Jordi Visser / VisserLabs
The AI Crash Is Over. Here’s What Comes Next
Ask the tutor about this video
Sign in with a verified email and ask the tutor anything about this video.
TL;DR
Research summary
▶ Market rebound and breadth
The speaker opens by saying the rally continued into all-time highs after a sharp fall in volatility. They say RIAs and institutions have chiefly asked how to hedge AI exposure after the factor volatility breakdown, and preview discussion of AI agents, a Gavin Baker interview, US intervention in dollar-yen, gold, and Bitcoin. Looking back at the previous week’s bounce after what they call a cleansing event, they had wanted two conditions: the broad bounce to hold and factor volatility to decline, suggesting funds were hedged or had reduced gross exposure. They report a four-day rally near 10%, with the S&P’s four-day rate of change reaching 6%, larger than the May-to-July trading range; they argue it was not a move to fade. For the week, they cite the S&P up 3.6%, Qs up 5%, and the thematic portfolio up 6.5%, its second-biggest week of the year. They call the market a bull market, citing the S&P up 13% year to date, all sectors positive, and new all-time highs in the S&P, IWM, NYSE Composite, and equal-weight S&P. They also cite the KOSPI up 61% year to date and its technology sector up 116%; say machinery and construction names have led and held gains as SK Hynix was slightly down; and note new highs in the DAX and FTSE.
▶ Volatility, earnings, and AI portfolio context
The speaker says volatility in market, technology, industrial, and sector-neutral momentum measures fell over the prior six days, which they interpret as evidence funds are hedged. They argue that volatility-targeted funds and hurt hedge-fund pods cannot quickly increase leverage, so the summer rally may continue on lower volume and leave investors chasing. They criticize bearish commentators looking for a false breakout, while acknowledging that one could occur. They say VIX is at its lowest level since January and single-name volatility has mean-reverted; in their view, investors who bought S&P puts on a contagion thesis lost on both direction and volatility. They see no credit issue in CDX. They cite earnings growth near 50%, revenue growth at 15%, and margins of 17% versus 13% a year earlier, saying growth is appearing across sectors and is connected to AI capital expenditure and adoption. They point to improving breadth, the highest 50-day reading since July 14, and upward-sloping 200-day averages for more than 80% of names. They also cite earnings estimate beats, rising revenues, PMI approaching 60, and durable-goods data near 60 as support for the growth thesis. The speaker describes four AI thematic portfolio versions: a Morgan Stanley portfolio overlaid with their 100-name portfolio, a 10-name concentrated portfolio, and a 25-name global concentrated portfolio. They say indexes are useful amid high volatility.
▶ Hedging framework and portfolio actions
The speaker argues AI is structurally changing markets by compressing economic time, and says its effects will include faster adoption of digital employees and AI agents. They cite Palantir, which they personally own and which is also in their model portfolio, as an example of corporate adoption. They expect AI agents to reduce hiring and eventually contribute to job losses at public companies, while AI-native private firms create jobs. They warn that uncertainty around terminal values may lead companies to move quickly from 30-times to 20-times earnings, and say broad access to backtests and portfolio optimization can intensify momentum, crowding, bubbles, parabolas, and speed crashes. The speaker considers the recent speed crash over and, on a probability basis, believes the bottom is in; they would be surprised if lows were taken out, while allowing that it could happen. For hedging, they propose monitoring factor volatility relative to index volatility, alongside price momentum and breadth across a diversified 100-name global portfolio. They say factor volatility includes long-short exposure and relates to gross leverage; they believe gross leverage is at a peak and may decline over the next few years, with structurally higher factor volatility. They say index puts may not work as they used to because factor volatility can diverge from S&P volatility. Their example uses a 50-day rate of change: a 50% move in slightly more than two months signals a fall risk, while 20% is a point at which risk grows and should be combined with breadth. They cite an earlier model warning in September 2007, when the S&P’s 252-day rate of change turned negative, and say they are adapting that approach to AI-era crowding by looking for extreme gains and deteriorating breadth. They report having sold Micron early and rotated into silver, Bitcoin, Eli Lilly, and other names; in July, they say silver was roughly flat, while Bitcoin and Lilly were up. They say the goal is to remain positioned to buy after a sell-off. They name Camurus, Fluence, Entegris, and Palantir as holdings; say Entegris had risen, Palantir was higher, and Palantir is the only software name they personally own. Cadence and Synopsys are in the thematic portfolio. They describe using the index and breadth data to automate hedging decisions.
▶ AI tools, agents, and the investment case
The speaker introduces a prompt, planned for release over the weekend, that takes their technical sheet and combines it with companies’ earnings commentary to produce an earnings mosaic. They say it can be used with ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or Grok, and give Eaton and Schneider as examples of companies covered in the week’s commentary and participants in Vera Rubin. They direct people seeking access to tools or presentations to contact Mark Whaling or visit the website. To illustrate agent use, they describe their college-age son, who is entering his junior year, is not a computer science major, and attended a Python boot camp in high school. The speaker says the son built a chief-of-staff tool that creates sub-agents for his internship, and urges subscribers to learn about agents. They recommend a Gavin Baker interview, describing Baker as knowledgeable about AI from the industrial side through the broader trade. In the speaker’s account of the interview, Baker says the AI sell-off is disconnected from quantitative data and that he has not found a real negative demand metric. The speaker says Nvidia is at its lowest forward P/E in 10 years and reports buying a decent amount of Nvidia over the prior three weeks. They believe Nvidia may benefit from Vera Rubin, GPU demand, and token-per-watt needs, while cautioning that it may not double in a short period. They relay claims that GPU availability, rental pricing, and spot DRAM prices were accelerating, and that a B200 cluster that rented for around $2 per GPU hour seven months earlier was expected to rent for just under $4. They argue that compute remains valuable amid a bottleneck, and that open-source use does not by itself imply falling AI demand or revenue. They say AI may compress both economic and market time, citing July momentum as worse than any year in their data. They quote a claimed compute shortage alongside estimates of 500,000 people, perhaps 250,000, using generative AI, and ask what could happen if use expands to 100 million or 500 million. The speaker expects compute to keep being built, with efficiency improving, and says agents could drive adoption because they work tirelessly. They distinguish their view from an unqualified bullish case on hyperscalers: they still expect heavy competition and say the companies need products and revenue beyond cloud infrastructure. They see risk that hyperscalers may eventually be valued like utilities or real estate as supply and demand change, and say that risk can justify compressed multiples and wider CDS.
▶ Hyperscaler risks, memory, and AI-native firms
The speaker says the departure of Jeff Dean and Demis Hassabis moving into another area at Google may signal tension between AI talent and bureaucracy at large companies. They argue that public-company bureaucracy could be a major problem by 2030 while AI-native companies grow quickly, and say Google’s AlphaFold release illustrates the challenge of costly work that may not generate enough revenue. They revisit a paper they wrote after selling Micron, saying it was meant to highlight that memory could remain in shortage, not to recommend a purchase. They attribute to Elon Musk the view that memory is currently the limiting factor: memory supply is increasing about 20% a year while demand is increasing 200% a year or more. The speaker says more compute does not resolve the bottleneck without more memory, especially as consumer agents require more memory. They present Palantir commercial revenue as evidence of adoption, citing year-over-year growth rates of 54% and 64%, revenue of $306 million in Q2 last year versus $764 million this year, and 220 deals of at least $1 million, 98 of at least $5 million, and 78 of at least $10 million. They also point to new business formations and the rise of one-employee, million-dollar companies, which they believe could eventually disrupt Fortune 500 profits, though they expect it to take time. They frame AI as a second “printing press” that may weaken the durability of corporate claims, alongside government money creation that dilutes currency.
▶ Rates, yen intervention, and debasement trades
The speaker discusses 30-year yields and Japanese government bonds, which they are writing about as a recurring “widow maker” trade. They argue that when yields rise sharply, stocks have often rallied because governments intervene, citing the government’s response around Liberation Day and concern that falling equity values could reduce tax receipts amid deficits of 5–6%. They say long-term yields are near highs across the US, UK, and Japan. They interpret US support for Japan’s yen as a way to help the Bank of Japan without forcing it to sell Treasuries, and describe it as the first coordinated move since 1998. They discuss reports that Scott Bessent urged the Fed to help defend the yen and expand capacity, and suggest the Treasury and Fed may be closer than before. They characterize the joint support and its financing as unusual and potentially adding liquidity when markets are already flush. The speaker says the Treasury has spent the exchange stabilization fund’s ammunition and that FX action may be ineffective without a change in interest-rate differentials. They cite a 45% chance of a US rate hike in September and a 63% chance of a BOJ hike, and say the remaining rate-hike expectations support their preference for “debasement trades.” They connect the episode to fiscal deficits and the likelihood, in their view, that the Fed will keep monetizing sovereign debt over time. They say July saw the largest monthly rise in 30-year yields during Trump’s tenure and argue that rising yields can prompt government intervention and support equities. They report gold rose 7.2% in a major week, broke above its 50-day moving average after being below it since March, and that the period below the 50-day was its third-longest. They believe that, in a bull market, recovery above the 50-day after correction and consolidation can precede a strong move. They see a case for gold, silver, platinum, and Bitcoin if the Fed does not cut rates in September, but note uncertainty and upcoming inflation data. They report platinum broke above the 50-day, silver closed above it, and they hold a sizable silver position, citing both AI exposure and the debasement thesis. They also say the dollar has broken down and that dollar positioning could fuel gains in metals and Bitcoin. On inflation, the speaker criticizes reliance on a single upward data point, says Truflation’s year-over-year measure has fallen sharply over four weeks, and urges considering it alongside trimmed mean and other measures.
▶ Labor-market weakness and Bitcoin status
The speaker argues the labor market is weak despite low claims, saying labor-force participation has fallen sharply and that quits and wage measures are back to 2019 levels. They cite average hourly earnings growth at 3.2%, and say aggregate payrolls combine weekly hours, average hourly earnings, and job creation. They claim that over the prior 18 months, job creation has been limited to healthcare, and that excluding healthcare there has been no job creation. They say AI is already affecting hiring, though not yet firing, and expect AI-native entrepreneurs to create jobs as some traditional firms gradually lose workers. They do not expect large job losses, pointing instead to demographics, retirements, and people leaving work after market gains. They characterize the latest six-month aggregate weekly payroll rate of change as the weakest since 2012 excluding the COVID period, and note that both the number seeking work and the number counted as unemployed fell. They expect future labor weakness or lower inflation to surprise people as AI agents and small firms disrupt larger companies. On Bitcoin, the speaker says it remains in a bear market until it rises above a chart level not specified in the transcript; until then, they treat it as a trading position. They think the current level will hold and expect a breakout, but say it has not happened yet. They see positive signs in the crypto ecosystem and their 40-name crypto index, while citing setbacks: the Clarity Act’s estimated probability of becoming law that year fell from near 50% about three weeks earlier to 17%, Michael Saylor sold more, and there was a Coldcard exploit and cold-storage issue affecting wallets. They conclude that Bitcoin held up during the week despite those developments, thank listeners, and sign off.
Full transcript
[0:02] Uh
[0:03] rally continues into all-time highs. Val
[0:06] falls off sharply.
[0:07] Uh the biggest question I've been asked,
[0:09] and as I mentioned last week, I'm
[0:11] spending a lot more time with uh RIAs.
[0:15] And
[0:16] also with the institutions, and the
[0:18] biggest question
[0:21] I received post uh let's say situational
[0:24] awareness in the
[0:25] the
[0:26] breakdown in uh in factor val was how to
[0:30] hedge AI going forward. So, I'm going to
[0:31] go through that. I put together a prompt
[0:34] for you guys uh
[0:35] on something connected back to the uh
[0:40] thematic portfolio, so you can run that.
[0:42] I'm also going to start to hopefully
[0:46] give you guys some stuff on agents. Uh
[0:49] Gavin Baker interview, uh I'll basically
[0:52] make sure uh that I emphasize this is a
[0:56] must-listen to, regardless of your views
[0:59] on AI. Uh I've said a lot of these
[1:02] things,
[1:04] but I think, as I take you through it,
[1:06] um it's really important to make sure
[1:08] that you at least hear what he's saying
[1:10] based on a trip out to Silicon Valley.
[1:12] Uh
[1:13] I didn't get a chance because I record
[1:16] on Fridays during the summertime most of
[1:18] the time. That'll probably be the case
[1:19] going forward, but
[1:21] after I recorded um the US intervened in
[1:25] dollar-yen, and I will uh give you my
[1:28] thoughts on that because there was a
[1:29] major reaction in gold this week.
[1:32] And uh I think this is all going to lead
[1:34] into Bitcoin, uh and I'm going to go
[1:37] through why and how
[1:41] what my Substack that I wrote last week
[1:43] kind of connects everything back to it.
[1:44] So, um last week I talked about uh
[1:48] the bounce that had occurred in the
[1:52] final 2 days post the
[1:55] Citadel buying from situational
[1:57] awareness, and how it reminded me of
[2:00] prior panic situations where we finally
[2:03] had a cleansing event and that you can't
[2:06] especially in in the moves that we had
[2:08] seen that were historic with the
[2:09] volatility with the factor drop that
[2:15] you had to look for follow through days
[2:18] and basically what I wanted to see was
[2:20] two conditions one hold the the bounce
[2:25] pretty much across the board and then
[2:27] secondly I wanted to see factor
[2:29] volatility in the volatility stuff come
[2:31] down to indicate that people were either
[2:34] a hedged or they had taken their gross
[2:35] down. Now I had seen the data that the
[2:37] gross was down but
[2:39] we obviously got
[2:41] almost all of that. So
[2:44] on the queues I posted this in X but the
[2:48] four-day rally which included one day
[2:51] last week and the first two days of this
[2:53] week ended up getting close to 10% and
[2:57] you can see that over the course of the
[2:58] last 17 years since the great financial
[3:01] crisis ended you can see these days over
[3:05] time uh
[3:08] and a lot of these are obviously very
[3:09] famous bottoms in terms of liberation
[3:11] day and obviously COVID
[3:13] also this one here in 2022.
[3:16] This one here
[3:18] was a let's say a bear market rally in
[3:21] early 2022. The difference was then
[3:25] we were below the 200-day moving
[3:27] average. This is something I brought up
[3:29] before bull markets stay above the
[3:31] 200-day moving average which is pointed
[3:33] upward. That's what we did in 80 plus
[3:36] percent of the AI thematic names which
[3:38] is why to me I was looking for where to
[3:41] put money to work. That's why we went
[3:43] through it that way. In terms of the S&P
[3:45] rate of change four-day rate of change
[3:47] the biggest one over the last year of 6%
[3:52] and just to give you an idea how vicious
[3:54] that rally was, we had been trading in a
[3:57] range. So, every week that I came in
[3:59] here, I kept saying the same thing,
[4:01] which is this is a pennant flag
[4:03] formation, whatever you want. And to get
[4:05] bearish charts like this is a very
[4:06] dangerous thing, but in particular when
[4:09] you're seeing Qs fall and you're seeing
[4:11] factor stuff collapse, you're looking
[4:13] for contagion on this, which is very
[4:15] difficult to happen when
[4:17] you have earnings growth at
[4:20] post-recession type times. Well, I'm not
[4:22] going to go through all of it you guys
[4:23] had, but the range that we were in
[4:26] basically from May
[4:30] to July. So, we're talking about 1 to
[4:33] almost 3 months, a 3-month pennant.
[4:37] And guess what? The rally we had was 6%
[4:41] bigger than the entire range that we saw
[4:43] for that time period.
[4:45] That is not something to fade. Um
[4:48] the S&P for the week up 3.6%.
[4:52] Qs up 5%.
[4:57] The thematic portfolio was up 6 and 1/2.
[4:59] It was the second biggest week of the
[5:03] year.
[5:05] In terms of where we stand year-to-date
[5:07] now in the S&P, again, I'll say this
[5:09] over and over again, this is a bull
[5:10] market.
[5:12] Every sector is up on the year. The S&P
[5:14] is up 13%.
[5:18] Pennant formation
[5:20] in there for a solid 3 months
[5:23] breakout higher than this. We not only
[5:26] hold after the Monday Tuesday, we make
[5:28] new all-time highs
[5:30] today.
[5:32] IWM made new all-time highs this week.
[5:35] New York Stock Exchange Composite made
[5:37] new all-time highs this week.
[5:39] The equal-weight S&P made new all-time
[5:41] highs this week.
[5:43] In terms of the KOSPI cuz I had a lot of
[5:44] people reaching out saying this is still
[5:46] a problem there. This is not a problem.
[5:48] The KOSPI is up 61% year-to-date. This
[5:51] is the KOSPI 200.
[5:53] >> [clears throat]
[5:53] >> The technology sector is up 116%.
[5:56] This is after a collapse, okay? And I'm
[5:59] not going to go through today, but on
[6:02] days now where SK Hynix is down
[6:04] slightly,
[6:06] the name the sectors that I showed, the
[6:08] machinery and the construction side,
[6:10] have
[6:11] been um leading on the way up and
[6:14] holding their gains. So, again, this is
[6:16] what long short is about. You get
[6:18] deleveraging on both sides and at some
[6:20] point you
[6:22] start to go the other direction.
[6:25] This is the DAX breaking out to new
[6:27] all-time highs.
[6:30] This is the FTSE breaking out to new
[6:32] all-time highs.
[6:34] Here's the big thing for the week. So, I
[6:36] showed you guys this. This is the
[6:38] market-neutral momentum. This is the uh
[6:42] So, this is the sector-neutralized
[6:43] market momentum. This is market
[6:45] momentum. This is technology momentum,
[6:47] and this is the industrials momentum.
[6:50] And if you look at all of these, the
[6:52] last 6 days,
[6:55] the drop-off in volatility says that
[6:58] funds are hedged.
[7:01] Here is the
[7:03] 7-day realized vol of the tech
[7:06] momentum [clears throat] vol.
[7:08] Uh basically collapsing,
[7:12] which is indicative of what I just
[7:13] showed. But, the what the main point is
[7:16] that we've seen factor volatility drop
[7:18] off. That is usually what happens after
[7:21] this. And as I've said, it takes a long
[7:23] time, particularly when you're below the
[7:24] 200-day moving average. You've knocked
[7:26] people out. Um anyone that's vol
[7:28] targeted just cannot lever back up. Any
[7:31] of the pods that were hurt, that had
[7:33] their risk management either reduced,
[7:36] it's the summertime. This is why we're
[7:39] going to rally on lower volume,
[7:41] and everyone is going to be put in a
[7:43] position of chasing. They don't want to
[7:45] chase, they're going to read about
[7:46] seasonality, they're going to read about
[7:47] September, they're going to read about
[7:48] the midterms and all of this stuff.
[7:51] And in my opinion, I've heard enough
[7:52] podcasts this week from quote-unquote
[7:56] market people who
[7:59] are in the game, I think, of being
[8:01] bearish. Uh
[8:04] they remain bearish in the rally and
[8:07] they're looking for a false breakout.
[8:08] So, we'll see if we get that, but
[8:11] this is really hard to be bearish on
[8:13] this stuff when this is going on.
[8:15] Um the VIXY Q for single name ball
[8:20] has fallen sharply, too, and it's
[8:21] basically in this period now all the way
[8:23] back to where it was before this whole
[8:27] thing
[8:28] rallied. Not where the panic started,
[8:30] but where it goes. So, we've seen mean
[8:32] reversion now on the ball side. In terms
[8:34] of the VIX,
[8:35] you're at the lows since January. So,
[8:38] for everyone who reached out to me
[8:39] saying the contagion was coming, they
[8:41] were buying S&P puts,
[8:43] uh
[8:45] you not only lost on the direction, you
[8:46] lost on the ball and the ball never
[8:49] really in was indicative of the panic
[8:51] that we saw with factor volatility at at
[8:53] 45-year highs on some measures.
[8:56] Uh we never got it in the S&P.
[8:58] CDX, um
[9:01] I talked last week about the silliness
[9:03] in the hyperscalers and how the
[9:06] companies with the best balance sheets,
[9:07] people are
[9:08] looking at their CDS uh and especially
[9:11] when they go into X. Here's what the CDX
[9:15] index did, basically the same as the
[9:17] VIX.
[9:19] There's no credit issues at all.
[9:21] Earning season, uh I'm not going to show
[9:23] you this number, but you know it's up
[9:25] near 50% in terms of earnings growth.
[9:27] Sales growth, though,
[9:29] uh
[9:30] we're just killing it.
[9:32] Killing it.
[9:33] And as you'll notice, this is across
[9:35] sectors. Um the AI trade from an
[9:38] earnings basis is just taking everyone
[9:40] up with it. Here's the revenue growth
[9:42] now up at 15% and I just want you to
[9:45] look that since Q1 of 25
[9:48] basically this has gone on. Now, what
[9:50] happened in Q1 of 25?
[9:52] Donald Trump took over as president and
[9:55] sentiment changed on the business side.
[9:57] He put tariffs
[9:59] in place. Everyone got worried, but the
[10:02] AI trade was now in full force.
[10:04] Uh and that's what is driving this. This
[10:07] is the certainty over the AI CapEx. So,
[10:09] these are the CapEx numbers basically
[10:11] driving this. It's having a huge impact.
[10:13] Margins
[10:15] last year at this point 13%. This year
[10:17] 17%. And again, not just technology, it
[10:21] is
[10:22] margins are increasing and as AI
[10:24] adoption and AI agents go, you're going
[10:26] to see more of this.
[10:27] Uh the breadth
[10:29] again, I highlighted last week that it
[10:32] was a good sign that we basically had
[10:34] two prints higher than these two
[10:36] and we followed through this week.
[10:39] The 50-day is up to the highest level
[10:41] since July 14th and most importantly
[10:44] the 200-day slope
[10:47] 80 plus percent pointed upward.
[10:51] Uh this has been the best quarter for
[10:53] years
[10:55] in terms of the earnings
[10:58] estimates beats.
[11:02] If you don't believe um
[11:05] well, when I If you don't believe the
[11:06] earnings
[11:07] then look at the revenues. They continue
[11:10] to move higher and this is the PMI which
[11:13] soared higher. I can remember it was a
[11:14] year ago PMI was below 50. I was writing
[11:17] papers on the
[11:20] PMI heading up towards 60 and what that
[11:23] would mean all on the back of the AI
[11:24] trade. Now, it's fairly consensus, but
[11:28] we're almost at 60 now and more
[11:30] importantly
[11:31] uh
[11:33] this implies that we're going to get
[11:34] closer to it. So, we continue to move
[11:37] higher, revs keep going up, and we got
[11:39] durable goods this week, non-defense ex-
[11:42] air,
[11:43] again, up at a level that
[11:46] is very close to 60. So,
[11:48] again, for anyone who has faded this,
[11:50] it's not just the earnings reports now,
[11:53] you're seeing it at the PMI level,
[11:55] you're seeing it global stock markets
[11:56] around the world, and you're still
[11:58] seeing revisions go higher.
[12:00] Here is the AI thematic portfolio with
[12:03] all four parts. Remember, you've got the
[12:05] Morgan Stanley one here overlaid with my
[12:08] 100 name one. The Morgan Stanley one was
[12:10] just created later. For those of you
[12:12] want to trade it, you can call up Morgan
[12:14] Stanley desk, they have it. You've got
[12:16] the concentrated portfolio, which has 10
[12:19] names, and then the more global
[12:21] concentrated portfolio, which has 25.
[12:23] Again, these were put together so that
[12:25] you can have an index.
[12:27] I think if everyone learned anything,
[12:29] the indexes are really important when
[12:31] you have this much volatility. So,
[12:34] I want to get into the hedging side down
[12:36] some of the conversation. So, I showed
[12:37] this slide last week. Uh I believe the
[12:39] market is changing structurally, and
[12:41] this is never going back to the way it
[12:43] was before, because AI is compressing
[12:46] economic time.
[12:47] Um I think you're going to see that with
[12:49] the rest of the year. I'm going to go
[12:50] through the payroll numbers from
[12:52] yesterday, and I want you to reach out
[12:54] to every one of your favorite economists
[12:55] and ask them
[12:57] why they're not seeing the weakness.
[12:59] This is not about people um necessarily
[13:02] being replaced by jobs. This is not
[13:03] about jobs being lost,
[13:06] but this is about wages. This is about
[13:09] the fact that digital employees are
[13:10] here, and they're coming
[13:12] incredibly quickly, because the adoption
[13:14] pace is picking up. I'm going to take
[13:16] you through Palantir, which is um
[13:19] a name that I own personally, but also a
[13:21] name in the model portfolio,
[13:23] which just showed their corporate
[13:24] numbers. Since we can't get Anthropic
[13:26] and OpenAI in terms of numbers that
[13:28] we're getting released, you can look at
[13:29] Palantir's. These numbers are insane in
[13:32] terms of the adoption. When the adoption
[13:33] picks up, the AI agents are going to
[13:35] come and the AI agents come, not only
[13:37] are you going to have less hiring, you
[13:38] will start to see more job losses in
[13:40] public companies. You'll have job
[13:42] creation in private AI native companies,
[13:45] which I'll go through. Terminal value
[13:47] gets harder to ask to estimate, which
[13:49] makes it more difficult that companies
[13:51] all of a sudden can go from trading at a
[13:54] 30 PE to a 20 PE in a very short amount
[13:56] of time. We've seen that in many many
[13:58] places and I think you're going to
[13:59] continue to see it. I think Google's
[14:01] kind of going through that right now. Um
[14:04] I won't read all of these, but all of
[14:05] these things, including this one, which
[14:07] Gavin Baker brought up, too.
[14:10] The the fact that everyone
[14:13] has access to it and everyone can create
[14:15] a backtest, everyone can create an
[14:17] optimized portfolio, everyone can find
[14:19] the names that are working, leads to
[14:21] more momentum, it leads to crowding. And
[14:23] again, it leads to bubbles, parabolas,
[14:25] and speed crashes. Exactly what we had
[14:27] this year, what I wrote about. The speed
[14:29] crash has occurred, it's over. The
[14:31] bottom is in as far as I'm concerned on
[14:33] a probability basis. If we take out the
[14:35] lows, I'd be surprised, uh mainly
[14:38] because I continue to believe people are
[14:41] way too bearish relative to the reality
[14:43] of the earnings growth that's coming. I
[14:45] also don't believe you're going to ever
[14:47] see that type of move again uh that we
[14:49] saw in the first quarter, but you never
[14:51] know. So, with that hedging side, how do
[14:53] you deal with bubble bubbles, parabolas,
[14:55] and speed crashes?
[14:57] Well, those are all based on
[14:59] price and time, which I started to show
[15:01] you last week, but I'm going to go
[15:02] through one of the demos in terms of how
[15:04] I how I'm handling this. And for the
[15:06] subscribers, this will become part of
[15:09] the way that I'm going to identify
[15:10] things. I built turbulence models. The
[15:12] turbulence models because everything was
[15:14] so correlated, they never really showed
[15:16] leading problems. The breadth did, and
[15:18] that's how I'm going to kind of go
[15:19] through this. So, I try to learn from
[15:22] what happens and look for the signals
[15:23] that will warn you. This is one signal
[15:25] that will warn you when factor vol
[15:28] continues to move higher and break away
[15:31] from index vol. The reason factor vol is
[15:34] is so much different than say single
[15:36] name equity vol, which also broke away
[15:38] and I showed last week,
[15:40] this has got a long short component of
[15:42] it and this is directly related to gross
[15:44] leverage. So, the great thing about
[15:45] factors are as gross leverage is going
[15:48] to all-time highs and I'm making the
[15:50] call that we are at peak gross leverage
[15:53] and that we will see leverage come down
[15:55] over the course of the next few years
[15:57] because of what I showed before that AI
[15:59] is compressing time, it's making it more
[16:01] crowded and it means the sharp ratio of
[16:03] this stuff is going to come down. I
[16:04] think factor vol is structurally going
[16:06] to be higher. I don't think we're going
[16:08] back down here. Maybe we come back down
[16:10] into 25, but if we spend now the rest of
[16:12] this year in the 30 to 25. And again,
[16:15] this is an equal weight of four separate
[16:17] factors. It's not just momentum because
[16:19] I have value in there, I have quality
[16:21] and I have beta. And so, I'm averaging
[16:23] them all in there. You can see the
[16:24] difference in the breakaway from the
[16:26] S&P, which means using index
[16:29] puts is not going to work the way that
[16:30] it used to.
[16:31] So, here's what I am using and this is
[16:33] the price in time side. So, right here
[16:36] when we when we got to 50% or almost
[16:39] 50%. This is a 50-day rate of change on
[16:42] my thematic portfolio. So, again, for
[16:45] those of you on the AI side that are
[16:47] more tech focused or you're more
[16:48] industrial focused or you're more
[16:49] utility,
[16:51] you need this tool. You need to have
[16:53] access to this data and the reason is
[16:56] because there are no indices that are
[16:58] diversified to this level. This is
[17:00] global. This is across sectors. This
[17:03] involves 100 names that are involved in
[17:05] there. There are chemicals, power
[17:07] companies, industrial companies. So, it
[17:09] is diversified.
[17:11] 50% move
[17:13] over 50 days. So, 50 trading days, which
[17:16] means slightly more than 2 months. To be
[17:19] up 50% you're going to fall. Now, here
[17:22] is the historical levels. At 20% I think
[17:25] the risk grows and I think that's when
[17:27] you need to combine it with
[17:30] this.
[17:31] These happen to peak at the exact same
[17:33] time.
[17:34] So, rate of change does not mean that
[17:37] the thematic trade goes down. It just
[17:39] means you start to run in. So, I've
[17:40] always used rate of change. In the past,
[17:43] before we had exponential
[17:46] uh innovation, in 2007 my model gave a
[17:49] recession
[17:51] uh warning or not it gave a recession
[17:53] signal in September of '07.
[17:56] So,
[17:57] in September of '07 is when the warning
[17:59] went out that we were going to have a
[18:01] recession. And the reason was because
[18:03] year-over-year S&P, the 252-day rate of
[18:07] change of the S&P,
[18:09] had basically started to turn negative.
[18:12] Once that happens, historically, that
[18:14] means we're at a bad point. When you add
[18:17] in corporate profits, you add in jobless
[18:18] claims, again, this is before
[18:20] exponential AI or before exponential
[18:23] innovation with software. So, for me,
[18:26] this is the way that I'm replacing this.
[18:28] I'm looking for
[18:30] the rate of change to be up at a level
[18:32] which doesn't make sense, which shows
[18:34] the crowding, it shows the AI agents, it
[18:36] shows everyone pushing everything. And
[18:38] then I'm looking for breath to be
[18:39] breaking down within inside the 100
[18:41] names. You need a diversified portfolio.
[18:43] So, this is the way I'm going to measure
[18:44] it. I gave you guys the warnings back
[18:46] here. We didn't make a high in the index
[18:49] until right around here.
[18:51] Then we didn't violently fall on the
[18:53] memory names and stuff here. So, I
[18:54] talked about selling Micron in here.
[18:56] This is when I got rid of all of it. It
[18:58] was early.
[19:00] I rotated to silver, to Bitcoin, and to
[19:04] Eli Lilly, and to some other names.
[19:07] The main point was those names in the
[19:09] month of July, go look what they did.
[19:12] Silver and Bitcoin
[19:14] Well, silver was flatish. Bitcoin was up
[19:17] a good amount. Lilly was up. You're
[19:19] trying to navigate where you're still in
[19:21] a position to buy when you get the puke.
[19:23] So, this is the way it looks and this is
[19:24] the way I'm going to go through it. This
[19:26] is the whole year actually.
[19:28] It's the It's the rate of change. So,
[19:30] once you break above
[19:32] this level, then the warning sign
[19:34] starts. So, we broke above this level.
[19:36] We started peaking in terms of the
[19:40] the breadth, we were up at 90% believe
[19:44] it or not. We're above the 20-day moving
[19:46] average and then gradually we broke
[19:47] down. You can see how this goes. Now,
[19:50] the four-week average peaked here and
[19:52] rolled over. So, as time goes on, I
[19:55] believe this is going to happen now more
[19:57] often and I think this is the way you're
[19:59] going to have to deal with it.
[20:00] I've had a lot of subscribers reach out
[20:03] about a bunch of names that just haven't
[20:05] bounced yet. Things like Camurus, I own
[20:08] this one. Fluence, I own this one.
[20:11] Entegris did go higher. I own this one
[20:13] and Palantir, I didn't include the price
[20:15] today. It's all the way up here now.
[20:18] For all the Palantir haters and all the
[20:20] short people and the people that go,
[20:22] you're missing something on this one.
[20:23] It's the only software name I own
[20:27] personally and then you've got Cadence
[20:29] and Synopsys that are part of the
[20:32] the thematic portfolio that are software
[20:34] design. I'll probably be talking about
[20:36] them soon
[20:37] because there's been some stuff. So,
[20:39] that's the way that I'm kind of working
[20:41] through with people to automate things
[20:43] on the hedging side, to use my index for
[20:46] that, but also to use the breadth and to
[20:48] use the different parts. This is the
[20:50] thing I was saying on an earnings
[20:52] mosaic. So, what I did create and the
[20:54] prompt will go up over the weekend.
[20:57] I created a prompt for you guys that
[20:59] will basically spit out something like
[21:00] this. You can use it in Gemini. You can
[21:02] use it in ChatGPT,
[21:04] but basically this will use and this is
[21:06] to give you a sense where if you take my
[21:07] technical sheet and you update you put
[21:11] the technical sheet into chat GPT
[21:14] and then or Claude or Gemini or
[21:16] whichever one you want Grok and then you
[21:19] just run the prompt it will go out and
[21:21] get the earnings commentary from the
[21:22] week and put it together with a bunch of
[21:25] different things including kind of a
[21:26] look at a mosaic side. So this was from
[21:29] Eaton you had Eaton report this week.
[21:32] You also had Schneider report. They're
[21:34] both on the electric side. They both
[21:35] happen to be participants in Vera Rubin.
[21:38] So it will go through and it will look
[21:40] at and give you basically a recap of
[21:42] that with some of the most important
[21:44] commentary that was in there. I'm trying
[21:46] to help you guys especially as times
[21:48] were goes so this is what it does. This
[21:50] is what you'll see up there.
[21:52] I'm trying to keep you guys going with
[21:53] the AI side. Again, if you guys want to
[21:56] access to the tools, if you want access
[21:58] reach out to Mark Wailing, go to the
[21:59] website.
[22:00] We're doing more and more of these but
[22:02] in particular I'm doing more and more
[22:03] presentations for RIAs where I'm also
[22:06] doing regular calls with them. They're
[22:08] setting things up that way so you can
[22:09] reach out to Mark. I did want to
[22:11] reference this because this is where we
[22:13] we are in the agentic side. This is a a
[22:16] a text
[22:17] exchange with my son. Uh
[22:20] he's a entering his junior year at
[22:23] college. He is not a computer science
[22:26] major. He I put him through
[22:29] Python boot camp when he was a junior in
[22:31] high school.
[22:33] I have my AI chief of staff spitting out
[22:35] new sub agents on the regular. This is
[22:37] what he's doing at his internship.
[22:39] He even said I prefer chat GPT Gemini
[22:41] coding is insane though. I got the
[22:43] information from YouTube and AI.
[22:46] Your kids have to be doing this guys. He
[22:48] is guaranteed to have a job at whatever
[22:50] firm he works because he has already
[22:52] built a chief of staff. He's spitting
[22:54] out those new sub agents. There's
[22:55] absolutely no reason
[22:57] why your kids can't do this. So remember
[23:00] the knowledge brain thing that I put in
[23:01] there, I will be doing AI agent stuff
[23:03] for the subscribers. I will probably be
[23:06] going through some videos
[23:07] as we get into this year. I got a lot
[23:10] going on with the crypto side, but my
[23:12] goal is to really make sure that you
[23:13] guys realize that the agentic side is
[23:15] here and if you're not using it, you're
[23:17] falling way behind. So, let's go through
[23:19] the Gavin Baker side. Again, this is a
[23:21] must listen. The reason it's a must
[23:23] listen is cuz very seldom do you find
[23:25] someone who is this knowledgeable about
[23:27] the AI trade from a very high level,
[23:30] which Gavin is. He speaks about it
[23:31] regularly. He's asked questions on it
[23:33] regularly. He invests in it. It's very
[23:36] hard to find people that know this from
[23:38] the industrial side all the way out.
[23:41] I'm not going to read all these up. I'm
[23:43] just going to go through the speaker
[23:44] argues the AI sell-off is disconnected
[23:46] from the quantitative data. He says he
[23:48] has not found a real negative demand
[23:50] metric.
[23:52] So, I just want to make sure that you
[23:54] guys, if you listen to this,
[23:57] if you just listen to the first 5
[23:59] minutes of this,
[24:00] these are all quotes from the first 5
[24:02] minutes.
[24:04] Nvidia actually, as we record this, is
[24:06] at the lowest forward PE of the last 10
[24:08] years.
[24:09] I've bought a decent amount of Nvidia
[24:11] over the course of the last 3 weeks. It
[24:14] looked good for a while, broke back down
[24:16] again, now it's looking better.
[24:18] I believe with Vera Rubin coming out and
[24:20] with all the chatter on this and the
[24:22] fact that it's this cheap, but also
[24:23] going through the token per watt needs
[24:26] and realizing how quickly they're
[24:28] they're coming out with this stuff, I
[24:29] just can't see a sign with what GPUs are
[24:32] doing, the price of them which he goes
[24:34] through,
[24:35] that they're not going to benefit from
[24:36] this at this level. So, they've done
[24:38] their multiple compression, it's been
[24:40] significant.
[24:42] I just it's it's not it's not going to
[24:44] double for you, I'm sure, in in in a
[24:45] short amount of time, but I think when
[24:48] you're looking at kind of safer names
[24:50] that already have seen their multiple
[24:51] compressed, I still think Nvidia is one
[24:53] of the best ones. Um
[24:56] not a single instance of deceleration,
[24:58] nothing. In fact, every metric rate is
[25:00] accelerating. Whether you cut GPU
[25:02] availability, whether you cut GPU rental
[25:04] pricing, whether you cut the spot price
[25:06] of DRAM this month to grow, everything
[25:07] is actually accelerated.
[25:09] So, when you go through all of these and
[25:12] you hear what he says about Anthropic
[25:14] and you hear what he says about deep
[25:16] compute prices and the anecdotal stuff
[25:18] that he gets out there.
[25:21] I He's basically saying that these
[25:24] companies
[25:26] Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, the
[25:27] hyperscalers, the critical part of this
[25:29] because if you've been bearish on them,
[25:30] which most people have, they've called
[25:32] this a bubble, they've been wrong.
[25:33] They've said ROIC will not come through,
[25:35] they've been wrong.
[25:37] Maybe they'll be right. The CDS is wider
[25:40] for justified reasons cuz they're still
[25:41] leveraging up more and more and I'll go
[25:43] through the reason why it does make
[25:45] sense in a second, but
[25:47] you can't argue the fact that at this
[25:49] point there's a chance that they could
[25:50] see significant revenue very short-term
[25:54] if for no other reason because they are
[25:56] building so much compute and the value
[25:59] of that compute is going up and he talks
[26:01] about it here.
[26:02] The same type of B200 cluster that
[26:04] rented around mid $2 per hour 7 months
[26:07] ago is now expected to rent for just
[26:10] under $4 per
[26:11] GPU hour. So, remember all the stuff
[26:15] about these chips won't survive, their
[26:17] lifespan. We have a bottleneck in
[26:21] compute.
[26:22] So, you have to go through all compute
[26:24] has value right now regardless of where
[26:27] it is. Open source would love to be
[26:29] using this stuff. So, let's just
[26:32] forget all the stuff that you've heard
[26:34] on this.
[26:35] Don't get all bearish on this because of
[26:37] something that isn't true by the data.
[26:40] If you see this data start not to happen
[26:42] and that's what he goes through,
[26:44] it's like the breath that I have on the
[26:46] index. If one thing is going down,
[26:48] that's fine, but when people look at the
[26:49] token index and that's their thing and I
[26:51] say on this video, even the people at
[26:54] the place that provided say it's not
[26:56] bearish on
[26:58] on market. It just means more and more
[27:01] of the usage is going on open source,
[27:03] which makes sense.
[27:05] It doesn't mean it's bearish. It doesn't
[27:07] mean that Anthropic's revenues aren't
[27:08] going to grow, but very smart people
[27:10] that I've known in the business for a
[27:11] long time were saying that to me. So,
[27:14] we've had a point that if you can listen
[27:16] to someone like him and go through it,
[27:18] it's there.
[27:20] It's rewiring the market structure. So,
[27:22] he got into the same thing that I talked
[27:25] about.
[27:26] He even brought up the probabilistic
[27:28] Bayesian interpretation of the future,
[27:29] which I write about all the time and I
[27:31] talk about all the time.
[27:32] AI compresses economic time, but it it
[27:35] may also compress market time.
[27:38] The month of July
[27:40] for momentum was worse than any year
[27:44] over the data that I have.
[27:46] So, that's how we're compressing market
[27:49] time. Bubbles, parabolas, and speed
[27:52] crashes.
[27:54] Here are the key quotes from the
[27:55] transcript. You guys
[27:59] can pause it and look at it on your own,
[28:01] but here's the most important one. We
[28:02] are in a cute compute shortage.
[28:05] And at the same time, 500,000 people,
[28:08] maybe 250,000 are using a generative AI.
[28:11] So, my son is one of them. He's spinning
[28:13] out sub-agents.
[28:15] But only 250,000 of 8 billion people.
[28:18] What happens when we go from 500,000 to
[28:21] 1%? To 100 million? To 500 million?
[28:24] Guys, I say it all the time.
[28:27] There will never be enough compute,
[28:29] ever. We will continually be building
[28:31] compute. We'll be doing it in different
[28:33] ways. We'll continue to get more
[28:35] efficiency. Everything will keep
[28:36] happening, but nothing is on the horizon
[28:38] for that to go away. So, when we see the
[28:41] prices of GPUs on older stuff start to
[28:44] head down, at least we're at a point
[28:46] where the newer stuff is saturating some
[28:48] of the demand ahead of adoption, but the
[28:50] adoption is happening because of agents.
[28:52] And once you set them off, they're
[28:55] tireless workers. So, it is exponential
[28:57] against
[28:59] the physical side. No amount will ever
[29:01] be enough. The math behind hyperscaler
[29:03] CapEx. This is my post earnings paper
[29:07] that went out this week
[29:08] on the hyperscalers and the reason why
[29:12] you should not be playing for them to
[29:14] break apart.
[29:15] Now,
[29:16] I got a lot of questions saying does
[29:18] this mean you're bullish on
[29:19] hyperscalers? No, not relative to the
[29:21] infrastructure trade. Nothing changes in
[29:24] that front. I still think they're going
[29:25] to have heavy competition, and here's
[29:27] the other reason why.
[29:29] The hyperscalers quarterly free cash
[29:31] flow, when we think they're going to go
[29:33] positive as a group by Goldman Sachs.
[29:36] Look how long this is out. So, here's
[29:38] the problem.
[29:40] They're going to keep spending money on
[29:42] hoping they get the revenues in the
[29:43] door.
[29:44] I I understand they have the cloud
[29:46] revenues, but the cloud revenues are not
[29:48] going to be enough in my opinion. You're
[29:50] going to need to have products, you're
[29:51] going to have need to have other things,
[29:53] or you're going to get priced like a
[29:54] utility or real estate company, cuz
[29:56] eventually, when the compute isn't
[29:59] as
[30:01] outsized in terms of supply versus
[30:03] demand as it is now, and by then we
[30:05] could have a lot of innovations. We
[30:08] could have a lot of things on the
[30:09] algorithmic side. Things could change.
[30:12] There could be breakthroughs in hardware
[30:13] that when we go to uh humanoids and we
[30:16] go to cars and we go to all this,
[30:17] everything could change. Now,
[30:19] I still believe we're going to need more
[30:21] compute, we're going to need more
[30:22] hardware, but
[30:24] whether their businesses will be there
[30:26] is a question, and that's why their
[30:27] multiples should be compressed, and
[30:29] their CDS should be
[30:32] wider. It There's a risk there. So,
[30:35] it's [clears throat] not a
[30:36] a a risk that I want to
[30:38] go out there and trade, but if you're
[30:39] buying their paper
[30:41] and you want to
[30:42] buy some CD I of course you do. If
[30:44] you're trying to short the AI trade and
[30:46] you want some stuff out there, of course
[30:47] you go buy CDS in this, especially when
[30:49] it just keeps moving. Um I just want to
[30:51] bring this up quickly cuz I think
[30:53] [clears throat] this is a sign about the
[30:55] problem inside these companies. So, I
[30:58] also believe that this is a big deal
[31:00] what happened this week with Jeff Dean
[31:02] leaving.
[31:03] And also, Demis Hassabis kind of moving
[31:06] into another area.
[31:08] This is a big deal to me and this is
[31:10] because Google is the perfect example of
[31:13] a company where
[31:15] they released AlphaFold,
[31:18] which makes them no money.
[31:20] If it makes them some money, it's coming
[31:22] through something, but for the amount of
[31:24] people using it to release it free,
[31:28] it's probably created some conflicts
[31:30] inside cuz they are spending tons of
[31:31] money, they're taking tons of debt. They
[31:33] need actual consumer products,
[31:35] corporation, they need something to come
[31:38] through and I think this is where the
[31:39] people who are trying to leave a legacy
[31:42] on this technology, the talent, are
[31:44] getting frustrated with the bureaucracy
[31:47] at big companies. And I think you're
[31:49] going to see this over and over again.
[31:51] It's reason why I'm negative on all
[31:53] public companies by the time we get to
[31:55] 2030, the bureaucracy is going to be a
[31:59] killer. At the same time, you're going
[32:01] to have AI native companies growing
[32:03] rapidly.
[32:04] Okay, I just want to remind you on the
[32:06] memory side. I wrote this paper
[32:09] is in June, AI equals memory. This is
[32:11] after I had sold my Micron. This was not
[32:14] to buy anything. This was just to let
[32:15] people know that memory will remain in a
[32:17] shortage and it is something to watch
[32:19] when it comes to the trade, but it's
[32:21] also something to watch closely to see
[32:23] if we ever get to the point where
[32:25] catches up to compute. So, on the SpaceX
[32:27] earnings call,
[32:29] Elon Musk
[32:31] basically reiterated what I wrote in
[32:32] that paper. The limiting factor
[32:33] currently is memory. The memory output
[32:35] is increasing by around 20% a year. So,
[32:38] supply is increasing by about 20% a
[32:40] year. The demand is increasing by 200% a
[32:43] year, maybe higher.
[32:45] If you've got demand increasing faster
[32:47] than supply, economics 101 would suggest
[32:48] the price increases.
[32:50] Uh again, I'm bringing this up because
[32:56] watch memory.
[32:58] And this goes through more compute does
[33:01] not solve the bottleneck without more
[33:02] memory. So, the memory side is going to
[33:04] be needed and that's what I wrote about
[33:05] is that memory is needed for all parts
[33:07] of this when you start thinking about
[33:09] what AI agents need, but especially when
[33:11] you get into consumer agents, we need
[33:13] lots of memory on everything that we do.
[33:16] Palantir shares jump on uh
[33:19] otherworldly sales improved forecast.
[33:23] This is what I was saying. This is
[33:24] commercial revenue. This is the adoption
[33:26] side of companies.
[33:28] This is the growth rate. 54%, 64%. These
[33:31] are year-over-year. They're not only
[33:33] growing by this much,
[33:34] they're still growing faster.
[33:37] So, 149%.
[33:39] So, in Q2 last year, they had 306
[33:41] million of revenue. This year, it's 764.
[33:43] So, whether it's quarter-over-quarter
[33:46] growing at 20-plus percent or whether
[33:48] it's
[33:49] it doesn't matter. These guys are
[33:51] growing rapidly. And everyone is focused
[33:54] on them and commercial was not their
[33:56] business. So, it's starting from a small
[33:58] pace. This just shows the adoption pace
[34:00] that's going. They closed on 220 deals
[34:02] of at least 1 million, 98 deals of at
[34:04] least 5 million, and 78 deals of at
[34:06] least
[34:07] 10 million.
[34:11] Only reason I brought this up is to just
[34:13] show you that the bear porn just remains
[34:16] out there.
[34:17] Here are new business formations.
[34:20] This is what the story is, guys. This is
[34:22] AI native companies. They're starting
[34:24] their own businesses. That's what I did.
[34:27] This is how This is what's happening.
[34:29] It's going parabolic with AI adoption.
[34:32] All started with Opus 4.5.
[34:34] The rise of million-dollar companies
[34:36] with just one employee. So, this is
[34:39] what's happening to disrupt the profits
[34:41] of the Fortune 500 companies eventually.
[34:43] It will take some time because these are
[34:45] small, but it's coming.
[34:49] The age of abundant intelligence and
[34:50] scarce Bitcoin. Two printing presses
[34:53] running at once. One dilutes the unit
[34:55] you measure wealth in.
[34:58] That is the debasement of your money.
[35:00] The other dilutes the durability of the
[35:02] corporate claims you bought into to
[35:03] protect that wealth. So, this one is
[35:05] from the government and the printing
[35:06] press.
[35:07] This is the AI printing press, which
[35:08] will disrupt public companies.
[35:12] That's in my Substack.
[35:13] Okay, 30-year yields. So, I put this
[35:16] line here cuz basically we took it out.
[35:19] This was a big story.
[35:20] Um
[35:22] I'm writing a paper right now on the
[35:25] JGBs
[35:26] as the widow maker from the 1990s.
[35:30] And how every time
[35:32] I get a technical chart or a person
[35:35] saying we just broke out, this is going
[35:37] to collapse,
[35:38] rates are moving higher,
[35:40] stocks pretty much almost always rally.
[35:43] Now,
[35:44] the reason is
[35:46] cuz the government doesn't really have a
[35:48] choice. So, if you're going to fight
[35:50] something
[35:51] and you want to be bearish on the
[35:52] equities because of bonds, the
[35:54] government, if the bond yields go too
[35:55] high,
[35:57] they clearly are going to do something.
[35:59] They've done it repeatedly. We know
[36:01] that. They did that on liberation day.
[36:03] Okay, we don't care if equities go down.
[36:05] Then when the bond market went down,
[36:06] they cared that equities went down and
[36:07] they had to do something. Here is the
[36:09] relationship between corporate tax
[36:10] receipts
[36:13] and household
[36:14] equities
[36:16] asset values.
[36:19] If you have asset values go down in
[36:20] stock market, you're going to have tax
[36:22] receipts go down at a time when we have
[36:23] 5 to 6% deficits. That's why Lyn Alden
[36:27] wrote about why nothing stops this
[36:29] fiscal train. It is still in place, guy,
[36:31] and we learn more about it this week
[36:33] because it's not just the US, it's the
[36:35] whole globe. So, when you see these
[36:36] charts and you got the US and you got
[36:38] the UK and you got JGBs and you even got
[36:41] bonds.
[36:43] They're all 30-year yields around highs
[36:46] of some level and what did happen so on
[36:48] Friday night Scott Bessent has to
[36:50] explain why he helped Japan strengthen
[36:53] the yen.
[36:54] So, I believe this is more a signal.
[36:58] Um Scott's obviously a savvy market
[37:01] person and he's trying to find a way to
[37:03] help the BOJ for a variety of reasons
[37:06] and one of the reasons is because they
[37:08] own a lot of treasuries and he doesn't
[37:09] want them to have to go in the market to
[37:11] sell the treasuries to be able to go out
[37:13] and
[37:15] buy the yen.
[37:17] So,
[37:18] first coordinated move since 1998.
[37:22] Long view, US props up the yen to
[37:24] support treasuries.
[37:27] Then Bessent is urging the Fed to help
[37:29] defend the Japanese yen using
[37:32] FEMA and hoping to expand the capacity
[37:35] of it. So, then you got the Wall Street
[37:37] Journal and Nick
[37:39] Timiraos
[37:41] Why Bessent is leaning on the Fed to
[37:43] help prop up Japan's currency. I want
[37:45] you to remember that cuz last week Kevin
[37:46] Warsh spoke. So, last week you had
[37:48] situational awareness. You had Kevin
[37:50] Warsh. Market got angry at Kevin Warsh
[37:53] cuz he didn't either raise rates or he
[37:54] didn't say he was going to raise rates,
[37:56] he gave no guidance. Nobody knows what
[37:57] to do. He didn't even say
[38:00] I think we're kind of getting the sense
[38:03] here that uh it's going to be really
[38:04] hard for Warsh to raise rates if the
[38:07] Fed's going in to help Japan and we need
[38:09] interest rate differentials there and
[38:10] he's actually going to the Fed and
[38:12] trying to see if they can raise the
[38:13] borrowing limit. Seems like the Treasury
[38:15] and the Fed might be a little closer
[38:17] than um they used to be.
[38:20] Uh then we go through and we're starting
[38:23] to talk about the unintended
[38:24] consequences and I think
[38:26] I think the joint US
[38:29] Japan support at the end is unusual. The
[38:31] way it is being financed is
[38:32] unprecedented and adds liquidity when
[38:33] the punch bowl of the US economy and
[38:35] markets is already overflowing.
[38:39] And he pledged to do whatever it takes
[38:42] to help.
[38:45] Again, I think the bazooka he doesn't
[38:48] want to do anything, but I think he's
[38:49] hoping we can stay away from 164 and
[38:53] maybe they'll raise rates in September,
[38:55] but if Warsh raises rates in September,
[38:57] then what does it really accomplish,
[38:59] which is one of the reasons why
[39:01] I'm shocked after this last 2 weeks that
[39:04] we still have a 45% chance of a rate
[39:07] hike in September, which is why I like
[39:09] all the debasement trades, as I talked
[39:12] about a few weeks ago, thinking that
[39:14] people were getting way too over their
[39:16] skis on rate hikes.
[39:19] Remember, a lot of places were talking
[39:20] about three, at least two, before the
[39:23] end of the year and now I'm now we still
[39:26] have one in change in there. We'll see
[39:27] where it goes. Uh, the policy fails to
[39:31] tackle the underlying problem can easily
[39:32] backfire. Not least drawing the Federal
[39:35] Reserve into exchange rate policy at an
[39:36] especially awkward moment. That's the
[39:38] awkward moment what I'm talking about.
[39:40] Um,
[39:42] Treasury has now spent all the ammo in
[39:43] their exchange stabilization fund.
[39:46] They can probably find other ways, but
[39:47] unless interest rate differentials
[39:49] change, it's all waste. So, we're back
[39:50] to the interest rate differentials.
[39:52] Then a former ex former Japan PM warns
[39:56] FX action won't save yen without 2.3
[39:59] trillion growth strategy. This is the
[40:01] run it hot into a scarcity of tools that
[40:05] the central banks can use. Can the US
[40:08] Treasury save the yen?
[40:11] Kevin Warsh is facing more than a
[40:12] communication problem. Um,
[40:16] I wanted to bring this up again because
[40:19] I think last week
[40:20] was a big week. Situational awareness,
[40:24] Kevin Warsh not raising rates,
[40:26] and then the Fed doing what they did
[40:28] with the BOJ, the first coordinated move
[40:31] since 1998.
[40:33] I think with all of that at the end of a
[40:36] historic month where we had deleveraging
[40:38] of significant size, there's a lot of
[40:40] similarities between October of '98 in
[40:43] there, a lot of them. And I believe when
[40:46] we look back as long as those lows are
[40:47] in place that that will be a time that
[40:50] we started to see a reality check
[40:53] that when the US is intervening in the
[40:56] Japanese currency market to help their
[40:59] treasury market, the fiat system might
[41:02] be in trouble. Uh
[41:05] especially when I go through some of the
[41:07] charts. So, we're 45% as of Friday for
[41:10] the Fed to raise
[41:12] rates, and and that's after the payroll
[41:14] number. And we're at 63% for the BOJ.
[41:18] Uh Darius Dale put this out on the
[41:20] quarterly refunding,
[41:22] the Fed has little choice but to
[41:24] continue monetizing US sovereign debt
[41:26] over time. The Basically, the refunding
[41:29] announcement, there's
[41:31] whatever Kevin Warsh people thought he
[41:33] was,
[41:34] again, this is why why nothing stops
[41:36] this fiscal train. It is we just have
[41:39] too big a debt, too big a deficit.
[41:41] Remember when Paul Tudor Jones went on
[41:42] and did the math and said there's just
[41:44] no way to solve this. They're running it
[41:45] hot, but they're not making any impact.
[41:47] So, here we go.
[41:49] During Donald Trump's tenure as
[41:51] president,
[41:53] July was the biggest 30-year
[41:56] yield rise in a month.
[41:59] So, back here is when he drew the line
[42:01] in the sand for the equity market. So,
[42:03] here's what happens to the S&P after the
[42:05] bond market ends up going higher.
[42:08] Bond market goes higher, guess what?
[42:10] Oh, you're starting to get the picture
[42:12] here. So, the S&P has rallied when rates
[42:14] go higher because everyone starts
[42:16] getting bearish on it and the Fed or the
[42:18] Treasury needs to step in. Nothing stops
[42:20] this train. We keep doing the same
[42:22] thing. So,
[42:23] gold is waking up that maybe Warsh is
[42:25] not going to be bad for gold. Maybe he's
[42:28] not going to raise rates. So, gold
[42:31] over the course of the last 16 years, it
[42:34] was the third biggest week for gold.
[42:36] Now,
[42:37] this was
[42:39] one of the largest printing press weeks
[42:41] of all time.
[42:44] This is when gold was out of control.
[42:46] This is a big week in gold, up 7.2%.
[42:50] Here's the chart. Broke through the
[42:52] 50-day. Look how long we were below the
[42:54] 50-day. We broke below the 50-day
[42:56] over here. We hadn't been back above
[42:59] since March. In fact,
[43:01] it was the third longest time that we
[43:03] had been below the 50-day moving
[43:05] average. Now,
[43:06] here are the returns 3 months out from
[43:08] the time of breaking back above. We'll
[43:10] see what this one is.
[43:11] But, year-over-year at the break point,
[43:16] most of the time these things were down
[43:17] big.
[43:18] Gold's in a bull market. So, again, I go
[43:20] back to what I said before.
[43:22] When you're in a bull market and you
[43:25] correct and then you consolidate and
[43:27] then you break back above the 50-day,
[43:29] things can run pretty hard. I think
[43:31] there is an absolute reason
[43:33] to be thinking that gold, silver,
[43:36] platinum, Bitcoin, all of them, assuming
[43:39] that the Fed is not going to cut rates
[43:41] in September,
[43:43] which again, I'm surprised we have 45%.
[43:46] We'll see what happens with the
[43:47] inflation data next week, but I think
[43:50] we're getting closer and closer to this
[43:52] and the market is telling you the
[43:53] signals where people like, well, why
[43:55] don't I just short Treasuries and go buy
[43:56] gold and go buy this? I think either way
[43:59] right now,
[44:01] I'm going to win because they're going
[44:02] to come in and stop it, but I don't
[44:04] think it can go down. So, here's what we
[44:06] got. Platinum breaks above the 50-day.
[44:09] And again,
[44:11] nice rounding chart. We'll see if
[44:13] there's follow-through. Silver finally
[44:15] closed above the 50-day today. I have a
[44:18] good-sized position in silver because of
[44:20] the AI side, but I like it now because
[44:23] of the the basement side. I showed this
[44:25] last week.
[44:26] We're at the highest dollar long
[44:28] position. So, the dollar has already
[44:30] broken down, but this is just fuel for
[44:32] the fire for gold and
[44:35] and silver and platinum and Bitcoin. And
[44:37] again, just a reminder, still 44%, not
[44:39] just that, we still have more
[44:41] tightenings in.
[44:42] I I think there's I mean, I think all of
[44:44] these should be coming out, personally.
[44:46] That's just me. And the reason is
[44:49] this inflation thing is driving me nuts.
[44:51] We have one inflation data point, which
[44:53] is upward. Um
[44:55] this is the Truflation core number
[44:59] relative to the CPI core number. You
[45:01] cannot get away from the fact that it
[45:03] has led and it has gone.
[45:05] This is a violent move lower over the
[45:07] course of the last 4 weeks. So, the
[45:09] year-over-year Truflation number just
[45:11] continues to fall. This is on the same
[45:13] scale, people. So, where this was around
[45:16] the same at the beginning of the year,
[45:18] you've had a slight uptick here, and
[45:19] you've had this collapse. Go read how
[45:21] they do their work.
[45:23] If Kevin Warsh is looking for better
[45:25] data points than just taking the way
[45:27] something was calculated 50 years ago,
[45:30] at least give Truflation a chance, along
[45:33] with trim mean, along with the other
[45:34] ones that I've shown. I think the
[45:36] inflation thing is a disaster. So, let's
[45:38] go the other way.
[45:40] I'm sick of economists and the payroll
[45:42] side.
[45:43] The job situation is not good.
[45:46] Yes, there are low claims. And the
[45:49] reason there's low claims, part of this
[45:51] is the labor force is coming down, but
[45:52] they never talk about that. So, the
[45:54] supply of labor is going down because
[45:56] the labor force participation rate is
[45:58] coming down sharply, has come down
[46:00] sharply this year. Well, if there's less
[46:02] labor supply, shouldn't that mean wages
[46:03] are going higher?
[46:05] Here are the wages.
[46:06] So, this is the quits rate and the
[46:08] Atlanta Fed wage side. On both measures,
[46:12] we are back to 2019 levels. You can't
[46:16] tell me the labor market is good with
[46:18] those metrics. Let's just take the
[46:20] average hourly earnings that we just
[46:22] got, which is now down to 3.2%. It's
[46:24] also the white line is also where it was
[46:26] before 2020.
[46:28] Overlay it again with the Atlanta Fed
[46:30] median wage growth, right here.
[46:32] You can't tell me the labor market is
[46:34] good.
[46:35] Let's go a different route. Let's now
[46:37] take the aggregate payrolls.
[46:40] This is the aggregate payrolls,
[46:42] which is taking weekly hours, average
[46:45] hourly earnings, and the number of job
[46:47] creation. I've talked about the fact
[46:48] that the only jobs that have been
[46:50] created over the last 18 months are in
[46:51] healthcare. When you strip out
[46:53] healthcare, there is no job creation.
[46:54] That is not a good jobs market. AI
[46:57] agents are have or AI is having an
[46:58] impact on hiring. It's not yet had an
[47:00] impact on firing, but again, if we're
[47:02] having job creation with entrepreneurs,
[47:04] and we're gradually losing people on the
[47:06] other side, which is the way I think it
[47:07] goes,
[47:09] I I don't think we're ever going to see
[47:10] big job losses. I think the demographics
[47:12] will kick in, we'll see more people
[47:13] retire, the stock market as it goes
[47:15] higher, more people say, "I don't need
[47:16] this anymore. I've made enough money."
[47:18] So, here is the last 6 months. Just look
[47:21] at these 6 months, guys,
[47:23] and take it back over time. This is a
[47:25] very weak period, and if you want to see
[47:27] really how weak it is, and again,
[47:29] this is the weakest 6-month rate of
[47:32] change
[47:33] on the aggregate weekly payrolls
[47:37] going all the way back to 2012
[47:40] when you throw out the COVID time
[47:41] period. I don't care how you measure
[47:43] this. Maybe it'll change, but right now
[47:45] the data is a fact.
[47:48] The number of people looking for work
[47:49] and the number of people counted as
[47:51] unemployed both fell.
[47:54] We're losing people in the labor force.
[47:56] This is 10-year yields, the 20-month
[47:58] moving average,
[48:01] which is at 4.29,
[48:03] and we're currently up here.
[48:05] Here's the labor force participation
[48:07] rate.
[48:09] As more people leave the labor force,
[48:11] rates should be coming down.
[48:15] That's it. So, we'll see what happens,
[48:17] but again, we've got the rise of the
[48:19] million-dollar companies happening now,
[48:21] so I think the
[48:23] future of the job situation will remain
[48:26] weaker because AI agents are coming.
[48:28] It's not that they're going to collapse,
[48:30] but I think people are making a huge
[48:32] mistake not understanding that these
[48:34] little tiny companies that have no
[48:35] employees will be replacing bigger
[48:37] companies
[48:38] with maybe 50 employees, 100 employees.
[48:41] And when those when that company closes,
[48:43] those people have to recycle in. I just
[48:45] think the quits rate, all of that stuff
[48:47] is showing what's happening much better
[48:49] than what your economists are telling
[48:51] you. And so, at some point here, I do
[48:54] think we're going to see weakness either
[48:55] A in inflation or B inside the job
[48:59] market driven by AI, which surprises
[49:01] people.
[49:05] So, here we are. Bitcoin is still in a
[49:06] bear market until we get above there.
[49:08] Anything from my perspective is a
[49:10] trading side. So, I'm going to I I think
[49:14] this is going to hold, and I think we're
[49:16] going to break out. But as of right now,
[49:17] we haven't. But there is some good news.
[49:20] I want you to go read this because I do
[49:22] believe that this is the most important
[49:24] time because of the agent to kick in.
[49:26] But what I really like is as the agent
[49:28] and my crypto 40 name index,
[49:31] the ecosystem is doing well.
[49:34] We just saw the Clarity Act basically
[49:37] over the course of the last 2 weeks go
[49:39] from about 33 to 40 uh let's say 3 weeks
[49:44] ago, we were getting close to 50. We
[49:46] collapsed to 17%
[49:50] chance that it gets signed into law this
[49:52] year.
[49:53] We also had strategy Michael Saylor sell
[49:55] more.
[49:57] And we also had
[50:00] cold card exploit. And if you guys
[50:02] didn't see this, there was even a, you
[50:05] know, a pretty big story on cold storage
[50:08] problem with one company
[50:11] uh and people's wallets. And yet, all
[50:13] that going on mm
[50:15] Bitcoin was okay this week.
[50:18] That's it for me this week, guys. Uh
[50:20] keep enjoying your summer. Reach out to
[50:22] Mark Whaling. Reach out to me.
[50:25] Uh and we'll keep going through it. But
[50:27] uh let's make some money
[50:28] uh starting now for the rest of the
[50:30] year. See you.