Jack Mallers

Lesson 4: Where Does Money Come From?

Complete 38:13 min youtube 2026 Week 38 Sep 16, 2026 🇬🇧 EN
Research summary

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7ykk9fZ-wg  |  Duration: 38 min

◆ Where Does Money Come From?

The episode addresses the fundamental question of where money originates, moving beyond common currencies like the dollar or euro. While these are forms of money, fiat currencies are relatively young compared to human history. Money actually possesses a very deep historical background and was not created by governments or banks. Instead, it was invented by people as a solution to a specific societal problem. The discussion aims to explore the origins and full history of money. It will cover when and how money was invented and examine current options for economic activity.

▶ Barter and the Birth of Money

Before money existed, trade relied on the coincidence of wants, where both parties had what the other desired. When desires did not align, complex transactions required a medium of exchange, which is essentially monetizing one good for later use. Money is defined as a market good acquired not to consume or produce, but specifically to save and later exchange for needed goods. There are three types of market goods: consumption goods, which are used directly by the consumer; capital goods, which are used to build more consumption goods; and money. This unique function allows money to act as the necessary intermediary in complex economic exchanges.

★ Scaling Trade to Billions of People

Human cognitive limits, such as Dunbar's number, restrict our ability to manage complex social networks and track detailed debts among large groups. Barter exchange fails to scale because tracking all possible price comparisons grows exponentially with the number of goods available. Money solves this scaling problem by acting as a pivot language that reduces the necessary prices from N squared down to just N. This allows for hyper-specialization, enabling individuals to become experts in niche fields and trade their value for money. They can then use that money to acquire diverse goods they need, improving overall societal efficiency. Conceptually, money functions as a formal token of delayed reciprocal altruism, allowing value exchange across time and different needs.

► What Makes Good Money?

Money and trade emerge naturally from mutually beneficial voluntary exchanges within a market. As certain mediums of exchange gain popularity, people begin to define what constitutes good money. Nick Szabo outlines three essential characteristics for any currency:

  1. It must be hard to lose or steal.
  2. It must be unforgably costly, meaning it is expensive to produce and impossible or very difficult to fake.
  3. The money must be very easy for merchants to verify its authenticity.

Historically, various items like shells, silver, and gold have served as currency because they possess these required properties.

★ Moving Value Across Space and Time

Money must fulfill two functions: sellability across space and the ability to store value across time. Perishable goods or fiat currencies prone to dilution fail because they cannot maintain purchasing power over time. The Stock-to-Flow ratio measures a currency's relative scarcity by comparing existing supply to its production rate. Highly inflationary assets, like the Venezuelan bolivar, create more money than currently exists. While gold is durable, it still experiences annual inflation. Bitcoin is presented as having an infinite stock-to-flow ratio due to its fixed cap of 21 million coins, making it exceptionally scarce compared to other forms of money.

► Money’s Two Forms: Lists and Things

Money exists in two fundamental forms: a list or a thing. A list involves tracking debts digitally through ledgers, which allows for massive global scalability but requires absolute trust in the entity maintaining those records. Conversely, a thing, such as gold, embeds value directly into the object itself, eliminating the need for an external ledger and reducing reliance on trust regarding ownership. However, physical things struggle to scale efficiently in modern digital economies. Historically, attempts to use physical tokens eventually led to the creation of centralized lists managed by governments. The current financial system is essentially a highly scaled, trusted list controlled by institutions like the Federal Reserve, having moved away from pure commodity standards.

★ Money Is a Technology

Money must be understood as a technology, similar to how there are many different ways to achieve flight. Different forms of currency function like various technologies; seashells are poor for scaling, while gold is an analog method that struggles in the modern economy. Bitcoin is presented as a highly scalable, engineered solution suitable for today's society. Although governments force adoption through taxation and legal mandates, individuals retain the choice to use different money technologies. Money itself is an ancient technology designed to scale human cooperation across large populations. Historically, various items like clams have served as legal tender long before modern currency systems existed.

► Gold vs. Fiat vs. Bitcoin

Money must possess specific qualities like durability, fungibility, portability, and scarcity to function effectively.

Asset Role/Strength Thesis/Weakness
Gold Excels in durability and scarcity. Struggles with divisibility and portability.
Fiat Currency Highly divisible and portable. Lacks scarcity, requires trust, prone to inflation.
Bitcoin Achieves durability, divisibility, fungibility, verifiability, and scarcity. Superior solution for preserving value over time due to technical attributes.

While Bitcoin has a shorter track record than gold, its technical attributes make it ideal for preserving value over time. The speaker chooses Bitcoin for their savings because it solves all fundamental problems of money, even if daily life requires using fiat through intermediaries like credit cards.

★ Satoshi’s Breakthrough

Bitcoin's core innovation is that it simultaneously functions as both a list and an object, unlike traditional monetary systems. The blockchain acts as a giant, transparent ledger publicly tracking who owes what to whom. This system allows users to spend Bitcoins by providing signatures using their private keys. Crucially, the information itself behaves like a bearer instrument, enabling easy transfer of ownership. Satoshi successfully turned digital information into a tangible form of value and wealth. This public and auditable nature gives Bitcoin unique monetary properties. It is an instantly updateable global ledger that requires minimal storage cost compared to physical assets like gold.

◆ Search for the alpha

The core thesis driving capital allocation is that traditional fiat currencies and even commodity-backed systems like gold are fundamentally flawed monetary technologies because they lack inherent scarcity, requiring reliance on centralized trust which is prone to systemic failure. The speaker views Bitcoin not merely as an asset, but as a superior, engineered monetary technology designed specifically to solve the scaling problems of value storage across time and space.

  • Capital Allocation Focus: Strong preference for Bitcoin as the primary savings vehicle due to its unique ability to function simultaneously as both a verifiable list (ledger) and an object (bearer instrument), solving fundamental issues inherent in fiat systems.
  • Avoidance/Risk Mitigation: Implicit avoidance of relying on highly inflationary, trust-dependent fiat currencies, which are prone to dilution because they lack a fixed Stock-to-Flow ratio.
  • Thematic Superiority: Bitcoin is positioned as the optimal modern solution, achieving durability, fungibility, divisibility, and verifiable scarcity—qualities that gold struggles with in a high-speed digital economy.
  • Regime Change Catalyst: The speaker views this shift as an evolution of monetary technology, moving away from centralized, government-mandated lists toward decentralized, auditable public ledgers (the blockchain).
Asset / signal / read
Asset Signal Reading
Bitcoin Strong Buy / Savings Vehicle Solves all fundamental problems of money; superior scarcity and verifiability.
The twist: The speaker is not just making a financial bet on Bitcoin's price, but rather betting on the failure of centralized monetary systems. By framing money as a technology, they are implicitly arguing that the current global financial architecture (Fiat/Fed) is an outdated and inherently unstable design waiting for a technologically superior replacement to take hold.

► Chapter Summaries

Where Does Money Come From? (0:00)

The episode addresses the fundamental question of where money originates, moving beyond common currencies like the dollar or euro. While these are forms of money, fiat currencies are relatively young compared to human history. Money actually possesses a very deep historical background and was not created by governments or banks. Instead, it was invented by people as a solution to a specific societal problem. The discussion aims to explore the origins and full history of money. It will cover when and how money was invented and examine current options for economic activity.

Barter and the Birth of Money (0:56)

Before money existed, trade relied on the coincidence of wants, where both parties had what the other desired. When desires did not align, complex transactions required a medium of exchange, which is essentially monetizing one good for later use. Money is defined as a market good acquired not to consume or produce, but specifically to save and later exchange for needed goods. There are three types of market goods: consumption goods, which are used directly by the consumer; capital goods, which are used to build more consumption goods; and money. This unique function allows money to act as the necessary intermediary in complex economic exchanges.

Scaling Trade to Billions of People (6:48)

Human cognitive limits, such as Dunbar's number, restrict our ability to manage complex social networks and track detailed debts among large groups. Barter exchange fails to scale because tracking all possible price comparisons grows exponentially with the number of goods available. Money solves this scaling problem by acting as a pivot language that reduces the necessary prices from N squared down to just N. This allows for hyper-specialization, enabling individuals to become experts in niche fields and trade their value for money. They can then use that money to acquire diverse goods they need, improving overall societal efficiency. Conceptually, money functions as a formal token of delayed reciprocal altruism, allowing value exchange across time and different needs.

What Makes Good Money? (16:08)

Money and trade emerge naturally from mutually beneficial voluntary exchanges within a market. As certain mediums of exchange gain popularity, people begin to define what constitutes good money. Nick Szabo outlines three essential characteristics for any currency. First, it must be hard to lose or steal. Second, it must be unforgably costly, meaning it is expensive to produce and impossible or very difficult to fake. Third, the money must be very easy for merchants to verify its authenticity. Historically, various items like shells, silver, and gold have served as currency because they possess these required properties.

Moving Value Across Space and Time (20:01)

Money must fulfill two functions: sellability across space and the ability to store value across time. Perishable goods or fiat currencies prone to dilution fail because they cannot maintain purchasing power over time. The Stock-to-Flow ratio measures a currency's relative scarcity by comparing existing supply to its production rate. Highly inflationary assets, like the Venezuelan bolivar, create more money than currently exists. While gold is durable, it still experiences annual inflation. Bitcoin is presented as having an infinite stock-to-flow ratio due to its fixed cap of 21 million coins, making it exceptionally scarce compared to other forms of money.

Money’s Two Forms: Lists and Things (25:03)

Money exists in two fundamental forms: a list or a thing. A list involves tracking debts digitally through ledgers, which allows for massive global scalability but requires absolute trust in the entity maintaining those records. Conversely, a thing, such as gold, embeds value directly into the object itself, eliminating the need for an external ledger and reducing reliance on trust regarding ownership. However, physical things struggle to scale efficiently in modern digital economies. Historically, attempts to use physical tokens eventually led to the creation of centralized lists managed by governments. The current financial system is essentially a highly scaled, trusted list controlled by institutions like the Federal Reserve, having moved away from pure commodity standards.

Money Is a Technology (28:45)

Money must be understood as a technology, similar to how there are many different ways to achieve flight. Different forms of currency function like various technologies; seashells are poor for scaling, while gold is an analog method that struggles in the modern economy. Bitcoin is presented as a highly scalable, engineered solution suitable for today's society. Although governments force adoption through taxation and legal mandates, individuals retain the choice to use different money technologies. Money itself is an ancient technology designed to scale human cooperation across large populations. Historically, various items like clams have served as legal tender long before modern currency systems existed.

Gold vs. Fiat vs. Bitcoin (32:55)

Money must possess specific qualities like durability, fungibility, portability, and scarcity to function effectively. Gold excels in durability and scarcity but struggles with divisibility and portability. Fiat currency solves gold's issues by being highly divisible and portable, yet it lacks scarcity and requires trust, making it prone to inflation. Bitcoin is presented as a superior solution because it achieves nearly all the necessary properties: durable, divisible, fungible, verifiable, and scarce. While Bitcoin has a shorter track record than gold, its technical attributes make it ideal for preserving value over time. The speaker chooses Bitcoin for their savings because it solves all fundamental problems of money, even if daily life requires using fiat through intermediaries like credit cards.

Satoshi’s Breakthrough (35:52)

Bitcoin's core innovation is that it simultaneously functions as both a list and an object, unlike traditional monetary systems. The blockchain acts as a giant, transparent ledger publicly tracking who owes what to whom. This system allows users to spend Bitcoins by providing signatures using their private keys. Crucially, the information itself behaves like a bearer instrument, enabling easy transfer of ownership. Satoshi successfully turned digital information into a tangible form of value and wealth. This public and auditable nature gives Bitcoin unique monetary properties. It is an instantly updateable global ledger that requires minimal storage cost compared to physical assets like gold.

Full transcript
[0:00] Yo, welcome back to another episode of
[0:03] The Jack Mallers Show. I am your host
[0:07] Jack, and today we've got another
[0:09] Bitcoin 101 episode. Where does money
[0:13] come from?
[0:14] I think when people hear money, they
[0:16] say, "Oh yeah, the dollar or the euro or
[0:18] the yen."
[0:19] And while that's true, those are all
[0:21] forms of money.
[0:23] Did you know that fiat currencies as we
[0:25] know them today are younger than the
[0:27] internet themselves?
[0:28] Money actually has a very deep history,
[0:31] and it was not invented by the
[0:33] government or by banks. It was invented
[0:36] by the people to solve a very particular
[0:38] problem. So, today's episode is to
[0:41] understand the origins of money, the
[0:43] history of money, when and how and why
[0:46] was it invented, and where are we today
[0:50] when it comes to money and the options
[0:52] that we the people have to monetize and
[0:55] economize. So, without further ado,
[0:57] let's get started.
[1:01] First, to understand the problem and why
[1:04] money was invented, I think we need to
[1:06] start on what humans did before there
[1:09] was money at all. Because the problem is
[1:12] two people inevitably want to trade,
[1:15] okay? Before there was money, how did
[1:17] they solve that? Which will then lead us
[1:20] to why money was invented in the first
[1:22] place.
[1:24] So, let's take Alice and Bob here on the
[1:27] screen.
[1:28] Alice has pecans. She grows pecans, and
[1:31] she happens to want apples.
[1:34] Okay, Bob is the opposite. He happens to
[1:37] have apples and happens to want pecans.
[1:40] This is what we call the coincidence of
[1:43] wants, where both parties trading happen
[1:47] to have what each other wants and want
[1:50] what each other has, okay? So, this is
[1:53] very simple. Alice hands over the
[1:55] pecans, Bob hands over the apples, and
[1:57] everybody is happy. Now, obviously, what
[2:02] if it's not that easy? What if Alice,
[2:06] she still grows pecans, and she really
[2:08] loves those apples. She still wants
[2:09] apples.
[2:11] What if this time Bob,
[2:13] he still grows apples, and he's happy to
[2:14] give Alice the apples, but he doesn't
[2:16] want pecans anymore. Bob wants salt.
[2:19] Well, Bob has a problem.
[2:21] Yes, he has what Alice wants, but Alice
[2:23] doesn't have what he wants. Alice only
[2:25] has pecans, and Bob wants salt.
[2:27] So, now in order for Bob to solve this,
[2:29] he needs to find somebody
[2:32] that wants pecans, wants Alice's pecans,
[2:35] cuz he doesn't want them,
[2:36] and is willing to exchange the salt that
[2:39] he's looking for.
[2:41] And so, he goes around town. The pecans
[2:43] are no good for Bob, but he happens to
[2:44] find Carol.
[2:46] Carol has salt and wants pecans. And I
[2:48] know that this is confusing, which is
[2:49] part of the problem. But, Alice has
[2:52] pecans and wants apples. Bob has the
[2:54] apples, but wants salt. Carol has salt
[2:57] and wants the pecans. So, what does Bob
[2:59] do? Well, Bob first trades his apples
[3:02] for Alice's pecans. And then he takes
[3:04] the pecans and exchanges with Carol for
[3:07] the salt. So, now everyone's happy.
[3:09] Alice gets the apples, Bob has salt,
[3:12] Carol has pecans. Perfect. Now, if we
[3:15] analyze these transactions, what
[3:17] actually happened is Bob monetized the
[3:21] pecans. You're like, "What does that
[3:24] mean, Jack? How What do you mean, he
[3:26] monetized the pecans?" What it means is
[3:29] that money is very simply a market good
[3:32] that you are acquiring not to consume.
[3:36] So, Bob did not buy the pecans to
[3:39] consume the pecans.
[3:41] Bob acquired the pecans to actually
[3:44] later exchange for the things that he
[3:47] actually wanted, which happened to be
[3:50] salt. So, if I go back a slide, you can
[3:53] see that pecans in this particular
[3:55] instance was the medium was the medium
[3:59] of exchange. You've probably heard this
[4:01] term.
[4:02] So, now I know you don't consider Oh,
[4:04] well, pecans aren't money, Jack. That
[4:06] would be silly. I understand, but you
[4:09] you have to know that money by
[4:10] definition is a market good that you are
[4:13] acquiring
[4:15] not to consume,
[4:17] but actually to either save
[4:19] or later exchange for the things that
[4:21] you are looking to consume. So,
[4:24] therefore, anything can be a money.
[4:27] Bob happened to monetize pecans in this
[4:30] instance. Now, obviously, pecans aren't
[4:32] great money, and we'll get into that in
[4:34] a second, but there are three types of
[4:37] goods in any marketplace. There are
[4:39] consumption goods, which is a
[4:42] cheeseburger or an apple, right? And I'm
[4:44] using those examples because I've never
[4:46] monetized a cheeseburger. I've never
[4:47] monetized an apple, and I've never
[4:49] acquired those things to save them and
[4:52] then later exchange them for the things
[4:53] that I want. These are consumption
[4:55] goods. By the way, it's not only food.
[4:57] What about a car? What about an
[4:59] airplane? What about a house? My house,
[5:01] I don't actually I didn't acquire it to
[5:04] later sell it. I acquired it to live in
[5:06] it. So, it's actually consumption good
[5:08] for me. I buy an airplane ticket not as
[5:11] an investment to later sell my ticket on
[5:13] United. I buy it to get on the plane,
[5:16] and that makes it a consumption good
[5:18] because I'm acquiring the good in the
[5:19] marketplace to consume it.
[5:22] You then have capital goods, which are
[5:25] like consumption goods, except they're
[5:27] used to build more consumption goods.
[5:30] For example,
[5:31] let's say Apple uh the company buys a
[5:34] lot of silver. Well, Apple may not be
[5:37] consuming the silver themselves, but
[5:39] they're using it to build an iPhone,
[5:41] which they're then selling as a
[5:43] consumption good for the buyer, right?
[5:45] Like I'm buying my iPhone not to leave
[5:47] it in the box and later sell it as a
[5:49] collectible. I'm buying it to use it as
[5:51] my cellular device and my smartphone.
[5:53] Now, the capital good would be Apple,
[5:56] which is acquiring the silver, which
[5:58] builds more consumption goods. And then
[6:00] the third type of market good is money.
[6:03] And this is it. There's three types of
[6:06] goods in any given marketplace. You have
[6:08] a consumption good, which you're
[6:10] actually consuming, capital good, which
[6:12] is used to produce more consumption
[6:14] goods, and then you have money. And
[6:16] money again is very unique. So you say
[6:18] like, "What is money? There's this is so
[6:21] confusing. I don't get it." It's
[6:23] actually very simple. Money is a market
[6:25] good that you're acquiring not to
[6:28] consume and not to produce more
[6:30] consumption goods. You're acquiring it
[6:32] to save it and then later exchange it
[6:35] for the things that you do need, that
[6:37] you do want to consume. Now,
[6:40] going back to Alice, Bob, and Carol.
[6:43] This all works when there's only three
[6:45] people.
[6:46] These monetizing pecans, or we can
[6:49] monetize cheeseburgers, or we can
[6:50] monetize salt. Alice, Bob, and Carol can
[6:53] hold all of these things in their head.
[6:55] Okay, Alice seems to like apples, Carol
[6:58] seems to like pecans, so I can get the
[7:00] salt. That's fine. But now try that with
[7:04] a village, or try that with the city of
[7:06] Chicago, or try that with 8 billion
[7:08] strangers. It gets really complicated
[7:10] really fast, and there's actually some
[7:12] science behind this. So this is what's
[7:13] known as Dunbar's number.
[7:16] What is the human brain capable of when
[7:18] it comes to building a social network?
[7:20] Because one thing that we're actually
[7:22] very good at is recognizing faces and
[7:25] having relationships. So let's say this
[7:27] is you, and you have five close friends.
[7:30] Sure. Well, can you have six? Yeah, you
[7:33] can grow those relationships up to 15,
[7:35] and and maybe that's family. And can you
[7:37] grow from there? Sure. And this is
[7:39] what's known as a clan. You can have 50
[7:42] folks that you're familiar with and you
[7:44] recognize their face and you can
[7:45] remember their name.
[7:47] The human brain actually scientifically
[7:49] tra- taps out at 150.
[7:52] And at 151, like when you see someone
[7:55] that has a Facebook friends list and and
[7:57] they're on Facebook, they're friends
[7:59] with 170 people. Well, according to
[8:02] Dunbar's number and the science behind
[8:04] that, they can't actually be friends
[8:08] with 170 people. Now, they may be
[8:10] vaguely recognizable. Oh, right, you're
[8:11] Jane's sister. Oh, okay, got it. But
[8:14] when push comes to shove, when literally
[8:16] building a social network with the
[8:18] neurons in your brain, you tap out at
[8:21] about 150, okay?
[8:23] Now, add on top of that that what money
[8:26] is is not simply recognizing a face and
[8:29] building a social network, but it's all
[8:31] about remembering who owes what to whom.
[8:34] Okay, right. Carol
[8:37] I owe Carol pecans, I owe Alice apples.
[8:40] Okay, so it's not just having friends
[8:42] and remembering, right, that's Alice,
[8:44] that's Jane, that's Sally. It's who owes
[8:46] what to whom. Okay, Alice owes Bob, Dan
[8:49] owes Eve, Gail owes Bob, and what do
[8:51] they owe each other, and when is it due,
[8:53] and what is each one worth? So, sure,
[8:55] you can track 150, but what about the
[8:57] ledgering between all of these people?
[9:00] Then it gets really, really, really
[9:02] complicated, really, really, really
[9:04] fast, right? Now, it's just too much.
[9:07] And the math behind this is actually
[9:09] very simple.
[9:11] However many goods are any given market,
[9:13] let's say there's five. To understand
[9:15] the amount of prices that you have to
[9:17] keep track of, you just square the goods
[9:20] number. So, if there's five goods in a
[9:22] market, the amount of prices you have to
[9:24] keep track of is 25. Because let's say
[9:26] you're you have honey. Well, what's
[9:29] honey's price against chicken? What's
[9:31] honey's price against blueberries?
[9:32] What's honey's price against salt?
[9:34] What's honey's price against wool? And
[9:35] then you got to do the same thing for
[9:36] wool. Wool to honey, wool to chicken, so
[9:39] on and so forth, so on and so forth. So,
[9:40] when you're doing direct barter
[9:42] exchange, it's very explosive. As you
[9:45] add goods to the marketplace, the amount
[9:47] of prices that people have to keep track
[9:49] of. So, if I were to take the goods and
[9:51] go from five to 500 goods in the market,
[9:54] as you walk in a Whole Foods, there's
[9:56] way more than
[9:57] uh 500 goods that you could technically
[9:59] buy in Whole Foods. You would have to
[10:02] keep track of a quarter million unique
[10:05] prices if you were to barter just by
[10:08] growing from five goods to 500 goods.
[10:11] And this is this n squared. It's the
[10:13] math behind how explosive it is as you
[10:16] grow the number of goods in a market,
[10:17] how complicated it is. And so, if we go
[10:20] back to Dunbar's number of, well, what's
[10:22] the maximum social network a human could
[10:24] memorize and actually keep track of in
[10:26] their brain, and then you add the
[10:28] complexity of you're going to have to
[10:30] square these things because you're not
[10:32] just keeping track of the humans, you're
[10:34] keeping track of
[10:36] which humans owe what to each other, and
[10:38] when is that due, and what's the value
[10:40] of each of those transactions. It
[10:42] clearly doesn't scale. And so, what
[10:45] money is intended to do is solve this
[10:47] exact problem. Is Sure, if you want to
[10:51] exchange with only two people in your
[10:52] life, fine. You don't Maybe you don't
[10:54] need money. Maybe you can monetize
[10:56] pecans. Maybe you can use barter. But if
[10:59] you wanted to then be a part of a
[11:00] village, and then that village becomes a
[11:02] town, and then that town becomes a city,
[11:04] and then that city becomes a country,
[11:06] and then that country becomes a region,
[11:08] and then all of a sudden we have the
[11:09] internet, and we want to economize 8
[11:12] billion people. We want all of us to be
[11:14] able to buy and sell goods with each
[11:16] other. Money is the technology we
[11:19] invented to solve for these exact
[11:21] problems. So, problem one is money needs
[11:23] to do solve for who owes what to whom.
[11:26] Favors can just be remembered by
[11:28] everybody, right? And especially not to
[11:32] keep track of both sides and for years
[11:34] and and without writing them down. Okay?
[11:36] We also need to keep track of what is it
[11:38] worth? So this concept of a price.
[11:41] Okay, it's very difficult to say okay,
[11:43] half jar of honey is worth one full
[11:45] chuck chicken, but how much is a half
[11:47] jar of money worth in wool? Is totally
[11:50] different. You're like, well, I mean, am
[11:52] I supposed to memorize this? Am I
[11:53] supposed to write this down? So it's
[11:54] also keeping track of what it's worth
[11:56] and it's solving for the scale problem,
[11:59] which is if I only have 500 goods, I
[12:01] need to remember and memorize 250,000
[12:04] barter prices. It's ridiculous.
[12:06] With money, we can drastically reduce
[12:09] that. So if I go back to the 250,000
[12:12] uh prices here that we have for 500
[12:14] goods, now if we introduce money here in
[12:16] the center,
[12:18] we're back to 500. Where if you have 500
[12:20] goods, there's only 500 prices and you
[12:23] can put those on a price tag and it's
[12:25] very simple and money acts as like a
[12:27] pivot language. It acts as a unifier is
[12:31] you can create a good, exchange it for
[12:33] money and then take the money and then
[12:35] go acquire the goods that you need and
[12:37] you don't have to monetize other
[12:39] consumption goods like a pecan.
[12:43] Now, the result of all of this also it
[12:46] makes society better because for
[12:48] example,
[12:50] if we were still bartering and let's say
[12:52] my profession was I'm a professional
[12:55] uh repairer of broken windshields, which
[12:58] is a valuable service. If anyone's ever
[12:59] broken their windshield, you're like,
[13:00] well, crap, now I can't see the road.
[13:02] There's a crack in my windshield. I
[13:04] really need to be able to fix this in
[13:06] order to drive. Thankfully, there are
[13:08] experts that you can drive in same day
[13:10] and within 30 minutes, your windshield
[13:11] is fixed. That's amazing. However, if I
[13:14] was a professional windshield fixer and
[13:16] I fixed a few windshields today and then
[13:18] I went into Whole Foods and I said, I
[13:20] would like a ribeye
[13:22] and they would say, okay, cool. What do
[13:24] I get in exchange? And I said, well, I
[13:25] fixed a few windshields today. They
[13:27] would say, "Well, I don't care that you
[13:29] fixed other people's windshields. My
[13:30] windshield wasn't broken, so why would I
[13:32] give you food in exchange for you fixing
[13:35] other people's windshields?"
[13:36] And that's a very valid point. And so,
[13:39] the problem is that maybe everyone's
[13:42] value they're creating isn't directly
[13:44] exchangeable for the things they want,
[13:45] which again, money solves this problem.
[13:48] Is that I can fix windshields and charge
[13:51] money for it. Charge for a good that I'm
[13:53] not intending to consume. I'm charging,
[13:56] as I fix your windshield, I'm collecting
[13:58] something that I'm not going to eat, I'm
[13:59] not going to drive, I'm not going to
[14:01] fly, I'm not going to live in. I'm going
[14:03] to save it, and then I'm going to put it
[14:05] in my pocket and walk to the grocery
[14:07] store, and then exchange it for the
[14:09] things that I actually need. And that is
[14:11] economizing and using money to scale
[14:14] barter and scale exchange and trade
[14:17] between humans. And now, obviously, if
[14:19] you scale that, and you say, "Wow, that
[14:22] means anybody can do anything of value
[14:24] to someone else. You can fix
[14:26] windshields, you can be a surgeon, you
[14:27] can be a welder, you can be a chip
[14:29] designer, you can be an artist, a
[14:30] rapper, an airplane pilot. You could do
[14:33] anything you want as long as someone
[14:35] else in the marketplace is values values
[14:38] it enough to give you money for it. And
[14:40] then you can take that money, and you
[14:42] can go acquire the things you need, like
[14:43] steak or rent or coffee or a phone or
[14:45] medicine or school or flights or power.
[14:48] And that greatly improves society.
[14:51] Because we all can be hyper specialist
[14:54] and hyper experts in very niche things.
[14:56] Like in a tribe of five, there's no
[14:59] windshield wiper. There is no chip
[15:01] designer. But if you have money, and
[15:03] you're able to scale human
[15:05] collaboration, then people can become
[15:08] hyper experts in very niche yet valuable
[15:11] things. And then they can use that value
[15:14] that they're driving
[15:15] to get the things that they want and
[15:17] need in their life using money as the
[15:20] technology to escrow and proxy all of
[15:23] this value exchange. So, I love this
[15:25] quote from Richard Dawkins. If you
[15:26] understand money deeply in this way,
[15:28] money is a formal token of delayed
[15:30] reciprocal altruism.
[15:33] Right? It's I did something valuable for
[15:35] someone else.
[15:36] But, I don't want to directly exchange
[15:39] that value right this second. If I fix
[15:41] your windshield, and I'm not hungry, and
[15:43] you don't have the food that I want,
[15:45] just give me a formal token of delayed
[15:48] reciprocal altruism.
[15:50] Just give me a token so that later on,
[15:52] when I want to, I can exchange the the
[15:55] value, the altruism I gave to you by
[15:57] fixing your windshield, for something
[15:59] that I would like in return, that I
[16:01] would like to consume. Right? That's a
[16:03] very high-level way of thinking about
[16:06] money. I think it's a very fascinating
[16:07] way to think about it. So,
[16:10] now, understanding all of this,
[16:13] now we must understand that money and
[16:16] trade,
[16:17] it arrives naturally.
[16:19] See, once you understand this,
[16:22] money was not invented by government,
[16:23] money was not invented by banks, money
[16:25] was not invented by corporations, money
[16:28] was invented by all of us. It was
[16:29] invented by the market. It emerges
[16:32] naturally. So, what I have on the screen
[16:35] here is you have a town or a city or a
[16:37] country or any market. Like, the market
[16:40] exists naturally. People naturally want
[16:43] to trade and exchange value because
[16:46] every trade is beneficial, or else the
[16:48] trade would not happen.
[16:50] I would not give someone $50 for a steak
[16:54] if I thought the steak wasn't worth $50.
[16:57] Every single voluntary exchange,
[17:00] voluntary, right? Like, no one's putting
[17:02] a gun to your head, is by definition
[17:05] mutually beneficial, or else one party
[17:07] wouldn't have done it. You could be
[17:09] like, "Ugh, I can't believe steak is
[17:10] $50." But, if you didn't think it was
[17:12] worth $50, then you wouldn't have swiped
[17:13] the card.
[17:14] And so, trade happens naturally. It's
[17:16] mutually beneficial between the parties,
[17:19] and then as the money scales and becomes
[17:22] more popularly adopted, this is like
[17:24] Bitcoin's story, more and more people
[17:26] are like, "Huh, this is a pretty good
[17:28] money. I could use lots of things for
[17:30] money. I could use pecans, I could use
[17:31] silver, I could use dollars, I could use
[17:33] Bitcoins." And slowly but surely, within
[17:36] the marketplace, people start adopting
[17:38] the money that benefit them.
[17:41] So, now we have to understand and think
[17:42] about what makes a thing money. What
[17:45] makes it good?
[17:46] And this is from Nick Szabo.
[17:49] One, hard to lose or steal.
[17:53] Obviously,
[17:54] if the money was trivial to take, like a
[17:58] or easy to lose,
[18:00] that would be pretty bad because you can
[18:02] work and fix all the windshields or work
[18:03] and do your job, and then you lose it,
[18:06] or then someone else takes it from you,
[18:08] and then what value is that? Now I can't
[18:10] eat dinner.
[18:11] The next is unforgably costly. This
[18:14] means expensive to produce and
[18:16] impossible to fake.
[18:18] Right? So, obviously, if the money that
[18:20] I'm getting in return for fixing the
[18:22] windshields and doing all this valuable
[18:23] work was easy for someone else to just
[18:26] make out of thin air,
[18:28] well, that's a problem, and that's one
[18:30] of the main problems I have with fiat
[18:31] currency, and that's why I say no man
[18:33] should work for what another man can
[18:35] print.
[18:36] Because what am I doing sacrificing my
[18:39] life and pouring my blood, sweat, and
[18:41] tears into something only for someone
[18:44] else, some other dude, who's either an
[18:46] elected or unelected official to be able
[18:48] to print what I earned through hard work
[18:50] out of thin air. Well, that makes the
[18:52] money not nearly as appealing.
[18:55] And then the last is very easy to
[18:57] verify.
[18:58] So, when I go exchange it,
[19:01] it's very important that a merchant or
[19:03] anyone receiving the money in exchange
[19:05] for the good that I want to consume,
[19:07] right? So, okay, I've fixed a bunch of
[19:09] windshields, and now I have this money
[19:11] thing. And it doesn't matter what money
[19:13] I'm electing to use, I could use any
[19:15] money I want.
[19:17] Now, the merchant is going to one have
[19:19] to want to receive that money and value
[19:21] that money as well, but they're also
[19:22] going to make sure that it's not fool's
[19:23] money. It's not fool's gold.
[19:25] And it has to be very easy. Like imagine
[19:27] I walk in with gold and they're like,
[19:28] well, I'm going to have to melt this
[19:29] gold down in order to verify it. Well,
[19:32] that's not a very usable money either.
[19:35] So, hard to lose or steal, easy to
[19:38] transport,
[19:40] impossible or very difficult to produce
[19:42] more of or fake, easy to verify what's
[19:44] real or not. These are, throughout the
[19:46] history of people monetizing things. So,
[19:49] right, we've used throughout human
[19:50] history we used shells, shark teeth,
[19:53] flint, silver coins, gold coins.
[19:56] The The thing is, which of these things
[19:59] carries all of these properties, right?
[20:02] So, let's talk about saleability, for
[20:04] example. And I give a little scorecard
[20:06] here across fresh fish, firewood, wool,
[20:08] salt, cattle, and silver. These were all
[20:10] money once upon a time back in the day
[20:12] and you're like, really, salt was money,
[20:14] Jack? Yeah. Hundreds and hundreds or
[20:17] thousands of years ago, yeah. Salt was
[20:19] relatively scarce, easy to transport,
[20:22] easy to tell whether
[20:24] I was holding sugar or salt. It's very
[20:26] easy, just put a little bit on your
[20:28] tongue. So, yeah, 100%. Now, over time,
[20:31] it becomes actually not very scarce,
[20:34] actually not very durable, actually not
[20:35] very sellable. So, sellable in this
[20:37] example is which of these goods are
[20:40] people willing to accept, right? Fresh
[20:43] fish?
[20:45] I
[20:46] That's a hard That's a hard sell for for
[20:48] for me to be like, hey, you know, I I'd
[20:50] like this house. I'll give you a bunch
[20:51] of fresh fish. Or what about wool? Or
[20:53] what about cattle? And over time,
[20:55] precious metals like silver and gold
[20:58] ended up winning out and becoming the
[21:00] most sellable hardest money over time.
[21:03] Let's talk about storing value across
[21:05] time. Let's say a cart of apples. Well,
[21:08] the problem with the cart of apples is
[21:09] they go bad over time. They go rotten.
[21:12] So, whilst they might be valuable while
[21:14] they're in season and fresh off the
[21:15] tree, just give an apple a week or two
[21:18] and they're rotten and you can't consume
[21:20] them. And so, maybe I worked and had my
[21:22] life savings in a fresh batch of apples,
[21:25] but then in 2 weeks I'm poor and
[21:26] homeless. So, that's not very good
[21:28] money.
[21:29] Now, what about money that I call leaks
[21:32] like the dollar? Well, sure. The
[21:35] dollar's not going to go rotten like an
[21:36] apple, but the more they print of it,
[21:39] then the more they're diluting the value
[21:41] of me being able to exchange it for
[21:43] other goods in the marketplace. And so,
[21:45] that's also not very good. So, not only
[21:46] does the good need to be sellable and
[21:48] acceptable and people want it and value
[21:51] it as money, but it also needs to store
[21:53] money across time. So, sellability is
[21:55] about transacting across space, right?
[21:58] Like is someone if I walk into a store,
[21:59] is someone going to want to receive this
[22:01] and have the ability to receive it? And
[22:03] then across time is, you know, are
[22:05] people
[22:06] can I store this you know, money has two
[22:10] jobs. One, can I send it like from here
[22:13] to London? And then the second is like,
[22:15] can I send it from here to 10 years from
[22:17] now? And you're like, wait, what are you
[22:19] talking about? I'm saying, can I create
[22:21] value for myself that in theory allows
[22:25] me to buy a house and in 10 years from
[22:26] now I could still buy a house. Cuz what
[22:28] happens with a lot of fiat currencies is
[22:30] people earn enough money to get a dinner
[22:33] or get a house or get a flight. And then
[22:36] 10 years from now due to inflation, it's
[22:37] only half a house and you know, only one
[22:40] flight instead of four and only dinner
[22:43] at McDonald's instead of dinners at
[22:44] steakhouses. And that's because that
[22:46] money is leaking value over time. So,
[22:48] money needs to be able to travel across
[22:50] space and across time. And so, I think
[22:52] this slide is a very fun visual to
[22:54] understand.
[22:56] Think about it this way. This is a
[22:59] known as stock-to-flow as a way to
[23:01] measure a money's scarcity so that your
[23:04] value isn't getting inflated away.
[23:06] So, on the screen, you have the white
[23:08] dots of the existing stockpile that
[23:11] exists. So, right now I have the
[23:13] Venezuelan bolivar.
[23:15] How many of Venezuelan bolivars
[23:17] currently exist versus how many are
[23:20] actively being produced? And that gives
[23:22] you this what we call a stock to flow
[23:24] ratio of okay,
[23:27] what's the relative scarcity? For
[23:29] example, if I had 10 Jack bucks and one
[23:32] was being created every single day,
[23:34] that's highly inflationary because we're
[23:36] going from 10 to 11 and 11 to 12. That's
[23:39] really, really inflationary. You're
[23:40] talking about double-digit inflating the
[23:43] core supply versus if I have a billion
[23:46] Jack bucks and I'm creating 0.00001
[23:49] a day, that's far less inflationary. So,
[23:52] Venezuelan bolivars highly, highly
[23:54] inflationary. They create more each each
[23:57] year than actually exists in total. Gold
[24:01] is much better. However, gold is still
[24:05] inflationary. People need to understand
[24:06] this. Gold still inflates about 2% a
[24:08] year. And what I mean by that is 2% new
[24:12] gold is created each year relative to
[24:14] the amount of gold that already exists
[24:16] today. And so, if you run 2% inflation
[24:19] forward, you're actually losing like
[24:20] half of your wealth due to inflation
[24:23] like every 30-40 years, believe it or
[24:25] not. Um
[24:26] so, anyways, the dollar, okay, dollar is
[24:30] better than the Venezuelan bolivar, but
[24:32] much, much worse than gold. And where is
[24:34] Bitcoin? Bitcoin today, because the 21
[24:37] million hasn't been fully issued, is
[24:38] technically inflating at less than 1%
[24:40] cuz there's still a block reward with
[24:42] each Bitcoin block. But if you consider
[24:44] Bitcoin as just the fixed 21 million as
[24:46] if they've all been issued, then
[24:48] Bitcoin's actually the only money with
[24:50] an infinite stock to flow, believe it or
[24:52] not.
[24:53] So, it's interesting to think of like,
[24:54] okay, wow, there's different forms of
[24:56] money and you can measure them different
[24:58] ways. Which one has Which one is more
[25:00] scarce? Which one carries more value
[25:02] across time? Which one's easier to
[25:04] transport across what I'm call space,
[25:06] like from here to London or from here to
[25:08] my grocer, right? Which one is more
[25:10] sellable? And so, throughout human
[25:13] history, there's been two core forms of
[25:16] money or approaches to money. There's
[25:17] been a list, and then what I call a
[25:19] thing. Let me break this down.
[25:22] Really, at the end of the day, as I
[25:23] mentioned, money solves for human
[25:25] memory. Like, if we could just memorize
[25:27] who owes what to whom, we wouldn't need
[25:29] money. But, as I mentioned,
[25:31] we physically and scientifically cannot
[25:34] create social networks and lists in our
[25:37] brains this complex. And so, one
[25:39] approach is to just write it down. I'll
[25:41] say, "Okay,
[25:42] I, Jack, am the king of the town, and I
[25:44] will keep the list
[25:46] that keeps track of who owes what to
[25:48] whom. So, whenever there's a trade, you
[25:50] have to report it to me, and I will
[25:51] enter a new ledger entry, and I'll say,
[25:54] "Okay,
[25:55] Dylan owes Sally this, and Jane owes
[25:58] Jack this, and I will keep track of the
[26:01] list."
[26:02] And then the other option is to have an
[26:03] actual thing. And a thing is like a gold
[26:06] token, or like a seashell.
[26:09] Now, the problem with lists over time
[26:12] is that both sides have to agree that
[26:14] it's right, and you end up needing
[26:16] trust. What if Jack says, "Yeah, you
[26:20] know, I actually don't like Jane that
[26:22] much, and so I know Jane is technically
[26:24] owed a bunch of apples, but I'm going to
[26:26] cross that out out of spite towards
[26:28] Jane." Right? And
[26:30] that is what we live in today, guys.
[26:32] Like, the Federal Reserve and the US
[26:34] government and whoever you believe is
[26:36] ultimately now we're in fiscal
[26:38] dominance, whoever you believe is
[26:39] ultimately controlling the money supply,
[26:41] they're really, at the end of the day,
[26:43] keeping track of who owes what to whom
[26:45] and how much money should exist, uh and
[26:48] that's accounts, like these banks have
[26:49] accounts at the Fed. And that's really
[26:52] how money works today. The other option,
[26:55] if you're like, well, trust has not
[26:57] worked and not scaled throughout human
[26:59] history,
[27:00] you can use a bearer token. You can use
[27:02] a thing like gold. And when you use
[27:04] something like gold, you don't need a
[27:06] list of who owes what to whom, because
[27:08] if I have 10 oz of gold, then it is
[27:11] implied that the world owes me 10 oz of
[27:14] gold worth of stuff.
[27:16] The actual keeping track of who owes
[27:18] what to whom is embedded in the token
[27:20] itself. Hey, I have this amount of gold,
[27:23] so the world owes me this amount of
[27:25] stuff. It's implicit and it's implied.
[27:27] The problem with the thing is that
[27:31] it doesn't scale.
[27:33] Because I cannot Right now, it's very
[27:36] easy to update a list at the Fed or a
[27:38] list at Cash App or a list at JP Morgan
[27:41] Chase. You could do it on your phone via
[27:43] apps. I cannot send gold over the
[27:46] internet. I don't want to carry gold on
[27:50] uh my dinner date this evening. Gold or
[27:53] physical tokens have had a tough time to
[27:55] scale. And what's interesting, I have an
[27:57] arrow here on the slide, is as we've
[27:59] used things to monetize and economize,
[28:02] we've actually ended up needing to
[28:03] create a list of the things, which is
[28:05] what the system we're in today. We were
[28:08] on the gold standard, but gold didn't
[28:10] scale on the internet into 8 billion
[28:12] people. And so then everyone deposited
[28:14] their gold to banks and governments, and
[28:16] governments kept a list of who has what
[28:18] gold, and then they divorced from the
[28:19] gold standard because we trusted them,
[28:21] and they were like, ah, screw this, you
[28:23] know, we're in so much debt, we don't
[28:25] want to do this anymore. And now we just
[28:26] have a trusted list with the US
[28:28] government and the Federal Reserve.
[28:31] And so, each have unique problems. A
[28:33] list has plenty scale,
[28:35] and it can work globally, and you can
[28:37] update a list digitally instantaneously.
[28:40] But the level of trust has failed us. A
[28:42] thing, you don't need to trust. You
[28:44] either have the gold or you don't. But
[28:46] gold hasn't scaled, especially modern
[28:49] day 2026. We've got the internet, an
[28:51] economy of billions of people.
[28:53] So, I close all this out and bring it
[28:55] back to you have to understand money is
[28:58] technology.
[29:00] Okay?
[29:00] There are many of them.
[29:02] Right? There's not one singular way to
[29:04] fly. There's not one singular way uh to
[29:08] go online, right? So,
[29:11] let me make this point.
[29:13] Flight.
[29:15] Technically, I could try and fly with a
[29:18] banana.
[29:19] I could go on my roof right now and jump
[29:21] off
[29:23] and try and fly
[29:25] with a banana. Now,
[29:28] I would have a really poor time. I'd
[29:30] probably hurt myself greatly or die.
[29:32] Because bananas are not good
[29:35] technologies to use for flight.
[29:38] Now, hot air balloons are better than
[29:41] bananas. I would probably not die,
[29:44] hopefully if the hot air balloon worked,
[29:46] but I also would not necessarily get to
[29:49] where I needed to go, at least in a
[29:50] timely manner. Biplanes are better than
[29:53] hot air balloons, and the best way to
[29:56] achieve flight is a jet.
[29:59] Guys, money is the same way, and people
[30:01] don't think of money this way. They
[30:02] don't think of it as a technology where
[30:05] there's many different options, and
[30:07] depending on what they're trying to
[30:08] solve for and what they want to do, they
[30:09] can elect whichever money techno-
[30:11] technology is better for them. So, for
[30:14] example, seashells. I would say
[30:15] seashells today are more like a banana.
[30:18] If you want to store your savings in
[30:19] seashells, you can. Think you're going
[30:21] to have a really bad time and you're
[30:23] going to be poor really, really fast. I
[30:25] would say paper money is more like hot
[30:26] air balloon. Yeah, sure, technically
[30:29] possible, but are you going to get to
[30:31] where you want to go? Are you going to
[30:32] end up being able to build savings, own
[30:34] a home, beat inflation? No, definitely
[30:38] not.
[30:39] Gold is probably like a biplane. It's
[30:41] the analog version. Like, okay, at one
[30:44] point in time, this was the bee's knees,
[30:46] but we're in 2026, and gold doesn't
[30:49] really scale. The biplane's not going to
[30:51] get me to
[30:53] California to visit my parents anytime
[30:55] soon. And Bitcoin is like the jet. It's
[30:59] the modern-day engineered version to
[31:01] scale to society as we know it today, at
[31:04] least in my opinion. But, you have to
[31:06] understand that money is a technology,
[31:07] and you can choose whatever money you
[31:09] want. Yes,
[31:10] governments make you pay taxes in their
[31:12] currency, and so they are forcing you in
[31:15] some way to adopt their money literally
[31:17] by force, literally via violence. Like,
[31:20] if you don't pay your taxes, and you
[31:22] don't use our money, we will lock you in
[31:23] a box for the rest of your life, which
[31:25] is very unfortunate, and I disagree
[31:27] with. But, nonetheless, you don't have
[31:29] to use their money all the time. You
[31:30] could use seashells if you want. You
[31:32] could use gold if you want. You could
[31:33] use Bitcoin to save money if you want.
[31:36] And just some fun history, um in New
[31:39] England in the mid-1600s, did you guys
[31:41] know that clams were actually legal
[31:44] tender?
[31:46] So, believe it or not, and and I I'm
[31:49] just giving you this context because
[31:50] people are like, "Wait, the dollar
[31:53] hasn't been money forever?" It's like,
[31:55] no, the dollar's actually younger than
[31:56] the internet. Money is an ancient
[31:59] technology to scale human cooperation.
[32:04] I'm going to say that again. Money is a
[32:06] technology as old as everything else
[32:09] that you use in your life, at least,
[32:12] to ensure that we cooperate at scale.
[32:16] So, yes, in the 1600s, clams were legal
[32:20] tender. By the way, issuing money from a
[32:23] central party actually started before
[32:25] there was government as we know it
[32:26] today. It started from kings.
[32:28] So, kings did it as a way to better
[32:31] collect taxes, and it's actually from
[32:33] that point in Lydia that
[32:36] it it it built this idea that one party,
[32:39] the dominant party, the kings of of the
[32:41] town, and now the government, the the
[32:44] the you know, US government, uh decided
[32:47] how much currency there should be.
[32:50] But this is thousands and thousands and
[32:53] thousands and thousands of years old.
[32:55] And there's many many many many moneys,
[32:57] and money solves a very particular
[33:00] problem. Very specific properties. And
[33:03] you get to choose which one you want to
[33:06] use. And so then I pose the question
[33:08] back to you guys, and this is how I live
[33:09] my life, of well, which money do you
[33:11] want?
[33:12] Based on the problem it's supposed to
[33:15] solve, it well, it needs to be able to
[33:16] travel through space. I need to be able
[33:18] to send it from point A to point B. It
[33:19] needs to be saleable. It needs to be
[33:21] liquid. It also needs to travel through
[33:23] time. I don't want my value being
[33:25] inflated away. I don't want to have a
[33:28] money that anybody can print. I want my
[33:29] money to be scarce. It needs to be easy
[33:31] for me to accept. I need to be able to
[33:33] really easily know the difference
[33:35] between fake gold and real gold, fake
[33:37] Bitcoin and real Bitcoin. And then you
[33:39] choose which technology suits your
[33:41] needs. So if I pull up gold, fiat, and
[33:44] Bitcoin here on the screen,
[33:45] and these are the properties of money
[33:47] that has have historically solved
[33:50] society's problems and made it good.
[33:53] We've got durability, divisibility,
[33:55] fungibility, portability,
[33:57] verify-ability, scarcity, and its track
[34:00] rec- record, which implies some version
[34:02] of trust.
[34:03] Gold historically has been very durable,
[34:05] but not divisible. It's been very
[34:07] fungible, but not portable. Not easy to
[34:10] verify. But it is scarce and has a track
[34:12] record of a very long time.
[34:15] Fiat currency,
[34:16] now fiat exists in large part to solve
[34:19] for where gold failed us.
[34:21] Fiat is not durable.
[34:23] It is very divisible, though. It is not
[34:26] fungible. But it is very portable.
[34:28] It is verify- or is is verifiable, it is
[34:31] not scarce, and it does not have nearly
[34:34] as long a track record.
[34:36] But, where gold failed predominantly in
[34:39] divisibility and uh portability, fiat is
[34:44] very divisible and very easy to move,
[34:46] right? You You just make an API call, or
[34:49] you get on your phone, you click a
[34:50] button, and people can update lists, but
[34:53] you got to trust them, and they can
[34:55] issue more currency and inflate your
[34:57] world away. Now, you go to Bitcoin, and
[34:59] Bitcoin actually achieves everything,
[35:01] except you can make an argument that it
[35:02] doesn't have the track record that gold
[35:04] has, right? Cuz Bitcoin hasn't been
[35:05] around as long as gold has. So, you can
[35:07] make the argument that Bitcoin is still
[35:08] the new kid on the block. But,
[35:10] everything else, Bitcoin is durable,
[35:11] divisible, fungible, portable,
[35:13] verifiable, and scarce. And these are
[35:15] actually the reasons that I choose
[35:17] Bitcoin for my money. Like, where are my
[35:19] life savings? My life savings are in
[35:21] Bitcoin, and people say, "Yeah, but when
[35:22] you go to Whole Foods, you don't use
[35:23] Bitcoin to exchange."
[35:25] Who cares? Sure. Okay, fine. You're
[35:27] right. Like, I use a credit card. So, I
[35:30] actually am able to use fiat without
[35:32] having to own it. And then, I either
[35:34] sell a little bit of Bitcoin to pay off
[35:36] my credit card bill, or I borrow against
[35:37] my Bitcoin. But, the money I elect to
[35:40] use for all of these properties, and in
[35:43] order for me to exchange and live my
[35:44] life and grow value and collaborate with
[35:46] society, Bitcoin's the best money for
[35:48] me. It It solves all the problems that
[35:50] money is supposed to solve. I don't just
[35:52] do what a bank tells me to do. I don't
[35:54] just do what the government says.
[35:56] And so, actually, if I go back to this
[35:57] idea of historically, we've had lists,
[36:00] or we've had objects, things, right? A
[36:03] list could be thought of as like the
[36:04] ledger at the Fed, and an object could
[36:06] be thought of as gold. Fascinatingly,
[36:09] Bitcoin, and what Satoshi invented, is
[36:11] actually both at the same time.
[36:14] And it's because
[36:16] the blockchain, so if you guys think,
[36:17] "Oh, yeah, the Bitcoin blockchain." The
[36:19] blockchain is just a giant list, right?
[36:21] It's a giant list of who owes what to
[36:23] whom. So, we we can all transparently
[36:26] see
[36:27] which public keys can spend which
[36:29] Bitcoins by providing a signature with
[36:31] their private keys. This is at the time
[36:33] for me, this was like a huge aha moment.
[36:35] I was like, "Oh, I totally get it now."
[36:38] Bitcoin's a giant list, but it's also an
[36:40] object in that the information itself,
[36:43] the list itself, like having a private
[36:45] key itself, behaves like a bearer
[36:48] instrument. Like I can literally hand
[36:51] someone Bitcoins by handing them my
[36:54] hardware wallet or my keys.
[36:56] So, it's actually both. What Satoshi
[36:58] solved for is turning information
[37:02] into a bearer instrument. So, it behaves
[37:05] like both. It's fascinating. And Bitcoin
[37:08] is the first money that has made a
[37:11] physical object out of a list
[37:13] or created a physical object that is a
[37:16] list. It depends how you want to think
[37:18] about it, but they're both true.
[37:19] And that's what actually allows Bitcoin
[37:22] to achieve monetary properties that no
[37:26] other money has. This is the core
[37:28] innovation, and this is why it's this
[37:30] public, auditable, transparent ledger.
[37:34] And because it's a ledger, I mean, you
[37:35] can update the ledger from anywhere in
[37:37] the world. Doesn't matter who you are,
[37:39] where you are, you can do it. And and
[37:41] obviously with things like lightning,
[37:42] instantaneously, it's easy to receive
[37:44] and verify, and
[37:46] it's free to store. Like if I needed to
[37:48] store a lot of gold, that sounds very
[37:50] expensive.
[37:52] Bitcoin's very easy, 12 words in your
[37:54] brain. Um so, fascinating.
[37:57] So, anyway, I hope this was very
[37:58] valuable. Thank you guys for tuning in
[38:00] and listening. Let me know what other
[38:01] Bitcoin 101, either direct or adjacent
[38:04] topics, you'd want to hear next. And
[38:06] with that, I'll catch you guys in the
[38:08] comments. Peace and love. Take care.

← Back to videos list

Scroll to Top