Anthony Pompliano
Wall Street apuesta todo por Bitcoin
Pregúntale al tutor sobre este vídeo
Entra con un email verificado y pregúntale al tutor lo que quieras sobre este vídeo.
TL;DR
Resumen de investigación
▶ Presentación y tesis inicial sobre Bitcoin
En la introducción, el presentador afirma que, en un mundo de abundancia, la escasez vuelve valioso a Bitcoin. Vincula su tesis alcista para la próxima década con la entrada de Morgan Stanley, BlackRock y Fidelity mediante ETF, y con las compras de Michael Saylor y Strategy. Opina que quienes mantengan el foco y comprendan el valor de Bitcoin podrían ser recompensados a largo plazo. Presenta la conversación con John Pompiliano, que tratará Bitcoin, IA, macroeconomía, petróleo, gasolina, PPI, CPI y la participación de bancos de Wall Street.
▶ Bitcoin durante el conflicto y su posible desacople
Ante la recuperación de Bitcoin por encima de 75.000 dólares y la reversión de pérdidas desde el inicio de la guerra con Irán, Pompiliano la describe como un alivio, aunque advierte que celebrar mientras se sigue abajo puede ser imprudente y que aún no se sabe si el mínimo fue 60.000 dólares. Según él, durante el conflicto Bitcoin subió mientras acciones, bonos y oro bajaron, y el petróleo subió; sostiene que esto contradijo las expectativas y podría indicar que Bitcoin rompió su correlación con acciones tecnológicas, aunque duda que el desacople vaya a mantenerse. Expone como atributos del activo su naturaleza digital, descentralizada, no soberana y neutral, y plantea que puede servir como reserva digital de valor para mover riqueza durante conflictos, cuando el transporte de petróleo está bloqueado y el oro es pesado. Matiza la lectura optimista: Bitcoin todavía había caído desde 126.000 hasta 75.000 dólares y seguía vendido.
▶ Deflación, petróleo y reacción de los mercados
Pompiliano atribuye buena parte de la debilidad de Bitcoin a fuerzas deflacionarias y discrepa de quienes creen que la gasolina más cara dominará la inflación. En su opinión, aranceles, deportaciones, IA y robótica son fuerzas deflacionarias mayores que el aumento temporal del petróleo. Argumenta que, si terminara la guerra con Irán y se reabriera el estrecho de Ormuz, el petróleo podría bajar con fuerza: estima entre 50 y 60 dólares por barril sin perturbaciones, y plantea que desde 100 dólares podría caer un 50%. Señala que el precio ya bajó a 80 dólares tras anunciarse un alto el fuego, aunque aclara que quitar los shocks externos no produciría necesariamente una caída inmediata. Pronostica que un acuerdo de paz haría bajar el petróleo y subir las acciones, y critica a quienes entran en pánico ante cada riesgo; recuerda que el mercado se recuperó de temores anteriores y sostiene que los precios de corto plazo del petróleo y la gasolina son ruido.
▶ Inflación medida, datos y escepticismo ante el pesimismo
Pompiliano usa el PPI recién publicado para cuestionar las previsiones: dice que Wall Street esperaba un 4,6% de PPI general y que el dato fue 4%, aunque reconoce que ese 4% era superior al registro anterior y no niega que hubiera impacto. Cita Trueflation: afirma que pasó de 0,8% a 1,7% desde la guerra, y luego bajó a 1,2% el 2 de abril. Atribuye esa revisión a caídas mensuales en alimentos, servicios públicos, transporte y vivienda, y sostiene que esos componentes pesan más que la gasolina por sí sola. Considera Trueflation la medida más precisa de inflación en EE. UU., con una correlación del 98% con el CPI y un adelanto de un mes respecto a este; esto es una afirmación suya. Contrasta el entorno actual —según él, bombardeos en Irán, bloqueo del estrecho de Ormuz, petróleo por encima de 100 dólares y gasolina a 4 dólares sin inflación alta— con el episodio excepcional de inflación CPI superior al 9% durante la COVID. Critica a comentaristas pesimistas por no mostrar sus resultados y recuerda que la caída del S&P fue de alrededor del 9–10%, frente a una reducción intraanual media que cifra en 14%; añade que el índice volvió a terreno positivo, pero aclara que el año no había terminado y que aún podía haber otra caída importante.
▶ Turbulencia geopolítica, disciplina y anuncios
Pompiliano enumera acontecimientos que, según su planteamiento hipotético, habrían sorprendido a quien conociera el saldo positivo del S&P: acciones de EE. UU. en torno al canal de Panamá y Maduro, bombardeos en Irán, ataques y represalias en Oriente Medio, negociaciones de alto el fuego, la guerra entre Rusia y Ucrania, las dificultades de China por el petróleo y ataques estadounidenses contra organizaciones que describe como narcoterroristas en Ecuador. Afirma que mucha gente desconocía estos últimos hechos. Sostiene que el buen desempeño de las acciones y de Bitcoin durante el conflicto refuerza su consejo de pensar a largo plazo, mantener una tesis de décadas y no tomar decisiones emocionales. Después hay anuncios: el presentador promociona Consensus Miami, previsto en el anuncio para el 5–7 de mayo, y Arch Public, una plataforma anunciada para automatizar estrategias de compraventa de criptomonedas.
▶ Previsión de activos y escenario de inflación dual
Al preguntarle por el resto del año, Pompiliano responde que espera que Bitcoin, el oro y las acciones suban. Sostiene que puede haber inflación de activos porque, ante la deflación, el gobierno tendría incentivos para emitir dinero que podría dirigirse a activos cuando la gente no quiera conservar efectivo. Aclara que no lo presenta como una predicción segura, sino como una posibilidad de mayor probabilidad: inflación de activos sin inflación de consumo fuera de control. Propone como escenario una economía de crecimiento alto e inflación baja, impulsada por IA, robótica, criptomonedas y otras tecnologías innovadoras que también reducirían costos para el consumidor.
▶ Robótica, productividad y empleo en fábricas
Como ejemplo, Pompiliano dice que Sharpie relocalizó fabricación, incorporó robótica, pagó más a sus empleados sin despedirlos y mejoró márgenes. Ilustra el mecanismo con una fábrica de 100 personas que produce 20 unidades diarias: las máquinas podrían elevar la producción a 22 o 25 sin aumentar el costo laboral diario, o incluso a 50, generando más beneficios y margen para pagar mejor. Reconoce que existen gastos de capital y matices. Menciona la producción de automóviles de Elon Musk como otro ejemplo que atribuye a la robótica. Dice haber cambiado de opinión sobre el impacto de la IA en los empleos: admite que muchas personas tendrán que recapacitarse y cambiar de trabajo, pero opina que habrá más empleos en la economía, no menos.
▶ IA, cambios laborales y adaptación de trabajadores
Pompiliano sostiene que las vacantes de ingeniería de software cayeron inicialmente tras la llegada de la IA, pero luego subieron y crecieron rápidamente; afirma que hoy hay más vacantes que cuando apareció ChatGPT. Su explicación es que, al aumentar la productividad de cada ingeniero, las empresas tienen incentivos para contratar más talento y crecer. Reconoce que la pérdida de empleos por IA es real en algunas industrias. Sobre Pro Cap Insights, que describe como una firma de investigación que usa IA para analizar datos y redactar informes, menciona un informe que atribuye pérdidas de empleo a personas de aproximadamente 22–28 años y crecimiento a mayores de 30; interpreta que la experiencia se ha vuelto más valiosa. Añade que la IA puede causar deflación al cambiar los costos, pero también acelerar el crecimiento empresarial. Menciona el fuerte crecimiento de Handshake en etiquetado de datos —con cifras que presenta con reservas, como “creo”— y una oferta de LinkedIn de 150 dólares por hora para etiquetar datos en algunos sectores. Plantea que alguien con experiencia, por ejemplo en una recepción médica, podría aplicar ese conocimiento al etiquetado de datos; aclara que no es una salida garantizada, fácil ni probable para todos. Ante la preocupación de que etiquetar datos entrene sistemas que sustituyan empleos, recomienda aprender a implementar IA dentro de la empresa y demostrar resultados, porque cree que eso puede generar más responsabilidades y seguridad laboral.
▶ Bitcoin, ETF y demanda institucional a largo plazo
Pompiliano vuelve a Bitcoin y lo relaciona con la liquidez global y el aumento de la deuda nacional estadounidense; afirma que Bitcoin se recuperará y que, en un mundo de abundancia, la escasez favorece al activo. Basa su optimismo para la próxima década en la entrada de Morgan Stanley, BlackRock y Fidelity con ETF, y en las compras de Strategy, aunque reconoce que parte del público ha perdido convicción. El entrevistador señala que Morgan Stanley lanzó su ETF con lo que califica como su lanzamiento más exitoso en ese espacio y pregunta si los gestores solo buscan comisiones o tienen una perspectiva más larga. Pompiliano lo describe como una competencia de Wall Street por captar activos: menciona a BlackRock, Fidelity, Bitwise, VanEck, 21Shares y ARK Invest, y elogia el lanzamiento de BlackRock. Relata una reunión de 2018 en Morgan Stanley en la que, según recuerda, las reacciones fueron desde el desinterés de dos asistentes mayores hasta el entusiasmo de uno más joven, con otra asistente más agnóstica. Dice que pasaron ocho años y que Morgan Stanley ahora ofrece fondos; atribuye a su responsable de activos digitales la afirmación de que el lanzamiento fue el mejor de la firma. Añade que BlackRock anunció un fondo de ingresos de Bitcoin y prevé más productos si continúa la inversión. Su tesis es que esa oferta institucional puede sostener una demanda persistente de Bitcoin con el tiempo. La conversación termina con agradecimientos y la mención de procapinsights.com.
Transcripción completa
[0:01] becomes very valuable. And so, what is
[0:03] more scarce than Bitcoin? Not a lot. And
[0:05] especially when you have Morgan Stanley,
[0:07] BlackRock, Fidelity, all these guys
[0:08] coming in with the ETFs, you have
[0:10] Michael Saylor and strategy buying up as
[0:12] much Bitcoin as they possibly can. Like
[0:14] Bitcoin is going to do very well over
[0:16] the next decade. I think a lot of people
[0:17] have been convinced otherwise. In a
[0:19] weird way, those who stay focused and
[0:20] and understand the power of Bitcoin, the
[0:22] value of Bitcoin, I think will be
[0:23] rewarded over a long period of time.
[0:25] What's going on, guys? Today, we got a
[0:26] great conversation with John Pompiliano.
[0:27] He turns the tables and he asked me some
[0:29] questions. Talking about Bitcoin, AI,
[0:32] what's going on in the macro
[0:32] environment, oil prices, gas, PPI, CPI,
[0:36] and what is going on with all these Wall
[0:37] Street banks all of a sudden diving deep
[0:39] into the deep end of Bitcoin. All that
[0:42] much more in this conversation with John
[0:43] Pompiliano.
[0:45] All right, John, what you got for me?
[0:46] Big story of the day, Bitcoin back above
[0:48] 75,000. We finally reversed all of the
[0:51] losses that we had since Iran war
[0:53] started. Uh what do you think about
[0:55] Bitcoin being back up and on the upward
[0:56] trend?
[0:57] >> Well, it's a couple things. Like
[0:58] celebrating when you're down is really
[0:59] not, you know, the the smartest thing to
[1:01] do. But I do think that there's a sign
[1:02] of relief here. People are excited
[1:04] because, hey, we're we're starting to
[1:05] see that maybe we did bottom at $60,000.
[1:07] Now, famous last words, let's knock on
[1:09] wood. But what I would say is two
[1:10] things. One, Bitcoin has definitely been
[1:12] the shining light among a sea of red
[1:14] during the Iran war. And so, there's
[1:16] kind of this weird dynamic where if you
[1:18] said to someone before we went in to
[1:19] Iran and started bombing them, okay,
[1:21] what's going to happen to stocks? People
[1:22] would say probably would rally because
[1:24] you would think that all of these asset
[1:26] prices are going to go up because
[1:28] there's going to be inflation to fund
[1:29] the war, going to be the dollar, and
[1:31] because of all of that
[1:33] you're going to see especially defense
[1:35] stocks, energy, etc. The second thing is
[1:37] you would expect oil to go up. The third
[1:39] thing is that you would expect bonds
[1:41] in terms of yields and all that. And
[1:44] then the fourth is Bitcoin would go
[1:45] down, kind of a risk type asset. Well,
[1:47] guess what happened? Exactly the
[1:49] opposite of all of that. Stocks and
[1:51] bonds went down, gold went down, oil
[1:54] went up, which you would have expected,
[1:56] and Bitcoin went up, which you not have
[1:57] expected. And so, when I look at that,
[1:59] it says to me that uh one, you can't
[2:01] look at history always as a guide for
[2:03] what's going to happen in the future.
[2:04] But two, is that Bitcoin has
[2:06] transcended. It has officially broken
[2:09] its correlation to all of the tech
[2:12] stocks, etc. Now, can it hold that
[2:14] broken correlation? Remains to be seen.
[2:16] But I say it has transcended because
[2:18] Bitcoin basically has a couple of
[2:20] different ways to look at it. It is a
[2:22] digital asset. There's some people who
[2:23] like the fact that it's digital and not
[2:25] analog or electronic. It is
[2:27] decentralized. Some people like the fact
[2:29] that it's not controlled by anyone. It
[2:30] is non-sovereign.
[2:32] Some people like the fact that it's
[2:33] outside of their government and no other
[2:35] government controls it. And it is
[2:37] neutral. And I think that's what we're
[2:39] seeing now is people are saying, wait a
[2:40] second, a neutral, non-sovereign,
[2:42] digital, decentralized asset has value
[2:45] in the world. And a big part of this is,
[2:48] yeah, sure, Iran allegedly wants to get
[2:51] paid in Bitcoin, blah blah blah,
[2:52] whatever.
[2:53] Forget all that for a second.
[2:55] If you need, right now, to move money
[2:58] around the world during conflict,
[3:01] well, you can't even move a barrel of
[3:02] oil around the world in some places
[3:04] because there's a blockade.
[3:06] Gold is pretty heavy.
[3:08] Now, you start to say to yourself, wait
[3:09] a second, what if I need a digital store
[3:12] of value?
[3:14] Bitcoin becomes interesting. Now, what I
[3:15] do think is interesting is that Bitcoin
[3:17] is still sold off. So, we can claim
[3:19] victory since February 20th to now and
[3:21] be like, oh, look how great we are.
[3:22] Okay, that's fine. Bitcoin's still down.
[3:24] It was $126,000, it's down to 75,000.
[3:26] I'm not a mathematician, but that's
[3:28] about $50,000
[3:29] of loss from the all-time high. And so,
[3:33] from that perspective, you say, okay,
[3:34] well, why is it that Bitcoin is still
[3:36] down 11% year to date or down, you know,
[3:38] $50,000 from its all-time high? I
[3:40] believe that a huge part of this is
[3:42] because of deflation. And there's plenty
[3:45] of people who disagree with me. Everyone
[3:46] says higher, you know, gas prices are
[3:48] going to lead to inflation, yada yada,
[3:49] whatever. I do not believe that the
[3:51] short-term impact on oil is going to be
[3:54] nearly as important as the four macro
[3:56] deflationary trends that are swallowing
[3:57] the US economy. Tariffs are
[3:59] deflationary. Deportations are
[4:01] deflationary. AI is deflationary. And
[4:03] robotics are deflationary. And I think
[4:05] those four forces are much, much bigger
[4:07] deal than the short-term spike in oil.
[4:09] And as we saw, we announced that, oh,
[4:11] there was a ceasefire, immediately oil
[4:13] drops. Now, there's a blockade, there's
[4:15] all the volatility coming back, prices
[4:16] going higher, all this stuff. But if we
[4:18] get to a culmination and a end, like an
[4:21] actual end to the Iran war, and the
[4:24] strait opens up, oil's going to fall off
[4:26] a cliff. A barrel of oil is somewhere
[4:28] around 50 to 60 bucks if there is no
[4:32] funky business going on in the world.
[4:34] Okay, well, if it's trading at 100, that
[4:36] means it could drop 50%.
[4:38] So, you say to yourself, a lot of the
[4:40] current price increase in oil is due to
[4:43] these artificial
[4:45] external shocks to oil. Well, that then
[4:48] trickles through to gas prices being
[4:49] higher. And if all of a sudden you
[4:52] remove those external shocks, sure, is
[4:54] it going to come right back down on a
[4:55] single day? Probably not. But we saw it
[4:58] drop down to 80 bucks a barrel as soon
[5:00] as ceasefire. Well, what if we actually
[5:03] announce a peace deal and it becomes
[5:06] known in the market we are not no longer
[5:09] bombing Iran?
[5:10] I think that you're going to see oil
[5:12] come down. I think you're going to see
[5:13] stocks rip higher. Stocks are back
[5:15] already green on the year.
[5:17] So, I mean, imagine being a panicking.
[5:19] What I mean, that's just like a loser
[5:20] life. Right? Just Just think about how
[5:22] crazy that is. Every time you get a
[5:25] sniff that there could be some sort of
[5:28] bad situation coming, you immediately
[5:30] panic. That's what a panicking is for
[5:31] those that don't know. You just panic
[5:33] all the time.
[5:33] >> Emotional investor. Yeah, not even
[5:35] emotional. You You just You don't have
[5:37] brain cells. Right? Terrorists are
[5:40] coming. Oh my god, the world's going to
[5:41] end. The shelves are going to be empty.
[5:42] Inflation's going to be high. THE GREAT
[5:43] DEPRESSION.
[5:45] REMEMBER HOW CRAZY EVERYONE WAS?
[5:48] DO YOU remember what I was saying in
[5:50] April of last year? We would be back to
[5:52] an all-time high stock price by the end
[5:53] of the year.
[5:54] We were back by like August.
[5:56] Why? Cuz all noise. It is all noise. It
[5:59] is an overreaction from the mainstream
[6:01] media and from investors who have an
[6:03] academic view of the world. Okay, guess
[6:06] what I've been saying this entire time.
[6:07] Short-term oil prices and gas prices are
[6:10] all noise.
[6:11] How do I know that? Well, we just got
[6:12] the PPI today. The expectation across
[6:16] Wall Street for PPI, headline PPI, was
[6:19] 4.6%. That's a massive jump.
[6:21] It was 4%.
[6:23] How do you miss that bad and keep your
[6:25] job?
[6:26] How's that possible?
[6:27] Imagine if I, on a daily basis, was so
[6:30] wrong that I would I basically ran
[6:32] around and told everyone, "The world's
[6:33] ending, the world's ending, the world's
[6:35] ending." And then we find out, no, it's
[6:36] only 4%. It'll be revised later on, too.
[6:38] >> By the way, the 4% is higher than it was
[6:41] before. So, it's not that like the
[6:42] direction of travel, which I'm not like
[6:43] they said it was going up and it went
[6:44] down. Right? So, I'm not claiming that,
[6:47] oh, there's no impact. What I'm saying
[6:49] though is consensus was 4.6%, it came in
[6:50] at four.
[6:52] Well, why is that? Hmm.
[6:54] Do you remember 2 weeks ago on April 2nd
[6:56] when I told everyone that Trueflation
[6:59] was telling us that higher gas prices in
[7:01] America were not going to lead to higher
[7:03] inflation at the level that everyone was
[7:05] expecting?
[7:07] If you go back, Trueflation, for those
[7:09] that forget, on the second day of April
[7:11] or or first and second day of April,
[7:13] they basically get updated at the start
[7:15] of each month with a bunch of these data
[7:16] sets. And so, they go and they revise
[7:18] Trueflation. It changes on a day-to-day
[7:20] basis because of the data points, but
[7:21] there's a lot of people who report once
[7:23] a month.
[7:24] Trueflation had gone from 0.8% CPI
[7:27] number up to 1.7%.
[7:30] More than doubled since the Iran war.
[7:33] That's a big deal. Right? So, no one is
[7:34] claiming that inflation was not going
[7:36] higher. Trueflation was saying it,
[7:37] people were saying it, all that.
[7:39] But on April 2nd, when I looked at
[7:42] Trueflation, it went from 1.7 down to
[7:44] 1.2%.
[7:46] Huge revision down. Like abnormal
[7:49] revision down. Why?
[7:51] Well, if you go and you look into the
[7:52] data, there was four major sectors that
[7:54] had negative growth on a
[7:56] month-over-month basis.
[7:58] Food, utilities, transport, and housing.
[8:02] All four sectors, four huge inputs into
[8:04] inflation
[8:06] measurement, were negative. Not like
[8:08] growing slower, they were negative.
[8:10] So, when you look at that, you say to
[8:12] yourself, hold on.
[8:14] Gas is up, of course.
[8:17] But is gas more important than food,
[8:18] utilities, transport,
[8:21] and housing? No.
[8:23] And so, that's how I knew. It's because
[8:25] actually the Trueflation number revised
[8:28] down 2 weeks ago. And so, I continue to
[8:30] tell people, Trueflation is the most
[8:32] accurate measurement of inflation in the
[8:33] United States. It has a 98% correlation
[8:37] to CPI, not PPI, but CPI.
[8:40] It's just that CPI has a 1-month lag.
[8:42] So, if you look at what Trueflation
[8:44] tells you,
[8:45] a month later, that's what CPI's going
[8:46] to tell you.
[8:47] This is easy. This is like I'm not a
[8:49] smart person. I'm just merely looking at
[8:51] the data and saying, okay, well, this
[8:53] one tells me it's going not going to be
[8:55] that bad, then this one's going to tell
[8:57] me that a month later. Why don't I just
[8:58] look at the one that is fresh, the one
[9:00] that's real time? So,
[9:02] to me, that's the whole story here. Is
[9:03] everyone
[9:05] constantly promising us, oh my god,
[9:07] inflation's coming, inflation's coming.
[9:08] Everyone's brain broke during COVID
[9:11] because everyone thought inflation's
[9:13] always going to come back. Like, no,
[9:15] actually the lesson from COVID is how
[9:17] insane that situation was.
[9:20] Um we literally are bombing Iran, we put
[9:23] a blockade on the Strait of Hormuz,
[9:25] oil has gone up over $100 a barrel, gas
[9:27] is $4 in America, and we don't have high
[9:30] inflation.
[9:31] So, the fact that we had over 9%
[9:33] inflation, according to the CPI, tells
[9:36] you everything you need to know about
[9:38] how insane and outlier event that was.
[9:42] But outlier events are outliers. They
[9:44] don't constantly repeat themselves over
[9:46] and over and over again. And so, from
[9:47] that perspective, I think that there's
[9:49] this, you know, kind of like mental
[9:51] psychosis that is happening in finance
[9:54] where it's It's like people want there
[9:56] to be bad things going on.
[9:57] And maybe some of it's like the Trump
[9:59] derangement syndrome stuff, but I think
[10:00] there was plenty of these people around
[10:01] when Biden was president. Right? So, I
[10:03] don't actually think it's like as
[10:04] political maybe as people want it to be.
[10:06] I just think there's a bunch of people
[10:07] who
[10:09] they have equal access to a megaphone
[10:10] now. You can get on social media, you
[10:12] can say whatever you want. And guess
[10:14] what? Pessimists, they are able to
[10:15] attract an audience cuz they sound
[10:16] smart.
[10:17] But show us your returns. How many times
[10:19] you've been right? Right? If you were
[10:21] predicting the next great recession, you
[10:22] sold your stocks on February 28th
[10:26] or on March 1st
[10:28] and you were waiting for the 25% drop in
[10:31] the stock market that you claimed was
[10:32] coming.
[10:34] When did you buy back in? When did you
[10:35] wave the white flag? When did you give
[10:37] up? Cry uncle.
[10:39] Cuz you definitely didn't get a 25% drop
[10:41] in the stock market. And so, it just
[10:43] goes back to
[10:45] I could make the argument that the stock
[10:46] market is having one of its best years
[10:48] ever so far. Why? The intra-year
[10:51] drawdown average
[10:53] average across years, the intra-year
[10:55] drawdown is 14%.
[10:57] We didn't get 14% down the S&P.
[11:01] So, we're doing better than average year
[11:02] so far. Year's not over. Year's not
[11:04] over, of course. I mean, look, could we
[11:05] get another huge drawdown? Sure. But
[11:07] like, I don't know, whatever the S&P
[11:09] ended up going down 9 10%? Didn't go
[11:11] down 14.
[11:12] And we're back to positive.
[11:15] So, if I told you the start of the year,
[11:16] all right, here's the deal. Ready?
[11:19] We're going go, we're going to get the
[11:20] Panama Canal stuff going.
[11:22] We're going to go put a bag over
[11:23] Maduro's head. We're use the
[11:24] discombobulator.
[11:26] Then Trump's going really get on one.
[11:28] Think he's got the hot hand. He's going
[11:29] to go start bombing Iran.
[11:32] We're going to have them firing off
[11:34] drones and rockets and missiles and
[11:36] stuff all over the Middle East, hitting
[11:37] random countries and civilians and uh
[11:40] energy depots and all this stuff.
[11:43] Then
[11:44] we're going to announce a ceasefire and
[11:46] then we're going to go to negotiations
[11:47] and not get the ceasefire. Oh, by the
[11:49] way, Russia-Ukraine still happening.
[11:52] By the way, China is over there trying
[11:56] to figure out what they're going to do
[11:57] because they're actually under a lot of
[11:58] pain right now. That's why they want
[12:00] Iran to settle this so they can start
[12:02] getting oil again.
[12:04] Oh, did you know that the United States
[12:07] has gone and bombed Ecuador?
[12:10] Ooh, that's going on.
[12:12] Let's have that conversation.
[12:13] We literally are doing so many things in
[12:15] the Western Hemisphere that most people
[12:16] don't even know that stuff is true.
[12:18] In Ecuador, over the last, I don't know,
[12:20] 8 weeks, we have bombed narco-terrorist
[12:23] organizations.
[12:25] A lot of you don't know that we dropped
[12:26] a bomb there. Right or or a missile or a
[12:27] strike, whatever you want to call it.
[12:29] So, if I told you all that was going on
[12:32] and I told you the S&P was positive,
[12:33] would you have believed me?
[12:35] Probably not.
[12:36] If I told you that Bitcoin was one of
[12:37] the best performing assets
[12:40] during
[12:41] the conflict with Iran
[12:43] most people probably wouldn't have
[12:43] believed that. Right? So, it just goes
[12:46] back to listen.
[12:48] Think long-term.
[12:49] It's all noise.
[12:50] The best performing people just have a
[12:52] thesis that is going to last decades.
[12:54] They stay disciplined.
[12:56] You can be intellectually stimulated by
[12:57] the public conversation. But just like
[12:59] don't don't make emotional decisions off
[13:01] of Today's episode is brought to you by
[13:02] Consensus Miami. I'm going to be
[13:04] speaking there on the main stage in a
[13:06] couple of weeks. This is the event the
[13:08] entire industry shows up for. Wall
[13:10] Street, the White House, all of crypto
[13:12] and Web3. This May 5th through May 7th,
[13:15] you can discover everything from crypto
[13:16] at scale to institutional integration
[13:19] and agentic commerce. It's the forces
[13:21] driving trillions on chain and reshaping
[13:23] global finance.
[13:25] 20,000 decision makers are going to be
[13:26] in attendance. Three action-packed days.
[13:29] Deals get signed here, funds get raised
[13:31] here, and the next cycle starts here as
[13:33] well. You can't afford to miss it. I'll
[13:35] be there speaking and you can use the
[13:37] code POMPLIANO to get 25% off your pass
[13:40] and join me there. Go in the description
[13:42] and look how to spell my name and use
[13:44] code POMPLIANO to get 25% off your pass
[13:47] to join me there.
[13:49] Today's episode is brought to you by
[13:51] Arch Public. I absolutely love these
[13:52] guys. Arch Public is an agentic trading
[13:55] platform that automates the buying and
[13:56] selling of your preferred crypto
[13:57] strategies. Using sophisticated
[13:59] algorithms like the intelligence,
[14:01] arbitrage, and oracle protocols, Arch
[14:03] Public executes advanced automated
[14:05] crypto strategies fully customized to
[14:07] your goals. Is your aim to accumulate
[14:09] Bitcoin during market dips, generate
[14:11] profits from Ethereum volatility, or
[14:13] sell Solana or XRP in layers as it
[14:15] reclaims all-time highs? If so, Arch
[14:18] Public is built for you. Are you worried
[14:20] about doing it alone? No problem. Arch
[14:22] Public provides everyone, yes, everyone,
[14:25] with hands-on dedicated support from
[14:27] their concierge team to help implement
[14:29] the strategy that you choose. As a
[14:31] preferred trading partner of Coinbase,
[14:33] Kraken, Robinhood, and Gemini, Arch
[14:35] Public offers a proven track record of
[14:36] security and performance so that you can
[14:39] trade with confidence. Sign up today at
[14:41] archpublic.com
[14:42] and start your automated trading
[14:44] strategy for free. No catch, no hidden
[14:46] fees, just smarter trading. Your crypto,
[14:49] your exchange, your profits. Arch
[14:51] Public. Go to archpublic.com
[14:54] and tell them I sent you.
[14:56] People care about returns. Uh what do
[14:57] you expect leading into the rest of this
[14:59] year? It seems like, you know, there's
[15:01] been a um a little bit of flip-flopping
[15:03] from inflation to deflation to kind of
[15:05] where where's this stuff going and how
[15:06] do you see as assets reacting to Higher.
[15:10] Higher. Why do you think that? You
[15:12] didn't even ask me what asset, just
[15:13] higher.
[15:14] Bitcoin's going higher, gold's going
[15:16] higher, stocks are going higher because
[15:18] ultimately we are going to get asset
[15:20] inflation. See, one of the weird things
[15:22] is um people want us to have a black and
[15:24] white world. So, if I tell you hey,
[15:25] deflation is likely to happen, right? Or
[15:26] it's the bigger risk, then people say,
[15:29] "Okay, well, if there's deflation, then
[15:31] asset prices actually usually go down."
[15:34] Hmm, okay.
[15:36] But then if I tell you
[15:37] but the government is going to be
[15:39] incentivized to print more money
[15:42] and that money
[15:43] is going to find its way into assets cuz
[15:46] now people are convinced I shouldn't
[15:47] hold this cash.
[15:50] I'm not predicting this necessarily, but
[15:52] I think that there are higher odds that
[15:55] we could get asset inflation
[15:57] while consumer inflation does not get
[16:00] out of control.
[16:03] Very nuanced. Could we get asset
[16:05] inflation without high consumer
[16:07] inflation?
[16:07] >> Does the Fed or like who would be the
[16:09] main driver to ensure that that is a
[16:11] path to a possibility? Well, what One
[16:15] way to think about this is could we have
[16:17] a low inflation, high growth economy?
[16:20] It's like a central banker's dream.
[16:22] Right? Is I don't have to juice the
[16:24] economy that much cuz we're getting the
[16:25] high
[16:26] high growth already and inflation is
[16:28] staying, you know, low and manageable.
[16:31] Okay, well, how could we get that?
[16:33] Well,
[16:34] could we drive growth from artificial
[16:36] intelligence, robotics
[16:38] crypto
[16:39] you know, name your space, right? Name
[16:41] all of these
[16:42] kind of innovative technologies
[16:44] at the same time
[16:46] that those technologies are deflationary
[16:48] from a consumer standpoint. 100% we
[16:51] could.
[16:52] And so, guess what is starting to
[16:54] happen? We're seeing that play out.
[16:56] Sharpie, the maker of the your favorite
[16:59] marker
[17:00] they somehow reshored their
[17:01] manufacturing, used robotics. They are
[17:03] paying their employees more money. They
[17:06] didn't fire people and they have better
[17:08] margins.
[17:10] That sounds How's that even possible?
[17:12] Well, it goes back to
[17:14] let's just use a a simple example. If
[17:16] you have a factory and you have 100
[17:18] employees at that factory and those 100
[17:21] people are you're working them to the
[17:23] bone. You need you got to get the work
[17:24] done. There's no robotics, there's no
[17:25] machines, there's no anything. Okay.
[17:27] Well, it let's say that those 100 people
[17:30] can produce
[17:31] I don't know, use easy numbers. They can
[17:33] produce 20 units of your good every
[17:36] single day. All right?
[17:39] If you start to actually introduce
[17:40] machines
[17:42] guess what happens?
[17:44] You first start machines augment the
[17:46] people. So, now those 100 people can
[17:48] produce not 20 units, maybe they can
[17:50] produce 22 or 25 units.
[17:53] Well, your cost in terms of running
[17:56] day-to-day labor is a big input, maybe
[17:58] the biggest input, stay the same. You
[18:00] still have 100 people working there. But
[18:02] now you're producing 25 units instead of
[18:04] 20.
[18:05] Well, if you have healthy margins, then
[18:07] you're likely to make more money.
[18:10] And you know you have healthy margins
[18:11] because the machines are making the same
[18:13] number of people more productive. Now,
[18:15] are there capex expenses and there's
[18:17] nuance, right? But but generally that's
[18:18] the idea.
[18:19] But what we're seeing is, well, what if
[18:21] you don't go from 20 to 25? What if the
[18:24] machines have you go from 20 to 50?
[18:27] Well, now you have more profits.
[18:30] You didn't fire anyone. So, you as a
[18:32] business owner can make more money and
[18:34] pay the employees more money.
[18:36] Because you have more money to work
[18:38] with.
[18:39] And you're more productive. So, what
[18:41] you've done essentially is you've
[18:42] increased or held your profit margin.
[18:45] You've got more profits as business
[18:47] owner and your employees are better
[18:48] paid.
[18:49] You think people want to work at those
[18:50] types of businesses? But why does that
[18:51] happen now? Like technology is it's not
[18:53] something new, right? Uh especially in
[18:55] the logistics
[18:56] >> Yes and no. Yes and no. Right? Um
[18:59] how is it that Elon is able to pump out
[19:02] as many cars as he does?
[19:04] Robotics.
[19:05] Right? So, you look at it like Sharpie's
[19:08] a good example. That that is pretty much
[19:10] a story of Sharpie is they invested in
[19:12] technology and they were able to do
[19:14] this. Right? And it didn't have a
[19:16] negative impact on employees. See, one
[19:18] of the things that I've changed my mind
[19:20] on is one one of the things I've changed
[19:22] my mind on is the impact of artificial
[19:24] intelligence on jobs. Are there a lot of
[19:26] people who are going to have to retrain
[19:28] themselves and get new jobs? 100%. But
[19:30] there will be more jobs in the economy,
[19:31] not less. What do I mean by that? Well,
[19:33] let's look at software engineers as an
[19:35] example. Basically, AI came out and we
[19:37] saw software job openings crater.
[19:40] Well, guess what?
[19:41] Now they're up and they're growing
[19:43] rapidly. There's more job openings today
[19:45] than there was when ChatGPT came out.
[19:47] Why is that? Well, if I can take this
[19:50] technology and I can hand it to an
[19:51] engineer and that engineer is now more
[19:53] productive, as a business owner I'm
[19:54] incentivized. How do I get as many of
[19:56] these people here as possible so that I
[19:57] can make them more productive so I can
[19:58] grow faster and accelerate and drive
[20:00] more profits and become more valuable.
[20:02] So, in a weird way, what we're doing is
[20:04] we're actually opening up the pool for a
[20:06] company and we're saying, "Look, for
[20:07] every dollar you invest in talent,
[20:11] you're actually getting more units of
[20:12] productivity from that dollar invested.
[20:15] So, you're incentivized to invest more,
[20:17] not less." And so, I think that the AI
[20:21] job loss narrative is real in certain
[20:23] industries, but Pro Cap Insights, the
[20:26] the research firm
[20:27] that we recently announced, what they're
[20:30] doing is they're using artificial
[20:31] intelligence to sift through mountains
[20:32] of data, find these insights, and then
[20:34] AI is actually writing the report. So,
[20:36] it's the first
[20:37] agentic research firm on Wall Street
[20:39] that we're aware of. Full bore AI writes
[20:42] the whole thing.
[20:44] One of those reports talks about the
[20:46] fact that actually
[20:48] there's a lot of job loss for people
[20:50] between the ages of like 22 and like 28.
[20:54] But there is job increase, job growth
[20:56] for people over the age of 30.
[20:58] And so, if you want to read that report,
[20:59] you can go to procapinsights.com.
[21:01] But in that report, you know what I took
[21:03] away from that?
[21:04] Experience just became more valuable.
[21:07] So, now it is not only, "Hey, do you now
[21:09] understand the technology?" but do you
[21:10] have experience? And so, if you put this
[21:13] stuff together, you realize like
[21:14] artificial intelligence is going to be a
[21:15] productivity boom.
[21:17] But there is going to be deflation
[21:19] because the cost structure changes, but
[21:22] just because cost structure changes
[21:23] doesn't mean all of a sudden companies
[21:24] stop growing. Actually, the opposite.
[21:25] They accelerate. You know, one of the
[21:27] industries I'm very interested in data
[21:29] labeling,
[21:30] I know, I don't know, I could probably
[21:31] rattle off eight or nine companies that
[21:33] either started going after this or were
[21:35] like defunct bad companies. There's a
[21:37] company called Handshake. I don't I
[21:38] don't know if you know this. So, there's
[21:39] a company called Handshake. They've been
[21:40] around for 12 or 13 years. It was going
[21:43] like okay. I think last January they did
[21:46] like a million dollars of revenue or
[21:48] something. Like they were on pace to do
[21:49] a million dollars of revenue.
[21:51] Then a couple of months later they were
[21:53] 5 million. I think they ended last year
[21:55] doing like a hundred.
[21:57] Then a hundred million in ARR. Then
[22:01] they're up to I think 500 million like a
[22:04] month or two ago. And now I think
[22:06] they're doing a billion.
[22:08] Or something like that. Like whatever it
[22:09] is. It's some crazy ramp, right?
[22:11] They're helping people do data labeling.
[22:13] LinkedIn
[22:14] is now offering a hundred fifty dollars
[22:16] an hour
[22:17] for people to label data in different
[22:19] sectors. So, if you think about that for
[22:21] a second, like, "Okay, so let's say that
[22:23] you are, I don't know, an accountant."
[22:25] And or let's even go less kind of
[22:27] professional training and and licensing.
[22:29] Let's just say that you are
[22:31] um
[22:32] the front desk receptionist at a medical
[22:37] facility. And you've spent most of your
[22:40] time, you know, answering calls, emails,
[22:42] greeting people, but also on the side
[22:44] you've been having to categorize and
[22:46] organize pharmaceutical drugs maybe,
[22:48] right?
[22:50] There's increasing odds that a place,
[22:53] whether it is a LinkedIn or some other
[22:54] service, will pay you to do the exact
[22:57] same thing, but label data so that the
[22:59] machines can learn how to do that.
[23:01] And they'll pay you 150 to 200 bucks an
[23:03] hour. So, if you lose your job because
[23:05] all of a sudden, you know, your boss
[23:07] becomes some genius who wants to put
[23:08] like a computer screen there and he's
[23:10] going to have somebody in the
[23:10] Philippines, you know, answer the calls
[23:12] or whatever or he's going to have
[23:13] somebody, you know, greet them on a on a
[23:15] computer screen.
[23:17] In a weird way, if you can reposition
[23:20] yourself and use the knowledge you have
[23:21] in data labeling, you actually may make
[23:24] more money.
[23:25] I'm not saying that's everybody. I'm not
[23:26] saying it's easy. I'm not saying that
[23:27] it's likely, but I think those are the
[23:29] types of opportunities now people are
[23:30] starting to realize is you can use the
[23:33] knowledge you have, again, the
[23:34] experience, and you can apply it to
[23:36] these new industries. And so, I think
[23:37] that there's a lot of folks who are
[23:39] saying to themselves, "Why am I doing
[23:40] the thing I'm doing? Why don't I take
[23:42] the knowledge and apply it to this new
[23:43] industry? And if I do that right, I can
[23:45] make more money, maybe work less,
[23:48] and end up in a much better position."
[23:50] And so, I think that's pretty exciting.
[23:51] Yeah, I didn't know this conversation
[23:52] was going to go this way, but it's an
[23:54] interesting topic on the idea of one,
[23:55] the experience side is, you know,
[23:58] if you have instead of a pool of 10
[23:59] entry-level employees, you have five.
[24:01] Obviously, you know, some employees
[24:02] leave over the years, but you just have
[24:04] a smaller pool to pick from on the
[24:05] executive side of things.
[24:07] That's one thing, but the second thing
[24:08] is I feel like a lot of people when they
[24:11] are, you know, "Hey, I'm data labeling."
[24:13] they feel like they're training the AI
[24:15] to take their job almost. How do you How
[24:18] should people think about the difference
[24:20] between, "Hey, I am helping to increase
[24:23] productivity in my company, but I'm also
[24:25] maybe replacing, you know, work that I
[24:27] will have to do in the future, and there
[24:28] is no guarantee that there is, you know,
[24:30] other work for me to go do and and be
[24:32] productive elsewhere?" The number one
[24:33] thing you can do inside of a company to
[24:34] have job security right now is become
[24:36] the AI guy or the AI girl. If you
[24:38] understand AI, if you understand how to
[24:40] implement it, you are not going to lose
[24:42] your job.
[24:43] These companies are going to ask you,
[24:44] "Can you do this?" You do it. They're
[24:46] going to say, "Okay, that's great.
[24:47] Here's more responsibility. Here's more
[24:48] responsibility." And it is a
[24:50] you know, there's a difference between
[24:51] elevators and stairs. You know, people
[24:53] usually say that
[24:54] you take the stairs up and the elevator
[24:56] down.
[24:57] Not if you know AI in a corporation. You
[24:59] take the elevator up, baby, right?
[25:01] Because as soon as you become known as
[25:03] the AI guy or the AI girl, you up. And I
[25:07] think that that's going to be a
[25:08] a huge thing. And you got to show
[25:09] results, right? But but that that's big.
[25:11] And look, this all comes back to Bitcoin
[25:13] as well, right? I think a lot of folks
[25:14] are saying to themselves, "Okay, well
[25:16] Bitcoin has this really weird
[25:17] relationship, very sensitive
[25:18] relationship to global liquidity. Right?
[25:20] Like the US government's national debt,
[25:22] it continues to skyrocket.
[25:24] Bitcoin is going to recover.
[25:26] On top of that,
[25:28] in a world of abundance, scarcity
[25:30] becomes very valuable.
[25:31] And so, what is more scarce than
[25:33] Bitcoin?
[25:34] Not a lot. And especially when you have
[25:36] Morgan Stanley, BlackRock, Fidelity, all
[25:38] these guys coming in with the ETFs, you
[25:40] have Michael Saylor and Strategy buying
[25:41] up as much Bitcoin as they possibly can.
[25:43] Like Bitcoin is going to do very well
[25:45] over the next decade. I think a lot of
[25:47] people have been convinced otherwise.
[25:49] And in a weird way, those who stay
[25:51] focused and and understand the power of
[25:53] Bitcoin, the value of Bitcoin, I think
[25:54] will be rewarded over long period of
[25:55] time. Morgan Stanley, good point. They
[25:58] just launched their ETF, most successful
[26:00] launch for them ever in the ETF space.
[26:02] How do you think about a lot of these
[26:03] players? Are they just They're looking
[26:05] to make transaction fees, looking to
[26:06] make, you know, custody fees, etc. or is
[26:08] there something else that they that
[26:09] they're thinking about like more
[26:10] long-term? There's a war going on on
[26:12] Wall Street, and they all competing over
[26:14] who can get more assets into their ETF,
[26:16] and I love it. This is why America is
[26:18] great, right? Is if you look at
[26:21] what has happened, is BlackRock came
[26:23] out, they broke the seal, they had a
[26:25] banger of a fund, right? I mean, they
[26:27] most successful product launch in the
[26:29] history of Wall Street. Kudos to Robbie,
[26:32] Larry Fink, all those guys over at
[26:34] BlackRock, right? They don't get nearly
[26:35] enough credit for what they did.
[26:37] Fidelity, right there alongside them.
[26:40] Then you get the Bitwises, you get the
[26:41] VanEcks, you get the 21 Shares, the ARK
[26:44] Invest, right? We just rattle off fund
[26:46] after fund after fund after fund. Okay?
[26:49] Morgan Stanley wasn't playing.
[26:51] Now, I got a story for you. I went and
[26:53] saw Morgan Stanley, I think in 2018. Me
[26:56] and Mark Yusko. Went in and said, "Hey,
[26:58] we got this fund, this is a venture
[26:59] capital fund, this Bitcoin thing. Would
[27:01] you guys consider putting this on your
[27:02] platform?" And I'll never forget. Two
[27:05] older people in the room, two younger
[27:07] people in the room.
[27:08] The two older people in the room, they
[27:10] might as might as well been snoozing.
[27:12] They were like, "Mhm, you guys are
[27:13] idiots, right?"
[27:15] One of the younger uh people was a guy,
[27:18] and he was, "Yo, this is This is going
[27:20] to fly. This is like He was like, "Hey,
[27:21] hey, hey, let me get your email.
[27:23] Let's talk, right? Like this thing I'm
[27:24] buying, right? You know, like I'm in the
[27:26] Bitcoin."
[27:30] And then uh there was a woman who was
[27:31] probably like mid to late 20s, if I
[27:33] remember correctly, and
[27:35] um she was kind of agnostic. She was
[27:36] like, "Well, I don't think that the old
[27:37] guys are right, and I think this guy's a
[27:39] little too enthusiastic." So, like she
[27:41] was kind of in the middle. And I think
[27:43] that that was pretty eye-opening because
[27:45] that was probably where most people
[27:46] were, right? Was like there was this
[27:48] stratification of some people really
[27:50] excited, a lot of people were not, and
[27:52] they were not interested in putting the
[27:53] fund on their platform, but they said,
[27:54] "You know, we'll keep following along,
[27:55] whatever."
[27:57] Now they're offering funds.
[27:59] But look, it took eight years, right?
[28:01] Amy, who's the head of digital assets at
[28:03] Morgan Stanley, went on Bloomberg, and
[28:04] she said it's the best launch they've
[28:05] ever had at Morgan Stanley.
[28:07] You telling me that every bank on Wall
[28:09] Street, every asset manager on Wall
[28:10] Street is not paying attention?
[28:11] BlackRock now just announced they're
[28:13] going to do an income Bitcoin fund.
[28:15] You You telling me they ain't going to
[28:16] go deeper? They're not going to try to
[28:18] get more assets?
[28:19] It's game on. And so, Wall Street's
[28:21] here, Wall Street's going to keep
[28:22] feeding the ducks. They're going to keep
[28:23] coming out with products as long as
[28:25] people keep investing in them, and I
[28:26] think it's only going to get bigger from
[28:27] here, and that's going to be a
[28:28] persistent bid for Bitcoin over time.
[28:30] Awesome. All right, thank you. All
[28:32] right, guys, thank you so much. Go check
[28:33] out procapinsights.com. We'll see you
[28:34] guys next time.