Jordi Visser / VisserLabs
La caída de la IA ha terminado. Esto es lo que viene ahora
Pregúntale al tutor sobre este vídeo
Entra con un email verificado y pregúntale al tutor lo que quieras sobre este vídeo.
TL;DR
Resumen de investigación
▶ Rebote del mercado y nuevos máximos
El presentador introduce la pregunta de cómo cubrirse frente a la IA y repasa el rebote tras la caída de factores. Había buscado dos señales: que el rebote se mantuviera y que bajara la volatilidad de factores; dice que la volatilidad cayó y que los fondos parecen estar cubiertos o haber reducido exposición bruta. El Nasdaq 100 subió cerca de 10% en cuatro días; el S&P 500 ganó 3,6% en la semana, el Nasdaq 100 5% y la cartera temática de IA 6,5%, su segunda mejor semana del año. Interpreta la ruptura de un rango de casi tres meses y los nuevos máximos del S&P 500, Russell 2000, compuesto de la Bolsa de Nueva York y S&P equiponderado como señales alcistas. Afirma que sigue siendo un mercado alcista: el S&P 500 lleva un alza de 13% en el año, todos los sectores están positivos y más del 80% de los nombres temáticos de IA tienen la media móvil de 200 días ascendente. También sostiene que las alzas en Corea del Sur, Alemania y Reino Unido, junto con la fortaleza de sectores industriales, muestran amplitud más allá de las tecnológicas.
▶ Volatilidad, resultados y amplitud
El presentador observa que la volatilidad de varios factores de mercado y tecnología se ha desplomado durante seis días, lo que interpreta como señal de que los fondos están cubiertos. Espera que el mercado avance con menor volumen durante el verano y que participantes bajistas puedan verse obligados a perseguir el alza; reconoce que otros esperan una falsa ruptura. La volatilidad del Nasdaq 100 y de valores individuales retrocedió, el VIX está en su nivel más bajo desde enero y el índice de crédito CDX se comportó de forma parecida, por lo que afirma que no ve problemas de crédito. Defiende el contexto de mercado con crecimiento de beneficios cercano al 50%, crecimiento de ingresos en torno al 15%, márgenes del 17% frente al 13% del año anterior y revisiones al alza. Atribuye parte de esa fortaleza a la inversión de capital en IA y dice que el impulso se extiende entre sectores. También señala que el PMI se acerca a 60, que los pedidos de bienes duraderos están cerca de ese nivel y que la amplitud mejora: la media de 50 días está en su punto más alto desde el 14 de julio y más del 80% de los componentes considerados tienen una pendiente positiva en la media de 200 días. Presenta cuatro versiones de su cartera temática de IA: una de Morgan Stanley, una de 100 nombres, una concentrada de 10 y otra global concentrada de 25; dice que sirven como índices diversificados en un mercado volátil.
▶ Señales para cubrirse y controlar el riesgo
El presentador sostiene que la IA está comprimiendo el tiempo económico y que la estructura de mercado está cambiando. Distingue este fenómeno de una sustitución inmediata generalizada de empleos: prevé primero menos contratación y, después, posibles pérdidas de puestos en empresas públicas, junto con creación de empleo en compañías nativas de IA. Considera que la menor previsibilidad del valor terminal podría comprimir múltiplos con rapidez. También advierte que el acceso generalizado a herramientas de análisis y optimización puede reforzar el momentum, la concentración, las burbujas y las caídas rápidas. A su juicio, la caída rápida ya ocurrió y es probable que el mínimo se mantenga; admite que podría equivocarse y que desconoce si volverá a ocurrir un movimiento similar al del primer trimestre. Para cubrirse, propone observar la volatilidad de factores frente a la volatilidad de índices, pues la primera incorpora posiciones largas y cortas y está ligada al apalancamiento bruto. Cree que el apalancamiento bruto puede haber tocado techo, que la volatilidad de factores será estructuralmente mayor y que las opciones de venta sobre índices podrían no cubrir como antes. Presenta como señal de riesgo una subida de 50% en 50 días de su cartera temática diversificada de 100 acciones; en torno al 20% de variación considera que el riesgo aumenta y debe combinarse con la amplitud interna. El ritmo de cambio extremo no implica necesariamente que la temática caiga, sino que recomienda reducir riesgo. Explica que vendió Micron y rotó a plata, Bitcoin, Eli Lilly y otros nombres para poder seguir expuesto a activos que considera comprables tras una caída fuerte. Dice que sus alertas de amplitud aparecieron antes de la caída posterior en nombres de memoria. Menciona que posee personalmente Camurus, Fluence, Entegris y Palantir; identifica a Palantir como su única acción de software personal y a Cadence y Synopsys como parte de la cartera temática.
▶ Herramientas de IA, Nvidia y riesgos de los hiperescaladores
Presenta un prompt que planea publicar para combinar su hoja técnica con comentarios de resultados y producir un panorama de empresas; dice que podrá utilizarse con ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini o Grok. Pone como ejemplos los resultados de Eaton y Schneider Electric, a las que describe como participantes en Vera Rubin. Comparte el caso de su hijo, estudiante universitario que no estudia informática y que, según cuenta, creó un jefe de gabinete de IA y subagentes para su internado; el presentador defiende que los jóvenes aprendan a usar agentes. Recomienda una entrevista con Gavin Baker y atribuye a Baker la opinión de que la venta de acciones de IA no está respaldada por los datos cuantitativos de demanda y que no ha encontrado un indicador negativo claro. El presentador dice haber comprado una cantidad considerable de Nvidia durante las tres semanas previas, considera que su múltiplo se ha comprimido y que puede beneficiarse de Vera Rubin y de la demanda de cómputo; no espera necesariamente que la acción se duplique pronto. Cita como indicios de aceleración la disponibilidad y alquiler de GPU y el precio de DRAM. Según el ejemplo que comenta, un clúster B200 que se alquilaba por algo más de 2 dólares por hora siete meses antes se esperaba alquilar por algo menos de 4 dólares por hora. Sostiene que la escasez de cómputo todavía favorece a los proveedores, incluso si aumenta el uso de modelos de código abierto. A la vez, aclara que su visión favorable de la infraestructura de IA no implica una opinión igualmente favorable sobre los hiperescaladores: prevé competencia intensa, gasto prolongado y dudas sobre si los ingresos futuros justificarán la inversión. Opina que los ingresos de nube podrían no bastar sin productos adicionales y que, con el tiempo, los hiperescaladores podrían valorarse como empresas de servicios públicos o inmobiliarias; considera justificados múltiplos más bajos y diferenciales de crédito más amplios ante esos riesgos. Relaciona posibles salidas de talento y burocracia en grandes empresas con dificultades para convertir investigación en productos comerciales. Afirma que será negativo respecto de las empresas públicas hacia 2030 y espera un crecimiento rápido de compañías nativas de IA.
▶ Memoria, adopción empresarial y compañías nativas de IA
El presentador retoma su tesis de que la memoria es un cuello de botella de la IA. Atribuye a Elon Musk la afirmación de que la producción de memoria aumenta alrededor de 20% anual, mientras que la demanda sube 200% anual o más; de ello infiere presión alcista sobre los precios si la demanda sigue creciendo más rápido que la oferta. Añade que más capacidad de cómputo no elimina el límite sin más memoria, especialmente cuando se generalicen los agentes de consumo. Sobre Palantir, que dice poseer personalmente y tener en su cartera modelo, destaca el crecimiento de ingresos comerciales: menciona tasas interanuales de 54% y 64%, ingresos del segundo trimestre de 306 millones de dólares un año antes frente a 764 millones ahora, y cierres de 220 contratos de al menos 1 millón, 98 de al menos 5 millones y 78 de al menos 10 millones. Interpreta esas cifras como evidencia de adopción empresarial, aunque señala que el negocio comercial partía de una base pequeña. Contrasta las preocupaciones bajistas con el aumento de nuevas empresas nativas de IA y la posibilidad de compañías de un solo empleado que alcancen ingresos de un millón de dólares; advierte que podrían afectar con el tiempo los beneficios de grandes empresas. Resume en su Substack una tesis de dos fuerzas: la emisión monetaria diluye el dinero y la IA podría debilitar la durabilidad de los derechos económicos de empresas públicas.
▶ Bonos, intervención cambiaria y activos de depreciación
El presentador comenta el alza de los rendimientos de bonos a 30 años en Estados Unidos, Reino Unido y Japón, y trabaja en un artículo sobre los bonos japoneses como una operación bajista que ha sido difícil desde los años noventa. Sostiene que cuando los rendimientos suben demasiado, los gobiernos terminan interviniendo, y que una caída de las acciones reduciría los ingresos fiscales en un contexto de déficits de 5% a 6%. Interpreta la intervención coordinada de Estados Unidos y Japón para apoyar al yen como una medida que también busca proteger el mercado de bonos del Tesoro, dado que Japón posee muchos de esos bonos. Según su relato, Scott Bessent explicó la operación y presionó a la Reserva Federal para ayudar a Japón; el presentador ve inusual la coordinación y advierte que podría añadir liquidez cuando ya hay mucha en la economía y los mercados. Pone en duda que la intervención cambiaria baste sin cambios en los diferenciales de tasas y señala que el Fondo de Estabilización Cambiaria habría agotado sus recursos. Dice que, tras la intervención y otros acontecimientos, el mercado todavía asignaba 45% de probabilidad a una subida de tasas de la Fed en septiembre y 63% a una del Banco de Japón; considera que esa expectativa respalda sus operaciones de depreciación monetaria. En su interpretación, los déficits y la deuda hacen probable que la Fed siga monetizando deuda soberana con el tiempo. Relaciona el avance de rendimientos con la respuesta de autoridades que sostiene a los mercados y destaca que el oro subió 7,2% en una de sus mejores semanas recientes, recuperó la media de 50 días y había pasado un periodo inusualmente largo debajo de ella. Considera que, si los mínimos de mercado se mantienen, la intervención podría marcar una toma de conciencia sobre los riesgos del sistema fiduciario. Ve razones para considerar oro, plata, platino y Bitcoin como activos beneficiados por la depreciación monetaria, aunque supedita parte de esa tesis a que la Fed no suba tasas en septiembre y dice que habrá que observar los próximos datos de inflación. Informa que tiene una posición considerable en plata, primero por su vínculo con la IA y ahora también por la tesis de depreciación; señala que plata y platino han superado o cerrado sobre sus medias de 50 días. Expresa dudas sobre la inflación: la medida de Truflation que muestra ha caído con fuerza en cuatro semanas, mientras que un dato de inflación había subido, y recomienda considerar otras medidas, como la media recortada.
▶ Empleo débil y situación de Bitcoin
El presentador sostiene que el mercado laboral es débil pese a las bajas solicitudes de subsidio, y atribuye parte de ello a la reducción de la fuerza laboral y de la participación. Afirma que la tasa de renuncias y las medidas salariales de la Reserva Federal de Atlanta han vuelto a niveles de 2019; cita el crecimiento de los salarios por hora en 3,2% y dice que no concuerda con describir el mercado laboral como sólido. Según su análisis, al excluir sanidad no se han creado empleos durante 18 meses y el crecimiento de las nóminas agregadas semanales en seis meses es el más débil desde 2012, excluyendo el periodo de COVID. Sostiene que la IA ya afecta la contratación, aunque todavía no las bajas, y prevé que la demografía, las jubilaciones y la creación de empresas pequeñas puedan reducir la necesidad de empleo sin provocar necesariamente una gran ola de despidos. Espera que la debilidad aparezca en la inflación o en el empleo y que la IA sorprenda a quienes no consideran el posible reemplazo de empresas mayores por compañías pequeñas con pocos empleados. Sobre Bitcoin, dice que sigue en un mercado bajista hasta superar un nivel técnico que no especifica; cree que podría mantenerse y romper al alza, pero reconoce que aún no lo ha hecho y considera su postura actual una operación de trading. Señala que el ecosistema de su índice de 40 empresas cripto funciona bien y que, según la probabilidad que menciona, la posibilidad de que la Clarity Act se convierta en ley ese año cayó de cerca de 50% a 17%, tras haber rondado 33% a 40% unas semanas antes. También menciona ventas adicionales de Michael Saylor y un exploit de Coldcard relacionado con almacenamiento en frío; a pesar de esos acontecimientos, dice que Bitcoin se comportó razonablemente bien esa semana. Cierra deseando buen verano y anticipando seguir analizando el resto del año.
Transcripción completa
[0:02] Uh
[0:03] rally continues into all-time highs. Val
[0:06] falls off sharply.
[0:07] Uh the biggest question I've been asked,
[0:09] and as I mentioned last week, I'm
[0:11] spending a lot more time with uh RIAs.
[0:15] And
[0:16] also with the institutions, and the
[0:18] biggest question
[0:21] I received post uh let's say situational
[0:24] awareness in the
[0:25] the
[0:26] breakdown in uh in factor val was how to
[0:30] hedge AI going forward. So, I'm going to
[0:31] go through that. I put together a prompt
[0:34] for you guys uh
[0:35] on something connected back to the uh
[0:40] thematic portfolio, so you can run that.
[0:42] I'm also going to start to hopefully
[0:46] give you guys some stuff on agents. Uh
[0:49] Gavin Baker interview, uh I'll basically
[0:52] make sure uh that I emphasize this is a
[0:56] must-listen to, regardless of your views
[0:59] on AI. Uh I've said a lot of these
[1:02] things,
[1:04] but I think, as I take you through it,
[1:06] um it's really important to make sure
[1:08] that you at least hear what he's saying
[1:10] based on a trip out to Silicon Valley.
[1:12] Uh
[1:13] I didn't get a chance because I record
[1:16] on Fridays during the summertime most of
[1:18] the time. That'll probably be the case
[1:19] going forward, but
[1:21] after I recorded um the US intervened in
[1:25] dollar-yen, and I will uh give you my
[1:28] thoughts on that because there was a
[1:29] major reaction in gold this week.
[1:32] And uh I think this is all going to lead
[1:34] into Bitcoin, uh and I'm going to go
[1:37] through why and how
[1:41] what my Substack that I wrote last week
[1:43] kind of connects everything back to it.
[1:44] So, um last week I talked about uh
[1:48] the bounce that had occurred in the
[1:52] final 2 days post the
[1:55] Citadel buying from situational
[1:57] awareness, and how it reminded me of
[2:00] prior panic situations where we finally
[2:03] had a cleansing event and that you can't
[2:06] especially in in the moves that we had
[2:08] seen that were historic with the
[2:09] volatility with the factor drop that
[2:15] you had to look for follow through days
[2:18] and basically what I wanted to see was
[2:20] two conditions one hold the the bounce
[2:25] pretty much across the board and then
[2:27] secondly I wanted to see factor
[2:29] volatility in the volatility stuff come
[2:31] down to indicate that people were either
[2:34] a hedged or they had taken their gross
[2:35] down. Now I had seen the data that the
[2:37] gross was down but
[2:39] we obviously got
[2:41] almost all of that. So
[2:44] on the queues I posted this in X but the
[2:48] four-day rally which included one day
[2:51] last week and the first two days of this
[2:53] week ended up getting close to 10% and
[2:57] you can see that over the course of the
[2:58] last 17 years since the great financial
[3:01] crisis ended you can see these days over
[3:05] time uh
[3:08] and a lot of these are obviously very
[3:09] famous bottoms in terms of liberation
[3:11] day and obviously COVID
[3:13] also this one here in 2022.
[3:16] This one here
[3:18] was a let's say a bear market rally in
[3:21] early 2022. The difference was then
[3:25] we were below the 200-day moving
[3:27] average. This is something I brought up
[3:29] before bull markets stay above the
[3:31] 200-day moving average which is pointed
[3:33] upward. That's what we did in 80 plus
[3:36] percent of the AI thematic names which
[3:38] is why to me I was looking for where to
[3:41] put money to work. That's why we went
[3:43] through it that way. In terms of the S&P
[3:45] rate of change four-day rate of change
[3:47] the biggest one over the last year of 6%
[3:52] and just to give you an idea how vicious
[3:54] that rally was, we had been trading in a
[3:57] range. So, every week that I came in
[3:59] here, I kept saying the same thing,
[4:01] which is this is a pennant flag
[4:03] formation, whatever you want. And to get
[4:05] bearish charts like this is a very
[4:06] dangerous thing, but in particular when
[4:09] you're seeing Qs fall and you're seeing
[4:11] factor stuff collapse, you're looking
[4:13] for contagion on this, which is very
[4:15] difficult to happen when
[4:17] you have earnings growth at
[4:20] post-recession type times. Well, I'm not
[4:22] going to go through all of it you guys
[4:23] had, but the range that we were in
[4:26] basically from May
[4:30] to July. So, we're talking about 1 to
[4:33] almost 3 months, a 3-month pennant.
[4:37] And guess what? The rally we had was 6%
[4:41] bigger than the entire range that we saw
[4:43] for that time period.
[4:45] That is not something to fade. Um
[4:48] the S&P for the week up 3.6%.
[4:52] Qs up 5%.
[4:57] The thematic portfolio was up 6 and 1/2.
[4:59] It was the second biggest week of the
[5:03] year.
[5:05] In terms of where we stand year-to-date
[5:07] now in the S&P, again, I'll say this
[5:09] over and over again, this is a bull
[5:10] market.
[5:12] Every sector is up on the year. The S&P
[5:14] is up 13%.
[5:18] Pennant formation
[5:20] in there for a solid 3 months
[5:23] breakout higher than this. We not only
[5:26] hold after the Monday Tuesday, we make
[5:28] new all-time highs
[5:30] today.
[5:32] IWM made new all-time highs this week.
[5:35] New York Stock Exchange Composite made
[5:37] new all-time highs this week.
[5:39] The equal-weight S&P made new all-time
[5:41] highs this week.
[5:43] In terms of the KOSPI cuz I had a lot of
[5:44] people reaching out saying this is still
[5:46] a problem there. This is not a problem.
[5:48] The KOSPI is up 61% year-to-date. This
[5:51] is the KOSPI 200.
[5:53] >> [clears throat]
[5:53] >> The technology sector is up 116%.
[5:56] This is after a collapse, okay? And I'm
[5:59] not going to go through today, but on
[6:02] days now where SK Hynix is down
[6:04] slightly,
[6:06] the name the sectors that I showed, the
[6:08] machinery and the construction side,
[6:10] have
[6:11] been um leading on the way up and
[6:14] holding their gains. So, again, this is
[6:16] what long short is about. You get
[6:18] deleveraging on both sides and at some
[6:20] point you
[6:22] start to go the other direction.
[6:25] This is the DAX breaking out to new
[6:27] all-time highs.
[6:30] This is the FTSE breaking out to new
[6:32] all-time highs.
[6:34] Here's the big thing for the week. So, I
[6:36] showed you guys this. This is the
[6:38] market-neutral momentum. This is the uh
[6:42] So, this is the sector-neutralized
[6:43] market momentum. This is market
[6:45] momentum. This is technology momentum,
[6:47] and this is the industrials momentum.
[6:50] And if you look at all of these, the
[6:52] last 6 days,
[6:55] the drop-off in volatility says that
[6:58] funds are hedged.
[7:01] Here is the
[7:03] 7-day realized vol of the tech
[7:06] momentum [clears throat] vol.
[7:08] Uh basically collapsing,
[7:12] which is indicative of what I just
[7:13] showed. But, the what the main point is
[7:16] that we've seen factor volatility drop
[7:18] off. That is usually what happens after
[7:21] this. And as I've said, it takes a long
[7:23] time, particularly when you're below the
[7:24] 200-day moving average. You've knocked
[7:26] people out. Um anyone that's vol
[7:28] targeted just cannot lever back up. Any
[7:31] of the pods that were hurt, that had
[7:33] their risk management either reduced,
[7:36] it's the summertime. This is why we're
[7:39] going to rally on lower volume,
[7:41] and everyone is going to be put in a
[7:43] position of chasing. They don't want to
[7:45] chase, they're going to read about
[7:46] seasonality, they're going to read about
[7:47] September, they're going to read about
[7:48] the midterms and all of this stuff.
[7:51] And in my opinion, I've heard enough
[7:52] podcasts this week from quote-unquote
[7:56] market people who
[7:59] are in the game, I think, of being
[8:01] bearish. Uh
[8:04] they remain bearish in the rally and
[8:07] they're looking for a false breakout.
[8:08] So, we'll see if we get that, but
[8:11] this is really hard to be bearish on
[8:13] this stuff when this is going on.
[8:15] Um the VIXY Q for single name ball
[8:20] has fallen sharply, too, and it's
[8:21] basically in this period now all the way
[8:23] back to where it was before this whole
[8:27] thing
[8:28] rallied. Not where the panic started,
[8:30] but where it goes. So, we've seen mean
[8:32] reversion now on the ball side. In terms
[8:34] of the VIX,
[8:35] you're at the lows since January. So,
[8:38] for everyone who reached out to me
[8:39] saying the contagion was coming, they
[8:41] were buying S&P puts,
[8:43] uh
[8:45] you not only lost on the direction, you
[8:46] lost on the ball and the ball never
[8:49] really in was indicative of the panic
[8:51] that we saw with factor volatility at at
[8:53] 45-year highs on some measures.
[8:56] Uh we never got it in the S&P.
[8:58] CDX, um
[9:01] I talked last week about the silliness
[9:03] in the hyperscalers and how the
[9:06] companies with the best balance sheets,
[9:07] people are
[9:08] looking at their CDS uh and especially
[9:11] when they go into X. Here's what the CDX
[9:15] index did, basically the same as the
[9:17] VIX.
[9:19] There's no credit issues at all.
[9:21] Earning season, uh I'm not going to show
[9:23] you this number, but you know it's up
[9:25] near 50% in terms of earnings growth.
[9:27] Sales growth, though,
[9:29] uh
[9:30] we're just killing it.
[9:32] Killing it.
[9:33] And as you'll notice, this is across
[9:35] sectors. Um the AI trade from an
[9:38] earnings basis is just taking everyone
[9:40] up with it. Here's the revenue growth
[9:42] now up at 15% and I just want you to
[9:45] look that since Q1 of 25
[9:48] basically this has gone on. Now, what
[9:50] happened in Q1 of 25?
[9:52] Donald Trump took over as president and
[9:55] sentiment changed on the business side.
[9:57] He put tariffs
[9:59] in place. Everyone got worried, but the
[10:02] AI trade was now in full force.
[10:04] Uh and that's what is driving this. This
[10:07] is the certainty over the AI CapEx. So,
[10:09] these are the CapEx numbers basically
[10:11] driving this. It's having a huge impact.
[10:13] Margins
[10:15] last year at this point 13%. This year
[10:17] 17%. And again, not just technology, it
[10:21] is
[10:22] margins are increasing and as AI
[10:24] adoption and AI agents go, you're going
[10:26] to see more of this.
[10:27] Uh the breadth
[10:29] again, I highlighted last week that it
[10:32] was a good sign that we basically had
[10:34] two prints higher than these two
[10:36] and we followed through this week.
[10:39] The 50-day is up to the highest level
[10:41] since July 14th and most importantly
[10:44] the 200-day slope
[10:47] 80 plus percent pointed upward.
[10:51] Uh this has been the best quarter for
[10:53] years
[10:55] in terms of the earnings
[10:58] estimates beats.
[11:02] If you don't believe um
[11:05] well, when I If you don't believe the
[11:06] earnings
[11:07] then look at the revenues. They continue
[11:10] to move higher and this is the PMI which
[11:13] soared higher. I can remember it was a
[11:14] year ago PMI was below 50. I was writing
[11:17] papers on the
[11:20] PMI heading up towards 60 and what that
[11:23] would mean all on the back of the AI
[11:24] trade. Now, it's fairly consensus, but
[11:28] we're almost at 60 now and more
[11:30] importantly
[11:31] uh
[11:33] this implies that we're going to get
[11:34] closer to it. So, we continue to move
[11:37] higher, revs keep going up, and we got
[11:39] durable goods this week, non-defense ex-
[11:42] air,
[11:43] again, up at a level that
[11:46] is very close to 60. So,
[11:48] again, for anyone who has faded this,
[11:50] it's not just the earnings reports now,
[11:53] you're seeing it at the PMI level,
[11:55] you're seeing it global stock markets
[11:56] around the world, and you're still
[11:58] seeing revisions go higher.
[12:00] Here is the AI thematic portfolio with
[12:03] all four parts. Remember, you've got the
[12:05] Morgan Stanley one here overlaid with my
[12:08] 100 name one. The Morgan Stanley one was
[12:10] just created later. For those of you
[12:12] want to trade it, you can call up Morgan
[12:14] Stanley desk, they have it. You've got
[12:16] the concentrated portfolio, which has 10
[12:19] names, and then the more global
[12:21] concentrated portfolio, which has 25.
[12:23] Again, these were put together so that
[12:25] you can have an index.
[12:27] I think if everyone learned anything,
[12:29] the indexes are really important when
[12:31] you have this much volatility. So,
[12:34] I want to get into the hedging side down
[12:36] some of the conversation. So, I showed
[12:37] this slide last week. Uh I believe the
[12:39] market is changing structurally, and
[12:41] this is never going back to the way it
[12:43] was before, because AI is compressing
[12:46] economic time.
[12:47] Um I think you're going to see that with
[12:49] the rest of the year. I'm going to go
[12:50] through the payroll numbers from
[12:52] yesterday, and I want you to reach out
[12:54] to every one of your favorite economists
[12:55] and ask them
[12:57] why they're not seeing the weakness.
[12:59] This is not about people um necessarily
[13:02] being replaced by jobs. This is not
[13:03] about jobs being lost,
[13:06] but this is about wages. This is about
[13:09] the fact that digital employees are
[13:10] here, and they're coming
[13:12] incredibly quickly, because the adoption
[13:14] pace is picking up. I'm going to take
[13:16] you through Palantir, which is um
[13:19] a name that I own personally, but also a
[13:21] name in the model portfolio,
[13:23] which just showed their corporate
[13:24] numbers. Since we can't get Anthropic
[13:26] and OpenAI in terms of numbers that
[13:28] we're getting released, you can look at
[13:29] Palantir's. These numbers are insane in
[13:32] terms of the adoption. When the adoption
[13:33] picks up, the AI agents are going to
[13:35] come and the AI agents come, not only
[13:37] are you going to have less hiring, you
[13:38] will start to see more job losses in
[13:40] public companies. You'll have job
[13:42] creation in private AI native companies,
[13:45] which I'll go through. Terminal value
[13:47] gets harder to ask to estimate, which
[13:49] makes it more difficult that companies
[13:51] all of a sudden can go from trading at a
[13:54] 30 PE to a 20 PE in a very short amount
[13:56] of time. We've seen that in many many
[13:58] places and I think you're going to
[13:59] continue to see it. I think Google's
[14:01] kind of going through that right now. Um
[14:04] I won't read all of these, but all of
[14:05] these things, including this one, which
[14:07] Gavin Baker brought up, too.
[14:10] The the fact that everyone
[14:13] has access to it and everyone can create
[14:15] a backtest, everyone can create an
[14:17] optimized portfolio, everyone can find
[14:19] the names that are working, leads to
[14:21] more momentum, it leads to crowding. And
[14:23] again, it leads to bubbles, parabolas,
[14:25] and speed crashes. Exactly what we had
[14:27] this year, what I wrote about. The speed
[14:29] crash has occurred, it's over. The
[14:31] bottom is in as far as I'm concerned on
[14:33] a probability basis. If we take out the
[14:35] lows, I'd be surprised, uh mainly
[14:38] because I continue to believe people are
[14:41] way too bearish relative to the reality
[14:43] of the earnings growth that's coming. I
[14:45] also don't believe you're going to ever
[14:47] see that type of move again uh that we
[14:49] saw in the first quarter, but you never
[14:51] know. So, with that hedging side, how do
[14:53] you deal with bubble bubbles, parabolas,
[14:55] and speed crashes?
[14:57] Well, those are all based on
[14:59] price and time, which I started to show
[15:01] you last week, but I'm going to go
[15:02] through one of the demos in terms of how
[15:04] I how I'm handling this. And for the
[15:06] subscribers, this will become part of
[15:09] the way that I'm going to identify
[15:10] things. I built turbulence models. The
[15:12] turbulence models because everything was
[15:14] so correlated, they never really showed
[15:16] leading problems. The breadth did, and
[15:18] that's how I'm going to kind of go
[15:19] through this. So, I try to learn from
[15:22] what happens and look for the signals
[15:23] that will warn you. This is one signal
[15:25] that will warn you when factor vol
[15:28] continues to move higher and break away
[15:31] from index vol. The reason factor vol is
[15:34] is so much different than say single
[15:36] name equity vol, which also broke away
[15:38] and I showed last week,
[15:40] this has got a long short component of
[15:42] it and this is directly related to gross
[15:44] leverage. So, the great thing about
[15:45] factors are as gross leverage is going
[15:48] to all-time highs and I'm making the
[15:50] call that we are at peak gross leverage
[15:53] and that we will see leverage come down
[15:55] over the course of the next few years
[15:57] because of what I showed before that AI
[15:59] is compressing time, it's making it more
[16:01] crowded and it means the sharp ratio of
[16:03] this stuff is going to come down. I
[16:04] think factor vol is structurally going
[16:06] to be higher. I don't think we're going
[16:08] back down here. Maybe we come back down
[16:10] into 25, but if we spend now the rest of
[16:12] this year in the 30 to 25. And again,
[16:15] this is an equal weight of four separate
[16:17] factors. It's not just momentum because
[16:19] I have value in there, I have quality
[16:21] and I have beta. And so, I'm averaging
[16:23] them all in there. You can see the
[16:24] difference in the breakaway from the
[16:26] S&P, which means using index
[16:29] puts is not going to work the way that
[16:30] it used to.
[16:31] So, here's what I am using and this is
[16:33] the price in time side. So, right here
[16:36] when we when we got to 50% or almost
[16:39] 50%. This is a 50-day rate of change on
[16:42] my thematic portfolio. So, again, for
[16:45] those of you on the AI side that are
[16:47] more tech focused or you're more
[16:48] industrial focused or you're more
[16:49] utility,
[16:51] you need this tool. You need to have
[16:53] access to this data and the reason is
[16:56] because there are no indices that are
[16:58] diversified to this level. This is
[17:00] global. This is across sectors. This
[17:03] involves 100 names that are involved in
[17:05] there. There are chemicals, power
[17:07] companies, industrial companies. So, it
[17:09] is diversified.
[17:11] 50% move
[17:13] over 50 days. So, 50 trading days, which
[17:16] means slightly more than 2 months. To be
[17:19] up 50% you're going to fall. Now, here
[17:22] is the historical levels. At 20% I think
[17:25] the risk grows and I think that's when
[17:27] you need to combine it with
[17:30] this.
[17:31] These happen to peak at the exact same
[17:33] time.
[17:34] So, rate of change does not mean that
[17:37] the thematic trade goes down. It just
[17:39] means you start to run in. So, I've
[17:40] always used rate of change. In the past,
[17:43] before we had exponential
[17:46] uh innovation, in 2007 my model gave a
[17:49] recession
[17:51] uh warning or not it gave a recession
[17:53] signal in September of '07.
[17:56] So,
[17:57] in September of '07 is when the warning
[17:59] went out that we were going to have a
[18:01] recession. And the reason was because
[18:03] year-over-year S&P, the 252-day rate of
[18:07] change of the S&P,
[18:09] had basically started to turn negative.
[18:12] Once that happens, historically, that
[18:14] means we're at a bad point. When you add
[18:17] in corporate profits, you add in jobless
[18:18] claims, again, this is before
[18:20] exponential AI or before exponential
[18:23] innovation with software. So, for me,
[18:26] this is the way that I'm replacing this.
[18:28] I'm looking for
[18:30] the rate of change to be up at a level
[18:32] which doesn't make sense, which shows
[18:34] the crowding, it shows the AI agents, it
[18:36] shows everyone pushing everything. And
[18:38] then I'm looking for breath to be
[18:39] breaking down within inside the 100
[18:41] names. You need a diversified portfolio.
[18:43] So, this is the way I'm going to measure
[18:44] it. I gave you guys the warnings back
[18:46] here. We didn't make a high in the index
[18:49] until right around here.
[18:51] Then we didn't violently fall on the
[18:53] memory names and stuff here. So, I
[18:54] talked about selling Micron in here.
[18:56] This is when I got rid of all of it. It
[18:58] was early.
[19:00] I rotated to silver, to Bitcoin, and to
[19:04] Eli Lilly, and to some other names.
[19:07] The main point was those names in the
[19:09] month of July, go look what they did.
[19:12] Silver and Bitcoin
[19:14] Well, silver was flatish. Bitcoin was up
[19:17] a good amount. Lilly was up. You're
[19:19] trying to navigate where you're still in
[19:21] a position to buy when you get the puke.
[19:23] So, this is the way it looks and this is
[19:24] the way I'm going to go through it. This
[19:26] is the whole year actually.
[19:28] It's the It's the rate of change. So,
[19:30] once you break above
[19:32] this level, then the warning sign
[19:34] starts. So, we broke above this level.
[19:36] We started peaking in terms of the
[19:40] the breadth, we were up at 90% believe
[19:44] it or not. We're above the 20-day moving
[19:46] average and then gradually we broke
[19:47] down. You can see how this goes. Now,
[19:50] the four-week average peaked here and
[19:52] rolled over. So, as time goes on, I
[19:55] believe this is going to happen now more
[19:57] often and I think this is the way you're
[19:59] going to have to deal with it.
[20:00] I've had a lot of subscribers reach out
[20:03] about a bunch of names that just haven't
[20:05] bounced yet. Things like Camurus, I own
[20:08] this one. Fluence, I own this one.
[20:11] Entegris did go higher. I own this one
[20:13] and Palantir, I didn't include the price
[20:15] today. It's all the way up here now.
[20:18] For all the Palantir haters and all the
[20:20] short people and the people that go,
[20:22] you're missing something on this one.
[20:23] It's the only software name I own
[20:27] personally and then you've got Cadence
[20:29] and Synopsys that are part of the
[20:32] the thematic portfolio that are software
[20:34] design. I'll probably be talking about
[20:36] them soon
[20:37] because there's been some stuff. So,
[20:39] that's the way that I'm kind of working
[20:41] through with people to automate things
[20:43] on the hedging side, to use my index for
[20:46] that, but also to use the breadth and to
[20:48] use the different parts. This is the
[20:50] thing I was saying on an earnings
[20:52] mosaic. So, what I did create and the
[20:54] prompt will go up over the weekend.
[20:57] I created a prompt for you guys that
[20:59] will basically spit out something like
[21:00] this. You can use it in Gemini. You can
[21:02] use it in ChatGPT,
[21:04] but basically this will use and this is
[21:06] to give you a sense where if you take my
[21:07] technical sheet and you update you put
[21:11] the technical sheet into chat GPT
[21:14] and then or Claude or Gemini or
[21:16] whichever one you want Grok and then you
[21:19] just run the prompt it will go out and
[21:21] get the earnings commentary from the
[21:22] week and put it together with a bunch of
[21:25] different things including kind of a
[21:26] look at a mosaic side. So this was from
[21:29] Eaton you had Eaton report this week.
[21:32] You also had Schneider report. They're
[21:34] both on the electric side. They both
[21:35] happen to be participants in Vera Rubin.
[21:38] So it will go through and it will look
[21:40] at and give you basically a recap of
[21:42] that with some of the most important
[21:44] commentary that was in there. I'm trying
[21:46] to help you guys especially as times
[21:48] were goes so this is what it does. This
[21:50] is what you'll see up there.
[21:52] I'm trying to keep you guys going with
[21:53] the AI side. Again, if you guys want to
[21:56] access to the tools, if you want access
[21:58] reach out to Mark Wailing, go to the
[21:59] website.
[22:00] We're doing more and more of these but
[22:02] in particular I'm doing more and more
[22:03] presentations for RIAs where I'm also
[22:06] doing regular calls with them. They're
[22:08] setting things up that way so you can
[22:09] reach out to Mark. I did want to
[22:11] reference this because this is where we
[22:13] we are in the agentic side. This is a a
[22:16] a text
[22:17] exchange with my son. Uh
[22:20] he's a entering his junior year at
[22:23] college. He is not a computer science
[22:26] major. He I put him through
[22:29] Python boot camp when he was a junior in
[22:31] high school.
[22:33] I have my AI chief of staff spitting out
[22:35] new sub agents on the regular. This is
[22:37] what he's doing at his internship.
[22:39] He even said I prefer chat GPT Gemini
[22:41] coding is insane though. I got the
[22:43] information from YouTube and AI.
[22:46] Your kids have to be doing this guys. He
[22:48] is guaranteed to have a job at whatever
[22:50] firm he works because he has already
[22:52] built a chief of staff. He's spitting
[22:54] out those new sub agents. There's
[22:55] absolutely no reason
[22:57] why your kids can't do this. So remember
[23:00] the knowledge brain thing that I put in
[23:01] there, I will be doing AI agent stuff
[23:03] for the subscribers. I will probably be
[23:06] going through some videos
[23:07] as we get into this year. I got a lot
[23:10] going on with the crypto side, but my
[23:12] goal is to really make sure that you
[23:13] guys realize that the agentic side is
[23:15] here and if you're not using it, you're
[23:17] falling way behind. So, let's go through
[23:19] the Gavin Baker side. Again, this is a
[23:21] must listen. The reason it's a must
[23:23] listen is cuz very seldom do you find
[23:25] someone who is this knowledgeable about
[23:27] the AI trade from a very high level,
[23:30] which Gavin is. He speaks about it
[23:31] regularly. He's asked questions on it
[23:33] regularly. He invests in it. It's very
[23:36] hard to find people that know this from
[23:38] the industrial side all the way out.
[23:41] I'm not going to read all these up. I'm
[23:43] just going to go through the speaker
[23:44] argues the AI sell-off is disconnected
[23:46] from the quantitative data. He says he
[23:48] has not found a real negative demand
[23:50] metric.
[23:52] So, I just want to make sure that you
[23:54] guys, if you listen to this,
[23:57] if you just listen to the first 5
[23:59] minutes of this,
[24:00] these are all quotes from the first 5
[24:02] minutes.
[24:04] Nvidia actually, as we record this, is
[24:06] at the lowest forward PE of the last 10
[24:08] years.
[24:09] I've bought a decent amount of Nvidia
[24:11] over the course of the last 3 weeks. It
[24:14] looked good for a while, broke back down
[24:16] again, now it's looking better.
[24:18] I believe with Vera Rubin coming out and
[24:20] with all the chatter on this and the
[24:22] fact that it's this cheap, but also
[24:23] going through the token per watt needs
[24:26] and realizing how quickly they're
[24:28] they're coming out with this stuff, I
[24:29] just can't see a sign with what GPUs are
[24:32] doing, the price of them which he goes
[24:34] through,
[24:35] that they're not going to benefit from
[24:36] this at this level. So, they've done
[24:38] their multiple compression, it's been
[24:40] significant.
[24:42] I just it's it's not it's not going to
[24:44] double for you, I'm sure, in in in a
[24:45] short amount of time, but I think when
[24:48] you're looking at kind of safer names
[24:50] that already have seen their multiple
[24:51] compressed, I still think Nvidia is one
[24:53] of the best ones. Um
[24:56] not a single instance of deceleration,
[24:58] nothing. In fact, every metric rate is
[25:00] accelerating. Whether you cut GPU
[25:02] availability, whether you cut GPU rental
[25:04] pricing, whether you cut the spot price
[25:06] of DRAM this month to grow, everything
[25:07] is actually accelerated.
[25:09] So, when you go through all of these and
[25:12] you hear what he says about Anthropic
[25:14] and you hear what he says about deep
[25:16] compute prices and the anecdotal stuff
[25:18] that he gets out there.
[25:21] I He's basically saying that these
[25:24] companies
[25:26] Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, the
[25:27] hyperscalers, the critical part of this
[25:29] because if you've been bearish on them,
[25:30] which most people have, they've called
[25:32] this a bubble, they've been wrong.
[25:33] They've said ROIC will not come through,
[25:35] they've been wrong.
[25:37] Maybe they'll be right. The CDS is wider
[25:40] for justified reasons cuz they're still
[25:41] leveraging up more and more and I'll go
[25:43] through the reason why it does make
[25:45] sense in a second, but
[25:47] you can't argue the fact that at this
[25:49] point there's a chance that they could
[25:50] see significant revenue very short-term
[25:54] if for no other reason because they are
[25:56] building so much compute and the value
[25:59] of that compute is going up and he talks
[26:01] about it here.
[26:02] The same type of B200 cluster that
[26:04] rented around mid $2 per hour 7 months
[26:07] ago is now expected to rent for just
[26:10] under $4 per
[26:11] GPU hour. So, remember all the stuff
[26:15] about these chips won't survive, their
[26:17] lifespan. We have a bottleneck in
[26:21] compute.
[26:22] So, you have to go through all compute
[26:24] has value right now regardless of where
[26:27] it is. Open source would love to be
[26:29] using this stuff. So, let's just
[26:32] forget all the stuff that you've heard
[26:34] on this.
[26:35] Don't get all bearish on this because of
[26:37] something that isn't true by the data.
[26:40] If you see this data start not to happen
[26:42] and that's what he goes through,
[26:44] it's like the breath that I have on the
[26:46] index. If one thing is going down,
[26:48] that's fine, but when people look at the
[26:49] token index and that's their thing and I
[26:51] say on this video, even the people at
[26:54] the place that provided say it's not
[26:56] bearish on
[26:58] on market. It just means more and more
[27:01] of the usage is going on open source,
[27:03] which makes sense.
[27:05] It doesn't mean it's bearish. It doesn't
[27:07] mean that Anthropic's revenues aren't
[27:08] going to grow, but very smart people
[27:10] that I've known in the business for a
[27:11] long time were saying that to me. So,
[27:14] we've had a point that if you can listen
[27:16] to someone like him and go through it,
[27:18] it's there.
[27:20] It's rewiring the market structure. So,
[27:22] he got into the same thing that I talked
[27:25] about.
[27:26] He even brought up the probabilistic
[27:28] Bayesian interpretation of the future,
[27:29] which I write about all the time and I
[27:31] talk about all the time.
[27:32] AI compresses economic time, but it it
[27:35] may also compress market time.
[27:38] The month of July
[27:40] for momentum was worse than any year
[27:44] over the data that I have.
[27:46] So, that's how we're compressing market
[27:49] time. Bubbles, parabolas, and speed
[27:52] crashes.
[27:54] Here are the key quotes from the
[27:55] transcript. You guys
[27:59] can pause it and look at it on your own,
[28:01] but here's the most important one. We
[28:02] are in a cute compute shortage.
[28:05] And at the same time, 500,000 people,
[28:08] maybe 250,000 are using a generative AI.
[28:11] So, my son is one of them. He's spinning
[28:13] out sub-agents.
[28:15] But only 250,000 of 8 billion people.
[28:18] What happens when we go from 500,000 to
[28:21] 1%? To 100 million? To 500 million?
[28:24] Guys, I say it all the time.
[28:27] There will never be enough compute,
[28:29] ever. We will continually be building
[28:31] compute. We'll be doing it in different
[28:33] ways. We'll continue to get more
[28:35] efficiency. Everything will keep
[28:36] happening, but nothing is on the horizon
[28:38] for that to go away. So, when we see the
[28:41] prices of GPUs on older stuff start to
[28:44] head down, at least we're at a point
[28:46] where the newer stuff is saturating some
[28:48] of the demand ahead of adoption, but the
[28:50] adoption is happening because of agents.
[28:52] And once you set them off, they're
[28:55] tireless workers. So, it is exponential
[28:57] against
[28:59] the physical side. No amount will ever
[29:01] be enough. The math behind hyperscaler
[29:03] CapEx. This is my post earnings paper
[29:07] that went out this week
[29:08] on the hyperscalers and the reason why
[29:12] you should not be playing for them to
[29:14] break apart.
[29:15] Now,
[29:16] I got a lot of questions saying does
[29:18] this mean you're bullish on
[29:19] hyperscalers? No, not relative to the
[29:21] infrastructure trade. Nothing changes in
[29:24] that front. I still think they're going
[29:25] to have heavy competition, and here's
[29:27] the other reason why.
[29:29] The hyperscalers quarterly free cash
[29:31] flow, when we think they're going to go
[29:33] positive as a group by Goldman Sachs.
[29:36] Look how long this is out. So, here's
[29:38] the problem.
[29:40] They're going to keep spending money on
[29:42] hoping they get the revenues in the
[29:43] door.
[29:44] I I understand they have the cloud
[29:46] revenues, but the cloud revenues are not
[29:48] going to be enough in my opinion. You're
[29:50] going to need to have products, you're
[29:51] going to have need to have other things,
[29:53] or you're going to get priced like a
[29:54] utility or real estate company, cuz
[29:56] eventually, when the compute isn't
[29:59] as
[30:01] outsized in terms of supply versus
[30:03] demand as it is now, and by then we
[30:05] could have a lot of innovations. We
[30:08] could have a lot of things on the
[30:09] algorithmic side. Things could change.
[30:12] There could be breakthroughs in hardware
[30:13] that when we go to uh humanoids and we
[30:16] go to cars and we go to all this,
[30:17] everything could change. Now,
[30:19] I still believe we're going to need more
[30:21] compute, we're going to need more
[30:22] hardware, but
[30:24] whether their businesses will be there
[30:26] is a question, and that's why their
[30:27] multiples should be compressed, and
[30:29] their CDS should be
[30:32] wider. It There's a risk there. So,
[30:35] it's [clears throat] not a
[30:36] a a risk that I want to
[30:38] go out there and trade, but if you're
[30:39] buying their paper
[30:41] and you want to
[30:42] buy some CD I of course you do. If
[30:44] you're trying to short the AI trade and
[30:46] you want some stuff out there, of course
[30:47] you go buy CDS in this, especially when
[30:49] it just keeps moving. Um I just want to
[30:51] bring this up quickly cuz I think
[30:53] [clears throat] this is a sign about the
[30:55] problem inside these companies. So, I
[30:58] also believe that this is a big deal
[31:00] what happened this week with Jeff Dean
[31:02] leaving.
[31:03] And also, Demis Hassabis kind of moving
[31:06] into another area.
[31:08] This is a big deal to me and this is
[31:10] because Google is the perfect example of
[31:13] a company where
[31:15] they released AlphaFold,
[31:18] which makes them no money.
[31:20] If it makes them some money, it's coming
[31:22] through something, but for the amount of
[31:24] people using it to release it free,
[31:28] it's probably created some conflicts
[31:30] inside cuz they are spending tons of
[31:31] money, they're taking tons of debt. They
[31:33] need actual consumer products,
[31:35] corporation, they need something to come
[31:38] through and I think this is where the
[31:39] people who are trying to leave a legacy
[31:42] on this technology, the talent, are
[31:44] getting frustrated with the bureaucracy
[31:47] at big companies. And I think you're
[31:49] going to see this over and over again.
[31:51] It's reason why I'm negative on all
[31:53] public companies by the time we get to
[31:55] 2030, the bureaucracy is going to be a
[31:59] killer. At the same time, you're going
[32:01] to have AI native companies growing
[32:03] rapidly.
[32:04] Okay, I just want to remind you on the
[32:06] memory side. I wrote this paper
[32:09] is in June, AI equals memory. This is
[32:11] after I had sold my Micron. This was not
[32:14] to buy anything. This was just to let
[32:15] people know that memory will remain in a
[32:17] shortage and it is something to watch
[32:19] when it comes to the trade, but it's
[32:21] also something to watch closely to see
[32:23] if we ever get to the point where
[32:25] catches up to compute. So, on the SpaceX
[32:27] earnings call,
[32:29] Elon Musk
[32:31] basically reiterated what I wrote in
[32:32] that paper. The limiting factor
[32:33] currently is memory. The memory output
[32:35] is increasing by around 20% a year. So,
[32:38] supply is increasing by about 20% a
[32:40] year. The demand is increasing by 200% a
[32:43] year, maybe higher.
[32:45] If you've got demand increasing faster
[32:47] than supply, economics 101 would suggest
[32:48] the price increases.
[32:50] Uh again, I'm bringing this up because
[32:56] watch memory.
[32:58] And this goes through more compute does
[33:01] not solve the bottleneck without more
[33:02] memory. So, the memory side is going to
[33:04] be needed and that's what I wrote about
[33:05] is that memory is needed for all parts
[33:07] of this when you start thinking about
[33:09] what AI agents need, but especially when
[33:11] you get into consumer agents, we need
[33:13] lots of memory on everything that we do.
[33:16] Palantir shares jump on uh
[33:19] otherworldly sales improved forecast.
[33:23] This is what I was saying. This is
[33:24] commercial revenue. This is the adoption
[33:26] side of companies.
[33:28] This is the growth rate. 54%, 64%. These
[33:31] are year-over-year. They're not only
[33:33] growing by this much,
[33:34] they're still growing faster.
[33:37] So, 149%.
[33:39] So, in Q2 last year, they had 306
[33:41] million of revenue. This year, it's 764.
[33:43] So, whether it's quarter-over-quarter
[33:46] growing at 20-plus percent or whether
[33:48] it's
[33:49] it doesn't matter. These guys are
[33:51] growing rapidly. And everyone is focused
[33:54] on them and commercial was not their
[33:56] business. So, it's starting from a small
[33:58] pace. This just shows the adoption pace
[34:00] that's going. They closed on 220 deals
[34:02] of at least 1 million, 98 deals of at
[34:04] least 5 million, and 78 deals of at
[34:06] least
[34:07] 10 million.
[34:11] Only reason I brought this up is to just
[34:13] show you that the bear porn just remains
[34:16] out there.
[34:17] Here are new business formations.
[34:20] This is what the story is, guys. This is
[34:22] AI native companies. They're starting
[34:24] their own businesses. That's what I did.
[34:27] This is how This is what's happening.
[34:29] It's going parabolic with AI adoption.
[34:32] All started with Opus 4.5.
[34:34] The rise of million-dollar companies
[34:36] with just one employee. So, this is
[34:39] what's happening to disrupt the profits
[34:41] of the Fortune 500 companies eventually.
[34:43] It will take some time because these are
[34:45] small, but it's coming.
[34:49] The age of abundant intelligence and
[34:50] scarce Bitcoin. Two printing presses
[34:53] running at once. One dilutes the unit
[34:55] you measure wealth in.
[34:58] That is the debasement of your money.
[35:00] The other dilutes the durability of the
[35:02] corporate claims you bought into to
[35:03] protect that wealth. So, this one is
[35:05] from the government and the printing
[35:06] press.
[35:07] This is the AI printing press, which
[35:08] will disrupt public companies.
[35:12] That's in my Substack.
[35:13] Okay, 30-year yields. So, I put this
[35:16] line here cuz basically we took it out.
[35:19] This was a big story.
[35:20] Um
[35:22] I'm writing a paper right now on the
[35:25] JGBs
[35:26] as the widow maker from the 1990s.
[35:30] And how every time
[35:32] I get a technical chart or a person
[35:35] saying we just broke out, this is going
[35:37] to collapse,
[35:38] rates are moving higher,
[35:40] stocks pretty much almost always rally.
[35:43] Now,
[35:44] the reason is
[35:46] cuz the government doesn't really have a
[35:48] choice. So, if you're going to fight
[35:50] something
[35:51] and you want to be bearish on the
[35:52] equities because of bonds, the
[35:54] government, if the bond yields go too
[35:55] high,
[35:57] they clearly are going to do something.
[35:59] They've done it repeatedly. We know
[36:01] that. They did that on liberation day.
[36:03] Okay, we don't care if equities go down.
[36:05] Then when the bond market went down,
[36:06] they cared that equities went down and
[36:07] they had to do something. Here is the
[36:09] relationship between corporate tax
[36:10] receipts
[36:13] and household
[36:14] equities
[36:16] asset values.
[36:19] If you have asset values go down in
[36:20] stock market, you're going to have tax
[36:22] receipts go down at a time when we have
[36:23] 5 to 6% deficits. That's why Lyn Alden
[36:27] wrote about why nothing stops this
[36:29] fiscal train. It is still in place, guy,
[36:31] and we learn more about it this week
[36:33] because it's not just the US, it's the
[36:35] whole globe. So, when you see these
[36:36] charts and you got the US and you got
[36:38] the UK and you got JGBs and you even got
[36:41] bonds.
[36:43] They're all 30-year yields around highs
[36:46] of some level and what did happen so on
[36:48] Friday night Scott Bessent has to
[36:50] explain why he helped Japan strengthen
[36:53] the yen.
[36:54] So, I believe this is more a signal.
[36:58] Um Scott's obviously a savvy market
[37:01] person and he's trying to find a way to
[37:03] help the BOJ for a variety of reasons
[37:06] and one of the reasons is because they
[37:08] own a lot of treasuries and he doesn't
[37:09] want them to have to go in the market to
[37:11] sell the treasuries to be able to go out
[37:13] and
[37:15] buy the yen.
[37:17] So,
[37:18] first coordinated move since 1998.
[37:22] Long view, US props up the yen to
[37:24] support treasuries.
[37:27] Then Bessent is urging the Fed to help
[37:29] defend the Japanese yen using
[37:32] FEMA and hoping to expand the capacity
[37:35] of it. So, then you got the Wall Street
[37:37] Journal and Nick
[37:39] Timiraos
[37:41] Why Bessent is leaning on the Fed to
[37:43] help prop up Japan's currency. I want
[37:45] you to remember that cuz last week Kevin
[37:46] Warsh spoke. So, last week you had
[37:48] situational awareness. You had Kevin
[37:50] Warsh. Market got angry at Kevin Warsh
[37:53] cuz he didn't either raise rates or he
[37:54] didn't say he was going to raise rates,
[37:56] he gave no guidance. Nobody knows what
[37:57] to do. He didn't even say
[38:00] I think we're kind of getting the sense
[38:03] here that uh it's going to be really
[38:04] hard for Warsh to raise rates if the
[38:07] Fed's going in to help Japan and we need
[38:09] interest rate differentials there and
[38:10] he's actually going to the Fed and
[38:12] trying to see if they can raise the
[38:13] borrowing limit. Seems like the Treasury
[38:15] and the Fed might be a little closer
[38:17] than um they used to be.
[38:20] Uh then we go through and we're starting
[38:23] to talk about the unintended
[38:24] consequences and I think
[38:26] I think the joint US
[38:29] Japan support at the end is unusual. The
[38:31] way it is being financed is
[38:32] unprecedented and adds liquidity when
[38:33] the punch bowl of the US economy and
[38:35] markets is already overflowing.
[38:39] And he pledged to do whatever it takes
[38:42] to help.
[38:45] Again, I think the bazooka he doesn't
[38:48] want to do anything, but I think he's
[38:49] hoping we can stay away from 164 and
[38:53] maybe they'll raise rates in September,
[38:55] but if Warsh raises rates in September,
[38:57] then what does it really accomplish,
[38:59] which is one of the reasons why
[39:01] I'm shocked after this last 2 weeks that
[39:04] we still have a 45% chance of a rate
[39:07] hike in September, which is why I like
[39:09] all the debasement trades, as I talked
[39:12] about a few weeks ago, thinking that
[39:14] people were getting way too over their
[39:16] skis on rate hikes.
[39:19] Remember, a lot of places were talking
[39:20] about three, at least two, before the
[39:23] end of the year and now I'm now we still
[39:26] have one in change in there. We'll see
[39:27] where it goes. Uh, the policy fails to
[39:31] tackle the underlying problem can easily
[39:32] backfire. Not least drawing the Federal
[39:35] Reserve into exchange rate policy at an
[39:36] especially awkward moment. That's the
[39:38] awkward moment what I'm talking about.
[39:40] Um,
[39:42] Treasury has now spent all the ammo in
[39:43] their exchange stabilization fund.
[39:46] They can probably find other ways, but
[39:47] unless interest rate differentials
[39:49] change, it's all waste. So, we're back
[39:50] to the interest rate differentials.
[39:52] Then a former ex former Japan PM warns
[39:56] FX action won't save yen without 2.3
[39:59] trillion growth strategy. This is the
[40:01] run it hot into a scarcity of tools that
[40:05] the central banks can use. Can the US
[40:08] Treasury save the yen?
[40:11] Kevin Warsh is facing more than a
[40:12] communication problem. Um,
[40:16] I wanted to bring this up again because
[40:19] I think last week
[40:20] was a big week. Situational awareness,
[40:24] Kevin Warsh not raising rates,
[40:26] and then the Fed doing what they did
[40:28] with the BOJ, the first coordinated move
[40:31] since 1998.
[40:33] I think with all of that at the end of a
[40:36] historic month where we had deleveraging
[40:38] of significant size, there's a lot of
[40:40] similarities between October of '98 in
[40:43] there, a lot of them. And I believe when
[40:46] we look back as long as those lows are
[40:47] in place that that will be a time that
[40:50] we started to see a reality check
[40:53] that when the US is intervening in the
[40:56] Japanese currency market to help their
[40:59] treasury market, the fiat system might
[41:02] be in trouble. Uh
[41:05] especially when I go through some of the
[41:07] charts. So, we're 45% as of Friday for
[41:10] the Fed to raise
[41:12] rates, and and that's after the payroll
[41:14] number. And we're at 63% for the BOJ.
[41:18] Uh Darius Dale put this out on the
[41:20] quarterly refunding,
[41:22] the Fed has little choice but to
[41:24] continue monetizing US sovereign debt
[41:26] over time. The Basically, the refunding
[41:29] announcement, there's
[41:31] whatever Kevin Warsh people thought he
[41:33] was,
[41:34] again, this is why why nothing stops
[41:36] this fiscal train. It is we just have
[41:39] too big a debt, too big a deficit.
[41:41] Remember when Paul Tudor Jones went on
[41:42] and did the math and said there's just
[41:44] no way to solve this. They're running it
[41:45] hot, but they're not making any impact.
[41:47] So, here we go.
[41:49] During Donald Trump's tenure as
[41:51] president,
[41:53] July was the biggest 30-year
[41:56] yield rise in a month.
[41:59] So, back here is when he drew the line
[42:01] in the sand for the equity market. So,
[42:03] here's what happens to the S&P after the
[42:05] bond market ends up going higher.
[42:08] Bond market goes higher, guess what?
[42:10] Oh, you're starting to get the picture
[42:12] here. So, the S&P has rallied when rates
[42:14] go higher because everyone starts
[42:16] getting bearish on it and the Fed or the
[42:18] Treasury needs to step in. Nothing stops
[42:20] this train. We keep doing the same
[42:22] thing. So,
[42:23] gold is waking up that maybe Warsh is
[42:25] not going to be bad for gold. Maybe he's
[42:28] not going to raise rates. So, gold
[42:31] over the course of the last 16 years, it
[42:34] was the third biggest week for gold.
[42:36] Now,
[42:37] this was
[42:39] one of the largest printing press weeks
[42:41] of all time.
[42:44] This is when gold was out of control.
[42:46] This is a big week in gold, up 7.2%.
[42:50] Here's the chart. Broke through the
[42:52] 50-day. Look how long we were below the
[42:54] 50-day. We broke below the 50-day
[42:56] over here. We hadn't been back above
[42:59] since March. In fact,
[43:01] it was the third longest time that we
[43:03] had been below the 50-day moving
[43:05] average. Now,
[43:06] here are the returns 3 months out from
[43:08] the time of breaking back above. We'll
[43:10] see what this one is.
[43:11] But, year-over-year at the break point,
[43:16] most of the time these things were down
[43:17] big.
[43:18] Gold's in a bull market. So, again, I go
[43:20] back to what I said before.
[43:22] When you're in a bull market and you
[43:25] correct and then you consolidate and
[43:27] then you break back above the 50-day,
[43:29] things can run pretty hard. I think
[43:31] there is an absolute reason
[43:33] to be thinking that gold, silver,
[43:36] platinum, Bitcoin, all of them, assuming
[43:39] that the Fed is not going to cut rates
[43:41] in September,
[43:43] which again, I'm surprised we have 45%.
[43:46] We'll see what happens with the
[43:47] inflation data next week, but I think
[43:50] we're getting closer and closer to this
[43:52] and the market is telling you the
[43:53] signals where people like, well, why
[43:55] don't I just short Treasuries and go buy
[43:56] gold and go buy this? I think either way
[43:59] right now,
[44:01] I'm going to win because they're going
[44:02] to come in and stop it, but I don't
[44:04] think it can go down. So, here's what we
[44:06] got. Platinum breaks above the 50-day.
[44:09] And again,
[44:11] nice rounding chart. We'll see if
[44:13] there's follow-through. Silver finally
[44:15] closed above the 50-day today. I have a
[44:18] good-sized position in silver because of
[44:20] the AI side, but I like it now because
[44:23] of the the basement side. I showed this
[44:25] last week.
[44:26] We're at the highest dollar long
[44:28] position. So, the dollar has already
[44:30] broken down, but this is just fuel for
[44:32] the fire for gold and
[44:35] and silver and platinum and Bitcoin. And
[44:37] again, just a reminder, still 44%, not
[44:39] just that, we still have more
[44:41] tightenings in.
[44:42] I I think there's I mean, I think all of
[44:44] these should be coming out, personally.
[44:46] That's just me. And the reason is
[44:49] this inflation thing is driving me nuts.
[44:51] We have one inflation data point, which
[44:53] is upward. Um
[44:55] this is the Truflation core number
[44:59] relative to the CPI core number. You
[45:01] cannot get away from the fact that it
[45:03] has led and it has gone.
[45:05] This is a violent move lower over the
[45:07] course of the last 4 weeks. So, the
[45:09] year-over-year Truflation number just
[45:11] continues to fall. This is on the same
[45:13] scale, people. So, where this was around
[45:16] the same at the beginning of the year,
[45:18] you've had a slight uptick here, and
[45:19] you've had this collapse. Go read how
[45:21] they do their work.
[45:23] If Kevin Warsh is looking for better
[45:25] data points than just taking the way
[45:27] something was calculated 50 years ago,
[45:30] at least give Truflation a chance, along
[45:33] with trim mean, along with the other
[45:34] ones that I've shown. I think the
[45:36] inflation thing is a disaster. So, let's
[45:38] go the other way.
[45:40] I'm sick of economists and the payroll
[45:42] side.
[45:43] The job situation is not good.
[45:46] Yes, there are low claims. And the
[45:49] reason there's low claims, part of this
[45:51] is the labor force is coming down, but
[45:52] they never talk about that. So, the
[45:54] supply of labor is going down because
[45:56] the labor force participation rate is
[45:58] coming down sharply, has come down
[46:00] sharply this year. Well, if there's less
[46:02] labor supply, shouldn't that mean wages
[46:03] are going higher?
[46:05] Here are the wages.
[46:06] So, this is the quits rate and the
[46:08] Atlanta Fed wage side. On both measures,
[46:12] we are back to 2019 levels. You can't
[46:16] tell me the labor market is good with
[46:18] those metrics. Let's just take the
[46:20] average hourly earnings that we just
[46:22] got, which is now down to 3.2%. It's
[46:24] also the white line is also where it was
[46:26] before 2020.
[46:28] Overlay it again with the Atlanta Fed
[46:30] median wage growth, right here.
[46:32] You can't tell me the labor market is
[46:34] good.
[46:35] Let's go a different route. Let's now
[46:37] take the aggregate payrolls.
[46:40] This is the aggregate payrolls,
[46:42] which is taking weekly hours, average
[46:45] hourly earnings, and the number of job
[46:47] creation. I've talked about the fact
[46:48] that the only jobs that have been
[46:50] created over the last 18 months are in
[46:51] healthcare. When you strip out
[46:53] healthcare, there is no job creation.
[46:54] That is not a good jobs market. AI
[46:57] agents are have or AI is having an
[46:58] impact on hiring. It's not yet had an
[47:00] impact on firing, but again, if we're
[47:02] having job creation with entrepreneurs,
[47:04] and we're gradually losing people on the
[47:06] other side, which is the way I think it
[47:07] goes,
[47:09] I I don't think we're ever going to see
[47:10] big job losses. I think the demographics
[47:12] will kick in, we'll see more people
[47:13] retire, the stock market as it goes
[47:15] higher, more people say, "I don't need
[47:16] this anymore. I've made enough money."
[47:18] So, here is the last 6 months. Just look
[47:21] at these 6 months, guys,
[47:23] and take it back over time. This is a
[47:25] very weak period, and if you want to see
[47:27] really how weak it is, and again,
[47:29] this is the weakest 6-month rate of
[47:32] change
[47:33] on the aggregate weekly payrolls
[47:37] going all the way back to 2012
[47:40] when you throw out the COVID time
[47:41] period. I don't care how you measure
[47:43] this. Maybe it'll change, but right now
[47:45] the data is a fact.
[47:48] The number of people looking for work
[47:49] and the number of people counted as
[47:51] unemployed both fell.
[47:54] We're losing people in the labor force.
[47:56] This is 10-year yields, the 20-month
[47:58] moving average,
[48:01] which is at 4.29,
[48:03] and we're currently up here.
[48:05] Here's the labor force participation
[48:07] rate.
[48:09] As more people leave the labor force,
[48:11] rates should be coming down.
[48:15] That's it. So, we'll see what happens,
[48:17] but again, we've got the rise of the
[48:19] million-dollar companies happening now,
[48:21] so I think the
[48:23] future of the job situation will remain
[48:26] weaker because AI agents are coming.
[48:28] It's not that they're going to collapse,
[48:30] but I think people are making a huge
[48:32] mistake not understanding that these
[48:34] little tiny companies that have no
[48:35] employees will be replacing bigger
[48:37] companies
[48:38] with maybe 50 employees, 100 employees.
[48:41] And when those when that company closes,
[48:43] those people have to recycle in. I just
[48:45] think the quits rate, all of that stuff
[48:47] is showing what's happening much better
[48:49] than what your economists are telling
[48:51] you. And so, at some point here, I do
[48:54] think we're going to see weakness either
[48:55] A in inflation or B inside the job
[48:59] market driven by AI, which surprises
[49:01] people.
[49:05] So, here we are. Bitcoin is still in a
[49:06] bear market until we get above there.
[49:08] Anything from my perspective is a
[49:10] trading side. So, I'm going to I I think
[49:14] this is going to hold, and I think we're
[49:16] going to break out. But as of right now,
[49:17] we haven't. But there is some good news.
[49:20] I want you to go read this because I do
[49:22] believe that this is the most important
[49:24] time because of the agent to kick in.
[49:26] But what I really like is as the agent
[49:28] and my crypto 40 name index,
[49:31] the ecosystem is doing well.
[49:34] We just saw the Clarity Act basically
[49:37] over the course of the last 2 weeks go
[49:39] from about 33 to 40 uh let's say 3 weeks
[49:44] ago, we were getting close to 50. We
[49:46] collapsed to 17%
[49:50] chance that it gets signed into law this
[49:52] year.
[49:53] We also had strategy Michael Saylor sell
[49:55] more.
[49:57] And we also had
[50:00] cold card exploit. And if you guys
[50:02] didn't see this, there was even a, you
[50:05] know, a pretty big story on cold storage
[50:08] problem with one company
[50:11] uh and people's wallets. And yet, all
[50:13] that going on mm
[50:15] Bitcoin was okay this week.
[50:18] That's it for me this week, guys. Uh
[50:20] keep enjoying your summer. Reach out to
[50:22] Mark Whaling. Reach out to me.
[50:25] Uh and we'll keep going through it. But
[50:27] uh let's make some money
[50:28] uh starting now for the rest of the
[50:30] year. See you.