Jack Mallers

Lesson 5: Bitcoin vs. Altcoins

Complete 1:13:46 min youtube 2026 Week 41 Oct 08, 2026 🇬🇧 EN
Research summary

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7OdYwJGGIw  |  Duration: 73 min


◆ The Job Money Must Do

The concept of the Jobs To Be Done framework is applied to finance. People "hire" money and assets to perform specific tasks in their lives, not just for profit. A study on milkshakes showed that commuters needed a sustained, hand-occupying snack during a long drive—their true competition was functional (bagels/bananas), not merely product-based (other milkshakes). Understanding this underlying need is key to evaluating any financial asset.

▶ Currency Debasement and Speculation

Modern fiat currency printing causes currency debasement, which forces individuals into a speculative environment. Simple saving becomes insufficient because inflation constantly erodes value. To preserve earnings from labor, people must take risks on the "risk curve," ranging from baseline savings up through bonds, stocks, altcoins, and gambling. Society's fundamental need is not profit-seeking investment but rather retaining purchasing power. The proliferation of speculative options reflects a broken monetary system where everyone becomes an involuntary speculator just trying to survive economically.

★ Bitcoin as True Money

Bitcoin solves historical problems inherent in fiat currency, specifically seigniorage, the Cantillon effect, and counterparty risk. Unlike government-issued money, Bitcoin has a hardcoded supply limit of 21 million coins and requires no trust in any central authority. It combines the scarcity properties of gold with the efficient global transportability of digital notes. Critically, Bitcoin does not compete with other cryptocurrencies; it competes in the massive $400 to $500 trillion market for storing collective human value (like real estate or equities), positioning it as a foundational monetary innovation.

► Decentralization vs. Corporate Structure

The distinction between decentralized money and corporate tokens is fundamental:

  • Who Controls Bitcoin? Bitcoin is not controlled by developers or large companies due to its decentralized nature. Control rests with the global network of nodes, which maintain control by rejecting blocks that violate established rules (like changing the 21 million cap). This open participation makes Bitcoin resistant to outside influence and allows holding it to be viewed as saving money under a monetary policy nobody can unilaterally change.
  • Why Altcoins Look Like Companies: Most altcoins utilize a premine structure, where founders receive initial allocations alongside funds for early investors and company treasuries before public sale. This distribution model mirrors traditional companies using founder equity and investor shares. Because these tokens involve special rights and control held by leadership, they are structurally more akin to companies than neutral currency.
⚠️ Critical Risk Alert: Centralized Control in Altcoins

The discussion details the critique of projects like Ethereum’s presale, where funds are raised by printing tokens at a fixed rate. This centralized approach allows founders to make decisions and spend buyer money before the sale concludes, contrasting sharply with Bitcoin's immutable hard cap. Many altcoins operate similarly to traditional finance, leading to market crashes and rug pulls, requiring investors to trust project foundations or founders who may change the rules.

★ Found vs. Founded: The Nature of Value

The speaker argues that Bitcoin was discovered or found (like fire), not founded by a single individual. Discoveries are public utilities and do not carry counterparty risk tied to an inventor's intent. In contrast, altcoins are often "founded" companies with clear CEOs and business strategies. The reliance of many projects on their own proprietary tokens often serves to profit the issuer through controlled monetary supply, functioning as disguised central banks.

◆ Stability vs. Features: The Trade-Off

Bitcoin prioritizes stability and unchanging rules for saving. Altcoins, conversely, are feature-rich and constantly evolve like companies. While Proof of Work operates within existing laws of physics, Proof of Stake allows developers to create simulated universes with custom rules, often leading to centralized control similar to fiat systems. Altcoins frequently compromise reliability and security for features, resulting in frequent crashes or exploitable smart contract bugs. Bitcoin maintains its hard money status by keeping complex functions on separate Layer 2 solutions rather than compromising the core consensus layer.

▶ The Case for Bitcoin's Uniqueness

Bitcoin’s value is rooted in its network effects and established trust, which cannot be copied merely by replicating open-source code. It operates as rules without rulers—it possesses no central issuer, treasury, roadmap, or operator. Its proof of work mechanism ensures that ownership requires real-world effort, distinguishing it from equity held by founders. Bitcoin has consistently outperformed professional hedge funds and Wall Street traders over time because it functions as money on a stable risk curve.

💡 Investment Philosophy Recommendations

  • Focus on Function, Not Features: Apply the Jobs To Be Done framework to any asset. Ask what fundamental economic job your money is hired to perform (e.g., store value, facilitate exchange).
  • Prioritize Stability Over Novelty: Recognize that feature-rich altcoins often compromise security and reliability for innovation; prioritize assets built on unchanging, decentralized rules.
  • Evaluate Control Mechanisms: Scrutinize who controls the monetary supply. Assets with a hardcoded limit and decentralized validation (like Bitcoin) offer superior protection against centralized risk compared to projects reliant on founder control or token printing.

◆ Search for the alpha

The core thesis driving capital allocation here is a fundamental rejection of speculative growth in favor of monetary stability. The guest views modern finance as broken because fiat currency forces individuals into involuntary speculation simply to retain purchasing power. Therefore, optimal capital deployment must target assets that function purely as hard money—solving historical problems like seigniorage and inflation—rather than tokens designed for corporate utility or feature expansion.

  • Avoidance: Altcoins should be viewed structurally as companies (with founders, treasuries, and premine allocations) rather than neutral currency. Capital allocated here is primarily betting on a business plan, not preserving value.
  • Best Expression of Theme: Bitcoin's primary function is defined by its hardcoded scarcity (21 million cap), making it a foundational monetary innovation that competes in the trillion-dollar store-of-value market, not merely against other crypto projects.
  • Capital Rotation Focus: Shift focus from feature-rich, evolving tokens to decentralized systems whose rules are immutable and resistant to unilateral change by developers or founders.
  • Regime Change Catalyst: The ongoing debasement of fiat currency is the primary catalyst forcing capital into risk curves; this systemic failure validates the need for hard money alternatives like Bitcoin.
The twist: The guest is not merely arguing that Bitcoin is "better," but rather that most altcoins are structurally compromised as financial instruments. By treating them like companies, they introduce counterparty risk and centralized control—risks fundamentally absent in Bitcoin's decentralized monetary design.

► Chapter Summaries

Bitcoin vs. Altcoins (0:00)

The chapter addresses the confusion caused by the sheer number of cryptocurrencies that appear similar in financial applications. The host argues there is a fundamental difference between Bitcoin and all other digital assets, which are collectively referred to as altcoins. He asserts that Bitcoin occupies a categorically separate category from things like NFTs, ICOs, equity investments, or precious metals. This distinction holds true at the base fundamental level of these technologies. However, the speaker cautions that this separation does not automatically mean Bitcoin is definitively better than any other asset. Ultimately, the suitability of an investment depends entirely on what the individual wants to achieve.

What Job Are You Hiring Your Money to Do? (3:10)

The Jobs To Be Done framework posits that customers hire products to perform specific tasks in their lives. A study on fast food milkshakes demonstrated that focusing solely on improving product features like flavor failed to increase sales. Researchers discovered that many morning buyers were commuters needing something to occupy their hands and provide sustained energy during a long drive. Their true competition was not other milkshakes, but various items like bagels or bananas that fulfilled this same functional job. By understanding the underlying need—a long-lasting, hand-occupying snack for the commute—the restaurant found a solution. They made thinner straws, which allowed the milkshake to last longer and successfully perform the desired job in the customer's mind.

How Broken Money Turns Everyone Into a Speculator (9:34)

Currency debasement caused by fiat money printing forces individuals into a speculative environment where simple saving is insufficient to retain value. Because currency constantly inflates, people must take risks on the "risk curve" just to preserve what they earn from their labor. This risk spectrum ranges from baseline savings up through bonds, stocks, altcoins, and gambling. Modern financial apps combine all these activities because society's fundamental need is not profit-seeking investment but rather retaining purchasing power. Many people are forced to bet or speculate simply to afford basic necessities like housing or education. The proliferation of speculative options reflects a broken monetary system where everyone becomes an involuntary speculator just trying to survive economically.

The Case for Bitcoin as Money (16:56)

Bitcoin is presented as true money because it solves the historical problems inherent in fiat currency: seigniorage, Cantillon effect, and counterparty risk. Unlike government-issued money, Bitcoin has a hardcoded supply limit of 21 million coins and functions without requiring trust in any central authority. It combines the scarcity properties of gold with the efficient global transportability of digital notes. Bitcoin does not compete with other cryptocurrencies but competes in the massive $400 to $500 trillion market for storing collective human value, such as gold, real estate, and equities. Its potential size is projected to exceed that of all the world's largest companies combined, positioning it as a foundational monetary innovation.

Who Controls Bitcoin? (30:01)

Bitcoin is not controlled by developers or large companies because its decentralized nature allows anyone to participate in validation. While code changes can be submitted, they only take effect if the global network of nodes accepts them, which they will not do for invalid proposals. The community running nodes maintains control by rejecting blocks that violate established rules, such as changing the 21 million cap. Bitcoin developers intentionally keep node requirements simple so that anyone in the world can participate and validate transactions. This open participation is what makes Bitcoin truly decentralized and resistant to outside influence. Consequently, holding Bitcoin is viewed as saving money under a monetary policy nobody can unilaterally change.

Why Altcoins Look Like Companies (33:42)

Altcoins are structurally more akin to companies than they are to money, despite their utility pitches resembling corporate slogans. Unlike Bitcoin, which is fully decentralized with all coins earned through mining under the same rules, most altcoins utilize a premine structure. This involves founders receiving initial allocations, alongside funds for early investors and company treasuries before public sale. This distribution model mirrors how traditional companies operate using founder equity, investor shares, and reserved corporate funds. Therefore, while building companies is acceptable, treating these token structures as neutral currency is misleading. The core issue lies in the fact that altcoins involve special rights and control held by leadership, which fundamentally differentiates them from decentralized money.

Found vs. Founded (39:46)

The speaker argues that Bitcoin was discovered or found, similar to fire or corn, rather than founded by a single individual. Discoveries are public utilities and do not carry counterparty risk tied to an inventor's intent. In contrast, altcoins and other projects are often "founded" companies with clear CEOs and business strategies, much like Amazon. The speaker questions why decentralized projects need their own proprietary tokens if they could simply use Bitcoin as currency. Many tokens function as disguised central banks because the person who can print the money is the primary beneficiary. This reliance on a project's own token often serves to profit the issuer through controlled monetary supply.

Inside Ethereum’s Presale (44:53)

The chapter details an experience with Ethereum’s presale, highlighting how the project raised funds by printing tokens at a fixed rate, which contrasts sharply with Bitcoin's immutable hard cap. The speaker critiques this model, noting that Ethereum functioned as a company needing capital, whereas Bitcoin is a decentralized system set in stone. This centralized approach allows founders to make decisions and spend buyer money before the sale concludes. Furthermore, the discussion warns that many altcoins operate similarly to traditional finance, where insiders and venture capitalists benefit from printing more tokens. This practice often leads to market crashes and rug pulls, requiring investors to trust the project's foundation or founders who may change the rules. Ultimately, the core difference is between Bitcoin’s trustless, decentralized nature and the corporate structure of most altcoins.

More Features, More Trade-Offs (52:18)

Bitcoin prioritizes stability and unchanging rules for saving, contrasting with feature-rich altcoins that constantly evolve like companies. The proliferation of specialized tokens risks recreating infinite inflation by creating a coin for every service, unlike corporate equity. Proof of Work operates within the existing laws of physics, while Proof of Stake allows developers to create simulated universes with custom rules, often leading to centralized control similar to fiat systems. Altcoins frequently compromise reliability and security for features, resulting in frequent crashes or exploitable smart contract bugs. Bitcoin maintains its hard money status by keeping complex functions on separate Layer 2 solutions rather than compromising the core consensus layer. The speaker argues that much of the altcoin hype is merely a justification used to promote business interests or inflate tokens.

Can Someone Build a Better Bitcoin? (66:19)

Bitcoin's value is rooted in its network effects and established trust, which cannot be copied simply by replicating its open-source code. Unlike companies or tokens, Bitcoin operates as rules without rulers, possessing no central issuer, treasury, roadmap, or operator. Its proof of work mechanism ensures that ownership requires real-world effort, distinguishing it from equity held by founders or investors. The speaker highlights Bitcoin's consistent long-term performance, which has outperformed professional hedge funds and Wall Street traders over time. While other assets are useful, Bitcoin is fundamentally different because it functions as money on a stable risk curve, unlike speculative altcoins or gambling.

Full transcript
[0:00] Yo, what is going on you guys? How are
[0:04] you? I hope you're well. Welcome back to
[0:06] another episode of the Jack Mer Show. I
[0:09] am your host Jack and you are listening
[0:10] to yet another edition of Bitcoin 101,
[0:14] our Bitcoin educational series where we
[0:17] take really big, really complex, really
[0:20] technical Bitcoin and Bitcoin related
[0:22] topics and we break them down for the
[0:25] everyday individual. Today's episode,
[0:28] Bitcoin versus altcoins.
[0:32] Is there a difference between Bitcoin
[0:33] and all of these other cryptocurrencies?
[0:36] If there is, then what is it? When I
[0:39] download a finance app nowadays and I
[0:40] open my phone and I see Bitcoin sit next
[0:43] to 30,000 different things, how am I
[0:46] supposed to think about the differences?
[0:48] I got your back, you guys. There's been
[0:51] a lot of content and debate and
[0:54] discussion about this topic, but I come
[0:56] in peace. I come with neutrality, and I
[0:59] come to dumb it all down and make it
[1:01] approachable, humanizable, and easy to
[1:05] understand. This is a show by the common
[1:08] man, for the common man. So, without
[1:10] further ado, sit down, get comfortable,
[1:13] stay a while, cuz we're about to get our
[1:16] education on Bitcoin 101, lesson five,
[1:20] Bitcoin verse altcoins. Okay, as I
[1:23] mentioned, if you download an app
[1:25] nowadays,
[1:27] there's a very high chance it looks
[1:29] something like this. You got Bitcoin,
[1:31] you got Ethereum, Salana, stable coins,
[1:34] sports betting, meme coins, betting on
[1:36] the weather, election outcomes. All of
[1:39] these things look the same. They all
[1:40] have a buy or an invest button sitting
[1:42] next to it. And you know, deep down
[1:45] somewhere you're like, well, I know
[1:47] betting on the weather and Bitcoin
[1:49] surely are different, right? But then
[1:52] what's the difference between betting on
[1:54] the weather and Ethereum or Ethereum and
[1:58] Bitcoin? And then stable coins come in
[2:00] here somewhere and now you've got
[2:01] prediction markets. But I haven't even
[2:03] understood this whole blockchain thing
[2:05] yet. I know and I got your back. And I'm
[2:08] here to tell you that there is Bitcoin
[2:12] and then there is everything else.
[2:14] Bitcoin is categorically different than
[2:18] everything else than altcoins and ICOs
[2:21] and NFTts than equity in a business than
[2:23] a precious metal than a real estate
[2:25] investment. There is Bitcoin and there
[2:27] is everything else. This comes from
[2:30] yours truly. This is a quote I said on
[2:32] CNBC right after FTX got hacked and Sam
[2:36] Bankman Freed went to jail. I guess they
[2:38] didn't get hacked. Uh they collapsed and
[2:40] Sam Bengman Freed uh went to jail. Uh
[2:43] and so this is a foreshadowing of this
[2:46] presentation. Listen, this does not make
[2:49] Bitcoin definitively better. Okay, as
[2:52] we'll get into in a second, it depends
[2:53] what you want and it depends what you
[2:55] want to do. However,
[2:58] at a base fundamental fundamental level,
[3:01] it is true that there is Bitcoin and
[3:04] then everything else sits in a entirely
[3:08] separate category and serves an entirely
[3:10] separate purpose. So, with that being
[3:13] said, here's what we're going to do for
[3:15] this episode. This is Professor Clayton
[3:18] Christensen, Clayton Christensen, excuse
[3:20] me, of Harvard Business School. This
[3:23] video is only 4 and 1/2 minutes. I know
[3:26] I don't usually embed YouTube videos
[3:28] into my own presentations, but this is a
[3:31] special episode and this is a special
[3:33] concept to understand
[3:35] tools that are in the market and why
[3:38] people hire tools to do things for them.
[3:43] And you're thinking, hire tools to do
[3:44] things for them? I don't hire water.
[3:47] Hold on. Pause right there and give me 4
[3:50] and 1/2 minutes of your undivided
[3:52] attention to listen to Professor Clayton
[3:54] Christensen of the Harvard Business
[3:56] School because I'm going to use this
[3:59] mental model to delineate between
[4:01] Bitcoin and everything else.
[4:08] We decided that the way we teach
[4:10] marketing is at the core of what makes
[4:13] motivation difficult to achieve. The
[4:16] most helpful way we've thought of it so
[4:18] far is that we actually hire products to
[4:22] do things for us. And understanding what
[4:26] job we have to do in our lives for which
[4:29] we would hire a product is really the
[4:31] key to cracking this problem of
[4:34] motivating customers to buy what we're
[4:36] offering. So I wanted just to tell you a
[4:39] story about a project we did for one of
[4:41] the big fast food restaurants.
[4:44] They were trying to goose up the sales
[4:46] of their milkshakes. They had just
[4:48] studied this problem up the gazoo. They
[4:50] brought in customers who fit the profile
[4:52] of the quintessential milkshake consumer
[4:55] and they'd give them samples and ask,
[4:57] "Could you tell us how we can improve
[4:59] our milkshake so you'd buy more of them?
[5:01] Do you want it chocolatier, cheaper,
[5:03] chunkier, chewier?" They get very clear
[5:06] feedback. They would then improve the
[5:07] milkshake on those dimensions and it had
[5:09] no impact on sales or profits
[5:11] whatsoever.
[5:13] So one of our colleagues went in with a
[5:15] different question on his mind and that
[5:18] was I wonder what job arises in people's
[5:22] lives that caused them to come to this
[5:24] restaurant to hire a milkshake.
[5:27] So we stood in a restaurant for 18 hours
[5:30] one day and just took very careful data.
[5:32] What time did they buy these milkshakes?
[5:34] What were they wearing? Were they alone?
[5:37] Did they buy other food with it? Did
[5:38] they eat it in the restaurant or drive
[5:40] off with it? It turned out that nearly
[5:43] half of the milkshakes were sold before
[5:45] 8:00 in the morning. The people who
[5:47] bought them were always alone. It was
[5:49] the only thing they bought and they all
[5:51] got in the car and drove off with it. So
[5:54] to figure out what job they were trying
[5:56] to hire it to do, we came back the next
[5:59] day and stood outside the restaurant so
[6:01] we could confront these folks as they
[6:03] left milkshake in hand. and in language
[6:06] that they could understand. We
[6:07] essentially asked, "Excuse me, please,
[6:10] but I got to sort this puzzle out. What
[6:12] job were you trying to do for yourself
[6:14] that caused you to come here and hire
[6:15] that milkshake?" And they'd struggle to
[6:18] answer. So, we'd then help them by
[6:20] asking other questions like, "Well,
[6:22] think about the last time you were in
[6:24] the same situation needing to get the
[6:27] same job done, but you didn't come here
[6:28] to hire a milkshake. What did you hire?"
[6:32] And then as we put all of their answers
[6:34] together, it became clear that they all
[6:36] had the same job to do in the morning.
[6:38] And that is they had a long and boring
[6:41] drive to work. And they just needed
[6:43] something to do while they drove to keep
[6:45] the commute interesting. One hand had to
[6:47] be on the wheel, but somebody had given
[6:49] them another hand. And there wasn't
[6:50] anything in it. And they just needed
[6:53] something to do while they drove.
[6:56] They weren't hungry yet, but they knew
[6:57] they'd be hungry by 10:00. So, they also
[7:00] wanted something that would just go down
[7:02] there and stay safe for that morning.
[7:04] Good question. What do I hire when I do
[7:06] this job? You know, I've never framed
[7:08] the question that way before, but last
[7:10] Friday, I hired a banana to do the job.
[7:13] Take my word for it. Never hire bananas.
[7:16] They're gone in 3 minutes. You're hungry
[7:18] by 7:30.
[7:20] If you promise not to tell my wife, I
[7:22] probably hire donuts twice a week. But
[7:24] they don't do it well either. They're
[7:26] gone fast. They crumb all over my
[7:28] clothes. They get my fingers gooey.
[7:30] Sometimes I hire bagels, but as you
[7:32] know, they're so dry and tasteless. Then
[7:35] I have to steer the car with my knees
[7:36] while I'm putting jam on them, and then
[7:38] if the phone rings, we got a crisis.
[7:41] I remember I hired a Snickers bar once,
[7:43] but h I felt so guilty. I've never hired
[7:46] Snickers again.
[7:48] Let me tell you, when I come here and
[7:50] hire this milkshake, it is so viscous
[7:54] that it easily takes me 20 minutes to
[7:56] suck it up, that thin little straw. Who
[7:59] cares what the ingredients are? I don't.
[8:01] All I know is I'm full all morning and
[8:03] it fits right here in my cup holder.
[8:06] Well, it turns out that the milkshake
[8:08] does the job better than any of the
[8:10] compet competitors, which in the
[8:12] customer's minds are not Burger King
[8:15] milkshakes, but it's bananas, donuts,
[8:17] bagels, Snickers bars, coffee, and so
[8:20] on. But I hope you can see how if you
[8:23] understand the job, how to improve the
[8:26] product becomes just obvious.
[8:31] >> Fascinating, right? I love love love
[8:35] Clayton Christensen's jobs to be done
[8:39] when if you think about products and
[8:41] things in the market as if you're hiring
[8:43] them to perform something for you. And
[8:46] what him and his team realized at a
[8:48] popular fast food restaurant is that a
[8:51] lot of milkshake sales are actually in
[8:52] the morning and milkshakes aren't
[8:54] necessarily competing against other
[8:56] milkshakes. These milkshakes are
[8:58] competing against a bagel for breakfast,
[9:01] a banana for breakfast, and all the
[9:03] things that you can eat or consume
[9:06] that'll keep you full until lunch with
[9:08] one hand on your drive and commute to
[9:11] work. So instead of making a bunch of
[9:15] different flavors, they did things like
[9:18] make the straws thinner so that it took
[9:20] you longer to suck the milkshake through
[9:22] the tiny little straw. that increased
[9:24] sales because the milkshake lasted
[9:26] longer through the drive and the commute
[9:28] to work. Now, why did I just give you
[9:31] guys this basic concept of jobs to be
[9:34] done by a Harvard professor? Well,
[9:39] I want us to ask what are we hiring
[9:42] these things to do? Start from the
[9:44] premise that for some reason all of
[9:47] these financial apps have all of these
[9:50] things on the same screens. Bitcoin,
[9:54] altcoins, prediction markets, equities
[9:57] and businesses like stocks, betting on
[10:00] the weather, betting on sports, betting
[10:02] on elections. What are we hiring these
[10:06] things to do?
[10:08] And I'm here to tell you that this is
[10:10] all a result of currency debasement, of
[10:15] fiat, of money printing. Because
[10:18] historically,
[10:20] humans just create value at their work.
[10:23] You get up and you do a particular
[10:25] service that's producing value for
[10:27] someone else. Whether you're fixing
[10:29] someone's wheel windshield, you're a
[10:31] grosser, you're a business owner, you're
[10:34] a social media influencer, whatever it
[10:36] is, you're producing value. And we use
[10:38] money to store that value and save that
[10:40] value. When the money is broken and when
[10:44] your currency is constantly getting
[10:45] debased and everything around you is
[10:47] constantly inflating, saving is not
[10:50] enough. You cannot just work hard, earn
[10:53] money, and save it. You must work hard,
[10:55] earn money, and then speculate and
[10:57] figure out, okay, I've created value.
[10:59] But unfortunately, that's not my full
[11:02] job as a member of this society, of this
[11:04] broken fiat monetary society. Once I've
[11:07] created value, I now have to find a way
[11:09] to persist and save that value because I
[11:11] can't just store it in fiat because
[11:13] it'll evaporate and be debased away and
[11:15] everything around me will be inflated to
[11:17] death. And so this what you're looking
[11:19] at is called a risk curve where everyone
[11:23] is a speculator whether they know it or
[11:26] not. When you guys go to family
[11:28] Thanksgiving and and Christmas and
[11:30] holidays this year and you look at your
[11:32] aunt, your uncle, your grandma, your
[11:34] grandpa and you say, "You're a
[11:36] speculator." And they say, "No, I'm not.
[11:38] I don't have any of those apps." And you
[11:40] say, "No, you don't understand. Yes, you
[11:41] are. Just by being in today's economy
[11:44] with fiat currencies being actively
[11:46] printed and debased and things around
[11:48] you being inflated, whether you know it
[11:49] or not, you're a speculator because you
[11:51] cannot simply save in the money that we
[11:53] use. you have to own something else if
[11:56] you want to afford a life worth living.
[11:58] And so what happens when money is broken
[12:01] is people are pushed out into what's
[12:04] called the risk curve. Okay? So if I go
[12:06] a slide advanced, money is supposed to
[12:09] be trusting nobody. You're not
[12:12] investing. You're not betting on a
[12:14] product. You're not betting on a team.
[12:16] You're not betting on a vision. You're
[12:18] not doing any of that. You don't care
[12:20] about the weather, the election outcome,
[12:22] uh what products they launched,
[12:24] quarterly earnings, uh what the uh what
[12:28] the president said, what wars, you don't
[12:31] want to take risk. You want to save.
[12:34] That is at a baseline. That is no risk.
[12:36] So you see this risk curve at the very
[12:38] bottom of the curve where there where
[12:41] it's flat is money. Money is supposed to
[12:44] be and intended to be riskless. It's
[12:46] called saving. You've already produced
[12:48] the value. Nowadays, one of the broken
[12:50] parts about society is because half of
[12:52] our lives were spent working and the
[12:54] other half were spent trying to find a
[12:57] way to save.
[12:58] Imagine if society didn't have to spend
[13:01] 50% of their time picking stocks, uh,
[13:05] betting on sports, predicting election
[13:07] outcomes, and they could just do a good
[13:08] job, raise good families, and enjoy
[13:11] their life. Right now, unfortunately,
[13:13] that's not the world we're living in
[13:15] because our money is broken. So, then
[13:16] you can go up the risk curve. Then
[13:18] you've got bonds, which is you trusting
[13:20] in the government. People consider that
[13:22] fairly risk-free, but as we've learned,
[13:24] bonds in a terrible bare market. Then
[13:26] you go up. If you need more returns, you
[13:28] need more risk. And you get stocks.
[13:30] Stocks, you have a relationship with a
[13:32] regulated company. Altcoins, as I'll get
[13:34] into a second, is a relationship with
[13:36] arguably an unregulated company. And
[13:39] then you get into things like gambling,
[13:40] where what's the difference between
[13:41] betting on sports and just bet putting
[13:43] it all on red at a Las Vegas casino?
[13:46] really not that much and at the end of
[13:48] the day you have a relationship what is
[13:50] called the house and so I'm here to tell
[13:53] you that the reason all of these things
[13:55] are on the same screen this is a
[13:57] function of modern-day money printing of
[14:00] fiat currency because unfortunately
[14:02] Bitcoin is coupled with all of the other
[14:05] things that people are forced to
[14:07] speculate on as a way to try and save
[14:10] and so how could you possibly put
[14:12] Bitcoin on the same screen or in the
[14:14] same app as betting on the weather.
[14:17] Well, because you have a population of
[14:20] human beings that are somewhere here
[14:22] along this risk curve just trying to
[14:26] save the value that they've already
[14:27] created so that they could own a home
[14:29] one day, so that they could put their
[14:31] kid through school, so that they could
[14:32] finance a medical emergency surgery, so
[14:35] that they can go on vacation, so that
[14:37] they don't have to take two jobs, they
[14:39] don't have to take that extra shift.
[14:41] That's why that's why people say, "I
[14:44] don't really know the difference between
[14:44] Litecoin and Bitcoin." Well, there is a
[14:47] difference and I'm about to explain it,
[14:49] but you have to understand what is
[14:51] society hiring these things to do.
[14:53] Society just wants to grow in their
[14:55] purchasing power, repa retain purchasing
[14:58] power. They just want to save. They just
[15:00] want to be able to afford things.
[15:02] Understand? Just some data to prove my
[15:05] point. This is American gambling since
[15:09] 2018. So, it hasn't even been a decade.
[15:12] And the industry, this is sports, by the
[15:14] way, not overall gambling, just gambling
[15:16] on sports. The industry has grown from
[15:18] $6 billion in 2018 to $166 billion in
[15:24] 2025. Exponential growth in gambling.
[15:28] Okay. If you take a look even more at
[15:30] further data, over 50% 52% of men 18 to
[15:34] 49 have an active sportsbook betting
[15:37] account. 52% of Gen Z investors moved
[15:41] their investing money again, investing
[15:44] money, money that they just want to
[15:45] save. They just want to persist into the
[15:47] future. They just want to retain in
[15:49] purchasing power. They just want to get
[15:51] closer to owning a home. They want to
[15:52] get closer to owning a car. They want to
[15:54] get closer to paying off their student
[15:55] debt. They want to get closer to paying
[15:57] off their credit card. That's all they
[15:59] want. They've taken that investment
[16:01] money, 52% of them, and beted on sports.
[16:06] 46% of Gen Z say they will never be able
[16:10] to afford a home that they actually
[16:11] like. Almost half, half of a generation
[16:15] doesn't think they have a chance at
[16:17] owning a home they'll love.
[16:20] So, this goes to show why are these
[16:22] things all on the same screen? Why does
[16:24] society conceptually have a tough time
[16:26] differentiating from them? What are they
[16:28] hiring these things to do? In the same
[16:31] way that you wouldn't think of a
[16:32] milkshake and a banana as competitors,
[16:35] one is a fruit and relatively healthy
[16:36] and the other is thought of as a dessert
[16:38] and a fast food item. But if you think
[16:41] about what people are hiring them to do,
[16:44] we live in a broken society because of
[16:46] fiat where everyone's a speculator and
[16:49] everyone has to go out on the risk curve
[16:51] and take risk to find a way to save.
[16:55] Okay.
[16:56] Now, what I'm here to tell you is along
[16:59] that risk curve where you've got money,
[17:01] which is no risk.
[17:03] You don't want to take counterparty
[17:05] risk. You don't want to bet on an
[17:06] executive team. You want to bet on the
[17:07] CEO. You don't want to bet on AI. You
[17:09] don't want to bet on us ever reaching
[17:11] Mars. You don't want to bet on the
[17:12] iPhone versus the Android. You don't
[17:14] want to bet on Facebook versus Google.
[17:16] You don't want to bet on the West versus
[17:19] the East, the North versus the South.
[17:21] You don't want to take risk. Coca-Cola
[17:23] versus Sprite. You just want to save.
[17:26] You want money and you want good money.
[17:28] You want hard money. Clearly fiat is not
[17:30] good money. But I'm here to tell you
[17:32] that what Bitcoin is is money. Okay,
[17:36] along that risk curve. Bitcoin is not a
[17:37] government. Bitcoin is not a regulated
[17:39] company. Bitcoin is not an unregulated
[17:41] group of founders. Bitcoin is not a
[17:43] speculation market like a casino.
[17:45] Bitcoin does not reside in Las Vegas.
[17:47] Where is Bitcoin along that? Bitcoin is
[17:50] money. What do I mean by that? Well,
[17:52] money historically has had three
[17:55] foundational problems. One is called
[17:57] senior. Who profits from issuing the
[18:01] money, right? Who profits from issuing
[18:05] dollars? Well, we all know uh the
[18:07] Federal Reserve and the US government
[18:10] and the politicians and people close to
[18:12] the money printer, which is what's
[18:14] called the Cantalon effect. Who gets the
[18:17] new money first when it is issued and
[18:19] when it is printed? Who has an
[18:20] advantage? Who has a bias? Who sits on
[18:23] the hierarchical level above you? And
[18:26] then the third issue is counterparty
[18:28] risk. Who do you have to trust? Okay. By
[18:32] using a money, do you have to implicitly
[18:34] trust someone? And these historically
[18:36] have all been really difficult problems
[18:38] to solve for a money. When you think
[18:40] about the euro, the pound, the yen, the
[18:42] dollar,
[18:44] people profit and and have serious
[18:47] advantage from being able to print it.
[18:49] There are people like Wall Street that
[18:52] that have extreme proximity to the money
[18:55] printer and they get access to credit to
[18:58] loans to bailouts first and then
[19:01] implicitly unfortunately by using the
[19:04] dollar I have to trust the US
[19:07] government, the Federal Reserve, Wall
[19:09] Street. I have to trust these people in
[19:12] order to just save to just take the
[19:14] value that I created at work today with
[19:16] me tomorrow.
[19:17] Bitcoin solves all three.
[19:21] Nobody profits from quote unquote
[19:24] issuing it. Mining it is really Bitcoin
[19:29] is unlocked over time. It's not like
[19:32] it's printed out of thin air. There's 21
[19:35] million. Not all of them have been
[19:37] unlocked every 10 minutes yet, but
[19:39] there's only 21 million. There is no
[19:41] seniorage
[19:42] in uh Bitcoin.
[19:46] Cancel on effect. No such thing in
[19:47] Bitcoin.
[19:50] Nobody sits closer to the fresh printed
[19:54] batch of bitcoins. There is no Wall
[19:56] Street that gets bailouts before anybody
[19:58] else. There's none of that in Bitcoin.
[20:00] And with Bitcoin, you don't trust
[20:03] anyone. You yourself can run a node. You
[20:06] yourself can hold your keys. And even if
[20:07] you don't, it's the optionality that you
[20:11] can if you want to, which is definitely
[20:14] important to the system. You don't trust
[20:16] anybody to ensure that there's 21
[20:18] million hardcode limit. You don't trust
[20:20] anybody to when someone sends you a
[20:23] bitcoin or those real bitcoins or those
[20:25] fake bitcoins. You don't trust anybody
[20:27] to make sure that when someone mines a
[20:28] block, is that a good good block or a
[20:30] bad block? No trust involved in bitcoin.
[20:35] Now
[20:36] outside of those historical those are,
[20:39] you know, issued money, paper money,
[20:42] government money. Well, what about gold?
[20:45] What about silver? What about precious
[20:47] metals? Well, the problem is,
[20:51] yes, gold, no one profits from using it.
[20:54] So, are issuing it, excuse me. So, gold
[20:56] and Bitcoin both have a check in that
[20:58] category. Nobody profits from
[21:00] necessarily issuing gold either. Okay.
[21:03] Also, with gold, you're not trusting
[21:05] anyone. Gold ultimately is governed by
[21:07] mother nature. It just is. It's governed
[21:09] by the physical realities of the
[21:11] universe, similar to Bitcoin. and proof
[21:14] of work. Okay, so gold and Bitcoin get
[21:16] that check. Now, gold unfortunately
[21:19] cannot move across the world, especially
[21:22] over a communications channel like the
[21:24] internet at all. And that's where paper
[21:28] and bankisssued notes and Bitcoin can
[21:32] effortlessly move across the internet,
[21:35] travel the world at the speed of light,
[21:37] where a physical thing, whether it's
[21:40] gold, silver, copper, seashells, shark
[21:43] teeth, doesn't matter what physical
[21:45] thing it is, like you can hold in your
[21:48] hand and that weighs a little bit and
[21:50] that if you curl it, you get big
[21:51] muscles. Gold can't travel over the
[21:55] internet, you see. So, Bitcoin found a
[21:57] way to solve for both. Okay, Bitcoin it
[22:02] the best of both worlds. It has the hard
[22:05] money properties of a gold and it has
[22:08] the transportable efficient properties
[22:11] of paper or bank credit notes. This is
[22:15] the innovation that Satoshi had. He
[22:19] found and discovered the greatest
[22:22] monetary creation ever because he takes
[22:24] the best of both worlds and he solves
[22:26] for all historic issues in monetary
[22:30] theory and and the struggles that we've
[22:32] had with money over centuries and
[22:35] centuries and centuries as human
[22:37] civilization.
[22:38] And he comes out with this. I mean this
[22:40] is like as I'll get into this is akin to
[22:43] fire or the wheel or I mean or you know
[22:47] this is or or steel. Steel is you know
[22:50] what is foundational in high structures
[22:54] to build cities. I mean this is a
[22:56] massive discovery foundationally that is
[23:00] money. Okay. Now, some of these
[23:03] concepts, for example, your slice of the
[23:05] 21 million Bitcoin never shrinks. Okay,
[23:09] the way to think about Bitcoin is that
[23:11] if you own 0.1 BTC, that is always in
[23:15] forever.1 BTC out of 21 million coins.
[23:21] Period. Whether the year is 2026, 2140,
[23:25] it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter.
[23:28] you own. You can never get diluted out
[23:31] of your There's no one that could ever
[23:33] ever ever ever ever ever debase you.
[23:38] Impossible. Okay. So,
[23:42] real quick, I want to address the size
[23:44] of money. So, when we're thinking about
[23:46] what are we hiring Bitcoin to do, all
[23:48] right, why would we buy Bitcoin? How is
[23:51] it different? What's it compete with?
[23:53] Does Bitcoin compete with Ethereum? Does
[23:55] Bitcoin compete with Dogecoin? Does
[23:56] Bitcoin compete with prediction markets?
[23:59] I'm here to tell you I don't think so.
[24:01] This is what I think Bitcoin competes
[24:03] with. Human beings own collectively as a
[24:07] species. So all 8 billion or so of us.
[24:09] Okay? Hang with me here. We collectively
[24:12] own about $900 trillion worth of stuff.
[24:15] Okay? Now that 900 trillion is made up
[24:18] of what you see on the screen. About,
[24:21] you know, between 15 to 30 trillion of
[24:23] it is gold. Then you've got about 20
[24:26] trillion of it. That's fine art. Then
[24:28] you've got over a hundred trillion
[24:29] dollars of equities. So equity in a
[24:31] business like a stock. Then you've got
[24:33] over a hundred trillion of what we call
[24:36] money like currencies. Then you've got
[24:38] $300 trillion of bonds, over $300
[24:42] trillion of real estate, right? And
[24:44] together and in the corner there, the
[24:46] little speck, you've got $1.7 trillion
[24:49] of Bitcoin.
[24:51] Now about half of this 900 trillion are
[24:55] humans. They've monetized these things.
[24:58] That's what we call it. That's when they
[25:00] own the asset not to use it but to save
[25:04] it because they're using it as a way to
[25:06] save value into the future as to store
[25:09] value into the future to avoid inflation
[25:11] to avoid debasement. Right? So instead
[25:13] of the dollar like I said we're all
[25:15] speculators. People have bought gold,
[25:17] stock in a company, art, currency,
[25:21] bonds, real estate, etc., etc., etc.,
[25:23] right? You following me? Now, Bitcoin is
[25:26] competing in this 400 to$500 trillion
[25:31] market. And what Bitcoin will continue
[25:33] to do, as you can see on the screen, is
[25:35] expand. It'll go from 1.7 trillion to 5
[25:38] trillion, 5 trillion to 25 trillion, 25
[25:41] trillion to 30 trillion. And it'll
[25:44] continue to become the money that when
[25:47] you do not want to take risk, you don't
[25:49] want to invest, you don't want to
[25:51] gamble, you just want to save, you have
[25:54] something that you don't have to trust,
[25:56] that no one can print and profit from,
[25:58] that no one's closer to the money
[26:00] printer and gets spec uh specific
[26:02] benefit and leisure and advantage. It is
[26:05] neutral. It is inclusive. It is fair. It
[26:08] is trustless. It is reliable. It is
[26:10] simple. It is money on the risk curve.
[26:13] It is at the bottom because there is no
[26:16] counterparty risk in owning this thing.
[26:19] Okay. So, one of the things that I see
[26:22] people say all the time is like, oh,
[26:24] these other coins could potentially, you
[26:26] know, flip Bitcoin, be bigger than
[26:28] Bitcoin. Well, I mean,
[26:32] Meta, Mark Zuckerberg's company, is
[26:35] worth $1.9 trillion today. Okay, Bitcoin
[26:38] is worth 1.7 trillion. Now, as I just
[26:42] described,
[26:46] you know, Bitcoin is going after assets
[26:49] like gold. Okay, if Bitcoin were to get
[26:53] to gold, which is currently sitting at
[26:56] $30 trillion market cap, it would be
[26:59] bigger than all of the magn magnificent
[27:02] seven companies combined.
[27:05] All of them. Nvidia, Meta, Microsoft,
[27:09] Google, Amazon, Tesla, like all of them.
[27:14] Apple, all of them combined. Bitcoin is
[27:18] expected to in a worstc case scenario. I
[27:21] think everyone's Bitcoin base case is it
[27:24] is a gold equivalent. I think
[27:26] everyone's, you know, honestly most
[27:29] probabilistic case is that Bitcoin is
[27:30] just a better version of gold and it's a
[27:33] better version of storing wealth in real
[27:35] estate and it's a better version at
[27:36] storing wealth in equities and it's a
[27:38] better version and it's a better version
[27:40] and it this I just don't think people
[27:42] appreciate being money
[27:45] which is not a company it's not a
[27:47] utility token it's not just just being
[27:50] money this thing that humans need just
[27:52] to store wealth without taking risk
[27:54] without gaming ling, without investing,
[27:56] without needing a thesis, without doing
[27:58] math, none of that, just just saving,
[28:01] the opportunity for that is 400 to 500
[28:05] trillion.
[28:08] And if Bitcoin does it just as good as a
[28:11] gold bar,
[28:12] it is bigger than the biggest companies
[28:15] in the world combined. Now, if I were to
[28:19] tell you Dogecoin is going to go on to
[28:22] do as much for the world as Apple has
[28:26] done,
[28:28] Apple's created the iPhone. Steve Jobs
[28:30] is arguably the greatest entrepreneur of
[28:32] all time. Apple has been one of the
[28:34] biggest companies in the world for
[28:36] decades and decades and decades and
[28:38] decades and decades. Okay? One of the
[28:40] most powerful companies in the world. If
[28:43] Dogecoin were to
[28:47] dethrone Steve Jobs
[28:50] and change the world at a magnitude
[28:53] bigger than Apple,
[28:55] it would be about the size of Bitcoin
[28:58] today. Just to put it into perspective,
[29:03] you see
[29:06] the market size for money and what
[29:08] Bitcoin is versus these other things.
[29:12] Because I'm sure these other things, and
[29:14] I'm, you know, I'm trying to be neutral
[29:15] here. I'm sure these other things, you
[29:17] could think they're cool, you could
[29:18] think they're interesting, you could
[29:19] think they're fascinating. And that's
[29:21] fine. I'm not telling you what to think.
[29:24] But what I'm telling you is there's a
[29:26] massive, massive difference than being
[29:29] neutral, reliable, credible money and
[29:33] being an application, being a utility
[29:36] token, being a company. Massive
[29:40] difference. There is no $400 trillion
[29:43] company. The biggest companies in the
[29:45] world today are about as big as Bitcoin
[29:48] is today. And Bitcoin is still
[29:50] considered the young buck on the block.
[29:52] You see? So, I'll keep going and just
[29:56] asserting Bitcoin's difference before we
[29:59] get into altcoins.
[30:01] You know, in Bitcoin developers can
[30:04] write any code they want. People often
[30:06] say, well, you know, Bitcoin, certain
[30:08] people are in control, like the
[30:10] developers or the miners or big
[30:12] companies in the space like a Micro
[30:14] Strategy or a Coinbase. Listen,
[30:17] developers can write any code they want.
[30:20] I can after this episode is recorded, I
[30:22] can go on to GitHub, download Bitcoin
[30:25] Core, and upload the Bitcoin code to
[30:28] delete the 21 million hard cap and put
[30:30] in 42 million hard cap. I can do that
[30:33] right now. And not only can I do that,
[30:36] anyone in the world can do that. Well,
[30:39] why didn't I just break Bitcoin? Well,
[30:42] because in order for that to take
[30:43] effect, you, my friends, running the
[30:47] nodes have to download it and have to
[30:50] run it. Same thing for miners. A minor
[30:53] can mine a block with a bunch of invalid
[30:55] transactions that take all of the
[30:57] bitcoins and send them to themselves.
[31:00] and they can mine it and they can send
[31:01] it to the network and they can say,
[31:03] "Aha, I broke Bitcoin." Anyone in the
[31:06] world can do what I just said. But why
[31:10] hasn't Bitcoin broke? Well, because in
[31:12] order for that to actually break
[31:14] Bitcoin, all of us running the nodes
[31:17] would have to accept that block.
[31:20] But we don't. We say that's invalid, not
[31:24] allowed in the blockchain. And all of
[31:26] these big companies, they can campaign
[31:28] for anything that they want. They could
[31:30] say, "We want the block size bigger. We
[31:32] want the uh 21 million hard cap to be
[31:35] raised. We want this. We want that." And
[31:38] guess what? If we the people running the
[31:42] nodes do not agree and do not update and
[31:48] do not run what they want, it doesn't
[31:52] matter. So the nodes, the people, right?
[31:55] And what's it take to run a node? Anyone
[31:58] in the world can run a node. The reason
[32:00] that Bitcoin developers in the Bitcoin
[32:01] community are so hardcore about not
[32:05] making it difficult, we don't want to
[32:06] raise the block size. We don't want to
[32:08] change any of the properties that make
[32:11] it harder to run a node because we want
[32:14] anyone in the world to say, "I'd like to
[32:17] participate in the Bitcoin network and
[32:19] I'd like to validate that every Bitcoin
[32:21] transaction that I send and receive is
[32:24] valid, that every block I receive is
[32:26] valid. I want to participate in what
[32:28] code is run." Because if someone writes
[32:31] and submits that Bitcoin's hard cap
[32:33] should be 42 million instead of 21
[32:35] million, I want to have the ability to
[32:36] say I'm not running that. My node is
[32:38] going to run the 21 million. You see,
[32:41] this is what makes Bitcoin truly
[32:43] decentralized is because when anybody
[32:47] can run a node and store the data, if
[32:48] your blockchain has so much data, then
[32:52] you need a server farm to run a node. If
[32:54] your blockchain has such big blocks or
[32:56] such fast blocks, then you need a server
[32:58] farm to run a node. anyone in the world
[33:01] can run Bitcoin. It's supposed to be
[33:04] money that nobody has an outsiz
[33:07] influence in and this is what it has
[33:09] achieved. Okay. Now, with that being
[33:13] said, so in summary, Bitcoin sits at the
[33:16] bottom of the risk curve, meaning there
[33:17] is no risk. There's no counterparty
[33:19] risk. You're not taking the other side
[33:21] of a of a gamble or a bet. You're not
[33:24] putting it all on black. You're not
[33:25] investing in Apple in the new version of
[33:27] the iPhone. You're not betting on Elon
[33:28] being able to get to Mars and start
[33:30] civilization up in space somewhere.
[33:33] You're not You're not You're just
[33:35] saving. You're saving in a monetary
[33:37] policy that nobody can change and that
[33:40] you can run a node and participate in.
[33:42] That's it. That's it. Now, what are
[33:45] altcoins? Okay. Every altcoin that I've
[33:48] ever heard of, by the way, there's
[33:50] thousands of them. So, I'm not going to
[33:52] be perfectly accurate in trying to be uh
[33:56] general and broad here. So, spare me a
[33:59] little bit. But
[34:01] almost all, if not all, cuz I can't
[34:04] account for all altcoins,
[34:06] has a utility pitch, right? Ethereum is
[34:09] the world computer. Salana is the
[34:11] webcale blockchain. Ripple is the
[34:13] internet of value. Litecoin is the
[34:15] silver to Bitcoin's gold. Dogecoin is
[34:18] fun and friendly internet currency.
[34:20] Monero is the private thing. Stellar is
[34:23] banking the unbanked. Cardano is a third
[34:27] generation blockchain. Avalanche is
[34:29] blazingly fast. Okay. Right now, with
[34:34] all of these slogans and taglines and
[34:36] pitches of utility for these tokens, let
[34:39] me read you this. Apple is think
[34:42] different and the iPhone. Meta is bring
[34:45] the world closer together with the
[34:47] internet. Tesla is accelerate the
[34:50] world's transition to sustainable
[34:51] energy. Google is organized the world's
[34:54] information. Amazon is Earth's most
[34:57] customer ccentric company. Microsoft is
[35:00] a computer on every desk and in every
[35:02] home. Nike is just do it for athletes.
[35:06] Airbnb is belong anywhere for travel.
[35:09] Netflix is entertain the world. Right?
[35:13] You guys see where I'm going with this?
[35:16] Old coins are far more like companies.
[35:20] Okay,
[35:21] what ground do I have to say that on?
[35:24] And here's another thing. They're not
[35:25] only far more like companies, but
[35:27] they're certainly far less like money
[35:30] like what we just went through in
[35:32] regards to Bitcoin and solving legacy
[35:35] monetary issues and the level of
[35:37] decentralization and the lack of control
[35:39] that anybody has. When you look at these
[35:42] altcoins, for starters, one, they have
[35:45] what's called a premine, where the
[35:47] founders of these altcoins create a
[35:49] bunch of the coins, whether it's
[35:50] Ethereum or Salana or whatever it is,
[35:53] and they give a bunch to themselves
[35:55] before the coin launches. So, a typical
[35:57] altcoin launch looks something like
[35:59] this. 20% goes to the founders, 20% or
[36:02] so goes to the first investors, another
[36:04] 20% or so goes to like the treasury, the
[36:07] the company for them to use in the
[36:09] future, and then the other 40% or so
[36:12] goes to the public. Now, compare that to
[36:15] Bitcoin.
[36:17] 100% of all the Bitcoin that will ever
[36:20] be mined that has already been mined,
[36:23] all 21 million is mined under the same
[36:25] rules. every single block. Anybody could
[36:29] go out and mine Bitcoin or anybody can
[36:31] go out and get a job and earn cash and
[36:34] buy Bitcoin. Nobody has ever had an
[36:38] advantage over anyone else ever. I'm
[36:41] going to say that again. Satoshi
[36:43] Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin, he
[36:46] himself needed energy to get his first
[36:51] bitcoins. They weren't printed. They
[36:53] weren't granted. It wasn't a well, you
[36:55] know, I did create it. I'll give myself
[36:56] a little bit. He had to plug in a
[36:58] computer and spin some compute and work
[37:02] hard to mine a block.
[37:05] Just like the people that are working on
[37:06] mining a block right now as I'm talking,
[37:09] everyone in the history of Bitcoin and
[37:11] in the future of Bitcoin will have to do
[37:14] the same. Okay?
[37:17] Now, all these old coins that have
[37:19] founder coins and investor coins and
[37:21] treasury coins and then coins that they
[37:23] sell to the public, guys, that's a
[37:26] company. You know, I founded Strike,
[37:29] okay? So, I'm not against building
[37:32] companies, building tools. I'm not
[37:34] necessarily against any of this. I'm a
[37:35] free markets guy. People should do
[37:36] whatever they want. But do you know how
[37:39] Strike worked? I have equity that I
[37:42] created and kept to myself. I have
[37:45] equity that I gave early investors in
[37:46] Strike. We have equity that we store
[37:48] aside as a company to give to employees
[37:52] to give out bonuses to try and recruit
[37:54] talent. And then there's equity that
[37:56] maybe someday if we go public, we'll
[37:59] sell to the public. That's literally how
[38:01] a company works. It's certainly not
[38:04] money. You know, you can make a debate
[38:06] of like, well, you know, certain
[38:08] altcoins are far different than starting
[38:10] a company like Strike. It depends what
[38:11] altcoin you're talking about. There's
[38:13] thousands of them. But no matter which
[38:15] one you're talking about, it's certainly
[38:17] not money. It is certainly not money. So
[38:20] to make this point even further, a tech
[38:22] company on left is typically a founder
[38:25] with a vision, investors who bought in
[38:27] early to that vision, a foundation and a
[38:30] treasury, a published roadmap for the
[38:33] customers and for the public, upgrades
[38:35] on a schedule, leadership that must keep
[38:37] delivering in order to drive value to
[38:40] the shareholders. Okay. Now, what are
[38:42] what is crypto? What are altcoins?
[38:44] Typically, it's founders with a vision,
[38:47] investors who bought in early, a
[38:48] foundation and a treasury, a published
[38:51] road map for the token holders, upgrades
[38:53] on the schedule, leadership that must
[38:55] keep delivering to drive value to the
[38:56] token. Again, nothing is wrong with
[39:00] owning a company, with building a
[39:01] company. There is, however, a problem in
[39:04] selling equity in one as if it were
[39:08] neutral money.
[39:10] Okay? I have no problem with people
[39:12] building companies, investing in
[39:13] companies. Why would I have a problem
[39:15] with that? I literally do that as my
[39:17] job.
[39:19] The problem, at least ethically, is if I
[39:23] were to convince, try and convince you
[39:24] guys that strike equity is just like
[39:26] Bitcoin.
[39:28] I would never do that. It's not. I have
[39:32] special rights. I have control. If I
[39:35] print strike equity, it benefits me more
[39:38] than it benefits you. You have to trust
[39:40] me when you own it. You might not like
[39:43] every decision. You don't get to
[39:44] participate, have the same rights as me.
[39:46] It's not the same. It's a company. You
[39:49] see? And so to carry this even further,
[39:53] I would make the argument that Bitcoin
[39:55] was discovered or found, not necessarily
[39:58] founded. You're like, "That's crazy.
[40:00] Satoshi's the founder of Bitcoin." I
[40:02] know it sounds crazy, but hear me out.
[40:05] Who was the founder of FIRE? Does anyone
[40:08] know?
[40:10] Who was the founder of the wheel?
[40:13] Who was the founder of aluminum?
[40:16] Who was the founder of gold?
[40:21] You see? Now, conversely, who founded
[40:25] Apple? Well, Steve Jobs who founded
[40:28] Amazon? Well, Jeff Bezos, who founded
[40:31] Meta?
[40:33] Well, Mark Zuckerberg who founded Salana
[40:36] and Ethereum,
[40:38] you know, Salana has a CEO.
[40:41] Ethereum was founded by Vitalic and Joe
[40:44] Luben and the Ethereum Foundation.
[40:48] You know, Ripple has a company.
[40:51] These like
[40:54] these altcoins again, it's not a
[40:55] problem. It's not I have no issue. Who's
[40:57] the founder of Strike? Jack Malers. No
[41:00] problem. But again,
[41:02] >> [clears throat]
[41:03] >> These things aren't Bitcoin. People
[41:05] conflate them because everyone is trying
[41:07] to hire these things to help them save
[41:10] cuz we're living in a society with
[41:12] broken money.
[41:14] But you get into the car every single
[41:17] day, [clears throat] but you don't know
[41:19] who invented the wheel.
[41:22] None of you get in a car and say, "Well,
[41:24] hold on a second. Before I take
[41:26] advantage of this pure innovation and
[41:30] transportation,
[41:32] who invented the wheel and what did they
[41:35] mean by this invention? What was their
[41:36] intent when inventing it? And was this
[41:39] their vision? You know, when people say,
[41:41] "Well, this isn't Satoshi's vision."
[41:43] Well, what was the inventor of of fire's
[41:45] vision while you used your stove, while
[41:49] you turned on the grill? Hm.
[41:51] [clears throat]
[41:53] Before you get in a car or an airplane,
[41:56] make sure you know the intent of the
[41:59] founder of the wheel.
[42:02] You guys see where I'm going with this,
[42:04] right? Who founded corn? Who founded
[42:07] wheat? Well, these things were
[42:09] discovered. They're public utilities.
[42:13] It's not about who founded it. You're
[42:16] not trusting. When you use corn, you
[42:18] don't have any counterparty risk. When
[42:20] you go to Chipotle and you say, "I'll
[42:21] take some corn on my burrito or I'll
[42:23] take some guac on my burrito." Are you
[42:26] taking on counterparty risk?
[42:29] Who are you implicitly trusting? Nobody.
[42:34] The wheel. Who are you implicitly
[42:36] trusting by using the wheel? When you
[42:39] light a fire to stay warm,
[42:42] what was the founder of fire's vision
[42:44] for the project? Guys, there's no such
[42:47] thing. Now, obviously, when you contrast
[42:50] that to Amazon,
[42:52] all of that is opposite. Well, what's
[42:54] Jeff Bezos's intent? How's he going to
[42:57] use excess cash? Are they going to do
[42:59] stock buybacks? What's the hiring plan?
[43:01] Well, they seem to be compressing
[43:03] margins on their core product. Are they
[43:05] trying to cannibalize the rest of their
[43:06] competitors or what's the long-term
[43:08] strategy? Who's presenting at the next
[43:10] quarterly earnings? All of that is
[43:13] extremely relevant, right?
[43:16] And all of that is extremely relevant to
[43:18] altcoins as well.
[43:20] So when you see all these things, I
[43:23] think back to first principles, you need
[43:25] to ask very basic question like does a
[43:27] world computer need its own money? Does
[43:30] a company need its own money? Does an
[43:33] exchange need its own money? Does your
[43:36] project need its own money?
[43:41] I would say the answer is no.
[43:44] Why would you need your own money,
[43:48] right? Like why does a world computer
[43:50] like can you build a world computer and
[43:52] if people need to use money on it just
[43:54] use Bitcoin?
[43:56] Of course you can. You know, people for
[43:58] years argued, you know, to in order to
[44:01] build a decentralized social media, you
[44:04] need your own token. Well, but then
[44:07] somebody created Noster
[44:10] and people just use Bitcoin if they need
[44:14] to send money between each other because
[44:15] why would you need your own token? You
[44:18] see, the token is back. This goes back
[44:21] to senior age. Who profits? Who benefits
[44:23] from the token? The person that can
[44:26] print it. Printing your own money is the
[44:28] business model. A lot of these things
[44:31] are disguised central banks that aren't
[44:35] nearly as legally accountable. You know,
[44:37] it's like, why do I need a world uh
[44:40] currency for my world computer? Well,
[44:42] the truth is because I can print it and
[44:45] I want you to buy it. That's why,
[44:48] you know, of course, you know, like So,
[44:51] yeah. Anyways, a little fun fact for you
[44:53] guys. I was around so as you know I've
[44:56] been around in this industry for a very
[44:57] long time almost 14 years at this point
[44:59] and my stepmother
[45:02] uh long time ago over a decade ago uh my
[45:04] stepmother went to a conference and
[45:07] happened to be sat next to Vitalic
[45:09] Buterine and this is before the launch
[45:11] of Ethereum
[45:13] and uh it was her Andreas Antonopoulos
[45:16] uh Vitalic Buterine uh and by the way
[45:19] Vitalik is uh one of the creators and
[45:21] founders of Ethereum and Vitalic is
[45:25] telling her about his new project called
[45:27] Ethereum. And he's like, "Man, you know,
[45:30] I'd appreciate if you contributed to the
[45:32] pre-sale um cuz we're, you know, we're
[45:34] we're trying to get it started. I'm
[45:35] trying to hire more developers to work
[45:37] on it for me and uh we're doing a
[45:40] pre-sale to raise some funds."
[45:42] And so my stepmom actually participated
[45:45] in the Ethereum pre-sale, believe it or
[45:47] not. And hilarious, hilarious story.
[45:52] And we all she got home from the
[45:54] conference and we all went online to
[45:56] this guy Vitalik's website which was
[46:00] this Ethereum Foundation blog and we
[46:03] read about his pre-sale.
[46:05] And here are some quotes from the
[46:07] pre-sale. The price of Ethereum is
[46:10] initially set to a discounted price of
[46:13] 2,000 Ethereum per Bitcoin and will stay
[46:16] this way for 14 days before linearly
[46:18] declining to a final rate of 1,337
[46:22] Ethereum per Bitcoin. Okay, first of
[46:25] all, guys, if anyone ever said the price
[46:29] of Bitcoin is this,
[46:32] you'd lose your mind. Nobody's allowed
[46:34] to determine the price of Bitcoin. No
[46:37] one's allowed to print Bitcoin out of
[46:38] thin air and sell it behind the scenes.
[46:40] Sell it because they need to hire
[46:42] somebody. Okay, so you know, people
[46:45] don't know this, but Ethereum was a
[46:48] project where they would just print
[46:50] these things and sell them at
[46:51] conferences
[46:53] uh and they set the price of it like a
[46:55] t-shirt or a hoodie or a dozen donuts.
[46:59] Okay, another quote in here. There are
[47:01] two endowment pools, each 0.099x 099x
[47:05] the initial quantity of ether sold that
[47:08] will be allocated in the first case to
[47:10] early contributors and in the second
[47:12] case to long-term endowment to our
[47:14] nonprofit foundation.
[47:16] Again, in the fine print, they printed
[47:20] money out of thin air and gave a slice
[47:22] for the early insiders and a slice for
[47:25] their foundation.
[47:27] Again, no such thing for Bitcoin. That
[47:30] doesn't exist. Can you imagine if
[47:33] someone came out and said, just letting
[47:34] everyone know, uh, I exceeded the 21
[47:37] million hard cap and printed some
[47:39] bitcoins,
[47:40] uh, because the people that were early
[47:43] on just felt like they didn't get enough
[47:45] and we might have some nonprofit
[47:46] interest in the future. So, we're going
[47:48] to set it aside in our foundation.
[47:51] Again, there's no problem with starting
[47:54] a company. Totally reasonable. I started
[47:56] one. But are these things like Bitcoin?
[47:59] Is this the equivalent of just saving in
[48:02] hard money that will appreciate against
[48:03] the debasing currency so that you can
[48:05] buy a home so you can put your kid
[48:07] through school? You don't want to take
[48:08] risk. You don't want to bet on people.
[48:10] You don't want to bet on products. You
[48:11] don't want to understand the different
[48:14] uh conversion currency, central bank,
[48:16] monetary policy, what's happening in
[48:17] Japan. You don't want to know. You don't
[48:19] care about that. Another quote, "We
[48:21] reserve the right to use up to 5,000
[48:23] Bitcoin from the pre-sale while the
[48:25] pre-sale is running in order to speed up
[48:27] development."
[48:28] Okay, so they're spending the buyer's
[48:31] money before the sale closes. Again,
[48:35] this is just someone running a company.
[48:37] I'm not mad at the CEO. They're making
[48:39] it's their company. It's their thing.
[48:41] They're making the decisions based on
[48:42] what they think is best. But it's I
[48:44] mean, this is far from a decentralized
[48:48] process where everybody has equal
[48:50] rights. Like after Satoshi mined a few
[48:53] blocks, he couldn't have said, "Ah,
[48:55] actually, I take that back." Once
[48:57] Bitcoin once the first block was mined,
[49:00] Bitcoin is set in stone for history. You
[49:02] guys know that if we ran the Bitcoin
[49:05] core code from 10 years ago, it would
[49:08] still run. It's the same rules.
[49:14] I just don't think people know this
[49:16] information. And and again, it is fine.
[49:19] You're allowed to invest in companies.
[49:21] You're allowed to do whatever you want.
[49:22] Just know what you own. And if you're
[49:24] trying to avoid currency debasement and
[49:26] inflation and you just want to work hard
[49:27] and save, there's a difference between
[49:30] Bitcoin and everything else. I found
[49:33] this hilarious. At the end of the
[49:34] website, they just wrote, "Ethereum is a
[49:37] product, not a security or an investment
[49:39] offering." And we were laughing at the
[49:41] time like, "Well, I mean, that's for the
[49:43] SEC to decide, not for you to decide.
[49:45] You can't just declare yourself a
[49:47] thing." But clearly they had enough
[49:49] self-awareness to realize that
[49:53] they were probably a company, but they
[49:56] didn't want to be one. They wanted to be
[49:58] compared to Bitcoin because that made
[50:00] them a lot more money. There was this
[50:02] new Bitcoin thing. You know, saying,
[50:04] "I'm going to create a competitor to
[50:06] Amazon." How many investors do you think
[50:08] you would have gotten? Probably not a
[50:10] lot. That sounds really hard. Saying,
[50:12] "Oh yeah, this Bitcoin thing, it's
[50:14] totally new. Well, I'm going to build
[50:15] the better version and I printed a bunch
[50:17] of the tokens and I'll sell them to you
[50:19] at an at a fixed exchange rate. It's a
[50:21] much easier way to raise money. But this
[50:26] is a startup.
[50:27] According to the website, this is July
[50:30] 22nd, 2014. I was on the website. My
[50:34] stepmom got home from a conference, got
[50:36] off the plane, said a crazy story. I sat
[50:38] next to this kid. He started this
[50:41] project, I guess, wants me to invest in
[50:43] it. Uh we pull up the website. This is
[50:47] what was on the website. It was a
[50:50] startup that was raising money.
[50:53] So calling back to the earlier slides,
[50:56] Bitcoin removed profits from issuing it,
[51:00] getting new coins first. So senior eggs,
[51:02] cancel on effect, counterparty risk. You
[51:05] don't have to trust anyone with Bitcoin.
[51:07] Nobody gets benefit or has close
[51:09] proximity to the money printer. And no
[51:11] one has advantage from issuing new
[51:14] bitcoins because they can't issue new
[51:15] bitcoins. Now take altcoins for example.
[51:18] Do people get benefit from printing more
[51:21] of them? First of all, can they print
[51:23] more of them? And do they get benefit
[51:24] from it? Yeah. I just read you my
[51:27] experience with one of the most popular
[51:28] altcoins in the world. I just told you
[51:30] guys what happened in my own life 100%.
[51:36] Uh like what about getting new coins
[51:39] first? Is there a cancel effect? Yeah,
[51:42] insiders, VCs, there's a whole culture
[51:44] in altcoins of like everyone getting
[51:46] rugpulled and dumped on because a lot of
[51:48] venture capitalists get in first and
[51:50] then they get their tokens unlocked and
[51:52] then they just sell them all and they
[51:54] crash the market and they crash the
[51:55] project. So yeah, 100%. This is like the
[51:58] dollar. You know, it's the same thing
[52:00] that Wall Street does to the people
[52:02] venture capitalists and insiders are
[52:04] doing with altcoins. It's the same
[52:06] thing.
[52:08] And then who do you have to trust? Well,
[52:11] you know, many times in a lot of these
[52:12] altcoins, uh, the foundation and the
[52:15] founders step in and change the rules.
[52:18] Uh, one of the most famed ones is
[52:20] probably the change to proof of stake,
[52:23] uh, for Ethereum. But
[52:26] another point is when people say, well,
[52:29] Bitcoin doesn't have enough features.
[52:31] Bitcoin isn't changing enough. It isn't
[52:33] adapting. Like this coin's coming out
[52:35] with new features every single week.
[52:37] Again, that's great, but that's a
[52:40] company. Strike comes out with new
[52:42] features every single week. I don't want
[52:44] my money to come out with new features
[52:46] every single week.
[52:48] I don't want to take risk. I don't want
[52:50] to place bets. I don't want to have to
[52:51] pay attention to earnings. I want to
[52:52] have to follow them on Twitter.
[52:55] Money is supposed to be the same rules
[52:58] for everyone forever. Stability is the
[53:01] point. software a company
[53:05] sure changes all the time and that's
[53:08] good but they're different.
[53:11] You see society is it's not healthy to
[53:14] push society all the way up the risk
[53:16] curve where everyone has to gamble to
[53:19] save.
[53:21] People need money that cannot rug pull
[53:24] them, that cannot lie to them, that
[53:25] cannot deceive them, that cannot
[53:27] disadvantage them, that they can just
[53:30] save. And over time, they get closer to
[53:33] owning a home. They get closer to
[53:34] putting their kid through school. They
[53:36] get closer to taking more vacations.
[53:37] They get closer to retirement. They take
[53:40] the value that they've rightfully
[53:42] earned. That is their right. That is
[53:44] their time and energy that they
[53:45] expended. And they have every right to
[53:48] save it. And that is very different than
[53:51] a feature-filled road map for a utility
[53:53] token. Another very obvious point,
[53:57] a coin for everything is inflation all
[54:00] over again. The vision for Bitcoin is
[54:04] that all of the world's value
[54:07] is distributed between 21 million
[54:09] bitcoins. They're infinitely divisible.
[54:11] Not, you know, technically infinitely,
[54:12] but you know, it's possible. But they're
[54:14] they're very very very divisible. So we
[54:17] take 21 million bitcoins and we put the
[54:19] 400 to 500 trillion dollars worth of
[54:21] value inside of those bitcoins and we
[54:23] divide them all up and we exchange them
[54:24] with each other as we produce value for
[54:26] each other. But if there is a McDonald's
[54:30] coin and an airlines coin and a vacation
[54:32] coin and a gym coin and a pizza coin,
[54:35] you're just inflating again. If I walk
[54:38] into McDonald's and I say I have
[54:39] bitcoins and they say, "Oh, nope. You
[54:41] need the McDonald's coin." And then I go
[54:43] fly home and I get on United and I say,
[54:45] "I got McDonald's coin and Bitcoin."
[54:46] Like, "No, no, you need the United coin.
[54:48] I need the smart contract coin. I need
[54:50] the fast coin. I need the I need the
[54:53] privacy coin. I need the this coin. I
[54:54] need the that coin." Well, now all of a
[54:56] sudden only 17% of the monetary units
[55:00] are Bitcoin. And whoever comes up with a
[55:02] brand new coin because they launched a
[55:03] new pizza shop or they launched a new
[55:05] school or they launched a new airline or
[55:07] they launched a new Uber service, well,
[55:09] then we all get debased.
[55:12] It's so obvious when you say these
[55:14] things out loud. Well, duh.
[55:16] Of course. But when someone creates a
[55:19] new company, is that inflationary? No,
[55:22] because equity in a company is not
[55:24] money.
[55:27] You're not printing more money. You're
[55:29] creating a business that people can, if
[55:32] they want to take risk, invest in.
[55:36] When I created Strike, I didn't debase
[55:38] you guys. I didn't inflate away your
[55:40] groceries and your housing and your
[55:42] vacations. I didn't. No, I created a
[55:45] business that hopefully provides value
[55:47] to my customers and if investors want an
[55:50] opportunity to take risk and invest in
[55:52] my vision and my leadership and my
[55:54] execution, they can call me and we can
[55:56] do a deal potentially. But that I mean,
[56:00] do you guys understand how asinine and
[56:02] insane it is to think that all of these
[56:04] things are money and that we're just
[56:06] going to recreate the infinite levels of
[56:08] inflation of fiat currencies by having
[56:10] tokens for every single thing? It's
[56:12] ridiculous. Here's another Ethereum. I
[56:16] don't mean to pick on Ethereum. It's
[56:17] just, you know, one of the bigger ones.
[56:20] They all share these characteristics.
[56:22] But listen to this. This is Vitalik, the
[56:24] founder of Ethereum, talking about
[56:26] Ethereum leading up to uh the uh update
[56:30] to proof of stake.
[56:38] Sure. So I think like to summarize, one
[56:42] of the ways that I think about this in a
[56:43] more philosophical way is like proof of
[56:45] work is based on the laws of physics.
[56:48] And so you sort of have to work with the
[56:50] world as it is, right? you have to work
[56:52] with, you know, electricity as it is,
[56:54] hardware as it is, what computers are as
[56:57] it is. Whereas, because proof of stake
[56:59] is virtualized in this way, it's
[57:01] basically letting us create a simulated
[57:03] universe that has its own laws of
[57:05] physics. And that just gives the us as
[57:09] protocol developers a lot more freedom
[57:11] to optimize the system around actually
[57:14] having all of the different security
[57:17] properties that we want, right?
[57:18] you know, if we want it the the system
[57:21] to have a particular security guarantee.
[57:26] I mean, guys, I hate to beat a dead
[57:29] horse, but like
[57:33] Bitcoin, what he just said, Bitcoin and
[57:36] proof of work
[57:38] operates on the existing laws of the
[57:42] universe,
[57:43] physics, right? Gold, Bitcoin, these
[57:47] things
[57:48] operate within and are regulated by
[57:51] physics.
[57:53] All right? You cannot cheat proof of
[57:55] work
[57:57] because it is physical reality.
[58:00] And the reason the founder of Ethereum
[58:02] wanted to go to proof of stake is so
[58:05] that and I quote directly this is a
[58:08] YouTube video you guys can go pull it
[58:10] up. He wanted to create a simulated
[58:13] universe that has its own laws of
[58:16] physics
[58:18] because the existing physical world
[58:21] wouldn't allow him to do what he wanted
[58:23] to do.
[58:25] He didn't want to be governed by the
[58:27] physical world.
[58:29] So, he created a simulated universe that
[58:32] has its own rules.
[58:35] Again,
[58:37] this is not a hard money. I don't know
[58:39] what to say. By the way, when an altcoin
[58:42] goes from proof of work to proof of
[58:44] stake, they just put all of the miners
[58:45] out of business. What about all the
[58:47] people that built all the chips and all
[58:49] the warehouses and invested the millions
[58:50] or tens of millions or hundreds of
[58:52] millions of dollars into mining that
[58:53] coin now just go insolvent overnight?
[58:57] Imagine
[58:59] being a business owner and and
[59:01] [clears throat] your family relying on
[59:03] the business you've built and the
[59:05] sacrifices you made and the investments
[59:06] you put in for a group to just decide
[59:09] that you are no longer relevant. Your
[59:12] kid has to drop out of school. You have
[59:13] to downsize your house. Your wife is
[59:16] fighting with you over the lack of
[59:18] savings for what? Your business failed.
[59:21] Why? because of a centralized decision
[59:27] to create its own laws of physics. And
[59:30] then I compare this to a to what we
[59:33] already have with central banks. Who
[59:34] writes the rules? Well, in proof of
[59:37] stake, it's the people that own the most
[59:40] of the currency.
[59:42] And in fiat, it's the same thing. It's a
[59:45] committee at the central bank.
[59:48] Who gets the new money? whoever holds
[59:51] the most of the currency. Who gets the
[59:52] new money in fiat lamp? Same thing. So,
[59:56] I just again it's I think these things
[60:00] are far more like businesses and what we
[60:02] already have, which is fine. Maybe
[60:04] Ethereum is going to be the new Apple
[60:06] and they're going to build something
[60:07] even better than the iPhone. I have no
[60:10] idea.
[60:12] But it is not Bitcoin. There is Bitcoin
[60:15] and then there is everything else. I
[60:16] thought this was funny.
[60:19] Way back in the day, guys, if you want
[60:20] to Google this, there's what's known as
[60:22] the DAO hack. So, Ethereum got hacked uh
[60:26] and uh the founding group uh wanted to
[60:30] reverse the hack uh which they did
[60:32] successfully. So, the non reversal
[60:35] Ethereum is called Ethereum Classic, but
[60:37] they rolled back the blockchain, undid
[60:39] the mistake. Again, it sounds crazy, but
[60:43] this happened. And uh Vitalic went into
[60:46] a group chat with all of the CEOs of
[60:48] exchanges at the time. And here's, you
[60:51] know, the screenshot. It says
[60:52] highlighted, okay, you guys can stop
[60:54] trading.
[60:56] And just told everyone, "Stop trading
[60:58] Ethereum. Turn it off for right now. I'm
[61:00] going to roll back the blockchain." And
[61:03] they did.
[61:05] And yeah, so like you know code is law
[61:09] unless it doesn't go the way you want it
[61:11] to go then it's not law then you reverse
[61:13] it. So you know Bitcoin is so slow buy
[61:17] my altcoin. Bitcoin uses too much energy
[61:20] so buy my altcoin. Bitcoin can't do
[61:22] smart contracts so b buy my altcoin.
[61:24] Bitcoin isn't private enough so buy my
[61:27] coin. Bitcoin is old technology so buy
[61:29] my coin. Bitcoin doesn't scale so buy my
[61:32] coin. You know, it all to me reads as
[61:35] justification to buy equity in their
[61:38] business.
[61:39] You know, all of these things made
[61:42] serious compromises to have the features
[61:45] they have. Vitalic wanted to bring
[61:47] Turing compete complete smart contracts
[61:50] to Bitcoin and the Bitcoin developer
[61:52] community deemed that it was far too
[61:55] vulnerable to attacks because by
[61:57] allowing for turn completeness, you
[61:59] allowed code execution on your machine.
[62:02] And the Bitcoin developer community said
[62:04] that sounds like it's really dangerous.
[62:05] We don't want to force nodes to have to
[62:07] run someone else's code and there's
[62:10] going to be a lot of hacks. And what
[62:13] happened? Ethereum launched and there's
[62:16] been a plethora of hacks. Salana, they
[62:20] wanted faster blocks for payments and
[62:22] the Bitcoin community said, well, we
[62:23] have to account for the size of the
[62:25] world and the speed of light. If blocks
[62:27] are too fast, then the whole whole world
[62:29] in a distributed set of nodes is never
[62:31] going to be able to reach consensus
[62:32] reliably.
[62:34] Salana did it anyway. What happens?
[62:36] Salana goes down frequently. No
[62:39] surprise. Monero base layer privacy.
[62:44] Monero wants very specific base layer
[62:46] privacy. Totally fine. But Bitcoiners
[62:48] said, "Well, if we do it at the base
[62:50] layer, then we can have hidden inflation
[62:53] that will go undetected. There's no way
[62:55] to audit and credibly enforce the 21
[62:58] million hard cap." Monero did it anyway.
[63:01] They had an in a bug and it's impossible
[63:04] to know if Monero got inflated or not.
[63:08] True story. This is all true.
[63:10] So for example,
[63:13] Salana guys, the reason Bitcoin's blocks
[63:16] are 10 minutes long is because you have
[63:18] to account for the speed of light.
[63:19] Nothing can travel faster than light. So
[63:22] a block takes time to reach every node
[63:24] on Earth, right? And 10 minutes leaves
[63:28] room for all of the nodes to hear the
[63:30] block and validate the block before the
[63:32] next one arrives. If you have 400
[63:35] millisecond blocks like these old coins
[63:37] have, you can see the visual on the
[63:38] left, it's firing far too fast to give a
[63:42] chance for a global set of nodes to
[63:44] reach any sense of consensus. This is
[63:47] why it is very practical to scale at
[63:51] layer 2. You cannot scale at layer 1's
[63:53] if it's truly decentralized and truly
[63:55] distributed. This is just basic 101
[63:57] stuff, but unfortunately it's crowded.
[64:00] All of this conversation is crowded with
[64:02] so much misinformation to justify you
[64:05] buying their coin that they get to print
[64:08] or that they got early allocations to or
[64:10] they got a sweet deal on. But like why
[64:13] doesn't Bitcoin have faster blocks? It's
[64:15] for no other reason than the speed of
[64:18] light.
[64:19] Really simple engineering.
[64:22] Okay. Like Salana,
[64:26] it's fast until it stops working. It
[64:29] goes down all the time like a company.
[64:32] Here are some of the examples. It's gone
[64:34] down in, [clears throat] you know,
[64:36] recent years for very prolonged periods
[64:38] of time. It's like if Visa were to go
[64:40] down or when Coinbase goes down,
[64:42] Ethereum, like I said, super smart
[64:45] contracts until you get hacked.
[64:48] There's been single individual smart
[64:51] contract bugs that have been exploited
[64:54] up to $325 million at a time. This is
[64:56] why Bitcoin said, "Ah, if we want
[64:58] anything like that, let's build it a
[65:00] separate layer, not the consensus layer.
[65:02] We don't want our hard, simple,
[65:05] reliable, credible money to be full of
[65:08] risk and hacks. It's not a company. It's
[65:10] not a utility thing." By the way, the uh
[65:14] most used utility token in the world
[65:16] today is the US dollar. It has what?
[65:20] Four, five, six billion daily active
[65:23] users, but nobody is holding it to store
[65:26] their value. Just because it's useful
[65:28] doesn't mean it's a good store of value,
[65:30] doesn't mean it's a hard money. So, you
[65:32] also have to ask yourself, even if these
[65:34] things are useful, why would I save it?
[65:41] Uh, Monero, has Monero had an inflation
[65:44] bug? We will never know.
[65:49] True story. These are the trade-offs
[65:52] being made. So again, is Bitcoin too
[65:54] slow or do they want you to just buy
[65:56] their coin? Does Bitcoin not have enough
[65:58] features or do they just want you to buy
[66:00] their coin? Is is Bitcoin the Facebook
[66:04] to some other or uh the MySpace to some
[66:07] other coins? Facebook. Is Bitcoin old
[66:09] technology or did someone print a lot of
[66:13] new tokens for themselves and they just
[66:14] need someone else to buy it? Just ask
[66:17] yourself that.
[66:19] And then lastly, like can someone build
[66:21] a better Bitcoin? So, okay, maybe these
[66:23] other coins are look more like
[66:25] companies, probably function more like
[66:26] companies and can be thought of more
[66:28] like investing in a thing, which again
[66:30] guys, if you you invest in Amazon and
[66:33] Apple, and you want to invest in these
[66:34] things, go for it. But just like it's
[66:37] not Bitcoin, Bitcoin is very very very
[66:41] different.
[66:42] Um, I would say Bitcoin's code is open
[66:45] to copy by anyone. Always has been,
[66:48] always will be. What you cannot copy are
[66:51] the existing users, its liquidity, its
[66:53] miners, its custodians, all of the
[66:56] network effects and economies of scale
[66:57] that have been built around it. You
[66:59] can't just copy that. In the same way
[67:01] that I can now vibe code my own version
[67:04] of Twitter easily. It'd take me 10
[67:06] minutes.
[67:08] But the problem is I'd have no users.
[67:11] I'd log onto it and I'd have no one to
[67:13] follow and I'd have no one that could
[67:15] follow me.
[67:17] So what am I missing? Why can't I just
[67:19] create my own version of Twitter and
[67:20] become a billionaire in the next 10
[67:22] minutes? Well, I don't have the network.
[67:24] I don't have the network effects. I
[67:26] don't have the economies of scale. I
[67:27] don't have the distribution. I don't
[67:29] have the trust, the brand recognition,
[67:31] the credibility. I don't have any of it.
[67:34] And that is what will be in my opinion
[67:38] impossible to replicate.
[67:41] Bitcoin, you can copy the code. You
[67:44] cannot copy the type of big bang. If we
[67:48] had to do Bitcoin all over again, how
[67:49] would it be credibly neutral and fair in
[67:52] distribution?
[67:54] Are we saying that like no one's going
[67:56] to, you know, relaunch Bitcoin but give
[67:58] themselves an early slice or tell their
[68:00] friends, you know, hey guys, pay
[68:02] attention. This is not, you know,
[68:04] Satoshi mined a block the same way that
[68:08] whoever's mining Bitcoin right now would
[68:10] have to mine a block. And the people
[68:12] that did not mine Bitcoin to get their
[68:13] Bitcoin, they had to do real work in the
[68:16] real world to earn cash to then buy
[68:19] their Bitcoin. It's all about proof of
[68:21] work. Nobody in the world owns Bitcoin
[68:24] without having to do some real work for
[68:26] it. Nobody.
[68:28] Nobody.
[68:30] That's not true for strike equity. One
[68:32] day I decided I wanted to create a
[68:34] company and I literally just gave myself
[68:36] 100% of the shares because it was mine.
[68:39] It's not how Bitcoin works.
[68:42] So for a company, a company has
[68:45] founders, investors, a treasury, a road
[68:47] map, governance, ongoing promises, a
[68:51] commodity or a neutral utility like
[68:55] fire, the wheel, aluminum, steel,
[68:58] Bitcoin.
[69:00] It has rules. It has proof of work. It
[69:05] does not have a treasury. It does not
[69:06] have a road map. It does not have a
[69:07] operator. It does not have anyone to
[69:09] trust. It is rules, no rulers, not
[69:12] rulers that enforce and make up rules.
[69:14] It is rules without any rulers.
[69:17] Companies are useful. I think society
[69:20] would cease to function without
[69:21] companies.
[69:23] But it's a different question when
[69:25] whether their token should be money or
[69:27] not. So ask yourself these questions.
[69:30] Who issued it? You know, a token, a
[69:33] company, Bitcoin, nobody. Who got the
[69:35] first units? A token, the founders and
[69:38] investors. Bitcoin, nobody. Who can
[69:40] create more of it? A token, whoever
[69:42] holds the keys, Bitcoin, nobody. Who can
[69:44] change the rules? A token, governance,
[69:47] or a team? Bitcoin? Nobody. Who can
[69:49] pause or restart it? A token? A small
[69:52] group and has Bitcoin? Nobody.
[69:56] Whose competence do I need? Who do I
[69:59] need to trust? A token? The founders,
[70:02] developing group, theirs indefinitely.
[70:04] Bitcoin, nobody. The nobody is the
[70:07] entire point. Nobody. Nobody. You just
[70:09] need you. Last thing, guys. The hot
[70:13] thing will always change. I've been
[70:14] around long enough. It was Litecoin,
[70:16] then Ethereum, then ICOs, then DeFi,
[70:18] Dogecoin, NFT, Salana, memecoins,
[70:21] prediction markets, this, that, now AI
[70:24] stocks. Okay, let me show you something.
[70:27] One of the goat hedge funds of all time,
[70:30] Citadel's hedge fund, Ken Griffin, one
[70:32] of the best performers on Wall Street of
[70:34] all time.
[70:36] His average per year net of fees return
[70:40] 19%.
[70:43] Bitcoin the last 10 years, 60%.
[70:47] I'm the best performer on Wall Street
[70:49] over the last 14 years. You're looking
[70:51] at them right now.
[70:54] I outperformed every hedge fund. I
[70:56] outperformed everything.
[70:59] So if you think the other thing is
[71:01] people will say, well, you know, this
[71:03] has outperformed Bitcoin for the last 6
[71:05] months. Yeah, but let hot things and
[71:10] flashy things be hot and flashy things.
[71:11] Do you know how much risk it is to have
[71:13] to predict the hot flashy thing every
[71:16] single time and never get it wrong and
[71:18] then as soon as it's about to crash,
[71:20] sell it and hop into the next new hot
[71:22] flashy thing? Do you guys know how hard
[71:24] that is? That's called running a hedge
[71:25] fund. That's called being a professional
[71:27] Wall Street trader. And I just pulled up
[71:29] the best performing professional Wall
[71:31] Street trader. And I kicked his butt in
[71:34] performance just by buying and saving in
[71:38] Bitcoin. So yes, of course there's going
[71:40] to be hot flashy things that in brief
[71:43] periods of time are going up a little
[71:44] more than Bitcoin, but over the course
[71:46] of time, again, I don't want to be out
[71:49] on the risk curve. I don't want to run a
[71:51] hedge fund. I don't want to have to do a
[71:52] bunch of research. I don't want to have
[71:54] to pick certain companies, bet on
[71:56] certain products, invest in certain
[71:57] CEOs, uh, jurisdictions, currency
[72:00] exchanges. I don't want to do any of
[72:01] that. I just want to work hard and save
[72:05] and get closer to owning a home, closer
[72:07] to supporting my family, closer to
[72:09] having no debt. That's what all I want.
[72:11] And it turns out with Bitcoin, not only
[72:14] do you get that, but you also outperform
[72:17] everybody else as long as you're
[72:19] patient, you have a low time preference.
[72:21] So in summary,
[72:23] this is my case for there is Bitcoin and
[72:26] there is everything else. Okay,
[72:31] I'm not saying everything else is bad. I
[72:33] am the founder of a company.
[72:36] I love companies. I built this company.
[72:39] I have no problem with companies. People
[72:41] should invest in and do whatever they
[72:44] want. However, be very careful when
[72:48] people tell you that something is like
[72:51] Bitcoin.
[72:52] When people say something is better than
[72:54] Bitcoin, Bitcoin is categorically
[72:57] different than all of these other
[72:59] things. And the only reason all of these
[73:01] other things are on the same screen as
[73:05] you know sports betting, gambling, uh
[73:08] weather predictions, altcoins, meme
[73:10] coins. The only reason is because our
[73:13] fiat currency is broken and everyone is
[73:15] speculating just trying to get by. But
[73:18] Bitcoin on that risk curve. Bitcoin is
[73:21] money. It sits at the bottom.
[73:25] Cool. All right. With that, I'm out of
[73:27] here. Thank you guys. Comments,
[73:28] questions, anything. Leave it in the
[73:30] comments below. Don't be uh afraid and
[73:32] scared. Hit like and subscribe. I'm
[73:34] almost at 50,000 YouTube subscribers. I
[73:36] want to get to 100,000. I want that
[73:38] plaque. So uh hit like and subscribe.
[73:40] And as always, I appreciate the support.
[73:42] Let me know what I should do next. Take
[73:44] care. Bye-bye.

← Back to videos list

Scroll to Top