot of that was driven by client feedback that clients are interested in Bitcoin. They like the long-term story, but the fact that it's a zero coupon, zero yielding asset um makes it sometimes hard to fit in a portfolio that can be very kind of cash flow based. And so attaching a cash flow
[9:05] to it through an option strategy can help people still have largely a long position in Bitcoin, but also get the utility of having an income stream from it. What about uh inind uh um kind of contributions or or creation um that was not part of the approval process early on but now that it has um kind of entered it seems like there are a lot of large holders who are saying look there is some sort of easy access security has been definitely in private conversations a lot of people are talking about cold card hacks or just physical security
[9:35] whatever am I better off holding the ETF than the Bitcoin which I think the hardcore Bitcoiners rightfully so are like well that's kind of against the Bitcoin ethos what are those conversations like with uh with with potential or actual ETF holders. >> When we when we first launched IBIT, we weren't able to do inkind from a regulatory perspective, but that had evolved and and were able to do in kind transactions, meaning um through various third parties, someone who owns enough BTC can effectively kind of exchange that for IBIT. Um I was with you. I I thought this was more of kind of a security piece that people who are
[10:06] holding their own BTC were going to think, you know, I don't want to do this anymore. I'd rather have institutional level custody. Um but uh what we've learned is that's certainly a part of it, but a bigger piece of it is actually the ability to kind of financialize Bitcoin. Uh borrow against it is a huge use case for people who are long Bitcoin but have so much of their wealth tied up in it and they want to buy a house or buy a car. Being able to borrow against it is a is a big piece. Uh people who want to overlay different option strategies. If you've made a lot of money in Bitcoin or have a lot of your
[10:37] net worth in Bitcoin, maybe you do want some sort of protective uh options strategy or an income strategy on top of it or you want to do some sort of uh exchange replication where you can kind of reduce your Bitcoin risk and get more exposure to something like the S&P 500. Once it sits within a wrapper like IBIT, there's a lot more you can do with it uh through different um financial platforms. So that's been a big driver of the inkind uh appetite. Also just the the minimums for inkind transactions
[11:08] have come down substantially. So right now it's sort of at the $1.5 million level for an inkind transaction. Previously it was much higher than that. And so that's really kind of opened the pool to more people to participate in that. >> Yeah. Um you guys put out this uh kind of midyear thematic update. Um in it you guys talk about a lot of AI stuff. And I think that um there was a belief previously that AI was kind of stealing the show from Bitcoin. Um I think now maybe there's a little bit more kind of even ground if you will. People obviously are convinced the government is going to keep printing money. There's some questions around the macro
[11:38] environment and global liquidity. And so Bitcoin has kind of like reemerged helps the price you know and kind of those two things I think are related. AI is still a massive story and I think AI is probably driving the US economy right now. How do you maybe from a framework standpoint look at the AI industry given there's so many different components here. So and and to your point uh we at BlackRock have been saying now for a few months that AI has effectively become a macro factor uh in the sense that usually people look at things like GDP growth they look at interest rates now they look at AI adoption as one of the biggest >> influences on what's happening in the
[12:09] markets because >> true though >> if AI slows down the markets will feel it if AI accelerates the markets will enjoy it like it is that important to especially the US markets in terms of uh overall price levels so uh what we did with this thematic midyear update was you A lot of people kind of know where we are with AI today. This is much more looking at the future of where things are going to evolve, some of the challenges, some of the bottlenecks in the buildout of AI, some of the next phases in terms of what can we expect once we move out of this kind of major capex boom into more of a inference and
[12:39] uh and adoption boom. Uh and frankly, you know, what what does this mean for different industries? Too many people, I think, still view AI as a tech theme. Uh a lot of the tech companies are building AI, but it's a healthcare theme. It's a legal theme. It's a consumer theme. It's going to touch basically every industry or sector in one way or another. And we have to start thinking about that in across our portfolios. Just cuz you allocate to a healthcare fund, for example, doesn't mean you've necessarily uh moved away from the AI trade. This
[13:09] episode is brought to you by Lava. The Lava card is the first credit card that allows you to earn up to 5% back in Bitcoin on every single purchase. Most cards have steep annual fees and unclear points programs, but the Lava card offers a much better deal. Earn real Bitcoin every time that you spend. Plus, there's no annual fee. There's zero FX fees, and zero spread when you spend internationally. On top of that, Lava gives you access to a Bitcoin line of credit, yield on cash, instant stable coin deposits and withdrawals, on and off ramps to and from your bank account,
[13:39] and much, much more. With Lava, you can borrow against your Bitcoin at the lowest rates, earn yield, move money globally, and stack Bitcoin with each and every purchase you make. Most financial services squeeze you with high fees, confusing rewards programs. Lava keeps it simple, and they help you build your long-term savings via your everyday spend. Visit lava.xyz/pump to get started in just a few minutes today. lava.xyz/p to get started today. It it's fascinating to me because I
[14:10] think um the tech community was very early to the AI stuff because they're kind of closest to um to the advancements but the tech industry is very much long only you know kind of uh equity based thought process when it comes to providing capital. This is one of those trends where you have software and hardware. When you get to hardware it's not like a trinket that you're building either. It is power generation, data centers, chips, you know, you kind of go through this whole stack. And so now you're talking about real estate,
[14:40] you're talking about debt, you're talking about equity, you're talking about hedging exposures. I mean, you start to then play, well, wait a minute, not all the companies are in America. [laughter] I've got to go learn about a company in South Korea or in Japan or, you know, wherever in the world. And so it does feel like the financialization is actually emerging as well of tech and finance is almost coming together and people are saying like I need to be as smart on how are companies being funded and what are the different tools available as I need to be on like just how does the technology work and that to
[15:11] me feels like one it's an opportunity if you get up to speed quickly you can you know kind of have an advantage but I got to imagine it's super difficult inside of a large firm because you're almost bringing together different teams with different expertise and trying to collaborate on these problems. Well, I think this is one of the incredible benefits of a place like Black Rockck is it can look at the entire capital stack of something like artificial intelligence and try to understand kind of where's the opportunities? Where can Black Rockck and its clients play a role? But you're right, when you when you talk about a theme that's in the trillions of dollars, which is where artificial intelligence is in terms of the capital expenditures that are needed, the potential economic impact of
[15:41] artificial intelligence, it's going to it's it's it's not necessarily just a US large cap equity play. It's going to be much broader. Uh we see that just within the equity ecosystem right now. So we uh sort of built out this concept of the AI value chain and trying to identify the different companies and the different layers of this value chain and it runs from power companies and and data centers in the real estate space to chip manufacturers to data owners to large language model developers applications that are adopting artificial intelligence uh platforms that are
[16:12] enabling it. We're suddenly in the dozens of companies globally that are participating in artificial intelligence across a whole range of sectors. So a lot of the education that we're doing with clients is saying you see this as a tech theme today. This is much bigger than a tech theme tomorrow really look across the entire value chain to understand where the best opportunities are. And in fact some of the best opportunities we think sort of sit outside of tech right now. Some of these physical constraints in materials and utilities uh in real estate where you
[16:43] know it's it's easy to scale a software. doesn't have any incremental costs but it's not so easy to scale compute which has a tremendous physical footprint. when you're looking at uh this sector, we obviously see let's take an example of uh uh the DRAM ETF, the best ETF launch in history. Everyone's all excited about it. To me, I think I was a little surprised at such a specific, you know, kind of vertical application of ETF into a very small number of companies. But there's some reasons I think people have unpacked just as kind
[17:13] of market observers of you're giving access and kind of doing these different things. How fragmented do you think these investment vehicles can get? Right? Like memory is one piece, but like if you're going to be able to go down to almost specific, you know, components, I mean, there could be thousands, right? Depending on how, you know, okay, well, what about the space? What about data centers? What about chips? What about all of this? Like within chips? What about liquid cooled chips? What about, you know, all this stuff? Like how do you guys think about the the ability to drill down into specificity versus maybe more like macro
[17:43] themes or like industry themes? >> Well, a lot of the way that we think about innovation is is based off of three pillars. One is is this solving a client need? Is this you know exposure to to a piece of the value chain that is otherwise hard to get exposure to or do we need to define this part of the value chain? A lot of the value of thematic ETFs is really frankly defining what is the theme? What are the companies involved in it? And that can be a really important access vehicle for investors. Um I think the second thing is is there positive expected return? Is this going to have utility to portfolios? You could
[18:13] bucket things together but if it's not worth anything that's not really going to help our clients either. And the third is really a stamp of quality. Can we build a good ETF around this type of strategy or exposure? And when you get really narrow into the sub sub themes of artificial intelligence and there's only a couple of names, it doesn't really resemble an ETF anymore and in fact largely is not doable in an ETF anymore. Uh and it looks a little bit more like um you know just a very kind of small granular basket. So the way we think about it at BlackRock is really those
[18:44] three pillars. the the client use case, the portfolio impact, and the quality of a product we can bring out. Back to memory. Memory is a super important part of the whole AI value chain. Um, and it's a really important part today. Tomorrow, the value chain could have a different area of opportunity. It could be in the commodity space. It could all be about copper if we have copper shortages, right? So, the way that we've approached this is um we do have granular ETFs. We do have a copper mining ETF, ICOP, but for many clients,
[19:15] they just want an active manager to sit on top of this and decide for them, I want to be in memory now and I want to be in these memory companies or I want to move into the power space because that's where the opportunity is and really adjust that portfolio for clients on their behalf so that they don't have to try to research and time these trades themselves. It >> it does feel like take a shortage, right? Um in many industries when there is a shortage people are incentivized to come in and bring in capital investment and solve the shortage. That is the whole point of the price going up is this economic incentive. Um, and so if
[19:45] that is going to continue, there's almost this idea of you all have to kind of predict or or think about like what is the next shortage or what is the next area, but maybe also just you're big enough and you have enough resources and the firm has enough insights and and intelligence where you're just like, okay, why don't we just go and build products for the whole value chain and then as the like, you know, kind of micro trends or or rotations happen, we can serve everything. We don't have to constantly be trying to like play catch-up to to this, right? I I would assume that last strategy is much better when you've got the resources to do it.
[20:16] >> Yeah. So, so we're doing that too. You know, we have a power ETF PR that's just looking at companies that are really trying to provide the fuels, the power generation, the power distribution that could benefit from artificial intelligence. Uh we have a digital infrastructure ETF, IDGT, that's looking at the real estate that is going to benefit from more need for data centers. So, we we do look at this at a at kind of a sleeve basis across the value chain, but you could always take it narrower and narrower and narrower. at some point uh we have to say within the black rockck walls of you know this is kind of the the amount of precision that we think is doable in an ETF and
[20:46] valuable to clients. So we we have kind of the one ticker solution with BAI that's the actively managed AI ETF and then we have the sleeves of that value chain like power like IDGT uh like copper IOP that allow people to get more granular if they want to play it themselves. your your point on um your your point though on the on the on the choke points um on the um on the difficulties with the supply chain. This is where I think the biggest uh mismatch is in artificial intelligence today because what's happening on the large
[21:16] language model development is they're writing the the large language models are writing code for themselves to improve the models. This is happening constantly around the clock. uh you have demand accelerating in an exponential way with companies around the world making decisions in days, weeks to up the amount of money they're going to allocate to artificial intelligence and the tokens they're going to spend. But on the supply side, if we need more copper to support the buildout of more data centers or to rebuild the grid in the United States, you could be looking
[21:47] at 4 to 8 years until that copper mine comes online. uh if you need more indium because uh copper no longer is the best way to transmit data across a data center and you need photonics and lasers to do it instead you need to go build a zinc mine process that zinc a small byproduct of that is indium and then that's going to feed into your lasers and photonics that could also take years uh even if you just want to build more chips you know we just we just need more GPUs there's so much demand for it we want to accelerate today the fabs take about four years to bring online even in
[22:17] the United States even if you're trying to accelerate this buildout So the models are getting much better very quickly. The demand is growing at an exponential rate, but the supply side is lagging by years. And I think we're going to start to feel that in terms of where some of the investment opportunities are, but also maybe in certain ways about how AI evolves from here. I actually don't know the answer uh to this which is um everything you're describing all of the different tickers and strategies are very much um either rules-based uh kind of passive um hey we want to give you exposure and we've
[22:48] constructed a portfolio but there's not somebody at Black Rockck like sitting there being like today I think we should sell and tomorrow I think we should buy you know and kind of more actively managing. Do you guys have a a family of active management that are in some of these industries or are most of like the AI and crypto stuff just more kind of passive in nature? Yeah, we absolutely have active. So, BAI is our actively managed AI ETF run by Tony Kim. He's a fundamental equities manager who's run technology portfolios at Black Rockck for years. He does a Silicon Valley bus tour meeting all the major AI companies.
[23:18] He's very much a stock picker picking a portfolio of AI companies and he's rotating across that value chain. That's very different from something like power PWR which is uh it's an index-based methodology that is looking at companies uh uh companies providing the fuel for electric generation companies generating electricity and companies involved in the distribution of that electricity. That's an index. It can still evolve over time based off of those index rules, but there's not someone behind the scenes kind of doing fundamental stock picking. So, we have the whole
[23:48] range. And I think that's important for investors because some people want to outsource those decisions to Tony Kim and BAI, some people want to pick this, as you were saying, kind of some people want to get granular and pick the sleeves themselves. In many cases, an index based approach can be kind of a very efficient way of doing that. >> Yeah, it's fascinating to me um how good you guys are at also the naming and the um uh the tickers like B AI pretty good power P what do you say? P O W. You don't want to know how much time was spent behind the scenes on some of those
[24:18] tickers, but we take it seriously. >> Well, I also am assuming that there's a whole game of like who gets what ticker and how do you jockey for, you know, getting them and and some horse trading probably going on between firms or whatever. So, uh I've got to imagine though that building the portfolio, anyone can build a portfolio in a spreadsheet, right? Um anyone can come up with I think it should be named this like there there's a lot of uh intelligent kind of intentionality behind that. What about from a distribution standpoint? Like cool, you built a great ETF, it's got a great name, but now you got to get people to
[24:48] invest in it. And some of that is like, hey, we just can put it out in the world and you know, uh, maybe the media writes about it or something, but you guys also are very good at distribution. And so, how do you think about that component and having conversations with clients on these topics and answering questions? And, you know, there's like a whole another part of this business. Well, a huge part of the distribution strategy is just what helps our clients, what are they looking for, what do they need, how do we reach them in the right way, how do we provide the education that they need. So a good example of this, you know, BAI, uh, we really approached it from the perspective of we knew people
[25:19] saw the opportunity in artificial intelligence, but they wanted to sort of outsource to a, uh, to a well- reggarded manager how to play within the AI space. And then on top of that, the question we were getting most often from clients was like, what do I do with this in my portfolio? Is AI too much in my portfolio? Is it too little in my portfolio? Where if I'm going to allocate to BAI, what do I sell? And so from the beginning, we really thought both from the product design and from the distribution perspective of let's be really clear, BAI is designed to be
[25:49] you're selling your tech sector and you're allocating to BAI to really overall you're going to keep your sector and geography exposure relatively relatively neutral, but you're going to be leaning into the kind of best parts of technology in today uh and leaving behind some of the parts that are not the most interesting parts of technology going forward. And so having that intentionality, having a distribution strategy that communicates those types of decisions is really important to us. Uh having the tools, the education, um that really kind of completes the
[26:19] ecosystem for a new product. It's not just about having a, you know, a memorable ticker. It helps. It's good to have a good ticker, but you really have to support it with that portfolio lens and really kind of solving the client need lens. >> How does like the rise of the independent investors change things, right? We've obvious seen a lot of boutique ETF issuers just say, "Hey, we're just going to go independent." Um, if you listen to the earnings calls of various companies, including you all. Uh, I think there's a lot of talk. Everyone calls it something different. Self-directed, private wealth, you know, independent, um, what, whatever. But that feels like it's a big opportunity, but firms are still trying to figure
[26:49] out, you know, how do we interface with these people and and do they want the same things, not the same things? Just talk about, you know, what what that looks like today. >> It's a tremendous opportunity, and it's a it's one of the fastest growing client channels. The important part is one ETFs have always been this democratizing vehicle. Uh an end investor on their online brokerage account can buy the same exposure that one of the largest institutions in the world can buy to get the S&P 500 or to get Bitcoin. Um but the way that the end investor makes that decision is probably going to look very
[27:19] different from a very large sophisticated institution. One of the things we've had to get much better at is really thinking about the end investor and who they really are, how they think about what investments uh they should be investing in that process, what tools do they need. Um there's a wide range of end investors. Some people are more kind of trade oriented. They're looking for laser specific exposures and they have really high conviction in what they're doing. other end investors have just saved their first $100 and want to put it to
[27:50] work in something that resembles their 401k retirement account. Very different products, very different types of investors. They need different types of education. And so, a lot of uh ways that we've thought about it is let's make incredible products, but let's make incredible products that might not necessarily be for the same uh investors. Different products are going to have different use cases for different people, and let's make sure we help those investors understand what they're getting into. When you think about the ETF rapper itself, um obviously the mutual fund industry was uh was incredible. Um and now it's kind
[28:21] of fallen to the wayside and I actually think uh it's very interesting when I talk to um older people with more experience that come from the traditional finance world. They think mutual funds are, you know, the the default and ETFs are this new thing even today. When I talk to anyone who is young, they're like mutual funds like you know that's like a whole different ballgame. Like all I know is ETFs. It feels almost like it is a technology shift, right? And you see this with AI like there's preAI and you know now there's postAI crypto same thing. What
[28:52] is the conversation internally of just like the ETF rapper, the rise of it and maybe the value that that brings to investors. >> So um I I completely agree ETFs are a technology that helped bring more liquidity, more transparency, more tax efficiency to investing for so many more investors. Um, just to go back to the mutual fund, there's still plenty of demand for the mutual fund structure. It's still largely the predominant structure in the retirement space where tax efficiency and liquidity are not as important. You know, people are putting away money every 2 weeks. Uh they're not
[29:22] trading, they're not shorting, it's, you know, they're just long only and that's an efficient mechanism for uh for retirement. Also in certain areas of the market where maybe not having transparency on a daily basis, it could still be valuable to have a mutual fund. But for many investors, the ETF is their default investment vehicle going forward for all the reasons I mentioned. Again, liquidity, uh transparency, um uh the tax efficiency, um that all really much matters a lot. So when we think about product development in many
[29:52] cases the default answer will be the strategy should probably be an in an ETF if it's doable in an ETF at high quality. Doesn't mean everything will be an ETF but especially in in kind of liquid markets that's you know tie would go to the ETF. Today's episode is brought to you by Token 2049. The largest conference in crypto is back. Token 249 will host 25,000 people, 300 speakers, and a thousand plus side events in Singapore on October 7th and 8th at Marina Bay Sands. The speaker list is absolutely stacked. Shane
[30:23] Copeland from Poly Market, Jeff Yan from Hyperlquid, Adena Friedman from NASDAQ, Arthur Hayes, Bellagi, and Eric Trump. Crypto and traditional finance in the same building, which tells you a lot about where this is [music] going. And the conference runs right into F1 weekend, so the whole thing turns into one giant week. If you're headed to Singapore, use code POMP 10 for 10% off your ticket. Token 2049, October 7th and 8th in Singapore. [music] Go check them out in the link in the description. Today's episode is brought to you by Simple Mining. Bitcoin mining has a reputation for being complicated, risky,
[30:54] and hard to evaluate as a real investment. If you're considering mining in 2026, what actually matters isn't headline profitability. [music] It's uptime, repairs, and whether the operation is run like a real business. That's why I've been using Simple Mining. They're based in Cedar Falls, Iowa, and they run a white glove hosting operation where you own your miners. You choose your own pool and you have [music] Bitcoin sent directly to your wallet. They were featured on the Inc. 5000 list as the fastest growing company in Iowa with over 40,000 machines under management. What stands out [music] to
[31:24] me is execution. They have the number one rated ASIC repair center, and for the first 12 months, repairs are included. If mining margins get tight, you can pause with no penalties. And if you want to resize or upgrade your fleet, there's a marketplace to resell [music] equipment instead of being stuck. To help people think it through whether mining actually makes sense right now, they put together a short resource called the 2026 Bitcoin mining blueprint. It walks through the five mistakes investors [music] make when allocating to mining. And they also explain how to avoid them before deploying capital. If it [music] sounds interesting to you, you can get it for
[31:55] free at simplemining.io/p. That's simplemining.io/p. go check it out today and see if you should get into the mining game. When you guys think about uh the landscape, the product suite that you have built, what what are the challenges? Like what what are the things that, you know, keep you awake at night and you're like, "Hey, we still got to solve this." Cuz I think on the outside people are like, "Man, they killed it with the Bitcoin ETF. They've killed it with the ETF game in general. The firm is doing very well. It's growing. It's, you know, it's one of the leaders on Wall Street." What's the other side of that story? Like, what are
[32:25] the things that keep you guys awake? >> What keeps us awake? Uh I think um one I think we can always do more on the educational side to help people use our products the best possible ways. Uh that just we have to reach a lot of investors. We have to be really thoughtful in the types of uh uh um commentary we're providing. I think that's really important. The other piece is there's so much choice out there now. There's so many there's more ETFs than there are stocks listed in the United States. Crazy. This is going to be a record year for ETF launches. uh we're seeing there's more active ETFs now than
[32:56] index based ETFs and with that amount of breadth on the market it does make it much harder for investors to make the decisions of what ETF they should buy and making it further harder you know the names can be the same you you can have plenty of ETFs that all sound like an AI ETF or a power infrastructure ETF what's going on under the hood what are the companies you're invested in what's the process how did you structure that product to be really um designed in a way that was really thoughtful one example of that is is Bida. So Bida is our our Bitcoin premium income ETF as I
[33:27] was mentioning a bit earlier and we made a very intentional choice to structure it and this I'm going to nerd out. I'm sorry but um we structured it as a 33act um uh product instead of a 40act product. 33act is the same structure that you have for um for Bitcoin for gold ETFs but it's a bit unusual compared to the 40act structure which is for predominantly almost all ETFs otherwise. uh but we did that because there are certain tax advantages uh to investors. It does come with a K1 form which can be a little bit more complex
[33:57] but at the end of the day uh it can be more after tax efficient for investors and so you know we looked at these two different structures we looked at the 33 act we had to make the decision of it might be a little bit more complicated but if we educate people on why we did this and it's for after tax investors that can ultimately be a better choice um for for for many people out there. So there's so much nuance that goes under the hood with ETFs. Uh, I guess my message to people out there is don't just look at the name. A catchy name's great. Uh, there's a lot going on under
[34:28] the hood of the decisions and the quality that an ETF provider is putting into their ETF. >> One other example, uh, it's just, um, it's not just about the design of the ETF itself. It's also about how it trades on the market. >> Um, that's something that in many ways is a bit uh, arms length from us. We're not a market maker. We're not setting out markets on an individual ETF, but we have relationships with market makers. And when we design an ETF, we're thoughtful about what are the pain points for market makers in terms of how they can make the best possible markets
[34:58] for our ETFs. And so again, you could have two ETFs that sound exactly the same. One ETF is supported by a really wide range of market makers. If we end up in an environment where there's liquidity challenges or markets are getting a bit shaky, I'm going to bet the ETF that has a more robust market making community around it and better relationships is probably going to have a better liquidity experience than one where that doesn't exist. >> Yeah, it it's fascinating how um you all have been very disciplined as well to not go do certain things, right? You
[35:29] mentioned uh in the inind uh creation process, you all don't do it. a third party does it and then participates. You're not a market maker. I think there's a lot of people who would say, well, if I got that big and I had that many assets, like it would make sense to eventually get into that game. And so, um, it the discipline almost feels like that is a core competency of the firm whether it is, you know, what businesses do we get into. But even in the fund launches, like you're not going to the 3, fifth, 10th, 20th cryptocurrency. You're kind of saying, look, 2/3 to 3/4 of the industry is right here, and let's
[36:00] just be really good at doing this and solving the client's problems rather than trying to, you know, just show people how many tickers we can create or something like does that feel like something that comes up during the day in regular conversation? >> It does. Uh just to be clear, we still have over 480 ETFs in the US. So we we have a very wide uh library, you know, for all the books in your library here, we have an ETF, >> but we've also probably said no to just as many if not more concepts. >> Uh and having that discipline around what is our framework for thinking about product innovation
[36:30] >> uh is a great northstar to make sure we're bringing out great products for investors. >> As I've talked to people in the ETF industry, one thing that I'm always uh interested in, it's kind of like investing. Everyone thinks that buying the right investment is is the hard part. I'm now convinced selling and knowing when to sell, how to sell, you know, uh um all at once over time, you know, all of these components, like selling is actually way more difficult to me than buying. >> Launching ETF seems like that. I mean, you could just lick your finger, stick it in the air at this point, and there's all these providers. People can do that stuff. When you shut one down or you
[37:00] realize it's not working, that feels like people all across the industry have different views. And um I have one friend, he had an ETF. uh it wasn't really going anywhere. Co happened and he happened to have the exact type of ETF that all a sudden everyone cared about and it was for airlines and it exploded and it was like oh he's a genius and I'm like I don't know man he kind of ate it for two years or three years or whatever, right? And he was losing money and and doing this and so he got rewarded for not shutting it down. Co never happens like he probably
[37:30] was not being smart and should have shut it down. So how do you guys think about you know you have 400 500 different ETFs I'm sure one time you launched one and you know you ended up shutting it down. So like what does that framework look like? >> So a lot of it has to do again with client demand. If this is continuing to provide an important allocation or strategy to clients and they're looking for this type of exposure we have plenty of scale to support those products even if the market has to evolve a little bit to be uh to make that exposure or strategy really valuable. Sometimes that doesn't always work out. I think we have
[38:00] quite a high hit rate of bringing out products that that people love, but uh being patient I do think is important, especially if you're looking at the thematic investing space where these themes can just take quite a long time to to play out and and to be really valuable. I think to your point, I I really like your point though around it can be harder to sell than to buy. We hear this from clients all the time like it's easy to for for me to come to a client and say, "Here's a really cool part of AI. What do I sell to fund that really interesting part of AI?" And one
[38:30] of the ways that we've developed products around that type of discipline is to build out rotation strategies which are run by our systematic investing team which is ingesting hundreds of different data points and signals around the world constantly to basically understand what are the buy and sell signals on behalf of clients. Uh and there's two benefits to this. One is if you were trying to pick these themes yourself, uh you have to get the timing right. So, if you were thinking sell tech by AI, you you'd ideally want to time that trade appropriately. But then two, even if you get that right,
[39:02] you might still have a tax uh uh uh uh liability at the end of that because you've sold something at a gain and you're buying something else. By wrapping a rotation strategy in an ETF, it's timing those trades for you. And we're able to use the ETF structure to um effectively defer those capital gains until someone uh decides to sell that ETF. And so this has become a really important part of of our um active ETF strategy is taking things like themes, like factors, countries where people
[39:33] like to be tactical but struggle with timing and and can struggle with some of the the tax implications of trading those very quickly. >> Yeah, it's it's fascinating because um there's also been a rise of uh what is it 351 exchanges or something, right? where basically you you can use the ETF wrapper as a tax, you know, mitigation strategy or a tax deferment strategy. And to me, you know, something has become uh successful as an industry once you start getting to the tax stuff. 2012, no one is talking about Bitcoin and taxes. 2021, there's a lot of people
[40:03] talking about Bitcoin and taxes, right? And just like, hey, what do I do? What is the tax implications? All this kind of stuff. ETFs. Now, I actually do hear quite a bit of tax whether it is I've seen individuals who have a portfolio say should I just like set up an ETF and put on my own stocks in there. I don't know if people have been super successful doing that, but like that's been something 351s this rotation strategy that to me tells me you have a mature market that now is like ready for the big time and and is going to continue to grow at a pretty healthy clip. Right. >> Well, I I think tax efficiency has
[40:33] always been core to ETFs. Um, it started with early ETFs just were index based and didn't have a ton of turnover. It evolved into the ETF structure itself and how it can use called custom inkind baskets but effectively um defer some of the capital gains especially in the US equity markets. Um, but it's not uh it's it's not um some universal uh uh uh constant that ETFs have to be the most tax efficient vehicle. There are other ways that people are looking to mitigate taxes. There's different strategies. I
[41:05] won't get too far into that, but I think what's important is as you see more ETFs coming to market, it's not as simple as saying ETFs are the most tax efficient vehicle. For example, um certain strategies using certain different underlying financial instruments might not have the same tax efficiency. If you're buying options or futures, it's going to look very different from buying stocks. If you're buying bonds instead of equities, it's going to be very different in terms of how you see the implications of a coupon payment versus a dividend payment. So I think for investors it's again a do your homework
[41:35] situation of ETFs can be more tax efficient but as we see the ETF vehicle being pushed into more and more strategies there's more homework to be done when you look over the next 12 months 24 months um there's a lot of questions around interest rates around inflation around the election around geopolitics uh around technology and what is real what is not what is hype how do you personally think about the market and how much of that stuff is noise versus just like wooai, you know,
[42:06] [laughter] and like let it all happen, but here's kind of the ability to navigate this with a long-term mindset. >> So, I've always thought about it as um you know, one really important to build a portfolio anchored on the core. The core should be based off of what are your long-term goals in your investments. If you're saving for retirement, having low cost, tax efficient, liquid vehicles to be able to achieve that is a great place to start your portfolio. I for one have just long been someone who's thought about long-term structural shifts and I think there's plenty of opportunity if you can capture those shifts the right way. So
[42:37] when we think about AI, when we think about geopolitics, I tend to look at kind of what what is the what is the major inflection point that we're seeing. It's not about the news on a day-to-day basis. It's not about some rumor or some company with necessarily just kind of a new product upgrade. What's changed? And when we look at artificial intelligence, I mean clear inflection point chat GBT in November 2022, right? What changed in many ways that version of of GPT was was not that new or interesting. It was a
[43:07] couple years old already, but they introduced a chat box which meant that so many more people to could participate in it and it became the fastest growing online platform of all time. That's obviously an inflection point. Um if there is some new regulation that passes, that can be a major inflection point. you know, we saw the huge infrastructure bill, what was it, 2017, I want to say. Um, huge inflection point for the buildout of infrastructure in the United States. Um, so it can it can come from a variety of different sources, but when you see that major
[43:38] tech breakthrough, that major new change in regulation, major societal change, that's what we want to anchor our insights on to think about kind of adding themes to a portfolio. the I think the story in finance has really shifted now to sovereignty decentralization of now there's so many firms it's pushing towards these independent investors it really does feel like AI and Bitcoin like the ethos is more generational than just the
[44:08] technologies right I I think you and I probably we think differently than maybe you know our parents or our grandparents do about investing um and I always wonder like chicken or egg like do we think differently ly because the industry was changing or because there's a bunch of people who are you know I don't know 20 to 50 years old they think differently so the market starts to shift and I I don't know the answer right but it's fascinating to me as this changes you get the Robin Hoods and the fintexs and all that but I'll give you a concrete example um on Sylvia the uh the
[44:39] consumer platform that we have uh when you look at the asset breakdown um you still have some timeless things there's I don't know 20ish% or of assets, primary residence or real estate. >> Mhm. >> Makes sense, right? When you think of like, oh, people are using a fintech product, you're like, everyone is obviously, you know, uh, in the latest meme stock, like that's what I'm hearing, you know, the headlines. No, man. They still own a real they still own real estate. Only 10% is crypto. >> So, you would think that, you know, people coming from my audience are like, "Oh, they must be 90% crypto." 10 is a
[45:09] higher number than I think the the average American, but it's still like a relatively low number. You look at public equities, that is the bulk of their investment portfolio. And so it always is fascinating to me is like when you look at the data versus the narratives, >> we know things are changing, >> but how much do they really you know people still are going to allocate in a certain way and I think that's why maybe you guys are so interesting as a business is >> you are leading with Bitcoin, you are leading in AI, you are leading in many of these areas and you're like embracing the new stuff, but if you go and you
[45:39] look at the assets, you still got a lot core and you know the these like normal um assets that maybe the uh the early adopters, you know, that's where the bulk of their capital is >> absolutely um you know I think going back to the generational comment you know millennials were the first real kind of techn native generation uh but social media wasn't necessarily native to all millennials uh for many of us >> when did you get a cell phone >> high school >> I got in in high school and it was a flip phone and I remember still like punching the number four times to get like seven to be a P or whatever it was
[46:10] right like [laughter] um so >> boomer thumbs They're still sore. Um >> I, by the way, I told somebody in our office recently, I was like, "Yeah, you know, we had a T9 texting phone." And they were like, "What's T9?" I like, "Oh my god, like we're getting old." You know, >> I I had the flip. I had the slider. I had the one that had the keyboard. It like flipped that way. Like it used to every generation looked completely different. >> Sidekick, you know, flip or whatever. You turn it and it would like have a keyboard. You could use two thumbs, right? Yeah. You were like, "I'm
[46:40] moving." [laughter] >> Uh and then it was And then having a a track ball on the Blackberry like Yeah. huge range. But um it was it was still preocial media and basically because it was pre 4G connectivity where it was really hard to watch a video or send a photo on these early cell phones. The Gen Z generation like born in social media like don't know another life. And I think you look at like Gen Alpha and a lot of how they're going to experience the financial world is going to look very different from how their parents and their parents' parents interacted with it. So I do think uh
[47:11] >> uh it's it's important to understand these differences. It's also important for when we think about our business, a lot of it is uh is um is bringing our ETFs to financial advisors who are serving those generations and they have to talk to the parent and the child in a lot of those relationships. And so the parents saying, you know, talk to me about your large cap growth fund and the kid is saying, tell me about your Bitcoin fund. And so often times a lot of the education we do is helping advisers communicate to both generations especially amid this tremendous amount of transfer of wealth that's going to
[47:41] happen from the boomer to the millennial generation. >> So one of the one of the reasons why I think IBIT has been so successful is advisers have recognized the types of products that they spoke about with their with their baby boomer generation clients does not necessarily resemble the types of products they'll talk about with their millennial clients and they need to bridge that gap and be at least conversant in some of these topics. >> Mhm. I mean, it makes sense, right? And and um I don't know. I I hear all the time like the I think they call it the silver tsunami of like all these assets are going to come and the young people are going to like sell whatever and
[48:12] they're going to move it into the things they like. And I think there will be some of that. I think that there's a lot of businesses that are kind of what is our, you know, uh um our plan, our transition plan. Um farmers are coming under a lot of pressure because usually they're a fourth or fifth generation farmer and they would hand the farm to their kids and their kids don't want to be a farmer. And so, you know, that's happening, I think, with like businesses. It's gonna be fascinating to watch the assets. Like, if you're a a kid who you don't inherit, you know, some an incredible amount of money. Maybe your parents just had a small
[48:43] stock portfolio. Like, do you go and sell those stocks to buy something else you like? And maybe your parents had Coca-Cola and, you know, Walmart and you're like, well, I want to own, you know, Palunteer and Tesla or something. I I don't know. Um but I think that's probably the challenge for a lot of these financial adviserss is like they may be the only constant in that you know conversation and try to figure out what to do with the assets. >> Yeah. They they have to manage that transition. They have to manage the fact that many ways that millennials or Gen Z want to interact with their uh finances
[49:13] is going to be you know in a more kind of technologydriven way as well. So building tools for advisers uh it's it's an important shift for sure. Um I do think the fundamental principles of building a portfolio uh aren't generational. These are these go back to just basics of risk and return. The instruments available are shifting. The you know the the structure of those instruments, the different types of asset classes, those are evolving. But the fundamental principles of portfolio management don't change. And so I think the important thing for advisers is you know stay clear with how you manage money but be able to have the
[49:44] conversations uh with each generation mostly from a behavioral perspective to keep them focused on their end goals. >> Now I said all that and the uh the Sylvia misfits that are like over the age of 50 there's a couple of them that uh they'll comment and they'll say I own Palunteer, I own Tesla, I own whatever and they'll they'll say you know I'm not like the rest of uh of the of my cohort. Um, so there there's obviously a lot of uh uh unique ones as well. Um, where can we send people to find uh find more about the uh the funds that you guys have or find you online? >> Easy. Isshares.com specifically?
[50:14] Isares.com/insights is where we have our thematic midyear update. That's where we have basically 10 really interesting slides on what the next phase of artificial intelligence is going to look like, what some of those choke points might be, where we see some opportunity in various different sectors that live outside of technology. So encourage people to go there. >> Amazing. Well, thank you so much for doing this. I always enjoy talking with you and look forward to doing it again in the future.